Cargando…

A prospective randomized comparative trial between open subinguinal and loupe assisted subinguinal varicocelectome: A single center experience

INTRODUCTION: In our study, we reviewed efficacy and complication rates of open subinguinal varicocelectomy (OSV) and loupe assisted subinguinal varicocelectomy (LASV) using seminal and hormonal parameters in a prospective randomized study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We prospectively studied 60 males wi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vyas, Hari Gopal, Bhandari, Vimal, Kumar, Anup, Nanda, Biswajit, Singh, Harbinder, Bhowmick, Subroto
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5308030/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28216922
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-7796.198899
_version_ 1782507478188032000
author Vyas, Hari Gopal
Bhandari, Vimal
Kumar, Anup
Nanda, Biswajit
Singh, Harbinder
Bhowmick, Subroto
author_facet Vyas, Hari Gopal
Bhandari, Vimal
Kumar, Anup
Nanda, Biswajit
Singh, Harbinder
Bhowmick, Subroto
author_sort Vyas, Hari Gopal
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: In our study, we reviewed efficacy and complication rates of open subinguinal varicocelectomy (OSV) and loupe assisted subinguinal varicocelectomy (LASV) using seminal and hormonal parameters in a prospective randomized study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We prospectively studied 60 males with Grade 2 and Grade 3 varicocele. Thirty patients underwent OSV and the other 30 patients underwent LASV. Intra-operative and post-operative complications along with pre-operative and post-operative seminal, hormonal parameters and testicular volume were compared between the groups. RESULTS: Sperm count, motility and morphology increased significantly in both groups, but the improvement was significantly better in LASV group. (Group A – improvement in sperm count, motility and morphology by 25%, 8.5%, 10.3%, respectively and in Group B – improvement in sperm count, motility and morphology by 110%, 68.59%, 71.1%, respectively. Decrease in serum follicular stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH) and increase in serum testosterone were significant in both groups, but the improvement was significantly better in LASV group. (Group A – serum FSH and LH decreased by 17.2%, 23%, respectively and serum testosterone increased by 13.7% and in Group B – serum FSH and LH decreased by 56.9%, 56.65%, respectively and serum testosterone increased by 95.9%). The recurrence (OSV = 13.2% and LASV = 0, P = 0.01) and complication rates were significantly lower in LASV group. CONCLUSION: Our study shows that LASV is significantly better than OSV regarding efficacy and complication rates.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5308030
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53080302017-02-17 A prospective randomized comparative trial between open subinguinal and loupe assisted subinguinal varicocelectome: A single center experience Vyas, Hari Gopal Bhandari, Vimal Kumar, Anup Nanda, Biswajit Singh, Harbinder Bhowmick, Subroto Urol Ann Original Article INTRODUCTION: In our study, we reviewed efficacy and complication rates of open subinguinal varicocelectomy (OSV) and loupe assisted subinguinal varicocelectomy (LASV) using seminal and hormonal parameters in a prospective randomized study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We prospectively studied 60 males with Grade 2 and Grade 3 varicocele. Thirty patients underwent OSV and the other 30 patients underwent LASV. Intra-operative and post-operative complications along with pre-operative and post-operative seminal, hormonal parameters and testicular volume were compared between the groups. RESULTS: Sperm count, motility and morphology increased significantly in both groups, but the improvement was significantly better in LASV group. (Group A – improvement in sperm count, motility and morphology by 25%, 8.5%, 10.3%, respectively and in Group B – improvement in sperm count, motility and morphology by 110%, 68.59%, 71.1%, respectively. Decrease in serum follicular stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH) and increase in serum testosterone were significant in both groups, but the improvement was significantly better in LASV group. (Group A – serum FSH and LH decreased by 17.2%, 23%, respectively and serum testosterone increased by 13.7% and in Group B – serum FSH and LH decreased by 56.9%, 56.65%, respectively and serum testosterone increased by 95.9%). The recurrence (OSV = 13.2% and LASV = 0, P = 0.01) and complication rates were significantly lower in LASV group. CONCLUSION: Our study shows that LASV is significantly better than OSV regarding efficacy and complication rates. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5308030/ /pubmed/28216922 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-7796.198899 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Urology Annals http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Vyas, Hari Gopal
Bhandari, Vimal
Kumar, Anup
Nanda, Biswajit
Singh, Harbinder
Bhowmick, Subroto
A prospective randomized comparative trial between open subinguinal and loupe assisted subinguinal varicocelectome: A single center experience
title A prospective randomized comparative trial between open subinguinal and loupe assisted subinguinal varicocelectome: A single center experience
title_full A prospective randomized comparative trial between open subinguinal and loupe assisted subinguinal varicocelectome: A single center experience
title_fullStr A prospective randomized comparative trial between open subinguinal and loupe assisted subinguinal varicocelectome: A single center experience
title_full_unstemmed A prospective randomized comparative trial between open subinguinal and loupe assisted subinguinal varicocelectome: A single center experience
title_short A prospective randomized comparative trial between open subinguinal and loupe assisted subinguinal varicocelectome: A single center experience
title_sort prospective randomized comparative trial between open subinguinal and loupe assisted subinguinal varicocelectome: a single center experience
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5308030/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28216922
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-7796.198899
work_keys_str_mv AT vyasharigopal aprospectiverandomizedcomparativetrialbetweenopensubinguinalandloupeassistedsubinguinalvaricocelectomeasinglecenterexperience
AT bhandarivimal aprospectiverandomizedcomparativetrialbetweenopensubinguinalandloupeassistedsubinguinalvaricocelectomeasinglecenterexperience
AT kumaranup aprospectiverandomizedcomparativetrialbetweenopensubinguinalandloupeassistedsubinguinalvaricocelectomeasinglecenterexperience
AT nandabiswajit aprospectiverandomizedcomparativetrialbetweenopensubinguinalandloupeassistedsubinguinalvaricocelectomeasinglecenterexperience
AT singhharbinder aprospectiverandomizedcomparativetrialbetweenopensubinguinalandloupeassistedsubinguinalvaricocelectomeasinglecenterexperience
AT bhowmicksubroto aprospectiverandomizedcomparativetrialbetweenopensubinguinalandloupeassistedsubinguinalvaricocelectomeasinglecenterexperience
AT vyasharigopal prospectiverandomizedcomparativetrialbetweenopensubinguinalandloupeassistedsubinguinalvaricocelectomeasinglecenterexperience
AT bhandarivimal prospectiverandomizedcomparativetrialbetweenopensubinguinalandloupeassistedsubinguinalvaricocelectomeasinglecenterexperience
AT kumaranup prospectiverandomizedcomparativetrialbetweenopensubinguinalandloupeassistedsubinguinalvaricocelectomeasinglecenterexperience
AT nandabiswajit prospectiverandomizedcomparativetrialbetweenopensubinguinalandloupeassistedsubinguinalvaricocelectomeasinglecenterexperience
AT singhharbinder prospectiverandomizedcomparativetrialbetweenopensubinguinalandloupeassistedsubinguinalvaricocelectomeasinglecenterexperience
AT bhowmicksubroto prospectiverandomizedcomparativetrialbetweenopensubinguinalandloupeassistedsubinguinalvaricocelectomeasinglecenterexperience