Cargando…

Patient experience of CT colonography and colonoscopy after fecal occult blood test in a national screening programme

OBJECTIVE: To investigate patient experience of CT colonography (CTC) and colonoscopy in a national screening programme. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of patient experience postal questionnaires. We included screenees from a fecal occult blood test (FOBt) based screening programme, where CTC was p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Plumb, Andrew A., Ghanouni, Alex, Rees, Colin J., Hewitson, Paul, Nickerson, Claire, Wright, Suzanne, Taylor, Stuart A., Halligan, Steve, von Wagner, Christian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5306317/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27287477
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-016-4428-x
_version_ 1782507176775909376
author Plumb, Andrew A.
Ghanouni, Alex
Rees, Colin J.
Hewitson, Paul
Nickerson, Claire
Wright, Suzanne
Taylor, Stuart A.
Halligan, Steve
von Wagner, Christian
author_facet Plumb, Andrew A.
Ghanouni, Alex
Rees, Colin J.
Hewitson, Paul
Nickerson, Claire
Wright, Suzanne
Taylor, Stuart A.
Halligan, Steve
von Wagner, Christian
author_sort Plumb, Andrew A.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To investigate patient experience of CT colonography (CTC) and colonoscopy in a national screening programme. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of patient experience postal questionnaires. We included screenees from a fecal occult blood test (FOBt) based screening programme, where CTC was performed when colonoscopy was incomplete or deemed unsuitable. We analyzed questionnaire responses concerning communication of test risks, test-related discomfort and post-test pain, as well as complications. CTC and colonoscopy responses were compared using multilevel logistic regression. RESULTS: Of 67,114 subjects identified, 52,805 (79 %) responded. Understanding of test risks was lower for CTC (1712/1970 = 86.9 %) than colonoscopy (48783/50975 = 95.7 %, p < 0.0001). Overall, a slightly greater proportion of screenees found CTC unexpectedly uncomfortable (506/1970 = 25.7 %) than colonoscopy (10,705/50,975 = 21.0 %, p < 0.0001). CTC was tolerated well as a completion procedure for failed colonoscopy (unexpected discomfort; CTC = 26.3 %: colonoscopy = 57.0 %, p < 0.001). Post-procedural pain was equally common (CTC: 288/1970,14.6 %, colonoscopy: 7544/50,975,14.8 %; p = 0.55). Adverse event rates were similar in both groups (CTC: 20/2947 = 1.2 %; colonoscopy: 683/64,312 = 1.1 %), but generally less serious with CTC. CONCLUSIONS: Even though CTC was reserved for individuals either unsuitable for or unable to complete colonoscopy, we found only small differences in test-related discomfort. CTC was well tolerated as a completion procedure and was extremely safe. CTC can be delivered across a national screening programme with high patient satisfaction. KEY POINTS: • High patient satisfaction at CTC is deliverable across a national screening programme. • Patients who cannot tolerate screening colonoscopy are likely to find CTC acceptable. • CTC is extremely safe; complications are rare and almost never serious. • Patients may require more detailed information regarding the expected discomfort of CTC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5306317
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53063172017-02-27 Patient experience of CT colonography and colonoscopy after fecal occult blood test in a national screening programme Plumb, Andrew A. Ghanouni, Alex Rees, Colin J. Hewitson, Paul Nickerson, Claire Wright, Suzanne Taylor, Stuart A. Halligan, Steve von Wagner, Christian Eur Radiol Gastrointestinal OBJECTIVE: To investigate patient experience of CT colonography (CTC) and colonoscopy in a national screening programme. