Cargando…
Using Twins to Better Understand Sibling Relationships
We compared the nature of the sibling relationship in dyads of varying genetic relatedness, employing a behavioural genetic design to estimate the contribution that genes and the environment have on this familial bond. Two samples were used—the Sisters and Brothers Study consisted of 173 families wi...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5306274/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27796609 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10519-016-9825-z |
_version_ | 1782507166691753984 |
---|---|
author | Mark, Katharine M. Pike, Alison Latham, Rachel M. Oliver, Bonamy R. |
author_facet | Mark, Katharine M. Pike, Alison Latham, Rachel M. Oliver, Bonamy R. |
author_sort | Mark, Katharine M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | We compared the nature of the sibling relationship in dyads of varying genetic relatedness, employing a behavioural genetic design to estimate the contribution that genes and the environment have on this familial bond. Two samples were used—the Sisters and Brothers Study consisted of 173 families with two target non-twin children (mean ages = 7.42 and 5.22 years respectively); and the Twins, Family and Behaviour study included 234 families with two target twin children (mean age = 4.70 years). Mothers and fathers reported on their children’s relationship with each other, via a postal questionnaire (the Sisters and Brothers Study) or a telephone interview (the Twins, Family and Behaviour study). Contrary to expectations, no mean level differences emerged when monozygotic twin pairs, dizygotic twin pairs, and non-twin pairs were compared on their sibling relationship quality. Behavioural genetic analyses also revealed that the sibling bond was modestly to moderately influenced by the genetic propensities of the children within the dyad, and moderately to substantially influenced by the shared environment common to both siblings. In addition, for sibling negativity, we found evidence of twin-specific environmental influence—dizygotic twins showed more reciprocity than did non-twins. Our findings have repercussions for the broader application of results from future twin-based investigations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5306274 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53062742017-02-27 Using Twins to Better Understand Sibling Relationships Mark, Katharine M. Pike, Alison Latham, Rachel M. Oliver, Bonamy R. Behav Genet Original Research We compared the nature of the sibling relationship in dyads of varying genetic relatedness, employing a behavioural genetic design to estimate the contribution that genes and the environment have on this familial bond. Two samples were used—the Sisters and Brothers Study consisted of 173 families with two target non-twin children (mean ages = 7.42 and 5.22 years respectively); and the Twins, Family and Behaviour study included 234 families with two target twin children (mean age = 4.70 years). Mothers and fathers reported on their children’s relationship with each other, via a postal questionnaire (the Sisters and Brothers Study) or a telephone interview (the Twins, Family and Behaviour study). Contrary to expectations, no mean level differences emerged when monozygotic twin pairs, dizygotic twin pairs, and non-twin pairs were compared on their sibling relationship quality. Behavioural genetic analyses also revealed that the sibling bond was modestly to moderately influenced by the genetic propensities of the children within the dyad, and moderately to substantially influenced by the shared environment common to both siblings. In addition, for sibling negativity, we found evidence of twin-specific environmental influence—dizygotic twins showed more reciprocity than did non-twins. Our findings have repercussions for the broader application of results from future twin-based investigations. Springer US 2016-10-28 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5306274/ /pubmed/27796609 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10519-016-9825-z Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Mark, Katharine M. Pike, Alison Latham, Rachel M. Oliver, Bonamy R. Using Twins to Better Understand Sibling Relationships |
title | Using Twins to Better Understand Sibling Relationships |
title_full | Using Twins to Better Understand Sibling Relationships |
title_fullStr | Using Twins to Better Understand Sibling Relationships |
title_full_unstemmed | Using Twins to Better Understand Sibling Relationships |
title_short | Using Twins to Better Understand Sibling Relationships |
title_sort | using twins to better understand sibling relationships |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5306274/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27796609 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10519-016-9825-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT markkatharinem usingtwinstobetterunderstandsiblingrelationships AT pikealison usingtwinstobetterunderstandsiblingrelationships AT lathamrachelm usingtwinstobetterunderstandsiblingrelationships AT oliverbonamyr usingtwinstobetterunderstandsiblingrelationships |