Cargando…

Accreditation in general practice in Denmark: study protocol for a cluster-randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Accreditation is used increasingly in health systems worldwide. However, there is a lack of evidence on the effects of accreditation, particularly in general practice. In 2016 a mandatory accreditation scheme was initiated in Denmark, and during a 3-year period all practices, as default,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Andersen, Merethe K., Pedersen, Line B., Siersma, Volkert, Bro, Flemming, Reventlow, Susanne, Søndergaard, Jens, Kousgaard, Marius Brostrøm, Waldorff, Frans B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5307771/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28193288
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-1818-6
_version_ 1782507428376477696
author Andersen, Merethe K.
Pedersen, Line B.
Siersma, Volkert
Bro, Flemming
Reventlow, Susanne
Søndergaard, Jens
Kousgaard, Marius Brostrøm
Waldorff, Frans B.
author_facet Andersen, Merethe K.
Pedersen, Line B.
Siersma, Volkert
Bro, Flemming
Reventlow, Susanne
Søndergaard, Jens
Kousgaard, Marius Brostrøm
Waldorff, Frans B.
author_sort Andersen, Merethe K.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Accreditation is used increasingly in health systems worldwide. However, there is a lack of evidence on the effects of accreditation, particularly in general practice. In 2016 a mandatory accreditation scheme was initiated in Denmark, and during a 3-year period all practices, as default, should undergo accreditation according to the Danish Healthcare Quality Program. The aim of this study is primarily to evaluate the effects of a mandatory accreditation scheme. METHODS/DESIGN: The study is conducted as a cluster-randomized controlled trial among 1252 practices (clusters) with 2211 general practitioners in Denmark. Practices allocated to accreditation in 2016 serve as the intervention group, and practices allocated to accreditation in 2018 serve as controls. The selected outcomes should meet the following criteria: (1) a high degree of clinical relevance; (2) the possibility to assess changes due to accreditation; (3) availability of data from registers with no self-reporting data. The primary outcome is the number of prescribed drugs in patients older than 65 years. Secondary outcomes are changes in outcomes related to other perspectives of safe medication, good clinical practice and mortality. All outcomes relate to quality indicators included in the Danish Healthcare Quality Program, which is based on general principles for accreditation. DISCUSSION: The consequences of accreditation and standard-setting processes are generally under-researched, particularly in general practice. This is the largest study in general practice with a randomized implementation approach to evaluate the clinical effects of a nation-wide mandatory accreditation scheme in general practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02762240. Registered on 24 May 2016. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-017-1818-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5307771
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53077712017-02-22 Accreditation in general practice in Denmark: study protocol for a cluster-randomized controlled trial Andersen, Merethe K. Pedersen, Line B. Siersma, Volkert Bro, Flemming Reventlow, Susanne Søndergaard, Jens Kousgaard, Marius Brostrøm Waldorff, Frans B. Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Accreditation is used increasingly in health systems worldwide. However, there is a lack of evidence on the effects of accreditation, particularly in general practice. In 2016 a mandatory accreditation scheme was initiated in Denmark, and during a 3-year period all practices, as default, should undergo accreditation according to the Danish Healthcare Quality Program. The aim of this study is primarily to evaluate the effects of a mandatory accreditation scheme. METHODS/DESIGN: The study is conducted as a cluster-randomized controlled trial among 1252 practices (clusters) with 2211 general practitioners in Denmark. Practices allocated to accreditation in 2016 serve as the intervention group, and practices allocated to accreditation in 2018 serve as controls. The selected outcomes should meet the following criteria: (1) a high degree of clinical relevance; (2) the possibility to assess changes due to accreditation; (3) availability of data from registers with no self-reporting data. The primary outcome is the number of prescribed drugs in patients older than 65 years. Secondary outcomes are changes in outcomes related to other perspectives of safe medication, good clinical practice and mortality. All outcomes relate to quality indicators included in the Danish Healthcare Quality Program, which is based on general principles for accreditation. DISCUSSION: The consequences of accreditation and standard-setting processes are generally under-researched, particularly in general practice. This is the largest study in general practice with a randomized implementation approach to evaluate the clinical effects of a nation-wide mandatory accreditation scheme in general practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02762240. Registered on 24 May 2016. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-017-1818-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-02-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5307771/ /pubmed/28193288 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-1818-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Andersen, Merethe K.
Pedersen, Line B.
Siersma, Volkert
Bro, Flemming
Reventlow, Susanne
Søndergaard, Jens
Kousgaard, Marius Brostrøm
Waldorff, Frans B.
Accreditation in general practice in Denmark: study protocol for a cluster-randomized controlled trial
title Accreditation in general practice in Denmark: study protocol for a cluster-randomized controlled trial
title_full Accreditation in general practice in Denmark: study protocol for a cluster-randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Accreditation in general practice in Denmark: study protocol for a cluster-randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Accreditation in general practice in Denmark: study protocol for a cluster-randomized controlled trial
title_short Accreditation in general practice in Denmark: study protocol for a cluster-randomized controlled trial
title_sort accreditation in general practice in denmark: study protocol for a cluster-randomized controlled trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5307771/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28193288
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-1818-6
work_keys_str_mv AT andersenmerethek accreditationingeneralpracticeindenmarkstudyprotocolforaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT pedersenlineb accreditationingeneralpracticeindenmarkstudyprotocolforaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT siersmavolkert accreditationingeneralpracticeindenmarkstudyprotocolforaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT broflemming accreditationingeneralpracticeindenmarkstudyprotocolforaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT reventlowsusanne accreditationingeneralpracticeindenmarkstudyprotocolforaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT søndergaardjens accreditationingeneralpracticeindenmarkstudyprotocolforaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kousgaardmariusbrostrøm accreditationingeneralpracticeindenmarkstudyprotocolforaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT waldorfffransb accreditationingeneralpracticeindenmarkstudyprotocolforaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial