Cargando…
Accreditation in general practice in Denmark: study protocol for a cluster-randomized controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Accreditation is used increasingly in health systems worldwide. However, there is a lack of evidence on the effects of accreditation, particularly in general practice. In 2016 a mandatory accreditation scheme was initiated in Denmark, and during a 3-year period all practices, as default,...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5307771/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28193288 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-1818-6 |
_version_ | 1782507428376477696 |
---|---|
author | Andersen, Merethe K. Pedersen, Line B. Siersma, Volkert Bro, Flemming Reventlow, Susanne Søndergaard, Jens Kousgaard, Marius Brostrøm Waldorff, Frans B. |
author_facet | Andersen, Merethe K. Pedersen, Line B. Siersma, Volkert Bro, Flemming Reventlow, Susanne Søndergaard, Jens Kousgaard, Marius Brostrøm Waldorff, Frans B. |
author_sort | Andersen, Merethe K. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Accreditation is used increasingly in health systems worldwide. However, there is a lack of evidence on the effects of accreditation, particularly in general practice. In 2016 a mandatory accreditation scheme was initiated in Denmark, and during a 3-year period all practices, as default, should undergo accreditation according to the Danish Healthcare Quality Program. The aim of this study is primarily to evaluate the effects of a mandatory accreditation scheme. METHODS/DESIGN: The study is conducted as a cluster-randomized controlled trial among 1252 practices (clusters) with 2211 general practitioners in Denmark. Practices allocated to accreditation in 2016 serve as the intervention group, and practices allocated to accreditation in 2018 serve as controls. The selected outcomes should meet the following criteria: (1) a high degree of clinical relevance; (2) the possibility to assess changes due to accreditation; (3) availability of data from registers with no self-reporting data. The primary outcome is the number of prescribed drugs in patients older than 65 years. Secondary outcomes are changes in outcomes related to other perspectives of safe medication, good clinical practice and mortality. All outcomes relate to quality indicators included in the Danish Healthcare Quality Program, which is based on general principles for accreditation. DISCUSSION: The consequences of accreditation and standard-setting processes are generally under-researched, particularly in general practice. This is the largest study in general practice with a randomized implementation approach to evaluate the clinical effects of a nation-wide mandatory accreditation scheme in general practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02762240. Registered on 24 May 2016. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-017-1818-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5307771 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53077712017-02-22 Accreditation in general practice in Denmark: study protocol for a cluster-randomized controlled trial Andersen, Merethe K. Pedersen, Line B. Siersma, Volkert Bro, Flemming Reventlow, Susanne Søndergaard, Jens Kousgaard, Marius Brostrøm Waldorff, Frans B. Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Accreditation is used increasingly in health systems worldwide. However, there is a lack of evidence on the effects of accreditation, particularly in general practice. In 2016 a mandatory accreditation scheme was initiated in Denmark, and during a 3-year period all practices, as default, should undergo accreditation according to the Danish Healthcare Quality Program. The aim of this study is primarily to evaluate the effects of a mandatory accreditation scheme. METHODS/DESIGN: The study is conducted as a cluster-randomized controlled trial among 1252 practices (clusters) with 2211 general practitioners in Denmark. Practices allocated to accreditation in 2016 serve as the intervention group, and practices allocated to accreditation in 2018 serve as controls. The selected outcomes should meet the following criteria: (1) a high degree of clinical relevance; (2) the possibility to assess changes due to accreditation; (3) availability of data from registers with no self-reporting data. The primary outcome is the number of prescribed drugs in patients older than 65 years. Secondary outcomes are changes in outcomes related to other perspectives of safe medication, good clinical practice and mortality. All outcomes relate to quality indicators included in the Danish Healthcare Quality Program, which is based on general principles for accreditation. DISCUSSION: The consequences of accreditation and standard-setting processes are generally under-researched, particularly in general practice. This is the largest study in general practice with a randomized implementation approach to evaluate the clinical effects of a nation-wide mandatory accreditation scheme in general practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02762240. Registered on 24 May 2016. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-017-1818-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-02-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5307771/ /pubmed/28193288 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-1818-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Andersen, Merethe K. Pedersen, Line B. Siersma, Volkert Bro, Flemming Reventlow, Susanne Søndergaard, Jens Kousgaard, Marius Brostrøm Waldorff, Frans B. Accreditation in general practice in Denmark: study protocol for a cluster-randomized controlled trial |
title | Accreditation in general practice in Denmark: study protocol for a cluster-randomized controlled trial |
title_full | Accreditation in general practice in Denmark: study protocol for a cluster-randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Accreditation in general practice in Denmark: study protocol for a cluster-randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Accreditation in general practice in Denmark: study protocol for a cluster-randomized controlled trial |
title_short | Accreditation in general practice in Denmark: study protocol for a cluster-randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | accreditation in general practice in denmark: study protocol for a cluster-randomized controlled trial |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5307771/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28193288 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-1818-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT andersenmerethek accreditationingeneralpracticeindenmarkstudyprotocolforaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT pedersenlineb accreditationingeneralpracticeindenmarkstudyprotocolforaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT siersmavolkert accreditationingeneralpracticeindenmarkstudyprotocolforaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT broflemming accreditationingeneralpracticeindenmarkstudyprotocolforaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT reventlowsusanne accreditationingeneralpracticeindenmarkstudyprotocolforaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT søndergaardjens accreditationingeneralpracticeindenmarkstudyprotocolforaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT kousgaardmariusbrostrøm accreditationingeneralpracticeindenmarkstudyprotocolforaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT waldorfffransb accreditationingeneralpracticeindenmarkstudyprotocolforaclusterrandomizedcontrolledtrial |