Cargando…

Evaluation of different mathematical models and different b-value ranges of diffusion-weighted imaging in peripheral zone prostate cancer detection using b-value up to 4500 s/mm(2)

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of different mathematical models and different b-value ranges of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in peripheral zone prostate cancer (PZ PCa) detection. METHODS: Fifty-six patients with histologically proven PZ PCa who underwent DWI-magnetic resonan...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Feng, Zhaoyan, Min, Xiangde, Margolis, Daniel J. A., Duan, Caohui, Chen, Yuping, Sah, Vivek Kumar, Chaudhary, Nabin, Li, Basen, Ke, Zan, Zhang, Peipei, Wang, Liang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5310778/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28199367
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172127
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of different mathematical models and different b-value ranges of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in peripheral zone prostate cancer (PZ PCa) detection. METHODS: Fifty-six patients with histologically proven PZ PCa who underwent DWI-magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using 21 b-values (0–4500 s/mm(2)) were included. The mean signal intensities of the regions of interest (ROIs) placed in benign PZs and cancerous tissues on DWI images were fitted using mono-exponential, bi-exponential, stretched-exponential, and kurtosis models. The b-values were divided into four ranges: 0–1000, 0–2000, 0–3200, and 0–4500 s/mm(2), grouped as A, B, C, and D, respectively. ADC, <D>, D*, f, DDC, α, D(app), and K(app) were estimated for each group. The adjusted coefficient of determination (R(2)) was calculated to measure goodness-of-fit. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the parameters. RESULTS: All parameters except D* showed significant differences between cancerous tissues and benign PZs in each group. The area under the curve values (AUCs) of ADC were comparable in groups C and D (p = 0.980) and were significantly higher than those in groups A and B (p< 0.05 for all). The AUCs of ADC and K(app) in groups B and C were similar (p = 0.07 and p = 0.954), and were significantly higher than the other parameters (p< 0.001 for all). The AUCs of ADC in group D was slightly higher than K(app) (p = 0.002), and both were significantly higher than the other parameters (p< 0.001 for all). CONCLUSIONS: ADC derived from conventional mono-exponential high b-value (3200 s/mm(2)) models is an optimal parameter for PZ PCa detection.