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of patient experience postal questionnaires. We included screenees from a fecal occult blood test (FOBt) based screening programme, where CTC was performed when colonoscopy was incomplete or deemed unsuitable. We analyzed questionnaire responses concerning communication of test risks, test-related discomfort and post-test pain, as well as complications. CTC and colonoscopy responses were compared using multilevel logistic regression. RESULTS: Of 67,114 subjects identified, 52,805 (79 %) responded. Understanding of test risks was lower for CTC (1712/1970 = 86.9 %) than colonoscopy (48783/50975 = 95.7 %, p < 0.0001). Overall, a slightly greater proportion of screenees found CTC unexpectedly uncomfortable (506/1970 = 25.7 %) than colonoscopy (10,705/50,975 = 21.0 %, p < 0.0001). CTC was tolerated well as a completion procedure for failed colonoscopy (unexpected discomfort; CTC = 26.3 %: colonoscopy = 57.0 %, p < 0.001). Post-procedural pain was equally common (CTC: 288/1970,14.6 %, colonoscopy: 7544/50,975,14.8 %; p = 0.55). Adverse event rates were similar in both groups (CTC: 20/2947 = 1.2 %; colonoscopy: 683/64,312 = 1.1 %), but generally less serious with CTC. CONCLUSIONS: Even though CTC was reserved for individuals either unsuitable for or unable to complete colonoscopy, we found only small differences in test-related discomfort. CTC was well tolerated as a completion procedure and was extremely safe. CTC can be delivered across a national screening programme with high patient satisfaction. KEY POINTS: • High patient satisfaction at CTC is deliverable across a national screening programme. • Patients who cannot tolerate screening colonoscopy are likely to find CTC acceptable. • CTC is extremely safe; complications are rare and almost never serious. • Patients may require more detailed information regarding the expected discomfort of CTC. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2016-06-10 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5306317/ /pubmed/27287477 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-016-4428-x Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Gastrointestinal
Plumb, Andrew A.
Ghanouni, Alex
Rees, Colin J.
Hewitson, Paul
Nickerson, Claire
Wright, Suzanne
Taylor, Stuart A.
Halligan, Steve
von Wagner, Christian
Patient experience of CT colonography and colonoscopy after fecal occult blood test in a national screening programme
title Patient experience of CT colonography and colonoscopy after fecal occult blood test in a national screening programme
title_full Patient experience of CT colonography and colonoscopy after fecal occult blood test in a national screening programme
title_fullStr Patient experience of CT colonography and colonoscopy after fecal occult blood test in a national screening programme
title_full_unstemmed Patient experience of CT colonography and colonoscopy after fecal occult blood test in a national screening programme
title_short Patient experience of CT colonography and colonoscopy after fecal occult blood test in a national screening programme
title_sort patient experience of ct colonography and colonoscopy after fecal occult blood test in a national screening programme
topic Gastrointestinal
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5306317/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27287477
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-016-4428-x
work_keys_str_mv AT plumbandrewa patientexperienceofctcolonographyandcolonoscopyafterfecaloccultbloodtestinanationalscreeningprogramme
AT ghanounialex patientexperienceofctcolonographyandcolonoscopyafterfecaloccultbloodtestinanationalscreeningprogramme
AT reescolinj patientexperienceofctcolonographyandcolonoscopyafterfecaloccultbloodtestinanationalscreeningprogramme
AT hewitsonpaul patientexperienceofctcolonographyandcolonoscopyafterfecaloccultbloodtestinanationalscreeningprogramme
AT nickersonclaire patientexperienceofctcolonographyandcolonoscopyafterfecaloccultbloodtestinanationalscreeningprogramme
AT wrightsuzanne patientexperienceofctcolonographyandcolonoscopyafterfecaloccultbloodtestinanationalscreeningprogramme
AT taylorstuarta patientexperienceofctcolonographyandcolonoscopyafterfecaloccultbloodtestinanationalscreeningprogramme
AT halligansteve patientexperienceofctcolonographyandcolonoscopyafterfecaloccultbloodtestinanationalscreeningprogramme
AT vonwagnerchristian patientexperienceofctcolonographyandcolonoscopyafterfecaloccultbloodtestinanationalscreeningprogramme