Cargando…

Preoperative embolization in patients with metastatic spinal cord compression: mandatory or optional?

BACKGROUND: The contribution of preoperative embolization in reducing intraoperative blood loss and its clinical importance are unclear. So, we aimed to compare the perioperative clinical outcomes based on whether preoperative embolization was performed and assess the role and safety of preoperative...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hong, Chul Gie, Cho, Jae Hwan, Suh, Dae Chul, Hwang, Chang Ju, Lee, Dong-Ho, Lee, Choon Sung
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5307698/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28193282
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-017-1118-3
_version_ 1782507414769106944
author Hong, Chul Gie
Cho, Jae Hwan
Suh, Dae Chul
Hwang, Chang Ju
Lee, Dong-Ho
Lee, Choon Sung
author_facet Hong, Chul Gie
Cho, Jae Hwan
Suh, Dae Chul
Hwang, Chang Ju
Lee, Dong-Ho
Lee, Choon Sung
author_sort Hong, Chul Gie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The contribution of preoperative embolization in reducing intraoperative blood loss and its clinical importance are unclear. So, we aimed to compare the perioperative clinical outcomes based on whether preoperative embolization was performed and assess the role and safety of preoperative embolization in metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC) patients. METHODS: We enrolled 52 patients (men, 37; women, 15) who underwent palliative decompression for MSCC. Demographic data, neurologic status, surgery-related data (operation time, estimated blood loss, and transfusion), complications, and survival time were recorded. Patients were categorized based on whether they received preoperative embolization: groups E (embolization) (n = 18) and NE (non-embolization) (n = 34) and the clinical parameters were compared. Subgroup analysis was performed specifically for cases of hypervascular tumors (23/52, 44%). RESULTS: The transfusion degree was greater in the NE group (4.6 pints) than in the E group (2.5 pints, P = 0.025); the other parameters did not differ between the groups. However, massive bleeding (>2000 mL) was more frequent in the NE group (10/34) than in the E group (0/18, P = 0.010). Subgroup analysis indicated that intraoperative blood loss was greater in the NE group (1988 mL) than in the E group (1095 mL, P = 0.042) in hypervascular tumor patients. Although massive bleeding was more frequent among hypervascular tumor patients, 3 patients with non-hypervascularized tumors also exhibited massive bleeding (P = 0.087). CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative blood loss and perioperative transfusion can be reduced by preoperative embolization in MSCC patients. Neurologic recovery, operation time, and complications did not differ according to the application of embolization. As preoperative embolization is relatively safe and effective for controlling intraoperative bleeding without any neurologic deterioration, it is highly recommended for hypervascular tumors. Moreover, it may also be effective for non-hypervascular tumors as massive bleeding may be noted in some cases.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5307698
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53076982017-02-22 Preoperative embolization in patients with metastatic spinal cord compression: mandatory or optional? Hong, Chul Gie Cho, Jae Hwan Suh, Dae Chul Hwang, Chang Ju Lee, Dong-Ho Lee, Choon Sung World J Surg Oncol Research BACKGROUND: The contribution of preoperative embolization in reducing intraoperative blood loss and its clinical importance are unclear. So, we aimed to compare the perioperative clinical outcomes based on whether preoperative embolization was performed and assess the role and safety of preoperative embolization in metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC) patients. METHODS: We enrolled 52 patients (men, 37; women, 15) who underwent palliative decompression for MSCC. Demographic data, neurologic status, surgery-related data (operation time, estimated blood loss, and transfusion), complications, and survival time were recorded. Patients were categorized based on whether they received preoperative embolization: groups E (embolization) (n = 18) and NE (non-embolization) (n = 34) and the clinical parameters were compared. Subgroup analysis was performed specifically for cases of hypervascular tumors (23/52, 44%). RESULTS: The transfusion degree was greater in the NE group (4.6 pints) than in the E group (2.5 pints, P = 0.025); the other parameters did not differ between the groups. However, massive bleeding (>2000 mL) was more frequent in the NE group (10/34) than in the E group (0/18, P = 0.010). Subgroup analysis indicated that intraoperative blood loss was greater in the NE group (1988 mL) than in the E group (1095 mL, P = 0.042) in hypervascular tumor patients. Although massive bleeding was more frequent among hypervascular tumor patients, 3 patients with non-hypervascularized tumors also exhibited massive bleeding (P = 0.087). CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative blood loss and perioperative transfusion can be reduced by preoperative embolization in MSCC patients. Neurologic recovery, operation time, and complications did not differ according to the application of embolization. As preoperative embolization is relatively safe and effective for controlling intraoperative bleeding without any neurologic deterioration, it is highly recommended for hypervascular tumors. Moreover, it may also be effective for non-hypervascular tumors as massive bleeding may be noted in some cases. BioMed Central 2017-02-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5307698/ /pubmed/28193282 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-017-1118-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Hong, Chul Gie
Cho, Jae Hwan
Suh, Dae Chul
Hwang, Chang Ju
Lee, Dong-Ho
Lee, Choon Sung
Preoperative embolization in patients with metastatic spinal cord compression: mandatory or optional?
title Preoperative embolization in patients with metastatic spinal cord compression: mandatory or optional?
title_full Preoperative embolization in patients with metastatic spinal cord compression: mandatory or optional?
title_fullStr Preoperative embolization in patients with metastatic spinal cord compression: mandatory or optional?
title_full_unstemmed Preoperative embolization in patients with metastatic spinal cord compression: mandatory or optional?
title_short Preoperative embolization in patients with metastatic spinal cord compression: mandatory or optional?
title_sort preoperative embolization in patients with metastatic spinal cord compression: mandatory or optional?
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5307698/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28193282
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-017-1118-3
work_keys_str_mv AT hongchulgie preoperativeembolizationinpatientswithmetastaticspinalcordcompressionmandatoryoroptional
AT chojaehwan preoperativeembolizationinpatientswithmetastaticspinalcordcompressionmandatoryoroptional
AT suhdaechul preoperativeembolizationinpatientswithmetastaticspinalcordcompressionmandatoryoroptional
AT hwangchangju preoperativeembolizationinpatientswithmetastaticspinalcordcompressionmandatoryoroptional
AT leedongho preoperativeembolizationinpatientswithmetastaticspinalcordcompressionmandatoryoroptional
AT leechoonsung preoperativeembolizationinpatientswithmetastaticspinalcordcompressionmandatoryoroptional