Cargando…
A comparison of three different corneal marking methods used to determine cyclotorsion in the horizontal meridian
During toric intraocular lens (IOL) implantation, surgeons must take particular care to ensure that inaccurate preoperative measurement and intraoperative misalignment do not cause unexpected postoperative residual astigmatism. This retrospective, comparative case series study aimed to analyze the r...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5308567/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28223775 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S124580 |
_version_ | 1782507552125222912 |
---|---|
author | Lin, Hung-Yuan Fang, Yi-Ting Chuang, Ya-Jung Karlin, Justin N Chen, Hsin-Yang Lin, Szu-Yuan Lin, Pi-Jung Chen, Ming |
author_facet | Lin, Hung-Yuan Fang, Yi-Ting Chuang, Ya-Jung Karlin, Justin N Chen, Hsin-Yang Lin, Szu-Yuan Lin, Pi-Jung Chen, Ming |
author_sort | Lin, Hung-Yuan |
collection | PubMed |
description | During toric intraocular lens (IOL) implantation, surgeons must take particular care to ensure that inaccurate preoperative measurement and intraoperative misalignment do not cause unexpected postoperative residual astigmatism. This retrospective, comparative case series study aimed to analyze the rotational deviation, or cyclotorsion, of three corneal marking methods: VERION digital marker (VDM; reference), horizontal slit beam marking (HSBM), and subjective direct visual marking (SDVM) on the table (using a bevel knife tip). Subjects included 81 eyes of 61 patients (mean age: 65.70±13.14 years; range: 32–91 years) undergoing scheduled cataract surgery. A preoperative reference image was taken of each eye. Subsequently, a slit lamp with the light beam turned to the horizontal meridian was used to align the seated patient’s head, and two reference marks were placed at the 3- and 9-o’clock positions of the corneal limbus using a 27-gauge needle and marking pen (HSBM). Upon transfer to the surgical table, the VDM was used to display a real-time dial scale on the patient’s eye, with the entrance of the temporal clear corneal incision (CCI) at 0° (horizontal meridian). Simultaneously, a bevel knife tip was used to create a marker based on the surgeon’s visual determination of the temporal 0° point (SDVM). We used the VDM to quantitatively evaluate the accuracy of axis alignment via deviation from the horizontal reference meridian. Compared with the reference meridian, the SDVM (−3.46°±7.32°, range: −18° to 13°) exhibited greater average relative cyclotorsion versus the HSBM (0.41°±4.92°, range: −10° to 10°). Furthermore, the mean average misalignment was significantly less in the HSBM group versus the SDVM group (t=4.179, P<0.001). The VDM is likely a reliable marking method, similar to the HSBM. In contrast, the SDVM is not entirely reliable. The VDM usage may prevent inaccurate preoperative manual marking during toric IOL implantation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5308567 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53085672017-02-21 A comparison of three different corneal marking methods used to determine cyclotorsion in the horizontal meridian Lin, Hung-Yuan Fang, Yi-Ting Chuang, Ya-Jung Karlin, Justin N Chen, Hsin-Yang Lin, Szu-Yuan Lin, Pi-Jung Chen, Ming Clin Ophthalmol Original Research During toric intraocular lens (IOL) implantation, surgeons must take particular care to ensure that inaccurate preoperative measurement and intraoperative misalignment do not cause unexpected postoperative residual astigmatism. This retrospective, comparative case series study aimed to analyze the rotational deviation, or cyclotorsion, of three corneal marking methods: VERION digital marker (VDM; reference), horizontal slit beam marking (HSBM), and subjective direct visual marking (SDVM) on the table (using a bevel knife tip). Subjects included 81 eyes of 61 patients (mean age: 65.70±13.14 years; range: 32–91 years) undergoing scheduled cataract surgery. A preoperative reference image was taken of each eye. Subsequently, a slit lamp with the light beam turned to the horizontal meridian was used to align the seated patient’s head, and two reference marks were placed at the 3- and 9-o’clock positions of the corneal limbus using a 27-gauge needle and