Cargando…
Neglected epiphyseal injuries of the distal end of the radius with ulnar impaction: analysis of distal osteotomy of both bones using a dorsal midline approach
BACKGROUND: To evaluate results of a technique for treating neglected epiphyseal injuries of the distal radius with ulnar impaction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study involved six cases (four males; two females), all of whom sustained the primary injury during childhood (range 9–12 yea...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5311000/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27468849 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10195-016-0423-x |
_version_ | 1782507951037087744 |
---|---|
author | Gogna, Paritosh Gaba, Sahil Mukhopadhyay, Reetadyuti Rohilla, Rajesh Singh, Amanpreet |
author_facet | Gogna, Paritosh Gaba, Sahil Mukhopadhyay, Reetadyuti Rohilla, Rajesh Singh, Amanpreet |
author_sort | Gogna, Paritosh |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: To evaluate results of a technique for treating neglected epiphyseal injuries of the distal radius with ulnar impaction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study involved six cases (four males; two females), all of whom sustained the primary injury during childhood (range 9–12 years of age). All presented with wrist deformity and ulnar-sided wrist pain. They were managed with osteotomy of the distal radius, osteotomy and shortening of the ulna, harvesting the bone grafts, and distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) reduction performed simultaneously through a dorsal midline approach. Mean follow-up was 30 months (range 24–36). RESULTS: Deformity correction and pain relief was observed in all patients. Flexion arc increased from an average of 60° to 102.5°, supination from an average of 31.67° to 67.50°, and pronation from an average of 30.83° to 61.67°. The mean preoperative DASH score was 87.5, which improved to 18.72 postoperatively. CONCLUSION: Neglected epiphyseal injuries of the distal radius are difficult to manage and many variations are described for handing each of the associated problems. Our technique provides an option for managing this injury with an easy surgical approach, single incision, and cost effectiveness. All the four components of the surgery, which include osteotomy of the distal radius, osteotomy of the ulna, harvesting the bone grafts, and DRUJ reduction were done through a single incision and in a single sitting. Level of evidence IV. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5311000 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53110002017-02-28 Neglected epiphyseal injuries of the distal end of the radius with ulnar impaction: analysis of distal osteotomy of both bones using a dorsal midline approach Gogna, Paritosh Gaba, Sahil Mukhopadhyay, Reetadyuti Rohilla, Rajesh Singh, Amanpreet J Orthop Traumatol Original Article BACKGROUND: To evaluate results of a technique for treating neglected epiphyseal injuries of the distal radius with ulnar impaction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study involved six cases (four males; two females), all of whom sustained the primary injury during childhood (range 9–12 years of age). All presented with wrist deformity and ulnar-sided wrist pain. They were managed with osteotomy of the distal radius, osteotomy and shortening of the ulna, harvesting the bone grafts, and distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) reduction performed simultaneously through a dorsal midline approach. Mean follow-up was 30 months (range 24–36). RESULTS: Deformity correction and pain relief was observed in all patients. Flexion arc increased from an average of 60° to 102.5°, supination from an average of 31.67° to 67.50°, and pronation from an average of 30.83° to 61.67°. The mean preoperative DASH score was 87.5, which improved to 18.72 postoperatively. CONCLUSION: Neglected epiphyseal injuries of the distal radius are difficult to manage and many variations are described for handing each of the associated problems. Our technique provides an option for managing this injury with an easy surgical approach, single incision, and cost effectiveness. All the four components of the surgery, which include osteotomy of the distal radius, osteotomy of the ulna, harvesting the bone grafts, and DRUJ reduction were done through a single incision and in a single sitting. Level of evidence IV. Springer International Publishing 2016-07-28 2017-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5311000/ /pubmed/27468849 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10195-016-0423-x Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Gogna, Paritosh Gaba, Sahil Mukhopadhyay, Reetadyuti Rohilla, Rajesh Singh, Amanpreet Neglected epiphyseal injuries of the distal end of the radius with ulnar impaction: analysis of distal osteotomy of both bones using a dorsal midline approach |
title | Neglected epiphyseal injuries of the distal end of the radius with ulnar impaction: analysis of distal osteotomy of both bones using a dorsal midline approach |
title_full | Neglected epiphyseal injuries of the distal end of the radius with ulnar impaction: analysis of distal osteotomy of both bones using a dorsal midline approach |
title_fullStr | Neglected epiphyseal injuries of the distal end of the radius with ulnar impaction: analysis of distal osteotomy of both bones using a dorsal midline approach |
title_full_unstemmed | Neglected epiphyseal injuries of the distal end of the radius with ulnar impaction: analysis of distal osteotomy of both bones using a dorsal midline approach |
title_short | Neglected epiphyseal injuries of the distal end of the radius with ulnar impaction: analysis of distal osteotomy of both bones using a dorsal midline approach |
title_sort | neglected epiphyseal injuries of the distal end of the radius with ulnar impaction: analysis of distal osteotomy of both bones using a dorsal midline approach |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5311000/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27468849 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10195-016-0423-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gognaparitosh neglectedepiphysealinjuriesofthedistalendoftheradiuswithulnarimpactionanalysisofdistalosteotomyofbothbonesusingadorsalmidlineapproach AT gabasahil neglectedepiphysealinjuriesofthedistalendoftheradiuswithulnarimpactionanalysisofdistalosteotomyofbothbonesusingadorsalmidlineapproach AT mukhopadhyayreetadyuti neglectedepiphysealinjuriesofthedistalendoftheradiuswithulnarimpactionanalysisofdistalosteotomyofbothbonesusingadorsalmidlineapproach AT rohillarajesh neglectedepiphysealinjuriesofthedistalendoftheradiuswithulnarimpactionanalysisofdistalosteotomyofbothbonesusingadorsalmidlineapproach AT singhamanpreet neglectedepiphysealinjuriesofthedistalendoftheradiuswithulnarimpactionanalysisofdistalosteotomyofbothbonesusingadorsalmidlineapproach |