Cargando…
Evaluation of different mathematical models and different b-value ranges of diffusion-weighted imaging in peripheral zone prostate cancer detection using b-value up to 4500 s/mm(2)
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of different mathematical models and different b-value ranges of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in peripheral zone prostate cancer (PZ PCa) detection. METHODS: Fifty-six patients with histologically proven PZ PCa who underwent DWI-magnetic resonan...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5310778/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28199367 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172127 |
_version_ | 1782507918370799616 |
---|---|
author | Feng, Zhaoyan Min, Xiangde Margolis, Daniel J. A. Duan, Caohui Chen, Yuping Sah, Vivek Kumar Chaudhary, Nabin Li, Basen Ke, Zan Zhang, Peipei Wang, Liang |
author_facet | Feng, Zhaoyan Min, Xiangde Margolis, Daniel J. A. Duan, Caohui Chen, Yuping Sah, Vivek Kumar Chaudhary, Nabin Li, Basen Ke, Zan Zhang, Peipei Wang, Liang |
author_sort | Feng, Zhaoyan |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of different mathematical models and different b-value ranges of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in peripheral zone prostate cancer (PZ PCa) detection. METHODS: Fifty-six patients with histologically proven PZ PCa who underwent DWI-magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using 21 b-values (0–4500 s/mm(2)) were included. The mean signal intensities of the regions of interest (ROIs) placed in benign PZs and cancerous tissues on DWI images were fitted using mono-exponential, bi-exponential, stretched-exponential, and kurtosis models. The b-values were divided into four ranges: 0–1000, 0–2000, 0–3200, and 0–4500 s/mm(2), grouped as A, B, C, and D, respectively. ADC, <D>, D*, f, DDC, α, D(app), and K(app) were estimated for each group. The adjusted coefficient of determination (R(2)) was calculated to measure goodness-of-fit. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the parameters. RESULTS: All parameters except D* showed significant differences between cancerous tissues and benign PZs in each group. The area under the curve values (AUCs) of ADC were comparable in groups C and D (p = 0.980) and were significantly higher than those in groups A and B (p< 0.05 for all). The AUCs of ADC and K(app) in groups B and C were similar (p = 0.07 and p = 0.954), and were significantly higher than the other parameters (p< 0.001 for all). The AUCs of ADC in group D was slightly higher than K(app) (p = 0.002), and both were significantly higher than the other parameters (p< 0.001 for all). CONCLUSIONS: ADC derived from conventional mono-exponential high b-value (3200 s/mm(2)) models is an optimal parameter for PZ PCa detection. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5310778 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53107782017-03-03 Evaluation of different mathematical models and different b-value ranges of diffusion-weighted imaging in peripheral zone prostate cancer detection using b-value up to 4500 s/mm(2) Feng, Zhaoyan Min, Xiangde Margolis, Daniel J. A. Duan, Caohui Chen, Yuping Sah, Vivek Kumar Chaudhary, Nabin Li, Basen Ke, Zan Zhang, Peipei Wang, Liang PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of different mathematical models and different b-value ranges of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in peripheral zone prostate cancer (PZ PCa) detection. METHODS: Fifty-six patients with histologically proven PZ PCa who underwent DWI-magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using 21 b-values (0–4500 s/mm(2)) were included. The mean signal intensities of the regions of interest (ROIs) placed in benign PZs and cancerous tissues on DWI images were fitted using mono-exponential, bi-exponential, stretched-exponential, and kurtosis models. The b-values were divided into four ranges: 0–1000, 0–2000, 0–3200, and 0–4500 s/mm(2), grouped as A, B, C, and D, respectively. ADC, <D>, D*, f, DDC, α, D(app), and K(app) were estimated for each group. The adjusted coefficient of determination (R(2)) was calculated to measure goodness-of-fit. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the parameters. RESULTS: All parameters except D* showed significant differences between cancerous tissues and benign PZs in each group. The area under the curve values (AUCs) of ADC were comparable in groups C and D (p = 0.980) and were significantly higher than those in groups A and B (p< 0.05 for all). The AUCs of ADC and K(app) in groups B and C were similar (p = 0.07 and p = 0.954), and were significantly higher than the other parameters (p< 0.001 for all). The AUCs of ADC in group D was slightly higher than K(app) (p = 0.002), and both were significantly higher than the other parameters (p< 0.001 for all). CONCLUSIONS: ADC derived from conventional mono-exponential high b-value (3200 s/mm(2)) models is an optimal parameter for PZ PCa detection. Public Library of Science 2017-02-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5310778/ /pubmed/28199367 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172127 Text en © 2017 Feng et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Feng, Zhaoyan Min, Xiangde Margolis, Daniel J. A. Duan, Caohui Chen, Yuping Sah, Vivek Kumar Chaudhary, Nabin Li, Basen Ke, Zan Zhang, Peipei Wang, Liang Evaluation of different mathematical models and different b-value ranges of diffusion-weighted imaging in peripheral zone prostate cancer detection using b-value up to 4500 s/mm(2) |
title | Evaluation of different mathematical models and different b-value ranges of diffusion-weighted imaging in peripheral zone prostate cancer detection using b-value up to 4500 s/mm(2) |
title_full | Evaluation of different mathematical models and different b-value ranges of diffusion-weighted imaging in peripheral zone prostate cancer detection using b-value up to 4500 s/mm(2) |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of different mathematical models and different b-value ranges of diffusion-weighted imaging in peripheral zone prostate cancer detection using b-value up to 4500 s/mm(2) |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of different mathematical models and different b-value ranges of diffusion-weighted imaging in peripheral zone prostate cancer detection using b-value up to 4500 s/mm(2) |
title_short | Evaluation of different mathematical models and different b-value ranges of diffusion-weighted imaging in peripheral zone prostate cancer detection using b-value up to 4500 s/mm(2) |
title_sort | evaluation of different mathematical models and different b-value ranges of diffusion-weighted imaging in peripheral zone prostate cancer detection using b-value up to 4500 s/mm(2) |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5310778/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28199367 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172127 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fengzhaoyan evaluationofdifferentmathematicalmodelsanddifferentbvaluerangesofdiffusionweightedimaginginperipheralzoneprostatecancerdetectionusingbvalueupto4500smm2 AT minxiangde evaluationofdifferentmathematicalmodelsanddifferentbvaluerangesofdiffusionweightedimaginginperipheralzoneprostatecancerdetectionusingbvalueupto4500smm2 AT margolisdanielja evaluationofdifferentmathematicalmodelsanddifferentbvaluerangesofdiffusionweightedimaginginperipheralzoneprostatecancerdetectionusingbvalueupto4500smm2 AT duancaohui evaluationofdifferentmathematicalmodelsanddifferentbvaluerangesofdiffusionweightedimaginginperipheralzoneprostatecancerdetectionusingbvalueupto4500smm2 AT chenyuping evaluationofdifferentmathematicalmodelsanddifferentbvaluerangesofdiffusionweightedimaginginperipheralzoneprostatecancerdetectionusingbvalueupto4500smm2 AT sahvivekkumar evaluationofdifferentmathematicalmodelsanddifferentbvaluerangesofdiffusionweightedimaginginperipheralzoneprostatecancerdetectionusingbvalueupto4500smm2 AT chaudharynabin evaluationofdifferentmathematicalmodelsanddifferentbvaluerangesofdiffusionweightedimaginginperipheralzoneprostatecancerdetectionusingbvalueupto4500smm2 AT libasen evaluationofdifferentmathematicalmodelsanddifferentbvaluerangesofdiffusionweightedimaginginperipheralzoneprostatecancerdetectionusingbvalueupto4500smm2 AT kezan evaluationofdifferentmathematicalmodelsanddifferentbvaluerangesofdiffusionweightedimaginginperipheralzoneprostatecancerdetectionusingbvalueupto4500smm2 AT zhangpeipei evaluationofdifferentmathematicalmodelsanddifferentbvaluerangesofdiffusionweightedimaginginperipheralzoneprostatecancerdetectionusingbvalueupto4500smm2 AT wangliang evaluationofdifferentmathematicalmodelsanddifferentbvaluerangesofdiffusionweightedimaginginperipheralzoneprostatecancerdetectionusingbvalueupto4500smm2 |