Cargando…
Monitoring training response in young Friesian dressage horses using two different standardised exercise tests (SETs)
BACKGROUND: Most Friesian horses reach their anaerobic threshold during a standardized exercise test (SET) which requires lower intensity exercise than daily routine training. Aim: to study strengths and weaknesses of an alternative SET-protocol. Two different SETs (SETA and SETB) were applied durin...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5309987/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28196500 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-017-0969-8 |
_version_ | 1782507799009296384 |
---|---|
author | de Bruijn, Cornelis Marinus Houterman, Willem Ploeg, Margreet Ducro, Bart Boshuizen, Berit Goethals, Klaartje Verdegaal, Elisabeth-Lidwien Delesalle, Catherine |
author_facet | de Bruijn, Cornelis Marinus Houterman, Willem Ploeg, Margreet Ducro, Bart Boshuizen, Berit Goethals, Klaartje Verdegaal, Elisabeth-Lidwien Delesalle, Catherine |
author_sort | de Bruijn, Cornelis Marinus |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Most Friesian horses reach their anaerobic threshold during a standardized exercise test (SET) which requires lower intensity exercise than daily routine training. Aim: to study strengths and weaknesses of an alternative SET-protocol. Two different SETs (SETA and SETB) were applied during a 2 month training period of 9 young Friesian dressage horses. SETB alternated short episodes of canter with trot and walk, lacking long episodes of cantering, as applied in SETA. Following parameters were monitored: blood lactic acid (BLA) after cantering, average heart rate (HR) in trot and maximum HR in canter. HR and BLA of SETA and SETB were analyzed using a paired two-sided T-test and Spearman Correlation-coefficient (p* < 0.05). RESULTS: BLA after cantering was significantly higher in SETA compared to SETB and maximum HR in canter was significantly higher in SETA compared to SETB. The majority of horses showed a significant training response based upon longitudinal follow-up of BLA. Horses with the lowest fitness at start, displayed the largest training response. BLA was significantly lower in week 8 compared to week 0, in both SETA and SETB. A significantly decreased BLA level after cantering was noticeable in week 6 in SETA, whereas in SETB only as of week 8. In SETA a very strong correlation for BLA and average HR at trot was found throughout the entire training period, not for canter. CONCLUSIONS: Young Friesian horses do reach their anaerobic threshold during a SET which requires lower intensity than daily routine training. Therefore close monitoring throughout training is warranted. Longitudinal follow up of BLA and not of HR is suitable to assess training response. In the current study, horses that started with the lowest fitness level, showed the largest training response. During training monitoring HR in trot rather than in canter is advised. SETB is best suited as a template for daily training in the aerobic window. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12917-017-0969-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5309987 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53099872017-03-13 Monitoring training response in young Friesian dressage horses using two different standardised exercise tests (SETs) de Bruijn, Cornelis Marinus Houterman, Willem Ploeg, Margreet Ducro, Bart Boshuizen, Berit Goethals, Klaartje Verdegaal, Elisabeth-Lidwien Delesalle, Catherine BMC Vet Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Most Friesian horses reach their anaerobic threshold during a standardized exercise test (SET) which requires lower intensity exercise than daily routine training. Aim: to study strengths and weaknesses of an alternative SET-protocol. Two different SETs (SETA and SETB) were applied during a 2 month training period of 9 young Friesian dressage horses. SETB alternated short episodes of canter with trot and walk, lacking long episodes of cantering, as applied in SETA. Following parameters were monitored: blood lactic acid (BLA) after cantering, average heart rate (HR) in trot and maximum HR in canter. HR and BLA of SETA and SETB were analyzed using a paired two-sided T-test and Spearman Correlation-coefficient (p* < 0.05). RESULTS: BLA after cantering was significantly higher in SETA compared to SETB and maximum HR in canter was significantly higher in SETA compared to SETB. The majority of horses showed a significant training response based upon longitudinal follow-up of BLA. Horses with the lowest fitness at start, displayed the largest training response. BLA was significantly lower in week 8 compared to week 0, in both SETA and SETB. A significantly decreased BLA level after cantering was noticeable in week 6 in SETA, whereas in SETB only as of week 8. In SETA a very strong correlation for BLA and average HR at trot was found throughout the entire training period, not for canter. CONCLUSIONS: Young Friesian horses do reach their anaerobic threshold during a SET which requires lower intensity than daily routine training. Therefore close monitoring throughout training is warranted. Longitudinal follow up of BLA and not of HR is suitable to assess training response. In the current study, horses that started with the lowest fitness level, showed the largest training response. During training monitoring HR in trot rather than in canter is advised. SETB is best suited as a template for daily training in the aerobic window. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12917-017-0969-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-02-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5309987/ /pubmed/28196500 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-017-0969-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article de Bruijn, Cornelis Marinus Houterman, Willem Ploeg, Margreet Ducro, Bart Boshuizen, Berit Goethals, Klaartje Verdegaal, Elisabeth-Lidwien Delesalle, Catherine Monitoring training response in young Friesian dressage horses using two different standardised exercise tests (SETs) |
title | Monitoring training response in young Friesian dressage horses using two different standardised exercise tests (SETs) |
title_full | Monitoring training response in young Friesian dressage horses using two different standardised exercise tests (SETs) |
title_fullStr | Monitoring training response in young Friesian dressage horses using two different standardised exercise tests (SETs) |
title_full_unstemmed | Monitoring training response in young Friesian dressage horses using two different standardised exercise tests (SETs) |
title_short | Monitoring training response in young Friesian dressage horses using two different standardised exercise tests (SETs) |
title_sort | monitoring training response in young friesian dressage horses using two different standardised exercise tests (sets) |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5309987/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28196500 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-017-0969-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT debruijncornelismarinus monitoringtrainingresponseinyoungfriesiandressagehorsesusingtwodifferentstandardisedexercisetestssets AT houtermanwillem monitoringtrainingresponseinyoungfriesiandressagehorsesusingtwodifferentstandardisedexercisetestssets AT ploegmargreet monitoringtrainingresponseinyoungfriesiandressagehorsesusingtwodifferentstandardisedexercisetestssets AT ducrobart monitoringtrainingresponseinyoungfriesiandressagehorsesusingtwodifferentstandardisedexercisetestssets AT boshuizenberit monitoringtrainingresponseinyoungfriesiandressagehorsesusingtwodifferentstandardisedexercisetestssets AT goethalsklaartje monitoringtrainingresponseinyoungfriesiandressagehorsesusingtwodifferentstandardisedexercisetestssets AT verdegaalelisabethlidwien monitoringtrainingresponseinyoungfriesiandressagehorsesusingtwodifferentstandardisedexercisetestssets AT delesallecatherine monitoringtrainingresponseinyoungfriesiandressagehorsesusingtwodifferentstandardisedexercisetestssets |