Cargando…
Endorsement of PRISMA statement and quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in nursing journals: a cross-sectional study
OBJECTIVE: Systematic reviews (SRs) often poorly report key information, thereby diminishing their usefulness. Previous studies evaluated published SRs and determined that they failed to meet explicit criteria or characteristics. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses...
Autores principales: | Tam, Wilson W S, Lo, Kenneth K H, Khalechelvam, Parames |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5306529/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28174224 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013905 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Is the information of systematic reviews published in nursing journals up-to-date? a cross-sectional study
por: Tam, Wilson W. S., et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Reporting quality of abstracts from randomised controlled trials published in leading critical care nursing journals: a methodological quality review
por: Villa, Michele, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Perception of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement of authors publishing reviews in nursing journals: a cross-sectional online survey
por: Tam, Wilson W S, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Evaluation of the Endorsement of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) Statement on the Quality of Published Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses
por: Panic, Nikola, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Scientific publications in nursing journals from Mainland China, Taiwan, and Hong Kong: a 10-year survey of the literature
por: Zhang, Di, et al.
Publicado: (2016)