Cargando…
Associations between the probabilities of frequency-specific hearing loss and unaided APHAB scores
The Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB) questionnaire reports subjective hearing impairments in four typical conditions. We investigated the association between the frequency-specific probability of hearing loss and scores from the unaided APHAB (APHAB(u)) to determine whether the APH...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5309283/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27858146 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-016-4385-7 |
_version_ | 1782507682617360384 |
---|---|
author | Löhler, J. Wollenberg, B. Schlattmann, P. Hoang, N. Schönweiler, R. |
author_facet | Löhler, J. Wollenberg, B. Schlattmann, P. Hoang, N. Schönweiler, R. |
author_sort | Löhler, J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB) questionnaire reports subjective hearing impairments in four typical conditions. We investigated the association between the frequency-specific probability of hearing loss and scores from the unaided APHAB (APHAB(u)) to determine whether the APHAB(u) could be useful in primary diagnoses of hearing loss, in addition to pure tone and speech audiometry. This retrospective study included database records from 6558 patients (average age 69.0 years). We employed a multivariate generalised linear mixed model to analyse the probabilities of hearing losses (severity range 20–75 dB, evaluated in 5-dB steps), measured at different frequencies (0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0, and 8.0 kHz), for nearly all combinations of APHAB(u) subscale scores (subscale scores from 20 to 80%, evaluated in steps of 5%). We calculated the probability of hearing loss for 28,561 different combinations of APHAB(u) subscale scores (results available online). In general, the probability of hearing loss was positively associated with the combined APHAB(u) score (i.e. increasing probability with increasing scores). However, this association was negative at one frequency (8 kHz). The highest probabilities were for a hearing loss of 45 dB at test frequency 2.0 kHz, but with a wide spreading. We showed that the APHAB(u) subscale scores were associated with the probability of hearing loss measured with audiometry. This information could enrich the expert’s evaluation of the subject’s hearing loss, and it might help resolve suspicious cases of aggravation. The 0.5 and 8.0 kHz frequencies influenced hearing loss less than the frequencies in-between, and 2.0 kHz was most influential on intermediate degree hearing loss (around 45 dB), which corresponded to the frequency-dependence of speech intelligibility measured with speech audiometry. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00405-016-4385-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5309283 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53092832017-02-28 Associations between the probabilities of frequency-specific hearing loss and unaided APHAB scores Löhler, J. Wollenberg, B. Schlattmann, P. Hoang, N. Schönweiler, R. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Otology The Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB) questionnaire reports subjective hearing impairments in four typical conditions. We investigated the association between the frequency-specific probability of hearing loss and scores from the unaided APHAB (APHAB(u)) to determine whether the APHAB(u) could be useful in primary diagnoses of hearing loss, in addition to pure tone and speech audiometry. This retrospective study included database records from 6558 patients (average age 69.0 years). We employed a multivariate generalised linear mixed model to analyse the probabilities of hearing losses (severity range 20–75 dB, evaluated in 5-dB steps), measured at different frequencies (0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0, and 8.0 kHz), for nearly all combinations of APHAB(u) subscale scores (subscale scores from 20 to 80%, evaluated in steps of 5%). We calculated the probability of hearing loss for 28,561 different combinations of APHAB(u) subscale scores (results available online). In general, the probability of hearing loss was positively associated with the combined APHAB(u) score (i.e. increasing probability with increasing scores). However, this association was negative at one frequency (8 kHz). The highest probabilities were for a hearing loss of 45 dB at test frequency 2.0 kHz, but with a wide spreading. We showed that the APHAB(u) subscale scores were associated with the probability of hearing loss measured with audiometry. This information could enrich the expert’s evaluation of the subject’s hearing loss, and it might help resolve suspicious cases of aggravation. The 0.5 and 8.0 kHz frequencies influenced hearing loss less than the frequencies in-between, and 2.0 kHz was most influential on intermediate degree hearing loss (around 45 dB), which corresponded to the frequency-dependence of speech intelligibility measured with speech audiometry. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00405-016-4385-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2016-11-17 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5309283/ /pubmed/27858146 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-016-4385-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Otology Löhler, J. Wollenberg, B. Schlattmann, P. Hoang, N. Schönweiler, R. Associations between the probabilities of frequency-specific hearing loss and unaided APHAB scores |
title | Associations between the probabilities of frequency-specific hearing loss and unaided APHAB scores |
title_full | Associations between the probabilities of frequency-specific hearing loss and unaided APHAB scores |
title_fullStr | Associations between the probabilities of frequency-specific hearing loss and unaided APHAB scores |
title_full_unstemmed | Associations between the probabilities of frequency-specific hearing loss and unaided APHAB scores |
title_short | Associations between the probabilities of frequency-specific hearing loss and unaided APHAB scores |
title_sort | associations between the probabilities of frequency-specific hearing loss and unaided aphab scores |
topic | Otology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5309283/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27858146 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-016-4385-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lohlerj associationsbetweentheprobabilitiesoffrequencyspecifichearinglossandunaidedaphabscores AT wollenbergb associationsbetweentheprobabilitiesoffrequencyspecifichearinglossandunaidedaphabscores AT schlattmannp associationsbetweentheprobabilitiesoffrequencyspecifichearinglossandunaidedaphabscores AT hoangn associationsbetweentheprobabilitiesoffrequencyspecifichearinglossandunaidedaphabscores AT schonweilerr associationsbetweentheprobabilitiesoffrequencyspecifichearinglossandunaidedaphabscores |