Cargando…
Non-reliance of metazoans on stromatolite-forming microbial mats as a food resource
Grazing and burrowing organisms usually homogenise microalgal mats that form on benthic sediments of many aquatic ecosystems. In the absence of this disruption, microalgal mats can accrete laminated deposits (stromatolites). Stromatolites are rare in modern coastal ecosystems, but persist at locatio...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5311985/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28205600 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep42614 |
_version_ | 1782508125602971648 |
---|---|
author | Rishworth, Gavin M. Perissinotto, Renzo Bird, Matthew S. Strydom, Nadine A. Peer, Nasreen Miranda, Nelson A. F. Raw, Jacqueline L. |
author_facet | Rishworth, Gavin M. Perissinotto, Renzo Bird, Matthew S. Strydom, Nadine A. Peer, Nasreen Miranda, Nelson A. F. Raw, Jacqueline L. |
author_sort | Rishworth, Gavin M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Grazing and burrowing organisms usually homogenise microalgal mats that form on benthic sediments of many aquatic ecosystems. In the absence of this disruption, microalgal mats can accrete laminated deposits (stromatolites). Stromatolites are rare in modern coastal ecosystems, but persist at locations where metazoans are largely excluded. This study aimed to assess the trophic structure at stromatolite locations where metazoans co-occur, to determine the grazing influence exerted by the metazoans on the stromatolite-forming microalgae (cyanobacteria and diatoms). Stable isotope signatures (δ(13)C and δ(15)N) were used as food-web tracers and dietary composition of consumers was calculated using source mixing models. Results clearly demonstrate that the dominant macrofaunal grazers do not utilise stromatolite material as a food resource, but rather subsist on autochthonous macroalgae. For instance, the mean (±SD) dietary composition of two of the most abundant grazers, Melita zeylanica (Amphipoda) and Composetia cf. keiskama (Polychaeta), consisted of 80 ± 11% and 91 ± 7% macroalgae, respectively. This suggests that the stromatolite-forming benthic microalgae are not disrupted significantly by grazing pressures, allowing for the layered mineralisation process to perpetuate. Additionally, grazers likely have a restrictive influence on pool macroalgae, maintaining the competitive balance between micro- and macroalgal groups. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5311985 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53119852017-02-23 Non-reliance of metazoans on stromatolite-forming microbial mats as a food resource Rishworth, Gavin M. Perissinotto, Renzo Bird, Matthew S. Strydom, Nadine A. Peer, Nasreen Miranda, Nelson A. F. Raw, Jacqueline L. Sci Rep Article Grazing and burrowing organisms usually homogenise microalgal mats that form on benthic sediments of many aquatic ecosystems. In the absence of this disruption, microalgal mats can accrete laminated deposits (stromatolites). Stromatolites are rare in modern coastal ecosystems, but persist at locations where metazoans are largely excluded. This study aimed to assess the trophic structure at stromatolite locations where metazoans co-occur, to determine the grazing influence exerted by the metazoans on the stromatolite-forming microalgae (cyanobacteria and diatoms). Stable isotope signatures (δ(13)C and δ(15)N) were used as food-web tracers and dietary composition of consumers was calculated using source mixing models. Results clearly demonstrate that the dominant macrofaunal grazers do not utilise stromatolite material as a food resource, but rather subsist on autochthonous macroalgae. For instance, the mean (±SD) dietary composition of two of the most abundant grazers, Melita zeylanica (Amphipoda) and Composetia cf. keiskama (Polychaeta), consisted of 80 ± 11% and 91 ± 7% macroalgae, respectively. This suggests that the stromatolite-forming benthic microalgae are not disrupted significantly by grazing pressures, allowing for the layered mineralisation process to perpetuate. Additionally, grazers likely have a restrictive influence on pool macroalgae, maintaining the competitive balance between micro- and macroalgal groups. Nature Publishing Group 2017-02-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5311985/ /pubmed/28205600 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep42614 Text en Copyright © 2017, The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Article Rishworth, Gavin M. Perissinotto, Renzo Bird, Matthew S. Strydom, Nadine A. Peer, Nasreen Miranda, Nelson A. F. Raw, Jacqueline L. Non-reliance of metazoans on stromatolite-forming microbial mats as a food resource |
title | Non-reliance of metazoans on stromatolite-forming microbial mats as a food resource |
title_full | Non-reliance of metazoans on stromatolite-forming microbial mats as a food resource |
title_fullStr | Non-reliance of metazoans on stromatolite-forming microbial mats as a food resource |
title_full_unstemmed | Non-reliance of metazoans on stromatolite-forming microbial mats as a food resource |
title_short | Non-reliance of metazoans on stromatolite-forming microbial mats as a food resource |
title_sort | non-reliance of metazoans on stromatolite-forming microbial mats as a food resource |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5311985/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28205600 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep42614 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rishworthgavinm nonrelianceofmetazoansonstromatoliteformingmicrobialmatsasafoodresource AT perissinottorenzo nonrelianceofmetazoansonstromatoliteformingmicrobialmatsasafoodresource AT birdmatthews nonrelianceofmetazoansonstromatoliteformingmicrobialmatsasafoodresource AT strydomnadinea nonrelianceofmetazoansonstromatoliteformingmicrobialmatsasafoodresource AT peernasreen nonrelianceofmetazoansonstromatoliteformingmicrobialmatsasafoodresource AT mirandanelsonaf nonrelianceofmetazoansonstromatoliteformingmicrobialmatsasafoodresource AT rawjacquelinel nonrelianceofmetazoansonstromatoliteformingmicrobialmatsasafoodresource |