Cargando…
Patient experience of CT colonography and colonoscopy after fecal occult blood test in a national screening programme
OBJECTIVE: To investigate patient experience of CT colonography (CTC) and colonoscopy in a national screening programme. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of patient experience postal questionnaires. We included screenees from a fecal occult blood test (FOBt) based screening programme, where CTC was p...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5306317/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27287477 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-016-4428-x |
_version_ | 1782507176775909376 |
---|---|
author | Plumb, Andrew A. Ghanouni, Alex Rees, Colin J. Hewitson, Paul Nickerson, Claire Wright, Suzanne Taylor, Stuart A. Halligan, Steve von Wagner, Christian |
author_facet | Plumb, Andrew A. Ghanouni, Alex Rees, Colin J. Hewitson, Paul Nickerson, Claire Wright, Suzanne Taylor, Stuart A. Halligan, Steve von Wagner, Christian |
author_sort | Plumb, Andrew A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To investigate patient experience of CT colonography (CTC) and colonoscopy in a national screening programme. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of patient experience postal questionnaires. We included screenees from a fecal occult blood test (FOBt) based screening programme, where CTC was performed when colonoscopy was incomplete or deemed unsuitable. We analyzed questionnaire responses concerning communication of test risks, test-related discomfort and post-test pain, as well as complications. CTC and colonoscopy responses were compared using multilevel logistic regression. RESULTS: Of 67,114 subjects identified, 52,805 (79 %) responded. Understanding of test risks was lower for CTC (1712/1970 = 86.9 %) than colonoscopy (48783/50975 = 95.7 %, p < 0.0001). Overall, a slightly greater proportion of screenees found CTC unexpectedly uncomfortable (506/1970 = 25.7 %) than colonoscopy (10,705/50,975 = 21.0 %, p < 0.0001). CTC was tolerated well as a completion procedure for failed colonoscopy (unexpected discomfort; CTC = 26.3 %: colonoscopy = 57.0 %, p < 0.001). Post-procedural pain was equally common (CTC: 288/1970,14.6 %, colonoscopy: 7544/50,975,14.8 %; p = 0.55). Adverse event rates were similar in both groups (CTC: 20/2947 = 1.2 %; colonoscopy: 683/64,312 = 1.1 %), but generally less serious with CTC. CONCLUSIONS: Even though CTC was reserved for individuals either unsuitable for or unable to complete colonoscopy, we found only small differences in test-related discomfort. CTC was well tolerated as a completion procedure and was extremely safe. CTC can be delivered across a national screening programme with high patient satisfaction. KEY POINTS: • High patient satisfaction at CTC is deliverable across a national screening programme. • Patients who cannot tolerate screening colonoscopy are likely to find CTC acceptable. • CTC is extremely safe; complications are rare and almost never serious. • Patients may require more detailed information regarding the expected discomfort of CTC. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5306317 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53063172017-02-27 Patient experience of CT colonography and colonoscopy after fecal occult blood test in a national screening programme Plumb, Andrew A. Ghanouni, Alex Rees, Colin J. Hewitson, Paul Nickerson, Claire Wright, Suzanne Taylor, Stuart A. Halligan, Steve von Wagner, Christian Eur Radiol Gastrointestinal OBJECTIVE: To investigate patient experience of CT colonography (CTC) and colonoscopy in a national screening programme. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of patient experience postal questionnaires. We included screenees from a fecal occult blood test (FOBt) based screening programme, where CTC was performed when colonoscopy was incomplete or deemed unsuitable. We analyzed questionnaire responses concerning communication of test risks, test-related discomfort and post-test pain, as well as complications. CTC and colonoscopy responses were compared using multilevel logistic regression. RESULTS: Of 67,114 subjects identified, 52,805 (79 %) responded. Understanding of test risks was lower for CTC (1712/1970 = 86.9 %) than colonoscopy (48783/50975 = 95.7 %, p < 0.0001). Overall, a slightly greater proportion of screenees found CTC unexpectedly uncomfortable (506/1970 = 25.7 %) than colonoscopy (10,705/50,975 = 21.0 %, p < 0.0001). CTC was tolerated well as a completion procedure for failed colonoscopy (unexpected discomfort; CTC = 26.3 %: colonoscopy = 57.0 %, p < 0.001). Post-procedural pain was equally common (CTC: 288/1970,14.6 %, colonoscopy: 7544/50,975,14.8 %; p = 0.55). Adverse event rates were similar in both groups (CTC: 20/2947 = 1.2 %; colonoscopy: 683/64,312 = 1.1 %), but generally less serious with CTC. CONCLUSIONS: Even though CTC was reserved for individuals either unsuitable for or unable to complete colonoscopy, we found only small differences in test-related discomfort. CTC was well tolerated as a completion procedure and was extremely safe. CTC can be delivered across a national screening programme with high patient satisfaction. KEY POINTS: • High patient satisfaction at CTC is deliverable across a national screening programme. • Patients who cannot tolerate screening colonoscopy are likely to find CTC acceptable. • CTC is extremely safe; complications are rare and almost never serious. • Patients may require more detailed information regarding the expected discomfort of CTC. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2016-06-10 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5306317/ /pubmed/27287477 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-016-4428-x Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Gastrointestinal Plumb, Andrew A. Ghanouni, Alex Rees, Colin J. Hewitson, Paul Nickerson, Claire Wright, Suzanne Taylor, Stuart A. Halligan, Steve von Wagner, Christian Patient experience of CT colonography and colonoscopy after fecal occult blood test in a national screening programme |
title | Patient experience of CT colonography and colonoscopy after fecal occult blood test in a national screening programme |
title_full | Patient experience of CT colonography and colonoscopy after fecal occult blood test in a national screening programme |
title_fullStr | Patient experience of CT colonography and colonoscopy after fecal occult blood test in a national screening programme |
title_full_unstemmed | Patient experience of CT colonography and colonoscopy after fecal occult blood test in a national screening programme |
title_short | Patient experience of CT colonography and colonoscopy after fecal occult blood test in a national screening programme |
title_sort | patient experience of ct colonography and colonoscopy after fecal occult blood test in a national screening programme |
topic | Gastrointestinal |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5306317/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27287477 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-016-4428-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT plumbandrewa patientexperienceofctcolonographyandcolonoscopyafterfecaloccultbloodtestinanationalscreeningprogramme AT ghanounialex patientexperienceofctcolonographyandcolonoscopyafterfecaloccultbloodtestinanationalscreeningprogramme AT reescolinj patientexperienceofctcolonographyandcolonoscopyafterfecaloccultbloodtestinanationalscreeningprogramme AT hewitsonpaul patientexperienceofctcolonographyandcolonoscopyafterfecaloccultbloodtestinanationalscreeningprogramme AT nickersonclaire patientexperienceofctcolonographyandcolonoscopyafterfecaloccultbloodtestinanationalscreeningprogramme AT wrightsuzanne patientexperienceofctcolonographyandcolonoscopyafterfecaloccultbloodtestinanationalscreeningprogramme AT taylorstuarta patientexperienceofctcolonographyandcolonoscopyafterfecaloccultbloodtestinanationalscreeningprogramme AT halligansteve patientexperienceofctcolonographyandcolonoscopyafterfecaloccultbloodtestinanationalscreeningprogramme AT vonwagnerchristian patientexperienceofctcolonographyandcolonoscopyafterfecaloccultbloodtestinanationalscreeningprogramme |