Cargando…

The Effectiveness of a Vocational Enablement Protocol for Employees With Hearing Difficulties: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a vocational enablement protocol (VEP) on need for recovery (NFR) after work as compared with usual care for employees with hearing difficulties. In a randomized controlled trial design, 136 employees with hearing impairment were randomly as...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gussenhoven, Arjenne H. M., Anema, Johannes R., Witte, Birgit I., Goverts, S. Theo, Kramer, Sophia E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5308425/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29298599
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2331216517692304
_version_ 1782507528444182528
author Gussenhoven, Arjenne H. M.
Anema, Johannes R.
Witte, Birgit I.
Goverts, S. Theo
Kramer, Sophia E.
author_facet Gussenhoven, Arjenne H. M.
Anema, Johannes R.
Witte, Birgit I.
Goverts, S. Theo
Kramer, Sophia E.
author_sort Gussenhoven, Arjenne H. M.
collection PubMed
description The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a vocational enablement protocol (VEP) on need for recovery (NFR) after work as compared with usual care for employees with hearing difficulties. In a randomized controlled trial design, 136 employees with hearing impairment were randomly assigned to either the VEP or the control group. VEP is a multidisciplinary program integrating audiological and occupational care for individuals experiencing difficulties in the workplace due to hearing loss. The primary outcome measure was NFR. Secondary outcome measures were communication strategy subscales (e.g., self-acceptance and maladaptive behavior), distress, and self-efficacy. Data were collected using questionnaires at baseline and at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months follow-up. No significant difference over the complete follow-up period was found between the intervention and control group for NFR. However, we observed a significant difference for one of the secondary outcomes after 12 months. “Self-acceptance” increased significantly in the VEP group, compared with the controls. The mean difference between the two groups was small, being only 0.24 (95% CI [0.04, 0.44]) on a scale of 1 to 5. The results do not support the use of VEP if the aim is to reduce NFR after work at 12 months follow-up. It may be that NFR does not adequately capture what is covered in the VEP. Although marginal, the effect on self-acceptance was significant. This is encouraging given that positive effects on self-acceptance have rarely been shown for audiological rehabilitation programs. Suggestions for further improvement of the VEP are discussed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5308425
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53084252017-02-22 The Effectiveness of a Vocational Enablement Protocol for Employees With Hearing Difficulties: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial Gussenhoven, Arjenne H. M. Anema, Johannes R. Witte, Birgit I. Goverts, S. Theo Kramer, Sophia E. Trends Hear Original Article The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a vocational enablement protocol (VEP) on need for recovery (NFR) after work as compared with usual care for employees with hearing difficulties. In a randomized controlled trial design, 136 employees with hearing impairment were randomly assigned to either the VEP or the control group. VEP is a multidisciplinary program integrating audiological and occupational care for individuals experiencing difficulties in the workplace due to hearing loss. The primary outcome measure was NFR. Secondary outcome measures were communication strategy subscales (e.g., self-acceptance and maladaptive behavior), distress, and self-efficacy. Data were collected using questionnaires at baseline and at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months follow-up. No significant difference over the complete follow-up period was found between the intervention and control group for NFR. However, we observed a significant difference for one of the secondary outcomes after 12 months. “Self-acceptance” increased significantly in the VEP group, compared with the controls. The mean difference between the two groups was small, being only 0.24 (95% CI [0.04, 0.44]) on a scale of 1 to 5. The results do not support the use of VEP if the aim is to reduce NFR after work at 12 months follow-up. It may be that NFR does not adequately capture what is covered in the VEP. Although marginal, the effect on self-acceptance was significant. This is encouraging given that positive effects on self-acceptance have rarely been shown for audiological rehabilitation programs. Suggestions for further improvement of the VEP are discussed. SAGE Publications 2017-02-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5308425/ /pubmed/29298599 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2331216517692304 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Article
Gussenhoven, Arjenne H. M.
Anema, Johannes R.
Witte, Birgit I.
Goverts, S. Theo
Kramer, Sophia E.
The Effectiveness of a Vocational Enablement Protocol for Employees With Hearing Difficulties: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial
title The Effectiveness of a Vocational Enablement Protocol for Employees With Hearing Difficulties: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full The Effectiveness of a Vocational Enablement Protocol for Employees With Hearing Difficulties: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial
title_fullStr The Effectiveness of a Vocational Enablement Protocol for Employees With Hearing Difficulties: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed The Effectiveness of a Vocational Enablement Protocol for Employees With Hearing Difficulties: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial
title_short The Effectiveness of a Vocational Enablement Protocol for Employees With Hearing Difficulties: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial
title_sort effectiveness of a vocational enablement protocol for employees with hearing difficulties: results of a randomized controlled trial
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5308425/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29298599
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2331216517692304
work_keys_str_mv AT gussenhovenarjennehm theeffectivenessofavocationalenablementprotocolforemployeeswithhearingdifficultiesresultsofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT anemajohannesr theeffectivenessofavocationalenablementprotocolforemployeeswithhearingdifficultiesresultsofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT wittebirgiti theeffectivenessofavocationalenablementprotocolforemployeeswithhearingdifficultiesresultsofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT govertsstheo theeffectivenessofavocationalenablementprotocolforemployeeswithhearingdifficultiesresultsofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kramersophiae theeffectivenessofavocationalenablementprotocolforemployeeswithhearingdifficultiesresultsofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT gussenhovenarjennehm effectivenessofavocationalenablementprotocolforemployeeswithhearingdifficultiesresultsofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT anemajohannesr effectivenessofavocationalenablementprotocolforemployeeswithhearingdifficultiesresultsofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT wittebirgiti effectivenessofavocationalenablementprotocolforemployeeswithhearingdifficultiesresultsofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT govertsstheo effectivenessofavocationalenablementprotocolforemployeeswithhearingdifficultiesresultsofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kramersophiae effectivenessofavocationalenablementprotocolforemployeeswithhearingdifficultiesresultsofarandomizedcontrolledtrial