Cargando…

Personalized medicine enrichment design for DHA supplementation clinical trial

Personalized medicine aims to match patient subpopulation to the most beneficial treatment. The purpose of this study is to design a prospective clinical trial in which we hope to achieve the highest level of confirmation in identifying and making treatment recommendations for subgroups, when the ri...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lei, Yang, Mayo, Matthew S., Carlson, Susan E., Gajewski, Byron J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5308793/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28217765
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conctc.2017.01.002
_version_ 1782507601573969920
author Lei, Yang
Mayo, Matthew S.
Carlson, Susan E.
Gajewski, Byron J.
author_facet Lei, Yang
Mayo, Matthew S.
Carlson, Susan E.
Gajewski, Byron J.
author_sort Lei, Yang
collection PubMed
description Personalized medicine aims to match patient subpopulation to the most beneficial treatment. The purpose of this study is to design a prospective clinical trial in which we hope to achieve the highest level of confirmation in identifying and making treatment recommendations for subgroups, when the risk levels in the control arm can be ordered. This study was motivated by our goal to identify subgroups in a DHA (docosahexaenoic acid) supplementation trial to reduce preterm birth (gestational age<37 weeks) rate. We performed a meta-analysis to obtain informative prior distributions and simulated operating characteristics to ensure that overall Type I error rate was close to 0.05 in designs with three different models: independent, hierarchical, and dynamic linear models. We performed simulations and sensitivity analysis to examine the subgroup power of models and compared results to a chi-square test. We performed simulations under two hypotheses: a large overall treatment effect and a small overall treatment effect. Within each hypothesis, we designed three different subgroup effects scenarios where resulting subgroup rates are linear, flat, or nonlinear. When the resulting subgroup rates are linear or flat, dynamic linear model appeared to be the most powerful method to identify the subgroups with a treatment effect. It also outperformed other methods when resulting subgroup rates are nonlinear and the overall treatment effect is big. When the resulting subgroup rates are nonlinear and the overall treatment effect is small, hierarchical model and chi-square test did better. Compared to independent and hierarchical models, dynamic linear model tends to be relatively robust and powerful when the control arm has ordinal risk subgroups.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5308793
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53087932018-03-01 Personalized medicine enrichment design for DHA supplementation clinical trial Lei, Yang Mayo, Matthew S. Carlson, Susan E. Gajewski, Byron J. Contemp Clin Trials Commun Article Personalized medicine aims to match patient subpopulation to the most beneficial treatment. The purpose of this study is to design a prospective clinical trial in which we hope to achieve the highest level of confirmation in identifying and making treatment recommendations for subgroups, when the risk levels in the control arm can be ordered. This study was motivated by our goal to identify subgroups in a DHA (docosahexaenoic acid) supplementation trial to reduce preterm birth (gestational age<37 weeks) rate. We performed a meta-analysis to obtain informative prior distributions and simulated operating characteristics to ensure that overall Type I error rate was close to 0.05 in designs with three different models: independent, hierarchical, and dynamic linear models. We performed simulations and sensitivity analysis to examine the subgroup power of models and compared results to a chi-square test. We performed simulations under two hypotheses: a large overall treatment effect and a small overall treatment effect. Within each hypothesis, we designed three different subgroup effects scenarios where resulting subgroup rates are linear, flat, or nonlinear. When the resulting subgroup rates are linear or flat, dynamic linear model appeared to be the most powerful method to identify the subgroups with a treatment effect. It also outperformed other methods when resulting subgroup rates are nonlinear and the overall treatment effect is big. When the resulting subgroup rates are nonlinear and the overall treatment effect is small, hierarchical model and chi-square test did better. Compared to independent and hierarchical models, dynamic linear model tends to be relatively robust and powerful when the control arm has ordinal risk subgroups. Elsevier 2017-01-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5308793/ /pubmed/28217765 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conctc.2017.01.002 Text en © 2017 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Lei, Yang
Mayo, Matthew S.
Carlson, Susan E.
Gajewski, Byron J.
Personalized medicine enrichment design for DHA supplementation clinical trial
title Personalized medicine enrichment design for DHA supplementation clinical trial
title_full Personalized medicine enrichment design for DHA supplementation clinical trial
title_fullStr Personalized medicine enrichment design for DHA supplementation clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Personalized medicine enrichment design for DHA supplementation clinical trial
title_short Personalized medicine enrichment design for DHA supplementation clinical trial
title_sort personalized medicine enrichment design for dha supplementation clinical trial
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5308793/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28217765
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conctc.2017.01.002
work_keys_str_mv AT leiyang personalizedmedicineenrichmentdesignfordhasupplementationclinicaltrial
AT mayomatthews personalizedmedicineenrichmentdesignfordhasupplementationclinicaltrial
AT carlsonsusane personalizedmedicineenrichmentdesignfordhasupplementationclinicaltrial
AT gajewskibyronj personalizedmedicineenrichmentdesignfordhasupplementationclinicaltrial