Cargando…

Comparison of surgical effect and postoperative patient experience between laparoendoscopic single-site and conventional laparoscopic varicocelectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The present meta-analysis was conducted to compare the clinical effect and patient experience of laparoendoscopic single-site varicocelectomy (LESSV) and conventional laparoscopic varicocelectomy. The candidate studies were included after literature search of database Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMBAS...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Zheng, Zheng, Shu-Juan, Yu, Wen, Han, You-Feng, Chen, Hai, Chen, Yun, Dai, Yu-Tian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5312228/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27212128
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1008-682X.181194
_version_ 1782508165627117568
author Zhang, Zheng
Zheng, Shu-Juan
Yu, Wen
Han, You-Feng
Chen, Hai
Chen, Yun
Dai, Yu-Tian
author_facet Zhang, Zheng
Zheng, Shu-Juan
Yu, Wen
Han, You-Feng
Chen, Hai
Chen, Yun
Dai, Yu-Tian
author_sort Zhang, Zheng
collection PubMed
description The present meta-analysis was conducted to compare the clinical effect and patient experience of laparoendoscopic single-site varicocelectomy (LESSV) and conventional laparoscopic varicocelectomy. The candidate studies were included after literature search of database Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMBASE, and MEDLINE. Related information on essential data and outcome measures was extracted from the eligible studies by two independent authors, and a meta-analysis was conducted using STATA 12.0 software. Subgroup analyses were conducted by study design (RCT and non-RCT). The odds ratio (OR) or standardized mean difference (SMD) and their 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were used to estimate the outcome measures. Seven articles were included in our meta-analysis. The results indicated that patient who had undergone LESSV had a shorter duration of back to work (overall: SMD = −1.454, 95% CI: −2.502–−0.405, P = 0.007; non-RCT: SMD = −2.906, 95% CI: −3.796–−2.017, P = 0.000; and RCT: SMD = −0.841, 95% CI: −1.393–−0.289, P = 0.003) and less pain experience at 3 h or 6 h (SMD = −0.447, 95% CI: −0.754–−0.139, P = 0.004), day 1 (SMD = −0.477, 95% CI: −0.905–−0.05, P = 0.029), and day 2 (SMD = −0.612, 95% CI: −1.099–−0.125, P = 0.014) postoperatively based on RCT studies. However, the meta-analyses based on operation time, clinical effect (improvement of semen quality and scrotal pain relief), and complications (hydrocele and recurrence) yielded nonsignificant results. In conclusion, LESSV had a rapid recovery and less pain experience over conventional laparoscopic varicocelectomy. However, there was no statistically significant difference between the two varicocelectomy techniques in terms of the clinical effect and the incidence of hydrocele and varicocele recurrence. More high-quality studies are warranted for a comprehensive conclusion.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5312228
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53122282017-03-01 Comparison of surgical effect and postoperative patient experience between laparoendoscopic single-site and conventional laparoscopic varicocelectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis Zhang, Zheng Zheng, Shu-Juan Yu, Wen Han, You-Feng Chen, Hai Chen, Yun Dai, Yu-Tian Asian J Androl Original Article The present meta-analysis was conducted to compare the clinical effect and patient experience of laparoendoscopic single-site varicocelectomy (LESSV) and conventional laparoscopic varicocelectomy. The candidate studies were included after literature search of database Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMBASE, and MEDLINE. Related information on essential data and outcome measures was extracted from the eligible studies by two independent authors, and a meta-analysis was conducted using STATA 12.0 software. Subgroup analyses were conducted by study design (RCT and non-RCT). The odds ratio (OR) or standardized mean difference (SMD) and their 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were used to estimate the outcome measures. Seven articles were included in our meta-analysis. The results indicated that patient who had undergone LESSV had a shorter duration of back to work (overall: SMD = −1.454, 95% CI: −2.502–−0.405, P = 0.007; non-RCT: SMD = −2.906, 95% CI: −3.796–−2.017, P = 0.000; and RCT: SMD = −0.841, 95% CI: −1.393–−0.289, P = 0.003) and less pain experience at 3 h or 6 h (SMD = −0.447, 95% CI: −0.754–−0.139, P = 0.004), day 1 (SMD = −0.477, 95% CI: −0.905–−0.05, P = 0.029), and day 2 (SMD = −0.612, 95% CI: −1.099–−0.125, P = 0.014) postoperatively based on RCT studies. However, the meta-analyses based on operation time, clinical effect (improvement of semen quality and scrotal pain relief), and complications (hydrocele and recurrence) yielded nonsignificant results. In conclusion, LESSV had a rapid recovery and less pain experience over conventional laparoscopic varicocelectomy. However, there was no statistically significant difference between the two varicocelectomy techniques in terms of the clinical effect and the incidence of hydrocele and varicocele recurrence. More high-quality studies are warranted for a comprehensive conclusion. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017 2016-05-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5312228/ /pubmed/27212128 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1008-682X.181194 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Asian Journal of Andrology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Zhang, Zheng
Zheng, Shu-Juan
Yu, Wen
Han, You-Feng
Chen, Hai
Chen, Yun
Dai, Yu-Tian
Comparison of surgical effect and postoperative patient experience between laparoendoscopic single-site and conventional laparoscopic varicocelectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Comparison of surgical effect and postoperative patient experience between laparoendoscopic single-site and conventional laparoscopic varicocelectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Comparison of surgical effect and postoperative patient experience between laparoendoscopic single-site and conventional laparoscopic varicocelectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Comparison of surgical effect and postoperative patient experience between laparoendoscopic single-site and conventional laparoscopic varicocelectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of surgical effect and postoperative patient experience between laparoendoscopic single-site and conventional laparoscopic varicocelectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Comparison of surgical effect and postoperative patient experience between laparoendoscopic single-site and conventional laparoscopic varicocelectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort comparison of surgical effect and postoperative patient experience between laparoendoscopic single-site and conventional laparoscopic varicocelectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5312228/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27212128
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1008-682X.181194
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangzheng comparisonofsurgicaleffectandpostoperativepatientexperiencebetweenlaparoendoscopicsinglesiteandconventionallaparoscopicvaricocelectomyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhengshujuan comparisonofsurgicaleffectandpostoperativepatientexperiencebetweenlaparoendoscopicsinglesiteandconventionallaparoscopicvaricocelectomyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yuwen comparisonofsurgicaleffectandpostoperativepatientexperiencebetweenlaparoendoscopicsinglesiteandconventionallaparoscopicvaricocelectomyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT hanyoufeng comparisonofsurgicaleffectandpostoperativepatientexperiencebetweenlaparoendoscopicsinglesiteandconventionallaparoscopicvaricocelectomyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT chenhai comparisonofsurgicaleffectandpostoperativepatientexperiencebetweenlaparoendoscopicsinglesiteandconventionallaparoscopicvaricocelectomyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT chenyun comparisonofsurgicaleffectandpostoperativepatientexperiencebetweenlaparoendoscopicsinglesiteandconventionallaparoscopicvaricocelectomyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT daiyutian comparisonofsurgicaleffectandpostoperativepatientexperiencebetweenlaparoendoscopicsinglesiteandconventionallaparoscopicvaricocelectomyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis