Cargando…

Predicting primary progressive aphasias with support vector machine approaches in structural MRI data

Primary progressive aphasia (PPA) encompasses the three subtypes nonfluent/agrammatic variant PPA, semantic variant PPA, and the logopenic variant PPA, which are characterized by distinct patterns of language difficulties and regional brain atrophy. To validate the potential of structural magnetic r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bisenius, Sandrine, Mueller, Karsten, Diehl-Schmid, Janine, Fassbender, Klaus, Grimmer, Timo, Jessen, Frank, Kassubek, Jan, Kornhuber, Johannes, Landwehrmeyer, Bernhard, Ludolph, Albert, Schneider, Anja, Anderl-Straub, Sarah, Stuke, Katharina, Danek, Adrian, Otto, Markus, Schroeter, Matthias L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5310935/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28229040
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2017.02.003
_version_ 1782507947788599296
author Bisenius, Sandrine
Mueller, Karsten
Diehl-Schmid, Janine
Fassbender, Klaus
Grimmer, Timo
Jessen, Frank
Kassubek, Jan
Kornhuber, Johannes
Landwehrmeyer, Bernhard
Ludolph, Albert
Schneider, Anja
Anderl-Straub, Sarah
Stuke, Katharina
Danek, Adrian
Otto, Markus
Schroeter, Matthias L.
author_facet Bisenius, Sandrine
Mueller, Karsten
Diehl-Schmid, Janine
Fassbender, Klaus
Grimmer, Timo
Jessen, Frank
Kassubek, Jan
Kornhuber, Johannes
Landwehrmeyer, Bernhard
Ludolph, Albert
Schneider, Anja
Anderl-Straub, Sarah
Stuke, Katharina
Danek, Adrian
Otto, Markus
Schroeter, Matthias L.
author_sort Bisenius, Sandrine
collection PubMed
description Primary progressive aphasia (PPA) encompasses the three subtypes nonfluent/agrammatic variant PPA, semantic variant PPA, and the logopenic variant PPA, which are characterized by distinct patterns of language difficulties and regional brain atrophy. To validate the potential of structural magnetic resonance imaging data for early individual diagnosis, we used support vector machine classification on grey matter density maps obtained by voxel-based morphometry analysis to discriminate PPA subtypes (44 patients: 16 nonfluent/agrammatic variant PPA, 17 semantic variant PPA, 11 logopenic variant PPA) from 20 healthy controls (matched for sample size, age, and gender) in the cohort of the multi-center study of the German consortium for frontotemporal lobar degeneration. Here, we compared a whole-brain with a meta-analysis-based disease-specific regions-of-interest approach for support vector machine classification. We also used support vector machine classification to discriminate the three PPA subtypes from each other. Whole brain support vector machine classification enabled a very high accuracy between 91 and 97% for identifying specific PPA subtypes vs. healthy controls, and 78/95% for the discrimination between semantic variant vs. nonfluent/agrammatic or logopenic PPA variants. Only for the discrimination between nonfluent/agrammatic and logopenic PPA variants accuracy was low with 55%. Interestingly, the regions that contributed the most to the support vector machine classification of patients corresponded largely to the regions that were atrophic in these patients as revealed by group comparisons. Although the whole brain approach took also into account regions that were not covered in the regions-of-interest approach, both approaches showed similar accuracies due to the disease-specificity of the selected networks. Conclusion, support vector machine classification of multi-center structural magnetic resonance imaging data enables prediction of PPA subtypes with a very high accuracy paving the road for its application in clinical settings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5310935
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53109352017-02-22 Predicting primary progressive aphasias with support vector machine approaches in structural MRI data Bisenius, Sandrine Mueller, Karsten Diehl-Schmid, Janine Fassbender, Klaus Grimmer, Timo Jessen, Frank Kassubek, Jan Kornhuber, Johannes Landwehrmeyer, Bernhard Ludolph, Albert Schneider, Anja Anderl-Straub, Sarah Stuke, Katharina Danek, Adrian Otto, Markus Schroeter, Matthias L. Neuroimage Clin Regular Article Primary progressive aphasia (PPA) encompasses the three subtypes nonfluent/agrammatic variant PPA, semantic variant PPA, and the logopenic variant PPA, which are characterized by distinct patterns of language difficulties and regional brain atrophy. To validate the potential of structural magnetic resonance imaging data for early individual diagnosis, we used support vector machine classification on grey matter density maps obtained by voxel-based morphometry analysis to discriminate PPA subtypes (44 patients: 16 nonfluent/agrammatic variant PPA, 17 semantic variant PPA, 11 logopenic variant PPA) from 20 healthy controls (matched for sample size, age, and gender) in the cohort of the multi-center study of the German consortium for frontotemporal lobar degeneration. Here, we compared a whole-brain with a meta-analysis-based disease-specific regions-of-interest approach for support vector machine classification. We also used support vector machine classification to discriminate the three PPA subtypes from each other. Whole brain support vector machine classification enabled a very high accuracy between 91 and 97% for identifying specific PPA subtypes vs. healthy controls, and 78/95% for the discrimination between semantic variant vs. nonfluent/agrammatic or logopenic PPA variants. Only for the discrimination between nonfluent/agrammatic and logopenic PPA variants accuracy was low with 55%. Interestingly, the regions that contributed the most to the support vector machine classification of patients corresponded largely to the regions that were atrophic in these patients as revealed by group comparisons. Although the whole brain approach took also into account regions that were not covered in the regions-of-interest approach, both approaches showed similar accuracies due to the disease-specificity of the selected networks. Conclusion, support vector machine classification of multi-center structural magnetic resonance imaging data enables prediction of PPA subtypes with a very high accuracy paving the road for its application in clinical settings. Elsevier 2017-02-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5310935/ /pubmed/28229040 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2017.02.003 Text en © 2017 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Regular Article
Bisenius, Sandrine
Mueller, Karsten
Diehl-Schmid, Janine
Fassbender, Klaus
Grimmer, Timo
Jessen, Frank
Kassubek, Jan
Kornhuber, Johannes
Landwehrmeyer, Bernhard
Ludolph, Albert
Schneider, Anja
Anderl-Straub, Sarah
Stuke, Katharina
Danek, Adrian
Otto, Markus
Schroeter, Matthias L.
Predicting primary progressive aphasias with support vector machine approaches in structural MRI data
title Predicting primary progressive aphasias with support vector machine approaches in structural MRI data
title_full Predicting primary progressive aphasias with support vector machine approaches in structural MRI data
title_fullStr Predicting primary progressive aphasias with support vector machine approaches in structural MRI data
title_full_unstemmed Predicting primary progressive aphasias with support vector machine approaches in structural MRI data
title_short Predicting primary progressive aphasias with support vector machine approaches in structural MRI data
title_sort predicting primary progressive aphasias with support vector machine approaches in structural mri data
topic Regular Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5310935/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28229040
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2017.02.003
work_keys_str_mv AT biseniussandrine predictingprimaryprogressiveaphasiaswithsupportvectormachineapproachesinstructuralmridata
AT muellerkarsten predictingprimaryprogressiveaphasiaswithsupportvectormachineapproachesinstructuralmridata
AT diehlschmidjanine predictingprimaryprogressiveaphasiaswithsupportvectormachineapproachesinstructuralmridata
AT fassbenderklaus predictingprimaryprogressiveaphasiaswithsupportvectormachineapproachesinstructuralmridata
AT grimmertimo predictingprimaryprogressiveaphasiaswithsupportvectormachineapproachesinstructuralmridata
AT jessenfrank predictingprimaryprogressiveaphasiaswithsupportvectormachineapproachesinstructuralmridata
AT kassubekjan predictingprimaryprogressiveaphasiaswithsupportvectormachineapproachesinstructuralmridata
AT kornhuberjohannes predictingprimaryprogressiveaphasiaswithsupportvectormachineapproachesinstructuralmridata
AT landwehrmeyerbernhard predictingprimaryprogressiveaphasiaswithsupportvectormachineapproachesinstructuralmridata
AT ludolphalbert predictingprimaryprogressiveaphasiaswithsupportvectormachineapproachesinstructuralmridata
AT schneideranja predictingprimaryprogressiveaphasiaswithsupportvectormachineapproachesinstructuralmridata
AT anderlstraubsarah predictingprimaryprogressiveaphasiaswithsupportvectormachineapproachesinstructuralmridata
AT stukekatharina predictingprimaryprogressiveaphasiaswithsupportvectormachineapproachesinstructuralmridata
AT danekadrian predictingprimaryprogressiveaphasiaswithsupportvectormachineapproachesinstructuralmridata
AT ottomarkus predictingprimaryprogressiveaphasiaswithsupportvectormachineapproachesinstructuralmridata
AT schroetermatthiasl predictingprimaryprogressiveaphasiaswithsupportvectormachineapproachesinstructuralmridata
AT predictingprimaryprogressiveaphasiaswithsupportvectormachineapproachesinstructuralmridata