Cargando…
Commissioning through competition and cooperation in the English NHS under the Health and Social Care Act 2012: evidence from a qualitative study of four clinical commissioning groups
OBJECTIVE: The Health and Social Care Act 2012 (‘HSCA 2012’) introduced a new, statutory, form of regulation of competition into the National Health Service (NHS), while at the same time recognising that cooperation was necessary. NHS England's policy document, The Five Year Forward View (‘5YFV...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5306513/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28183806 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011745 |
_version_ | 1782507205215387648 |
---|---|
author | Allen, Pauline Osipovič, Dorota Shepherd, Elizabeth Coleman, Anna Perkins, Neil Garnett, Emma Williams, Lorraine |
author_facet | Allen, Pauline Osipovič, Dorota Shepherd, Elizabeth Coleman, Anna Perkins, Neil Garnett, Emma Williams, Lorraine |
author_sort | Allen, Pauline |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: The Health and Social Care Act 2012 (‘HSCA 2012’) introduced a new, statutory, form of regulation of competition into the National Health Service (NHS), while at the same time recognising that cooperation was necessary. NHS England's policy document, The Five Year Forward View (‘5YFV’) of 2014 placed less emphasis on competition without altering the legislation. We explored how commissioners and providers understand the complex regulatory framework, and how they behave in relation to competition and cooperation. DESIGN: We carried out detailed case studies in four clinical commissioning groups, using interviews and documentary analysis to explore the commissioners’ and providers’ understanding and experience of competition and cooperation. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: We conducted 42 interviews with senior managers in commissioning organisations and senior managers in NHS and independent provider organisations (acute and community services). RESULTS: Neither commissioners nor providers fully understand the regulatory regime in respect of competition in the NHS, and have not found that the regulatory authorities have provided adequate guidance. Despite the HSCA 2012 promoting competition, commissioners chose mainly to use collaborative strategies to effect major service reconfigurations, which is endorsed as a suitable approach by providers. Nevertheless, commissioners are using competitive tendering in respect of more peripheral services in order to improve quality of care and value for money. CONCLUSIONS: Commissioners regard the use of competition and cooperation as appropriate in the NHS currently, although collaborative strategies appear more helpful in respect of large-scale changes. However, the current regulatory framework contained in the HSCA 2012, particularly since the publication of the 5YFV, is not clear. Better guidance should be issued by the regulatory authorities. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5306513 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53065132017-02-27 Commissioning through competition and cooperation in the English NHS under the Health and Social Care Act 2012: evidence from a qualitative study of four clinical commissioning groups Allen, Pauline Osipovič, Dorota Shepherd, Elizabeth Coleman, Anna Perkins, Neil Garnett, Emma Williams, Lorraine BMJ Open Health Services Research OBJECTIVE: The Health and Social Care Act 2012 (‘HSCA 2012’) introduced a new, statutory, form of regulation of competition into the National Health Service (NHS), while at the same time recognising that cooperation was necessary. NHS England's policy document, The Five Year Forward View (‘5YFV’) of 2014 placed less emphasis on competition without altering the legislation. We explored how commissioners and providers understand the complex regulatory framework, and how they behave in relation to competition and cooperation. DESIGN: We carried out detailed case studies in four clinical commissioning groups, using interviews and documentary analysis to explore the commissioners’ and providers’ understanding and experience of competition and cooperation. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: We conducted 42 interviews with senior managers in commissioning organisations and senior managers in NHS and independent provider organisations (acute and community services). RESULTS: Neither commissioners nor providers fully understand the regulatory regime in respect of competition in the NHS, and have not found that the regulatory authorities have provided adequate guidance. Despite the HSCA 2012 promoting competition, commissioners chose mainly to use collaborative strategies to effect major service reconfigurations, which is endorsed as a suitable approach by providers. Nevertheless, commissioners are using competitive tendering in respect of more peripheral services in order to improve quality of care and value for money. CONCLUSIONS: Commissioners regard the use of competition and cooperation as appropriate in the NHS currently, although collaborative strategies appear more helpful in respect of large-scale changes. However, the current regulatory framework contained in the HSCA 2012, particularly since the publication of the 5YFV, is not clear. Better guidance should be issued by the regulatory authorities. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-02-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5306513/ /pubmed/28183806 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011745 Text en © 2017 Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Health Services Research Allen, Pauline Osipovič, Dorota Shepherd, Elizabeth Coleman, Anna Perkins, Neil Garnett, Emma Williams, Lorraine Commissioning through competition and cooperation in the English NHS under the Health and Social Care Act 2012: evidence from a qualitative study of four clinical commissioning groups |
title | Commissioning through competition and cooperation in the English NHS under the Health and Social Care Act 2012: evidence from a qualitative study of four clinical commissioning groups |
title_full | Commissioning through competition and cooperation in the English NHS under the Health and Social Care Act 2012: evidence from a qualitative study of four clinical commissioning groups |
title_fullStr | Commissioning through competition and cooperation in the English NHS under the Health and Social Care Act 2012: evidence from a qualitative study of four clinical commissioning groups |
title_full_unstemmed | Commissioning through competition and cooperation in the English NHS under the Health and Social Care Act 2012: evidence from a qualitative study of four clinical commissioning groups |
title_short | Commissioning through competition and cooperation in the English NHS under the Health and Social Care Act 2012: evidence from a qualitative study of four clinical commissioning groups |
title_sort | commissioning through competition and cooperation in the english nhs under the health and social care act 2012: evidence from a qualitative study of four clinical commissioning groups |
topic | Health Services Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5306513/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28183806 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011745 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT allenpauline commissioningthroughcompetitionandcooperationintheenglishnhsunderthehealthandsocialcareact2012evidencefromaqualitativestudyoffourclinicalcommissioninggroups AT osipovicdorota commissioningthroughcompetitionandcooperationintheenglishnhsunderthehealthandsocialcareact2012evidencefromaqualitativestudyoffourclinicalcommissioninggroups AT shepherdelizabeth commissioningthroughcompetitionandcooperationintheenglishnhsunderthehealthandsocialcareact2012evidencefromaqualitativestudyoffourclinicalcommissioninggroups AT colemananna commissioningthroughcompetitionandcooperationintheenglishnhsunderthehealthandsocialcareact2012evidencefromaqualitativestudyoffourclinicalcommissioninggroups AT perkinsneil commissioningthroughcompetitionandcooperationintheenglishnhsunderthehealthandsocialcareact2012evidencefromaqualitativestudyoffourclinicalcommissioninggroups AT garnettemma commissioningthroughcompetitionandcooperationintheenglishnhsunderthehealthandsocialcareact2012evidencefromaqualitativestudyoffourclinicalcommissioninggroups AT williamslorraine commissioningthroughcompetitionandcooperationintheenglishnhsunderthehealthandsocialcareact2012evidencefromaqualitativestudyoffourclinicalcommissioninggroups |