Cargando…

Cardiac PET/CT with Rb-82: optimization of image acquisition and reconstruction parameters

BACKGROUND: Our aim was to characterize the influence of time-of-flight (TOF) and point spread function (PSF) recovery corrections, as well as ordered subset expectation maximization (OSEM) reconstruction parameters, in (82)Rb PET/CT quantification of myocardial blood flow (MBF) and myocardial flow...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chilra, P., Gnesin, S., Allenbach, G., Monteiro, M., Prior, J. O., Vieira, L., Pires Jorge, J. A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5311016/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28205113
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40658-017-0178-3
_version_ 1782507954097881088
author Chilra, P.
Gnesin, S.
Allenbach, G.
Monteiro, M.
Prior, J. O.
Vieira, L.
Pires Jorge, J. A.
author_facet Chilra, P.
Gnesin, S.
Allenbach, G.
Monteiro, M.
Prior, J. O.
Vieira, L.
Pires Jorge, J. A.
author_sort Chilra, P.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Our aim was to characterize the influence of time-of-flight (TOF) and point spread function (PSF) recovery corrections, as well as ordered subset expectation maximization (OSEM) reconstruction parameters, in (82)Rb PET/CT quantification of myocardial blood flow (MBF) and myocardial flow reserve (MFR). Rest and stress list-mode dynamic (82)Rb PET acquisition data from 10 patients without myocardial flow defects and 10 patients with myocardial blood flow defects were reconstructed retrospectively. OSEM reconstructions were performed with Gaussian filters of 4, 6, and 8 mm, different iterations, and subset numbers (2 × 24; 2 × 16; 3 × 16; 4 × 16). Rest and stress global, regional, and segmental MBF and MFR were computed from time activity curves with FlowQuant(©) software. Left ventricular segmentation using the 17-segment American Heart Association model was obtained. RESULTS: Whole left ventricle (LV) MBF at rest and stress were 0.97 ± 0.30 and 2.30 ± 1.00 mL/min/g, respectively, and MFR was 2.40 ± 1.13. Concordance was excellent and all reconstruction parameters had no significant impact on MBF, except for the exclusion of TOF which led to significantly decreased concordance in rest and stress MBF in patients with or without perfusion defects on a coronary artery basis and in MFR in patients with perfusion defects. CONCLUSIONS: Changes in reconstruction parameters in perfusion (82)Rb PET/CT studies influence quantitative MBF analysis. The inclusion of TOF information in the tomographic reconstructions had significant impact in MBF quantification.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5311016
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53110162017-03-02 Cardiac PET/CT with Rb-82: optimization of image acquisition and reconstruction parameters Chilra, P. Gnesin, S. Allenbach, G. Monteiro, M. Prior, J. O. Vieira, L. Pires Jorge, J. A. EJNMMI Phys Original Research BACKGROUND: Our aim was to characterize the influence of time-of-flight (TOF) and point spread function (PSF) recovery corrections, as well as ordered subset expectation maximization (OSEM) reconstruction parameters, in (82)Rb PET/CT quantification of myocardial blood flow (MBF) and myocardial flow reserve (MFR). Rest and stress list-mode dynamic (82)Rb PET acquisition data from 10 patients without myocardial flow defects and 10 patients with myocardial blood flow defects were reconstructed retrospectively. OSEM reconstructions were performed with Gaussian filters of 4, 6, and 8 mm, different iterations, and subset numbers (2 × 24; 2 × 16; 3 × 16; 4 × 16). Rest and stress global, regional, and segmental MBF and MFR were computed from time activity curves with FlowQuant(©) software. Left ventricular segmentation using the 17-segment American Heart Association model was obtained. RESULTS: Whole left ventricle (LV) MBF at rest and stress were 0.97 ± 0.30 and 2.30 ± 1.00 mL/min/g, respectively, and MFR was 2.40 ± 1.13. Concordance was excellent and all reconstruction parameters had no significant impact on MBF, except for the exclusion of TOF which led to significantly decreased concordance in rest and stress MBF in patients with or without perfusion defects on a coronary artery basis and in MFR in patients with perfusion defects. CONCLUSIONS: Changes in reconstruction parameters in perfusion (82)Rb PET/CT studies influence quantitative MBF analysis. The inclusion of TOF information in the tomographic reconstructions had significant impact in MBF quantification. Springer International Publishing 2017-02-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5311016/ /pubmed/28205113 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40658-017-0178-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Research
Chilra, P.
Gnesin, S.
Allenbach, G.
Monteiro, M.
Prior, J. O.
Vieira, L.
Pires Jorge, J. A.
Cardiac PET/CT with Rb-82: optimization of image acquisition and reconstruction parameters
title Cardiac PET/CT with Rb-82: optimization of image acquisition and reconstruction parameters
title_full Cardiac PET/CT with Rb-82: optimization of image acquisition and reconstruction parameters
title_fullStr Cardiac PET/CT with Rb-82: optimization of image acquisition and reconstruction parameters
title_full_unstemmed Cardiac PET/CT with Rb-82: optimization of image acquisition and reconstruction parameters
title_short Cardiac PET/CT with Rb-82: optimization of image acquisition and reconstruction parameters
title_sort cardiac pet/ct with rb-82: optimization of image acquisition and reconstruction parameters
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5311016/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28205113
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40658-017-0178-3
work_keys_str_mv AT chilrap cardiacpetctwithrb82optimizationofimageacquisitionandreconstructionparameters
AT gnesins cardiacpetctwithrb82optimizationofimageacquisitionandreconstructionparameters
AT allenbachg cardiacpetctwithrb82optimizationofimageacquisitionandreconstructionparameters
AT monteirom cardiacpetctwithrb82optimizationofimageacquisitionandreconstructionparameters
AT priorjo cardiacpetctwithrb82optimizationofimageacquisitionandreconstructionparameters
AT vieiral cardiacpetctwithrb82optimizationofimageacquisitionandreconstructionparameters
AT piresjorgeja cardiacpetctwithrb82optimizationofimageacquisitionandreconstructionparameters