marking pen (HSBM). Upon transfer to the surgical table, the VDM was used to display a real-time dial scale on the patient’s eye, with the entrance of the temporal clear corneal incision (CCI) at 0° (horizontal meridian). Simultaneously, a bevel knife tip was used to create a marker based on the surgeon’s visual determination of the temporal 0° point (SDVM). We used the VDM to quantitatively evaluate the accuracy of axis alignment via deviation from the horizontal reference meridian. Compared with the reference meridian, the SDVM (−3.46°±7.32°, range: −18° to 13°) exhibited greater average relative cyclotorsion versus the HSBM (0.41°±4.92°, range: −10° to 10°). Furthermore, the mean average misalignment was significantly less in the HSBM group versus the SDVM group (t=4.179, P<0.001). The VDM is likely a reliable marking method, similar to the HSBM. In contrast, the SDVM is not entirely reliable. The VDM usage may prevent inaccurate preoperative manual marking during toric IOL implantation. Dove Medical Press 2017-02-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5308567/ /pubmed/28223775 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S124580 Text en © 2017 Lin et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Lin, Hung-Yuan Fang, Yi-Ting Chuang, Ya-Jung Karlin, Justin N Chen, Hsin-Yang Lin, Szu-Yuan Lin, Pi-Jung Chen, Ming A comparison of three different corneal marking methods used to determine cyclotorsion in the horizontal meridian |
title | A comparison of three different corneal marking methods used to determine cyclotorsion in the horizontal meridian |
title_full | A comparison of three different corneal marking methods used to determine cyclotorsion in the horizontal meridian |
title_fullStr | A comparison of three different corneal marking methods used to determine cyclotorsion in the horizontal meridian |
title_full_unstemmed | A comparison of three different corneal marking methods used to determine cyclotorsion in the horizontal meridian |
title_short | A comparison of three different corneal marking methods used to determine cyclotorsion in the horizontal meridian |
title_sort | comparison of three different corneal marking methods used to determine cyclotorsion in the horizontal meridian |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5308567/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28223775 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S124580 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT linhungyuan acomparisonofthreedifferentcornealmarkingmethodsusedtodeterminecyclotorsioninthehorizontalmeridian AT fangyiting acomparisonofthreedifferentcornealmarkingmethodsusedtodeterminecyclotorsioninthehorizontalmeridian AT chuangyajung acomparisonofthreedifferentcornealmarkingmethodsusedtodeterminecyclotorsioninthehorizontalmeridian AT karlinjustinn acomparisonofthreedifferentcornealmarkingmethodsusedtodeterminecyclotorsioninthehorizontalmeridian AT chenhsinyang acomparisonofthreedifferentcornealmarkingmethodsusedtodeterminecyclotorsioninthehorizontalmeridian AT linszuyuan acomparisonofthreedifferentcornealmarkingmethodsusedtodeterminecyclotorsioninthehorizontalmeridian AT linpijung acomparisonofthreedifferentcornealmarkingmethodsusedtodeterminecyclotorsioninthehorizontalmeridian AT chenming acomparisonofthreedifferentcornealmarkingmethodsusedtodeterminecyclotorsioninthehorizontalmeridian AT linhungyuan comparisonofthreedifferentcornealmarkingmethodsusedtodeterminecyclotorsioninthehorizontalmeridian AT fangyiting comparisonofthreedifferentcornealmarkingmethodsusedtodeterminecyclotorsioninthehorizontalmeridian AT chuangyajung comparisonofthreedifferentcornealmarkingmethodsusedtodeterminecyclotorsioninthehorizontalmeridian AT karlinjustinn comparisonofthreedifferentcornealmarkingmethodsusedtodeterminecyclotorsioninthehorizontalmeridian AT chenhsinyang comparisonofthreedifferentcornealmarkingmethodsusedtodeterminecyclotorsioninthehorizontalmeridian AT linszuyuan comparisonofthreedifferentcornealmarkingmethodsusedtodeterminecyclotorsioninthehorizontalmeridian AT linpijung comparisonofthreedifferentcornealmarkingmethodsusedtodeterminecyclotorsioninthehorizontalmeridian AT chenming comparisonofthreedifferentcornealmarkingmethodsusedtodeterminecyclotorsioninthehorizontalmeridian |