Cargando…
Computed tomography myocardial perfusion vs (15)O-water positron emission tomography and fractional flow reserve
OBJECTIVES: Computed tomography (CT) can perform comprehensive cardiac imaging. We compared CT coronary angiography (CTCA) and CT myocardial perfusion (CTP) with (15)O-water positron emission tomography (PET) and invasive coronary angiography (ICA) with fractional flow reserve (FFR). METHODS: 51 pat...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5306314/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27334015 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-016-4404-5 |
_version_ | 1782507176093286400 |
---|---|
author | Williams, Michelle C. Mirsadraee, Saeed Dweck, Marc R. Weir, Nicholas W. Fletcher, Alison Lucatelli, Christophe MacGillivray, Tom Golay, Saroj K. Cruden, Nicholas L. Henriksen, Peter A. Uren, Neal McKillop, Graham Lima, João A. C. Reid, John H. van Beek, Edwin J. R. Patel, Dilip Newby, David E. |
author_facet | Williams, Michelle C. Mirsadraee, Saeed Dweck, Marc R. Weir, Nicholas W. Fletcher, Alison Lucatelli, Christophe MacGillivray, Tom Golay, Saroj K. Cruden, Nicholas L. Henriksen, Peter A. Uren, Neal McKillop, Graham Lima, João A. C. Reid, John H. van Beek, Edwin J. R. Patel, Dilip Newby, David E. |
author_sort | Williams, Michelle C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Computed tomography (CT) can perform comprehensive cardiac imaging. We compared CT coronary angiography (CTCA) and CT myocardial perfusion (CTP) with (15)O-water positron emission tomography (PET) and invasive coronary angiography (ICA) with fractional flow reserve (FFR). METHODS: 51 patients (63 (61–65) years, 80 % male) with known/suspected coronary artery disease (CAD) underwent 320-multidetector CTCA followed by “snapshot” adenosine stress CTP. Of these 22 underwent PET and 47 ICA/FFR. Obstructive CAD was defined as CTCA stenosis >50 % and CTP hypoperfusion, ICA stenosis >70 % or FFR <0.80. RESULTS: PET hyperaemic myocardial blood flow (MBF) was lower in obstructive than non-obstructive territories defined by ICA/FFR (1.76 (1.32–2.20) vs 3.11 (2.44–3.79) mL/(g/min), P < 0.001) and CTCA/CTP (1.76 (1.32–2.20) vs 3.12 (2.44–3.79) mL/(g/min), P < 0.001). Baseline and hyperaemic CT attenuation density was lower in obstructive than non-obstructive territories (73 (71–76) vs 86 (84–88) HU, P < 0.001 and 101 (96–106) vs 111 (107–114) HU, P 0.001). PET hyperaemic MBF corrected for rate pressure product correlated with CT attenuation density (r = 0.579, P < 0.001). There was excellent per-patient sensitivity (96 %), specificity (85 %), negative predictive value (90 %) and positive predictive value (94 %) for CTCA/CTP vs ICA/FFR. CONCLUSION: CT myocardial attenuation density correlates with (15)O-water PET MBF. CTCA and CTP can accurately identify obstructive CAD. KEY POINTS: •CT myocardial perfusion can aid the assessment of suspected coronary artery disease. • CT attenuation density from “snapshot” imaging is a marker of myocardial perfusion. • CT myocardial attenuation density correlates with (15) O-water PET myocardial blood flow. • CT attenuation density is lower in obstructive territories defined by invasive angiography. • Diagnostic accuracy of CTCA+CTP is comparable to invasive angiography + fractional flow reserve. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00330-016-4404-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5306314 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53063142017-02-27 Computed tomography myocardial perfusion vs (15)O-water positron emission tomography and fractional flow reserve Williams, Michelle C. Mirsadraee, Saeed Dweck, Marc R. Weir, Nicholas W. Fletcher, Alison Lucatelli, Christophe MacGillivray, Tom Golay, Saroj K. Cruden, Nicholas L. Henriksen, Peter A. Uren, Neal McKillop, Graham Lima, João A. C. Reid, John H. van Beek, Edwin J. R. Patel, Dilip Newby, David E. Eur Radiol Cardiac OBJECTIVES: Computed tomography (CT) can perform comprehensive cardiac imaging. We compared CT coronary angiography (CTCA) and CT myocardial perfusion (CTP) with (15)O-water positron emission tomography (PET) and invasive coronary angiography (ICA) with fractional flow reserve (FFR). METHODS: 51 patients (63 (61–65) years, 80 % male) with known/suspected coronary artery disease (CAD) underwent 320-multidetector CTCA followed by “snapshot” adenosine stress CTP. Of these 22 underwent PET and 47 ICA/FFR. Obstructive CAD was defined as CTCA stenosis >50 % and CTP hypoperfusion, ICA stenosis >70 % or FFR <0.80. RESULTS: PET hyperaemic myocardial blood flow (MBF) was lower in obstructive than non-obstructive territories defined by ICA/FFR (1.76 (1.32–2.20) vs 3.11 (2.44–3.79) mL/(g/min), P < 0.001) and CTCA/CTP (1.76 (1.32–2.20) vs 3.12 (2.44–3.79) mL/(g/min), P < 