Cargando…

Is there any Correlation between Magnetic Resonance Imaging Features of Breast Lesions of BIRADS Category 4 with Histopathologic Results?

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the correlation of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features of breast lesions of Breast Imaging Reporting and Database System (BI-RADS) category 4 with histopathologic results. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a prospective study between December 2013 and April 2015, patients with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Farghadani, Maryam, Soofi, Ghazale Jamalipoor, Sarrami, Amir Hossein
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5309441/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28217652
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2277-9175.199258
_version_ 1782507705566494720
author Farghadani, Maryam
Soofi, Ghazale Jamalipoor
Sarrami, Amir Hossein
author_facet Farghadani, Maryam
Soofi, Ghazale Jamalipoor
Sarrami, Amir Hossein
author_sort Farghadani, Maryam
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To evaluate the correlation of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features of breast lesions of Breast Imaging Reporting and Database System (BI-RADS) category 4 with histopathologic results. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a prospective study between December 2013 and April 2015, patients with suspicious mammographic and/or ultrasound findings referred for Breast MRI were evaluated. Patients with lesions of BI-RADS category 4 were enrolled with a written informed consent. In each patient, mass lesion (ML) or nonmass lesion (NML) was determined, and different characteristics of the lesions were recorded. A follow-up program was taken with mean 3–12 months. Patients who underwent core needle biopsy or open biopsy were summoned. RESULTS: Seventy-eight females aged 24–67 years (mean 43.1 ± 8.8) met the inclusion criteria and had adequate samples for histopathologic study. Twenty-nine (37.2%) patients had ML and 49 (62.8%) patients had NML. Tissue sampling in 63 (80.7%) patients was through core needle biopsy and in 15 (19.2%) patients through surgery. A wide spectrum of benign and malignant pathologic diagnoses was seen. In statistical analysis, none of the MRI features has a significant correlation with any specific histopathologic diagnosis (P = 0.185). However, the relation between the MRI category (ML or NML) and pathology results was significant at level of 0.1 (P = 0.06). CONCLUSION: This study showed that a wide spectrum of histopathologic results is seen in BI-RADS category 4. However, in this sample volume, none of the MRI features in this BI-RADS category has a significant correlation with any specific histopathologic diagnosis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5309441
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53094412017-02-17 Is there any Correlation between Magnetic Resonance Imaging Features of Breast Lesions of BIRADS Category 4 with Histopathologic Results? Farghadani, Maryam Soofi, Ghazale Jamalipoor Sarrami, Amir Hossein Adv Biomed Res Original Article BACKGROUND: To evaluate the correlation of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features of breast lesions of Breast Imaging Reporting and Database System (BI-RADS) category 4 with histopathologic results. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a prospective study between December 2013 and April 2015, patients with suspicious mammographic and/or ultrasound findings referred for Breast MRI were evaluated. Patients with lesions of BI-RADS category 4 were enrolled with a written informed consent. In each patient, mass lesion (ML) or nonmass lesion (NML) was determined, and different characteristics of the lesions were recorded. A follow-up program was taken with mean 3–12 months. Patients who underwent core needle biopsy or open biopsy were summoned. RESULTS: Seventy-eight females aged 24–67 years (mean 43.1 ± 8.8) met the inclusion criteria and had adequate samples for histopathologic study. Twenty-nine (37.2%) patients had ML and 49 (62.8%) patients had NML. Tissue sampling in 63 (80.7%) patients was through core needle biopsy and in 15 (19.2%) patients through surgery. A wide spectrum of benign and malignant pathologic diagnoses was seen. In statistical analysis, none of the MRI features has a significant correlation with any specific histopathologic diagnosis (P = 0.185). However, the relation between the MRI category (ML or NML) and pathology results was significant at level of 0.1 (P = 0.06). CONCLUSION: This study showed that a wide spectrum of histopathologic results is seen in BI-RADS category 4. However, in this sample volume, none of the MRI features in this BI-RADS category has a significant correlation with any specific histopathologic diagnosis. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC5309441/ /pubmed/28217652 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2277-9175.199258 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Advanced Biomedical Research http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Farghadani, Maryam
Soofi, Ghazale Jamalipoor
Sarrami, Amir Hossein
Is there any Correlation between Magnetic Resonance Imaging Features of Breast Lesions of BIRADS Category 4 with Histopathologic Results?
title Is there any Correlation between Magnetic Resonance Imaging Features of Breast Lesions of BIRADS Category 4 with Histopathologic Results?
title_full Is there any Correlation between Magnetic Resonance Imaging Features of Breast Lesions of BIRADS Category 4 with Histopathologic Results?
title_fullStr Is there any Correlation between Magnetic Resonance Imaging Features of Breast Lesions of BIRADS Category 4 with Histopathologic Results?
title_full_unstemmed Is there any Correlation between Magnetic Resonance Imaging Features of Breast Lesions of BIRADS Category 4 with Histopathologic Results?
title_short Is there any Correlation between Magnetic Resonance Imaging Features of Breast Lesions of BIRADS Category 4 with Histopathologic Results?
title_sort is there any correlation between magnetic resonance imaging features of breast lesions of birads category 4 with histopathologic results?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5309441/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28217652
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2277-9175.199258
work_keys_str_mv AT farghadanimaryam isthereanycorrelationbetweenmagneticresonanceimagingfeaturesofbreastlesionsofbiradscategory4withhistopathologicresults
AT soofighazalejamalipoor isthereanycorrelationbetweenmagneticresonanceimagingfeaturesofbreastlesionsofbiradscategory4withhistopathologicresults
AT sarramiamirhossein isthereanycorrelationbetweenmagneticresonanceimagingfeaturesofbreastlesionsofbiradscategory4withhistopathologicresults