Cargando…

Evaluation of different mathematical models and different b-value ranges of diffusion-weighted imaging in peripheral zone prostate cancer detection using b-value up to 4500 s/mm(2)

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of different mathematical models and different b-value ranges of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in peripheral zone prostate cancer (PZ PCa) detection. METHODS: Fifty-six patients with histologically proven PZ PCa who underwent DWI-magnetic resonan...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Feng, Zhaoyan, Min, Xiangde, Margolis, Daniel J. A., Duan, Caohui, Chen, Yuping, Sah, Vivek Kumar, Chaudhary, Nabin, Li, Basen, Ke, Zan, Zhang, Peipei, Wang, Liang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5310778/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28199367
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172127
_version_ 1782507918370799616
author Feng, Zhaoyan
Min, Xiangde
Margolis, Daniel J. A.
Duan, Caohui
Chen, Yuping
Sah, Vivek Kumar
Chaudhary, Nabin
Li, Basen
Ke, Zan
Zhang, Peipei
Wang, Liang
author_facet Feng, Zhaoyan
Min, Xiangde
Margolis, Daniel J. A.
Duan, Caohui
Chen, Yuping
Sah, Vivek Kumar
Chaudhary, Nabin
Li, Basen
Ke, Zan
Zhang, Peipei
Wang, Liang
author_sort Feng, Zhaoyan
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of different mathematical models and different b-value ranges of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in peripheral zone prostate cancer (PZ PCa) detection. METHODS: Fifty-six patients with histologically proven PZ PCa who underwent DWI-magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using 21 b-values (0–4500 s/mm(2)) were included. The mean signal intensities of the regions of interest (ROIs) placed in benign PZs and cancerous tissues on DWI images were fitted using mono-exponential, bi-exponential, stretched-exponential, and kurtosis models. The b-values were divided into four ranges: 0–1000, 0–2000, 0–3200, and 0–4500 s/mm(2), grouped as A, B, C, and D, respectively. ADC, <D>, D*, f, DDC, α, D(app), and K(app) were estimated for each group. The adjusted coefficient of determination (R(2)) was calculated to measure goodness-of-fit. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the parameters. RESULTS: All parameters except D* showed significant differences between cancerous tissues and benign PZs in each group. The area under the curve values (AUCs) of ADC were comparable in groups C and D (p = 0.980) and were significantly higher than those in groups A and B (p< 0.05 for all). The AUCs of ADC and K(app) in groups B and C were similar (p = 0.07 and p = 0.954), and were significantly higher than the other parameters (p< 0.001 for all). The AUCs of ADC in group D was slightly higher than K(app) (p = 0.002), and both were significantly higher than the other parameters (p< 0.001 for all). CONCLUSIONS: ADC derived from conventional mono-exponential high b-value (3200 s/mm(2)) models is an optimal parameter for PZ PCa detection.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5310778
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53107782017-03-03 Evaluation of different mathematical models and different b-value ranges of diffusion-weighted imaging in peripheral zone prostate cancer detection using b-value up to 4500 s/mm(2) Feng, Zhaoyan Min, Xiangde Margolis, Daniel J. A. Duan, Caohui Chen, Yuping Sah, Vivek Kumar Chaudhary, Nabin Li, Basen Ke, Zan Zhang, Peipei Wang, Liang PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of different mathematical models and different b-value ranges of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in peripheral zone prostate cancer (PZ PCa) detection. METHODS: Fifty-six patients with histologically proven PZ PCa who underwent DWI-magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using 21 b-values (0–4500 s/mm(2)) were included. The mean signal intensities of the regions of interest (ROIs) placed in benign PZs and cancerous tissues on DWI images were fitted using mono-exponential, bi-exponential, stretched-exponential, and kurtosis models. The b-values were divided into four ranges: 0–1000, 0–2000, 0–3200, and 0–4500 s/mm(2), grouped as A, B, C, and D, respectively. ADC, <D>, D*, f, DDC, α, D(app), and K(app) were estimated for each group. The adjusted coefficient of determination (R(2)) was calculated to measure goodness-of-fit. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the parameters. RESULTS: All parameters except D* showed significant differences between cancerous tissues and benign PZs in each group. The area under the curve values (AUCs) of ADC were comparable in groups C and D (p = 0.980) and were significantly higher than those in groups A and B (p< 0.05 for all). The AUCs of ADC and K(app) in groups B and C were similar (p = 0.07 and p = 0.954), and were significantly higher than the other parameters (p< 0.001 for all). The AUCs of ADC in group D was slightly higher than K(app) (p = 0.002), and both were significantly higher than the other parameters (p< 0.001 for all). CONCLUSIONS: ADC derived from conventional mono-exponential high b-value (3200 s/mm(2)) models is an optimal parameter for PZ PCa detection. Public Library of Science 2017-02-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5310778/ /pubmed/28199367 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172127 Text en © 2017 Feng et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Feng, Zhaoyan
Min, Xiangde
Margolis, Daniel J. A.
