Cargando…

A comparison of three different corneal marking methods used to determine cyclotorsion in the horizontal meridian

During toric intraocular lens (IOL) implantation, surgeons must take particular care to ensure that inaccurate preoperative measurement and intraoperative misalignment do not cause unexpected postoperative residual astigmatism. This retrospective, comparative case series study aimed to analyze the r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lin, Hung-Yuan, Fang, Yi-Ting, Chuang, Ya-Jung, Karlin, Justin N, Chen, Hsin-Yang, Lin, Szu-Yuan, Lin, Pi-Jung, Chen, Ming
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5308567/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28223775
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S124580
_version_ 1782507552125222912
author Lin, Hung-Yuan
Fang, Yi-Ting
Chuang, Ya-Jung
Karlin, Justin N
Chen, Hsin-Yang
Lin, Szu-Yuan
Lin, Pi-Jung
Chen, Ming
author_facet Lin, Hung-Yuan
Fang, Yi-Ting
Chuang, Ya-Jung
Karlin, Justin N
Chen, Hsin-Yang
Lin, Szu-Yuan
Lin, Pi-Jung
Chen, Ming
author_sort Lin, Hung-Yuan
collection PubMed
description During toric intraocular lens (IOL) implantation, surgeons must take particular care to ensure that inaccurate preoperative measurement and intraoperative misalignment do not cause unexpected postoperative residual astigmatism. This retrospective, comparative case series study aimed to analyze the rotational deviation, or cyclotorsion, of three corneal marking methods: VERION digital marker (VDM; reference), horizontal slit beam marking (HSBM), and subjective direct visual marking (SDVM) on the table (using a bevel knife tip). Subjects included 81 eyes of 61 patients (mean age: 65.70±13.14 years; range: 32–91 years) undergoing scheduled cataract surgery. A preoperative reference image was taken of each eye. Subsequently, a slit lamp with the light beam turned to the horizontal meridian was used to align the seated patient’s head, and two reference marks were placed at the 3- and 9-o’clock positions of the corneal limbus using a 27-gauge needle and marking pen (HSBM). Upon transfer to the surgical table, the VDM was used to display a real-time dial scale on the patient’s eye, with the entrance of the temporal clear corneal incision (CCI) at 0° (horizontal meridian). Simultaneously, a bevel knife tip was used to create a marker based on the surgeon’s visual determination of the temporal 0° point (SDVM). We used the VDM to quantitatively evaluate the accuracy of axis alignment via deviation from the horizontal reference meridian. Compared with the reference meridian, the SDVM (−3.46°±7.32°, range: −18° to 13°) exhibited greater average relative cyclotorsion versus the HSBM (0.41°±4.92°, range: −10° to 10°). Furthermore, the mean average misalignment was significantly less in the HSBM group versus the SDVM group (t=4.179, P<0.001). The VDM is likely a reliable marking method, similar to the HSBM. In contrast, the SDVM is not entirely reliable. The VDM usage may prevent inaccurate preoperative manual marking during toric IOL implantation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5308567
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53085672017-02-21 A comparison of three different corneal marking methods used to determine cyclotorsion in the horizontal meridian Lin, Hung-Yuan Fang, Yi-Ting Chuang, Ya-Jung Karlin, Justin N Chen, Hsin-Yang Lin, Szu-Yuan Lin, Pi-Jung Chen, Ming Clin Ophthalmol Original Research During toric intraocular lens (IOL) implantation, surgeons must take particular care to ensure that inaccurate preoperative measurement and intraoperative misalignment do not cause unexpected postoperative residual astigmatism. This retrospective, comparative case series study aimed to analyze the rotational deviation, or cyclotorsion, of three corneal marking methods: VERION digital marker (VDM; reference), horizontal slit beam marking (HSBM), and subjective direct visual marking (SDVM) on the table (using a bevel knife tip). Subjects included 81 eyes of 61 patients (mean age: 65.70±13.14 years; range: 32–91 years) undergoing scheduled cataract surgery. A preoperative reference image was taken of each eye. Subsequently, a slit lamp with the light beam turned to the horizontal meridian was used to align the seated patient’s head, and two reference marks were