Cargando…
Inferring polydomy: a review of functional, spatial and genetic methods for identifying colony boundaries
Identifying the boundaries of a social insect colony is vital for properly understanding its ecological function and evolution. Many species of ants are polydomous: colonies inhabit multiple, spatially separated, nests. Ascertaining which nests are parts of the same colony is an important considerat...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5310590/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28255180 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00040-016-0534-7 |
_version_ | 1782507897083658240 |
---|---|
author | Ellis, S. Procter, D. S. Buckham-Bonnett, P. Robinson, E. J. H. |
author_facet | Ellis, S. Procter, D. S. Buckham-Bonnett, P. Robinson, E. J. H. |
author_sort | Ellis, S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Identifying the boundaries of a social insect colony is vital for properly understanding its ecological function and evolution. Many species of ants are polydomous: colonies inhabit multiple, spatially separated, nests. Ascertaining which nests are parts of the same colony is an important consideration when studying polydomous populations. In this paper, we review the methods that are used to identify which nests are parts of the same polydomous colony and to determine the boundaries of colonies. Specifically, we define and discuss three broad categories of approach: identifying nests sharing resources, identifying nests sharing space, and identifying nests sharing genes. For each of these approaches, we review the theoretical basis, the limitations of the approach and the methods that can be used to implement it. We argue that all three broad approaches have merits and weaknesses, and provide a methodological comparison to help researchers select the tool appropriate for the biological question they are investigating. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5310590 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53105902017-02-28 Inferring polydomy: a review of functional, spatial and genetic methods for identifying colony boundaries Ellis, S. Procter, D. S. Buckham-Bonnett, P. Robinson, E. J. H. Insectes Soc Review Article Identifying the boundaries of a social insect colony is vital for properly understanding its ecological function and evolution. Many species of ants are polydomous: colonies inhabit multiple, spatially separated, nests. Ascertaining which nests are parts of the same colony is an important consideration when studying polydomous populations. In this paper, we review the methods that are used to identify which nests are parts of the same polydomous colony and to determine the boundaries of colonies. Specifically, we define and discuss three broad categories of approach: identifying nests sharing resources, identifying nests sharing space, and identifying nests sharing genes. For each of these approaches, we review the theoretical basis, the limitations of the approach and the methods that can be used to implement it. We argue that all three broad approaches have merits and weaknesses, and provide a methodological comparison to help researchers select the tool appropriate for the biological question they are investigating. Springer International Publishing 2016-12-05 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5310590/ /pubmed/28255180 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00040-016-0534-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Ellis, S. Procter, D. S. Buckham-Bonnett, P. Robinson, E. J. H. Inferring polydomy: a review of functional, spatial and genetic methods for identifying colony boundaries |
title | Inferring polydomy: a review of functional, spatial and genetic methods for identifying colony boundaries |
title_full | Inferring polydomy: a review of functional, spatial and genetic methods for identifying colony boundaries |
title_fullStr | Inferring polydomy: a review of functional, spatial and genetic methods for identifying colony boundaries |
title_full_unstemmed | Inferring polydomy: a review of functional, spatial and genetic methods for identifying colony boundaries |
title_short | Inferring polydomy: a review of functional, spatial and genetic methods for identifying colony boundaries |
title_sort | inferring polydomy: a review of functional, spatial and genetic methods for identifying colony boundaries |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5310590/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28255180 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00040-016-0534-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT elliss inferringpolydomyareviewoffunctionalspatialandgeneticmethodsforidentifyingcolonyboundaries AT procterds inferringpolydomyareviewoffunctionalspatialandgeneticmethodsforidentifyingcolonyboundaries AT buckhambonnettp inferringpolydomyareviewoffunctionalspatialandgeneticmethodsforidentifyingcolonyboundaries AT robinsonejh inferringpolydomyareviewoffunctionalspatialandgeneticmethodsforidentifyingcolonyboundaries |