Cargando…

Retrospective analysis of outcomes and prognostic factors of chemotherapy for small-cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND: Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is responsive to initial chemotherapy but becomes resistant to cytotoxic drugs. The aim of this study was to evaluate what proportion of patients with SCLC had received the first- and further-line chemotherapy and which patients had benefited from chemothera...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Minami, Seigo, Ogata, Yoshitaka, Ihara, Shouichi, Yamamoto, Suguru, Komuta, Kiyoshi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5310697/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28210159
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/LCTT.S100184
_version_ 1782507908866506752
author Minami, Seigo
Ogata, Yoshitaka
Ihara, Shouichi
Yamamoto, Suguru
Komuta, Kiyoshi
author_facet Minami, Seigo
Ogata, Yoshitaka
Ihara, Shouichi
Yamamoto, Suguru
Komuta, Kiyoshi
author_sort Minami, Seigo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is responsive to initial chemotherapy but becomes resistant to cytotoxic drugs. The aim of this study was to evaluate what proportion of patients with SCLC had received the first- and further-line chemotherapy and which patients had benefited from chemotherapy. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed medical records of patients with SCLC who had been treated with the best supportive care alone and the first-, second-, or third-line chemotherapy at the Osaka Police Hospital from June 2007 until March 2015. RESULTS: Among 145 patients diagnosed with SCLC and eligible for analysis, 118 patients received chemotherapy. We added five patients who initiated the second-line chemotherapy during the study period at our institution. Sixty-five and 31 patients received the second- and third-line chemotherapies, respectively. Multivariate logistic regression analysis detected age ≥75 years (odds ratio, 2.80; 95% confidence interval, 1.01–7.75; P=0.047) and European Clinical Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) 3–4 (14.3; 4.86–41.9; P<0.01) as factors disturbing the introduction of chemotherapy. Multivariate Cox hazard analyses also detected ECOG PS 2–4 (3.34; 2.00–5.58; P<0.01) as a factor decreasing overall survival after the first-line chemotherapy, and C-reactive protein level ≥1.0 mg/dL (2.67; 1.30–5.47; P<0.01) and progression-free survival after the first-line chemotherapy ≥6 months (2.85; 1.50–5.43; P<0.01) as factors influencing overall survival after the second-line chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: Approximately two-thirds and one-third of the patients who receive chemotherapy proceed to the second- and third-line chemotherapies, respectively. Several factors, such as age, ECOG PS, C-reactive protein level, and progression-free survival after previous treatment may be useful when considering the introduction of further-line chemotherapy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5310697
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53106972017-02-16 Retrospective analysis of outcomes and prognostic factors of chemotherapy for small-cell lung cancer Minami, Seigo Ogata, Yoshitaka Ihara, Shouichi Yamamoto, Suguru Komuta, Kiyoshi Lung Cancer (Auckl) Original Research BACKGROUND: Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is responsive to initial chemotherapy but becomes resistant to cytotoxic drugs. The aim of this study was to evaluate what proportion of patients with SCLC had received the first- and further-line chemotherapy and which patients had benefited from chemotherapy. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed medical records of patients with SCLC who had been treated with the best supportive care alone and the first-, second-, or third-line chemotherapy at the Osaka Police Hospital from June 2007 until March 2015. RESULTS: Among 145 patients diagnosed with SCLC and eligible for analysis, 118 patients received chemotherapy. We added five patients who initiated the second-line chemotherapy during the study period at our institution. Sixty-five and 31 patients received the second- and third-line chemotherapies, respectively. Multivariate logistic regression analysis detected age ≥75 years (odds ratio, 2.80; 95% confidence interval, 1.01–7.75; P=0.047) and European Clinical Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) 3–4 (14.3; 4.86–41.9; P<0.01) as factors disturbing the introduction of chemotherapy. Multivariate Cox hazard analyses also detected ECOG PS 2–4 (3.34; 2.00–5.58; P<0.01) as a factor decreasing overall survival after the first-line chemotherapy, and C-reactive protein level ≥1.0 mg/dL (2.67; 1.30–5.47; P<0.01) and progression-free survival after the first-line chemotherapy ≥6 months (2.85; 1.50–5.43; P<0.01) as factors influencing overall survival after the second-line chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: Approximately two-thirds and one-third of the patients who receive chemotherapy proceed to the second- and third-line chemotherapies, respectively. Several factors, such as age, ECOG PS, C-reactive protein level, and progression-free survival after previous treatment may be useful when considering the introduction of further-line chemotherapy. Dove Medical Press 2016-04-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5310697/ /pubmed/28210159 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/LCTT.S100184 Text en © 2016 Minami et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Minami, Seigo
Ogata, Yoshitaka
Ihara, Shouichi
Yamamoto, Suguru
Komuta, Kiyoshi
Retrospective analysis of outcomes and prognostic factors of chemotherapy for small-cell lung cancer
title Retrospective analysis of outcomes and prognostic factors of chemotherapy for small-cell lung cancer
title_full Retrospective analysis of outcomes and prognostic factors of chemotherapy for small-cell lung cancer
title_fullStr Retrospective analysis of outcomes and prognostic factors of chemotherapy for small-cell lung cancer
title_full_unstemmed Retrospective analysis of outcomes and prognostic factors of chemotherapy for small-cell lung cancer
title_short Retrospective analysis of outcomes and prognostic factors of chemotherapy for small-cell lung cancer
title_sort retrospective analysis of outcomes and prognostic factors of chemotherapy for small-cell lung cancer
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5310697/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28210159
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/LCTT.S100184
work_keys_str_mv AT minamiseigo retrospectiveanalysisofoutcomesandprognosticfactorsofchemotherapyforsmallcelllungcancer
AT ogatayoshitaka retrospectiveanalysisofoutcomesandprognosticfactorsofchemotherapyforsmallcelllungcancer
AT iharashouichi retrospectiveanalysisofoutcomesandprognosticfactorsofchemotherapyforsmallcelllungcancer
AT yamamotosuguru retrospectiveanalysisofoutcomesandprognosticfactorsofchemotherapyforsmallcelllungcancer
AT komutakiyoshi retrospectiveanalysisofoutcomesandprognosticfactorsofchemotherapyforsmallcelllungcancer