Duan, Caohui
Chen, Yuping
Sah, Vivek Kumar
Chaudhary, Nabin
Li, Basen
Ke, Zan
Zhang, Peipei
Wang, Liang
Evaluation of different mathematical models and different b-value ranges of diffusion-weighted imaging in peripheral zone prostate cancer detection using b-value up to 4500 s/mm(2)
title Evaluation of different mathematical models and different b-value ranges of diffusion-weighted imaging in peripheral zone prostate cancer detection using b-value up to 4500 s/mm(2)
title_full Evaluation of different mathematical models and different b-value ranges of diffusion-weighted imaging in peripheral zone prostate cancer detection using b-value up to 4500 s/mm(2)
title_fullStr Evaluation of different mathematical models and different b-value ranges of diffusion-weighted imaging in peripheral zone prostate cancer detection using b-value up to 4500 s/mm(2)
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of different mathematical models and different b-value ranges of diffusion-weighted imaging in peripheral zone prostate cancer detection using b-value up to 4500 s/mm(2)
title_short Evaluation of different mathematical models and different b-value ranges of diffusion-weighted imaging in peripheral zone prostate cancer detection using b-value up to 4500 s/mm(2)
title_sort evaluation of different mathematical models and different b-value ranges of diffusion-weighted imaging in peripheral zone prostate cancer detection using b-value up to 4500 s/mm(2)
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5310778/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28199367
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172127
work_keys_str_mv AT fengzhaoyan evaluationofdifferentmathematicalmodelsanddifferentbvaluerangesofdiffusionweightedimaginginperipheralzoneprostatecancerdetectionusingbvalueupto4500smm2
AT minxiangde evaluationofdifferentmathematicalmodelsanddifferentbvaluerangesofdiffusionweightedimaginginperipheralzoneprostatecancerdetectionusingbvalueupto4500smm2
AT margolisdanielja evaluationofdifferentmathematicalmodelsanddifferentbvaluerangesofdiffusionweightedimaginginperipheralzoneprostatecancerdetectionusingbvalueupto4500smm2
AT duancaohui evaluationofdifferentmathematicalmodelsanddifferentbvaluerangesofdiffusionweightedimaginginperipheralzoneprostatecancerdetectionusingbvalueupto4500smm2
AT chenyuping evaluationofdifferentmathematicalmodelsanddifferentbvaluerangesofdiffusionweightedimaginginperipheralzoneprostatecancerdetectionusingbvalueupto4500smm2
AT sahvivekkumar evaluationofdifferentmathematicalmodelsanddifferentbvaluerangesofdiffusionweightedimaginginperipheralzoneprostatecancerdetectionusingbvalueupto4500smm2
AT chaudharynabin evaluationofdifferentmathematicalmodelsanddifferentbvaluerangesofdiffusionweightedimaginginperipheralzoneprostatecancerdetectionusingbvalueupto4500smm2
AT libasen evaluationofdifferentmathematicalmodelsanddifferentbvaluerangesofdiffusionweightedimaginginperipheralzoneprostatecancerdetectionusingbvalueupto4500smm2
AT kezan evaluationofdifferentmathematicalmodelsanddifferentbvaluerangesofdiffusionweightedimaginginperipheralzoneprostatecancerdetectionusingbvalueupto4500smm2
AT zhangpeipei evaluationofdifferentmathematicalmodelsanddifferentbvaluerangesofdiffusionweightedimaginginperipheralzoneprostatecancerdetectionusingbvalueupto4500smm2
AT wangliang evaluationofdifferentmathematicalmodelsanddifferentbvaluerangesofdiffusionweightedimaginginperipheralzoneprostatecancerdetectionusingbvalueupto4500smm2