placed at the 3- and 9-o’clock positions of the corneal limbus using a 27-gauge needle and marking pen (HSBM). Upon transfer to the surgical table, the VDM was used to display a real-time dial scale on the patient’s eye, with the entrance of the temporal clear corneal incision (CCI) at 0° (horizontal meridian). Simultaneously, a bevel knife tip was used to create a marker based on the surgeon’s visual determination of the temporal 0° point (SDVM). We used the VDM to quantitatively evaluate the accuracy of axis alignment via deviation from the horizontal reference meridian. Compared with the reference meridian, the SDVM (−3.46°±7.32°, range: −18° to 13°) exhibited greater average relative cyclotorsion versus the HSBM (0.41°±4.92°, range: −10° to 10°). Furthermore, the mean average misalignment was significantly less in the HSBM group versus the SDVM group (t=4.179, P<0.001). The VDM is likely a reliable marking method, similar to the HSBM. In contrast, the SDVM is not entirely reliable. The VDM usage may prevent inaccurate preoperative manual marking during toric IOL implantation. Dove Medical Press 2017-02-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5308567/ /pubmed/28223775 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S124580 Text en © 2017 Lin et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Lin, Hung-Yuan
Fang, Yi-Ting
Chuang, Ya-Jung
Karlin, Justin N
Chen, Hsin-Yang
Lin, Szu-Yuan
Lin, Pi-Jung
Chen, Ming
A comparison of three different corneal marking methods used to determine cyclotorsion in the horizontal meridian
title A comparison of three different corneal marking methods used to determine cyclotorsion in the horizontal meridian
title_full A comparison of three different corneal marking methods used to determine cyclotorsion in the horizontal meridian
title_fullStr A comparison of three different corneal marking methods used to determine cyclotorsion in the horizontal meridian
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of three different corneal marking methods used to determine cyclotorsion in the horizontal meridian
title_short A comparison of three different corneal marking methods used to determine cyclotorsion in the horizontal meridian
title_sort comparison of three different corneal marking methods used to determine cyclotorsion in the horizontal meridian
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5308567/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28223775
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S124580
work_keys_str_mv AT linhungyuan acomparisonofthreedifferentcornealmarkingmethodsusedtodeterminecyclotorsioninthehorizontalmeridian
AT fangyiting acomparisonofthreedifferentcornealmarkingmethodsusedtodeterminecyclotorsioninthehorizontalmeridian
AT chuangyajung acomparisonofthreedifferentcornealmarkingmethodsusedtodeterminecyclotorsioninthehorizontalmeridian
AT karlinjustinn acomparisonofthreedifferentcornealmarkingmethodsusedtodeterminecyclotorsioninthehorizontalmeridian
AT chenhsinyang acomparisonofthreedifferentcornealmarkingmethodsusedtodeterminecyclotorsioninthehorizontalmeridian
AT linszuyuan acomparisonofthreedifferentcornealmarkingmethodsusedtodeterminecyclotorsioninthehorizontalmeridian
AT linpijung acomparisonofthreedifferentcornealmarkingmethodsusedtodeterminecyclotorsioninthehorizontalmeridian
AT chenming acomparisonofthreedifferentcornealmarkingmethodsusedtodeterminecyclotorsioninthehorizontalmeridian
AT linhungyuan comparisonofthreedifferentcornealmarkingmethodsusedtodeterminecyclotorsioninthehorizontalmeridian
AT fangyiting comparisonofthreedifferentcornealmarkingmethodsusedtodeterminecyclotorsioninthehorizontalmeridian
AT chuangyajung comparisonofthreedifferentcornealmarkingmethodsusedtodeterminecyclotorsioninthehorizontalmeridian
AT karlinjustinn comparisonofthreedifferentcornealmarkingmethodsusedtodeterminecyclotorsioninthehorizontalmeridian
AT chenhsinyang comparisonofthreedifferentcornealmarkingmethodsusedtodeterminecyclotorsioninthehorizontalmeridian
AT linszuyuan comparisonofthreedifferentcornealmarkingmethodsusedtodeterminecyclotorsioninthehorizontalmeridian
AT linpijung comparisonofthreedifferentcornealmarkingmethodsusedtodeterminecyclotorsioninthehorizontalmeridian
AT chenming comparisonofthreedifferentcornealmarkingmethodsusedtodeterminecyclotorsioninthehorizontalmeridian