Cargando…

Associations between the probabilities of frequency-specific hearing loss and unaided APHAB scores

The Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB) questionnaire reports subjective hearing impairments in four typical conditions. We investigated the association between the frequency-specific probability of hearing loss and scores from the unaided APHAB (APHAB(u)) to determine whether the APH...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Löhler, J., Wollenberg, B., Schlattmann, P., Hoang, N., Schönweiler, R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5309283/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27858146
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-016-4385-7
_version_ 1782507682617360384
author Löhler, J.
Wollenberg, B.
Schlattmann, P.
Hoang, N.
Schönweiler, R.
author_facet Löhler, J.
Wollenberg, B.
Schlattmann, P.
Hoang, N.
Schönweiler, R.
author_sort Löhler, J.
collection PubMed
description The Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB) questionnaire reports subjective hearing impairments in four typical conditions. We investigated the association between the frequency-specific probability of hearing loss and scores from the unaided APHAB (APHAB(u)) to determine whether the APHAB(u) could be useful in primary diagnoses of hearing loss, in addition to pure tone and speech audiometry. This retrospective study included database records from 6558 patients (average age 69.0 years). We employed a multivariate generalised linear mixed model to analyse the probabilities of hearing losses (severity range 20–75 dB, evaluated in 5-dB steps), measured at different frequencies (0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0, and 8.0 kHz), for nearly all combinations of APHAB(u) subscale scores (subscale scores from 20 to 80%, evaluated in steps of 5%). We calculated the probability of hearing loss for 28,561 different combinations of APHAB(u) subscale scores (results available online). In general, the probability of hearing loss was positively associated with the combined APHAB(u) score (i.e. increasing probability with increasing scores). However, this association was negative at one frequency (8 kHz). The highest probabilities were for a hearing loss of 45 dB at test frequency 2.0 kHz, but with a wide spreading. We showed that the APHAB(u) subscale scores were associated with the probability of hearing loss measured with audiometry. This information could enrich the expert’s evaluation of the subject’s hearing loss, and it might help resolve suspicious cases of aggravation. The 0.5 and 8.0 kHz frequencies influenced hearing loss less than the frequencies in-between, and 2.0 kHz was most influential on intermediate degree hearing loss (around 45 dB), which corresponded to the frequency-dependence of speech intelligibility measured with speech audiometry. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00405-016-4385-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5309283
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53092832017-02-28 Associations between the probabilities of frequency-specific hearing loss and unaided APHAB scores Löhler, J. Wollenberg, B. Schlattmann, P. Hoang, N. Schönweiler, R. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Otology The Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB) questionnaire reports subjective hearing impairments in four typical conditions. We investigated the association between the frequency-specific probability of hearing loss and scores from the unaided APHAB (APHAB(u)) to determine whether the APHAB(u) could be useful in primary diagnoses of hearing loss, in addition to pure tone and speech audiometry. This retrospective study included database records from 6558 patients (average age 69.0 years). We employed a multivariate generalised linear mixed model to analyse the probabilities of hearing losses (severity range 20–75 dB, evaluated in 5-dB steps), measured at different frequencies (0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0, and 8.0 kHz), for nearly all combinations of APHAB(u) subscale scores (subscale scores from 20 to 80%, evaluated in steps of 5%). We calculated the probability of hearing loss for 28,561 different combinations of APHAB(u) subscale scores (results available online). In general, the probability of hearing loss was positively associated with the combined APHAB(u) score (i.e. increasing probability with increasing scores). However, this association was negative at one frequency (8 kHz). The highest probabilities were for a hearing loss of 45 dB at test frequency 2.0 kHz, but with a wide spreading. We showed that the APHAB(u) subscale scores were associated with the probability of hearing loss measured with audiometry. This information could enrich the expert’s evaluation of the subject’s hearing loss, and it might help resolve suspicious cases of aggravation. The 0.5 and 8.0 kHz frequencies influenced hearing loss less than the frequencies in-between, and 2.0 kHz was most influential on intermediate degree hearing loss (around 45 dB), which corresponded to the frequency-dependence of speech intelligibility measured with speech audiometry. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00405-016-4385-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2016-11-17 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5309283/ /pubmed/27858146 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-016-4385-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Otology
Löhler, J.
Wollenberg, B.
Schlattmann, P.
Hoang, N.
Schönweiler, R.
Associations between the probabilities of frequency-specific hearing loss and unaided APHAB scores
title Associations between the probabilities of frequency-specific hearing loss and unaided APHAB scores
title_full Associations between the probabilities of frequency-specific hearing loss and unaided APHAB scores
title_fullStr Associations between the probabilities of frequency-specific hearing loss and unaided APHAB scores
title_full_unstemmed Associations between the probabilities of frequency-specific hearing loss and unaided APHAB scores
title_short Associations between the probabilities of frequency-specific hearing loss and unaided APHAB scores
title_sort associations between the probabilities of frequency-specific hearing loss and unaided aphab scores
topic Otology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5309283/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27858146
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-016-4385-7
work_keys_str_mv AT lohlerj associationsbetweentheprobabilitiesoffrequencyspecifichearinglossandunaidedaphabscores
AT wollenbergb associationsbetweentheprobabilitiesoffrequencyspecifichearinglossandunaidedaphabscores
AT schlattmannp associationsbetweentheprobabilitiesoffrequencyspecifichearinglossandunaidedaphabscores
AT hoangn associationsbetweentheprobabilitiesoffrequencyspecifichearinglossandunaidedaphabscores
AT schonweilerr associationsbetweentheprobabilitiesoffrequencyspecifichearinglossandunaidedaphabscores