Cargando…

Using Twins to Better Understand Sibling Relationships

We compared the nature of the sibling relationship in dyads of varying genetic relatedness, employing a behavioural genetic design to estimate the contribution that genes and the environment have on this familial bond. Two samples were used—the Sisters and Brothers Study consisted of 173 families wi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mark, Katharine M., Pike, Alison, Latham, Rachel M., Oliver, Bonamy R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5306274/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27796609
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10519-016-9825-z
_version_ 1782507166691753984
author Mark, Katharine M.
Pike, Alison
Latham, Rachel M.
Oliver, Bonamy R.
author_facet Mark, Katharine M.
Pike, Alison
Latham, Rachel M.
Oliver, Bonamy R.
author_sort Mark, Katharine M.
collection PubMed
description We compared the nature of the sibling relationship in dyads of varying genetic relatedness, employing a behavioural genetic design to estimate the contribution that genes and the environment have on this familial bond. Two samples were used—the Sisters and Brothers Study consisted of 173 families with two target non-twin children (mean ages = 7.42 and 5.22 years respectively); and the Twins, Family and Behaviour study included 234 families with two target twin children (mean age = 4.70 years). Mothers and fathers reported on their children’s relationship with each other, via a postal questionnaire (the Sisters and Brothers Study) or a telephone interview (the Twins, Family and Behaviour study). Contrary to expectations, no mean level differences emerged when monozygotic twin pairs, dizygotic twin pairs, and non-twin pairs were compared on their sibling relationship quality. Behavioural genetic analyses also revealed that the sibling bond was modestly to moderately influenced by the genetic propensities of the children within the dyad, and moderately to substantially influenced by the shared environment common to both siblings. In addition, for sibling negativity, we found evidence of twin-specific environmental influence—dizygotic twins showed more reciprocity than did non-twins. Our findings have repercussions for the broader application of results from future twin-based investigations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5306274
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53062742017-02-27 Using Twins to Better Understand Sibling Relationships Mark, Katharine M. Pike, Alison Latham, Rachel M. Oliver, Bonamy R. Behav Genet Original Research We compared the nature of the sibling relationship in dyads of varying genetic relatedness, employing a behavioural genetic design to estimate the contribution that genes and the environment have on this familial bond. Two samples were used—the Sisters and Brothers Study consisted of 173 families with two target non-twin children (mean ages = 7.42 and 5.22 years respectively); and the Twins, Family and Behaviour study included 234 families with two target twin children (mean age = 4.70 years). Mothers and fathers reported on their children’s relationship with each other, via a postal questionnaire (the Sisters and Brothers Study) or a telephone interview (the Twins, Family and Behaviour study). Contrary to expectations, no mean level differences emerged when monozygotic twin pairs, dizygotic twin pairs, and non-twin pairs were compared on their sibling relationship quality. Behavioural genetic analyses also revealed that the sibling bond was modestly to moderately influenced by the genetic propensities of the children within the dyad, and moderately to substantially influenced by the shared environment common to both siblings. In addition, for sibling negativity, we found evidence of twin-specific environmental influence—dizygotic twins showed more reciprocity than did non-twins. Our findings have repercussions for the broader application of results from future twin-based investigations. Springer US 2016-10-28 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5306274/ /pubmed/27796609 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10519-016-9825-z Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Research
Mark, Katharine M.
Pike, Alison
Latham, Rachel M.
Oliver, Bonamy R.
Using Twins to Better Understand Sibling Relationships
title Using Twins to Better Understand Sibling Relationships
title_full Using Twins to Better Understand Sibling Relationships
title_fullStr Using Twins to Better Understand Sibling Relationships
title_full_unstemmed Using Twins to Better Understand Sibling Relationships
title_short Using Twins to Better Understand Sibling Relationships
title_sort using twins to better understand sibling relationships
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5306274/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27796609
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10519-016-9825-z
work_keys_str_mv AT markkatharinem usingtwinstobetterunderstandsiblingrelationships
AT pikealison usingtwinstobetterunderstandsiblingrelationships
AT lathamrachelm usingtwinstobetterunderstandsiblingrelationships
AT oliverbonamyr usingtwinstobetterunderstandsiblingrelationships