0.001). Baseline and hyperaemic CT attenuation density was lower in obstructive than non-obstructive territories (73 (71–76) vs 86 (84–88) HU, P < 0.001 and 101 (96–106) vs 111 (107–114) HU, P 0.001). PET hyperaemic MBF corrected for rate pressure product correlated with CT attenuation density (r = 0.579, P < 0.001). There was excellent per-patient sensitivity (96 %), specificity (85 %), negative predictive value (90 %) and positive predictive value (94 %) for CTCA/CTP vs ICA/FFR. CONCLUSION: CT myocardial attenuation density correlates with (15)O-water PET MBF. CTCA and CTP can accurately identify obstructive CAD. KEY POINTS: •CT myocardial perfusion can aid the assessment of suspected coronary artery disease. • CT attenuation density from “snapshot” imaging is a marker of myocardial perfusion. • CT myocardial attenuation density correlates with (15) O-water PET myocardial blood flow. • CT attenuation density is lower in obstructive territories defined by invasive angiography. • Diagnostic accuracy of CTCA+CTP is comparable to invasive angiography + fractional flow reserve. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00330-016-4404-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2016-06-22 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5306314/ /pubmed/27334015 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-016-4404-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Cardiac Williams, Michelle C. Mirsadraee, Saeed Dweck, Marc R. Weir, Nicholas W. Fletcher, Alison Lucatelli, Christophe MacGillivray, Tom Golay, Saroj K. Cruden, Nicholas L. Henriksen, Peter A. Uren, Neal McKillop, Graham Lima, João A. C. Reid, John H. van Beek, Edwin J. R. Patel, Dilip Newby, David E. Computed tomography myocardial perfusion vs (15)O-water positron emission tomography and fractional flow reserve |
title | Computed tomography myocardial perfusion vs (15)O-water positron emission tomography and fractional flow reserve |
title_full | Computed tomography myocardial perfusion vs (15)O-water positron emission tomography and fractional flow reserve |
title_fullStr | Computed tomography myocardial perfusion vs (15)O-water positron emission tomography and fractional flow reserve |
title_full_unstemmed | Computed tomography myocardial perfusion vs (15)O-water positron emission tomography and fractional flow reserve |
title_short | Computed tomography myocardial perfusion vs (15)O-water positron emission tomography and fractional flow reserve |
title_sort | computed tomography myocardial perfusion vs (15)o-water positron emission tomography and fractional flow reserve |
topic | Cardiac |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5306314/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27334015 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-016-4404-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT williamsmichellec computedtomographymyocardialperfusionvs15owaterpositronemissiontomographyandfractionalflowreserve AT mirsadraeesaeed computedtomographymyocardialperfusionvs15owaterpositronemissiontomographyandfractionalflowreserve AT dweckmarcr computedtomographymyocardialperfusionvs15owaterpositronemissiontomographyandfractionalflowreserve AT weirnicholasw computedtomographymyocardialperfusionvs15owaterpositronemissiontomographyandfractionalflowreserve AT fletcheralison computedtomographymyocardialperfusionvs15owaterpositronemissiontomographyandfractionalflowreserve AT lucatellichristophe computedtomographymyocardialperfusionvs15owaterpositronemissiontomographyandfractionalflowreserve AT macgillivraytom computedtomographymyocardialperfusionvs15owaterpositronemissiontomographyandfractionalflowreserve AT golaysarojk computedtomographymyocardialperfusionvs15owaterpositronemissiontomographyandfractionalflowreserve AT crudennicholasl computedtomographymyocardialperfusionvs15owaterpositronemissiontomographyandfractionalflowreserve AT henriksenpetera computedtomographymyocardialperfusionvs15owaterpositronemissiontomographyandfractionalflowreserve AT urenneal computedtomographymyocardialperfusionvs15owaterpositronemissiontomographyandfractionalflowreserve AT mckillopgraham computedtomographymyocardialperfusionvs15owaterpositronemissiontomographyandfractionalflowreserve AT limajoaoac computedtomographymyocardialperfusionvs15owaterpositronemissiontomographyandfractionalflowreserve AT reidjohnh computedtomographymyocardialperfusionvs15owaterpositronemissiontomographyandfractionalflowreserve AT vanbeekedwinjr computedtomographymyocardialperfusionvs15owaterpositronemissiontomographyandfractionalflowreserve AT pateldilip computedtomographymyocardialperfusionvs15owaterpositronemissiontomographyandfractionalflowreserve AT newbydavide computedtomographymyocardialperfusionvs15owaterpositronemissiontomographyandfractionalflowreserve |