Cargando…

Commissioning through competition and cooperation in the English NHS under the Health and Social Care Act 2012: evidence from a qualitative study of four clinical commissioning groups

OBJECTIVE: The Health and Social Care Act 2012 (‘HSCA 2012’) introduced a new, statutory, form of regulation of competition into the National Health Service (NHS), while at the same time recognising that cooperation was necessary. NHS England's policy document, The Five Year Forward View (‘5YFV...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Allen, Pauline, Osipovič, Dorota, Shepherd, Elizabeth, Coleman, Anna, Perkins, Neil, Garnett, Emma, Williams, Lorraine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5306513/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28183806
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011745
_version_ 1782507205215387648
author Allen, Pauline
Osipovič, Dorota
Shepherd, Elizabeth
Coleman, Anna
Perkins, Neil
Garnett, Emma
Williams, Lorraine
author_facet Allen, Pauline
Osipovič, Dorota
Shepherd, Elizabeth
Coleman, Anna
Perkins, Neil
Garnett, Emma
Williams, Lorraine
author_sort Allen, Pauline
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The Health and Social Care Act 2012 (‘HSCA 2012’) introduced a new, statutory, form of regulation of competition into the National Health Service (NHS), while at the same time recognising that cooperation was necessary. NHS England's policy document, The Five Year Forward View (‘5YFV’) of 2014 placed less emphasis on competition without altering the legislation. We explored how commissioners and providers understand the complex regulatory framework, and how they behave in relation to competition and cooperation. DESIGN: We carried out detailed case studies in four clinical commissioning groups, using interviews and documentary analysis to explore the commissioners’ and providers’ understanding and experience of competition and cooperation. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: We conducted 42 interviews with senior managers in commissioning organisations and senior managers in NHS and independent provider organisations (acute and community services). RESULTS: Neither commissioners nor providers fully understand the regulatory regime in respect of competition in the NHS, and have not found that the regulatory authorities have provided adequate guidance. Despite the HSCA 2012 promoting competition, commissioners chose mainly to use collaborative strategies to effect major service reconfigurations, which is endorsed as a suitable approach by providers. Nevertheless, commissioners are using competitive tendering in respect of more peripheral services in order to improve quality of care and value for money. CONCLUSIONS: Commissioners regard the use of competition and cooperation as appropriate in the NHS currently, although collaborative strategies appear more helpful in respect of large-scale changes. However, the current regulatory framework contained in the HSCA 2012, particularly since the publication of the 5YFV, is not clear. Better guidance should be issued by the regulatory authorities.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5306513
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53065132017-02-27 Commissioning through competition and cooperation in the English NHS under the Health and Social Care Act 2012: evidence from a qualitative study of four clinical commissioning groups Allen, Pauline Osipovič, Dorota Shepherd, Elizabeth Coleman, Anna Perkins, Neil Garnett, Emma Williams, Lorraine BMJ Open Health Services Research OBJECTIVE: The Health and Social Care Act 2012 (‘HSCA 2012’) introduced a new, statutory, form of regulation of competition into the National Health Service (NHS), while at the same time recognising that cooperation was necessary. NHS England's policy document, The Five Year Forward View (‘5YFV’) of 2014 placed less emphasis on competition without altering the legislation. We explored how commissioners and providers understand the complex regulatory framework, and how they behave in relation to competition and cooperation. DESIGN: We carried out detailed case studies in four clinical commissioning groups, using interviews and documentary analysis to explore the commissioners’ and providers’ understanding and experience of competition and cooperation. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: We conducted 42 interviews with senior managers in commissioning organisations and senior managers in NHS and independent provider organisations (acute and community services). RESULTS: Neither commissioners nor providers fully understand the regulatory regime in respect of competition in the NHS, and have not found that the regulatory authorities have provided adequate guidance. Despite the HSCA 2012 promoting competition, commissioners chose mainly to use collaborative strategies to effect major service reconfigurations, which is endorsed as a suitable approach by providers. Nevertheless, commissioners are using competitive tendering in respect of more peripheral services in order to improve quality of care and value for money. CONCLUSIONS: Commissioners regard the use of competition and cooperation as appropriate in the NHS currently, although collaborative strategies appear more helpful in respect of large-scale changes. However, the current regulatory framework contained in the HSCA 2012, particularly since the publication of the 5YFV, is not clear. Better guidance should be issued by the regulatory authorities. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-02-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5306513/ /pubmed/28183806 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011745 Text en © 2017 Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Health Services Research
Allen, Pauline
Osipovič, Dorota
Shepherd, Elizabeth
Coleman, Anna
Perkins, Neil
Garnett, Emma
Williams, Lorraine
Commissioning through competition and cooperation in the English NHS under the Health and Social Care Act 2012: evidence from a qualitative study of four clinical commissioning groups
title Commissioning through competition and cooperation in the English NHS under the Health and Social Care Act 2012: evidence from a qualitative study of four clinical commissioning groups
title_full Commissioning through competition and cooperation in the English NHS under the Health and Social Care Act 2012: evidence from a qualitative study of four clinical commissioning groups
title_fullStr Commissioning through competition and cooperation in the English NHS under the Health and Social Care Act 2012: evidence from a qualitative study of four clinical commissioning groups
title_full_unstemmed Commissioning through competition and cooperation in the English NHS under the Health and Social Care Act 2012: evidence from a qualitative study of four clinical commissioning groups
title_short Commissioning through competition and cooperation in the English NHS under the Health and Social Care Act 2012: evidence from a qualitative study of four clinical commissioning groups
title_sort commissioning through competition and cooperation in the english nhs under the health and social care act 2012: evidence from a qualitative study of four clinical commissioning groups
topic Health Services Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5306513/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28183806
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011745
work_keys_str_mv AT allenpauline commissioningthroughcompetitionandcooperationintheenglishnhsunderthehealthandsocialcareact2012evidencefromaqualitativestudyoffourclinicalcommissioninggroups
AT osipovicdorota commissioningthroughcompetitionandcooperationintheenglishnhsunderthehealthandsocialcareact2012evidencefromaqualitativestudyoffourclinicalcommissioninggroups
AT shepherdelizabeth commissioningthroughcompetitionandcooperationintheenglishnhsunderthehealthandsocialcareact2012evidencefromaqualitativestudyoffourclinicalcommissioninggroups
AT colemananna commissioningthroughcompetitionandcooperationintheenglishnhsunderthehealthandsocialcareact2012evidencefromaqualitativestudyoffourclinicalcommissioninggroups
AT perkinsneil commissioningthroughcompetitionandcooperationintheenglishnhsunderthehealthandsocialcareact2012evidencefromaqualitativestudyoffourclinicalcommissioninggroups
AT garnettemma commissioningthroughcompetitionandcooperationintheenglishnhsunderthehealthandsocialcareact2012evidencefromaqualitativestudyoffourclinicalcommissioninggroups
AT williamslorraine commissioningthroughcompetitionandcooperationintheenglishnhsunderthehealthandsocialcareact2012evidencefromaqualitativestudyoffourclinicalcommissioninggroups