Cargando…

Monitoring training response in young Friesian dressage horses using two different standardised exercise tests (SETs)

BACKGROUND: Most Friesian horses reach their anaerobic threshold during a standardized exercise test (SET) which requires lower intensity exercise than daily routine training. Aim: to study strengths and weaknesses of an alternative SET-protocol. Two different SETs (SETA and SETB) were applied durin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Bruijn, Cornelis Marinus, Houterman, Willem, Ploeg, Margreet, Ducro, Bart, Boshuizen, Berit, Goethals, Klaartje, Verdegaal, Elisabeth-Lidwien, Delesalle, Catherine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5309987/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28196500
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-017-0969-8
_version_ 1782507799009296384
author de Bruijn, Cornelis Marinus
Houterman, Willem
Ploeg, Margreet
Ducro, Bart
Boshuizen, Berit
Goethals, Klaartje
Verdegaal, Elisabeth-Lidwien
Delesalle, Catherine
author_facet de Bruijn, Cornelis Marinus
Houterman, Willem
Ploeg, Margreet
Ducro, Bart
Boshuizen, Berit
Goethals, Klaartje
Verdegaal, Elisabeth-Lidwien
Delesalle, Catherine
author_sort de Bruijn, Cornelis Marinus
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Most Friesian horses reach their anaerobic threshold during a standardized exercise test (SET) which requires lower intensity exercise than daily routine training. Aim: to study strengths and weaknesses of an alternative SET-protocol. Two different SETs (SETA and SETB) were applied during a 2 month training period of 9 young Friesian dressage horses. SETB alternated short episodes of canter with trot and walk, lacking long episodes of cantering, as applied in SETA. Following parameters were monitored: blood lactic acid (BLA) after cantering, average heart rate (HR) in trot and maximum HR in canter. HR and BLA of SETA and SETB were analyzed using a paired two-sided T-test and Spearman Correlation-coefficient (p* < 0.05). RESULTS: BLA after cantering was significantly higher in SETA compared to SETB and maximum HR in canter was significantly higher in SETA compared to SETB. The majority of horses showed a significant training response based upon longitudinal follow-up of BLA. Horses with the lowest fitness at start, displayed the largest training response. BLA was significantly lower in week 8 compared to week 0, in both SETA and SETB. A significantly decreased BLA level after cantering was noticeable in week 6 in SETA, whereas in SETB only as of week 8. In SETA a very strong correlation for BLA and average HR at trot was found throughout the entire training period, not for canter. CONCLUSIONS: Young Friesian horses do reach their anaerobic threshold during a SET which requires lower intensity than daily routine training. Therefore close monitoring throughout training is warranted. Longitudinal follow up of BLA and not of HR is suitable to assess training response. In the current study, horses that started with the lowest fitness level, showed the largest training response. During training monitoring HR in trot rather than in canter is advised. SETB is best suited as a template for daily training in the aerobic window. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12917-017-0969-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5309987
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53099872017-03-13 Monitoring training response in young Friesian dressage horses using two different standardised exercise tests (SETs) de Bruijn, Cornelis Marinus Houterman, Willem Ploeg, Margreet Ducro, Bart Boshuizen, Berit Goethals, Klaartje Verdegaal, Elisabeth-Lidwien Delesalle, Catherine BMC Vet Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Most Friesian horses reach their anaerobic threshold during a standardized exercise test (SET) which requires lower intensity exercise than daily routine training. Aim: to study strengths and weaknesses of an alternative SET-protocol. Two different SETs (SETA and SETB) were applied during a 2 month training period of 9 young Friesian dressage horses. SETB alternated short episodes of canter with trot and walk, lacking long episodes of cantering, as applied in SETA. Following parameters were monitored: blood lactic acid (BLA) after cantering, average heart rate (HR) in trot and maximum HR in canter. HR and BLA of SETA and SETB were analyzed using a paired two-sided T-test and Spearman Correlation-coefficient (p* < 0.05). RESULTS: BLA after cantering was significantly higher in SETA compared to SETB and maximum HR in canter was significantly higher in SETA compared to SETB. The majority of horses showed a significant training response based upon longitudinal follow-up of BLA. Horses with the lowest fitness at start, displayed the largest training response. BLA was significantly lower in week 8 compared to week 0, in both SETA and SETB. A significantly decreased BLA level after cantering was noticeable in week 6 in SETA, whereas in SETB only as of week 8. In SETA a very strong correlation for BLA and average HR at trot was found throughout the entire training period, not for canter. CONCLUSIONS: Young Friesian horses do reach their anaerobic threshold during a SET which requires lower intensity than daily routine training. Therefore close monitoring throughout training is warranted. Longitudinal follow up of BLA and not of HR is suitable to assess training response. In the current study, horses that started with the lowest fitness level, showed the largest training response. During training monitoring HR in trot rather than in canter is advised. SETB is best suited as a template for daily training in the aerobic window. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12917-017-0969-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-02-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5309987/ /pubmed/28196500 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-017-0969-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
de Bruijn, Cornelis Marinus
Houterman, Willem
Ploeg, Margreet
Ducro, Bart
Boshuizen, Berit
Goethals, Klaartje
Verdegaal, Elisabeth-Lidwien
Delesalle, Catherine
Monitoring training response in young Friesian dressage horses using two different standardised exercise tests (SETs)
title Monitoring training response in young Friesian dressage horses using two different standardised exercise tests (SETs)
title_full Monitoring training response in young Friesian dressage horses using two different standardised exercise tests (SETs)
title_fullStr Monitoring training response in young Friesian dressage horses using two different standardised exercise tests (SETs)
title_full_unstemmed Monitoring training response in young Friesian dressage horses using two different standardised exercise tests (SETs)
title_short Monitoring training response in young Friesian dressage horses using two different standardised exercise tests (SETs)
title_sort monitoring training response in young friesian dressage horses using two different standardised exercise tests (sets)
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5309987/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28196500
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-017-0969-8
work_keys_str_mv AT debruijncornelismarinus monitoringtrainingresponseinyoungfriesiandressagehorsesusingtwodifferentstandardisedexercisetestssets
AT houtermanwillem monitoringtrainingresponseinyoungfriesiandressagehorsesusingtwodifferentstandardisedexercisetestssets
AT ploegmargreet monitoringtrainingresponseinyoungfriesiandressagehorsesusingtwodifferentstandardisedexercisetestssets
AT ducrobart monitoringtrainingresponseinyoungfriesiandressagehorsesusingtwodifferentstandardisedexercisetestssets
AT boshuizenberit monitoringtrainingresponseinyoungfriesiandressagehorsesusingtwodifferentstandardisedexercisetestssets
AT goethalsklaartje monitoringtrainingresponseinyoungfriesiandressagehorsesusingtwodifferentstandardisedexercisetestssets
AT verdegaalelisabethlidwien monitoringtrainingresponseinyoungfriesiandressagehorsesusingtwodifferentstandardisedexercisetestssets
AT delesallecatherine monitoringtrainingresponseinyoungfriesiandressagehorsesusingtwodifferentstandardisedexercisetestssets