Cargando…
Comparison of surgical effect and postoperative patient experience between laparoendoscopic single-site and conventional laparoscopic varicocelectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
The present meta-analysis was conducted to compare the clinical effect and patient experience of laparoendoscopic single-site varicocelectomy (LESSV) and conventional laparoscopic varicocelectomy. The candidate studies were included after literature search of database Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMBAS...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5312228/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27212128 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1008-682X.181194 |
_version_ | 1782508165627117568 |
---|---|
author | Zhang, Zheng Zheng, Shu-Juan Yu, Wen Han, You-Feng Chen, Hai Chen, Yun Dai, Yu-Tian |
author_facet | Zhang, Zheng Zheng, Shu-Juan Yu, Wen Han, You-Feng Chen, Hai Chen, Yun Dai, Yu-Tian |
author_sort | Zhang, Zheng |
collection | PubMed |
description | The present meta-analysis was conducted to compare the clinical effect and patient experience of laparoendoscopic single-site varicocelectomy (LESSV) and conventional laparoscopic varicocelectomy. The candidate studies were included after literature search of database Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMBASE, and MEDLINE. Related information on essential data and outcome measures was extracted from the eligible studies by two independent authors, and a meta-analysis was conducted using STATA 12.0 software. Subgroup analyses were conducted by study design (RCT and non-RCT). The odds ratio (OR) or standardized mean difference (SMD) and their 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were used to estimate the outcome measures. Seven articles were included in our meta-analysis. The results indicated that patient who had undergone LESSV had a shorter duration of back to work (overall: SMD = −1.454, 95% CI: −2.502–−0.405, P = 0.007; non-RCT: SMD = −2.906, 95% CI: −3.796–−2.017, P = 0.000; and RCT: SMD = −0.841, 95% CI: −1.393–−0.289, P = 0.003) and less pain experience at 3 h or 6 h (SMD = −0.447, 95% CI: −0.754–−0.139, P = 0.004), day 1 (SMD = −0.477, 95% CI: −0.905–−0.05, P = 0.029), and day 2 (SMD = −0.612, 95% CI: −1.099–−0.125, P = 0.014) postoperatively based on RCT studies. However, the meta-analyses based on operation time, clinical effect (improvement of semen quality and scrotal pain relief), and complications (hydrocele and recurrence) yielded nonsignificant results. In conclusion, LESSV had a rapid recovery and less pain experience over conventional laparoscopic varicocelectomy. However, there was no statistically significant difference between the two varicocelectomy techniques in terms of the clinical effect and the incidence of hydrocele and varicocele recurrence. More high-quality studies are warranted for a comprehensive conclusion. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5312228 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53122282017-03-01 Comparison of surgical effect and postoperative patient experience between laparoendoscopic single-site and conventional laparoscopic varicocelectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis Zhang, Zheng Zheng, Shu-Juan Yu, Wen Han, You-Feng Chen, Hai Chen, Yun Dai, Yu-Tian Asian J Androl Original Article The present meta-analysis was conducted to compare the clinical effect and patient experience of laparoendoscopic single-site varicocelectomy (LESSV) and conventional laparoscopic varicocelectomy. The candidate studies were included after literature search of database Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMBASE, and MEDLINE. Related information on essential data and outcome measures was extracted from the eligible studies by two independent authors, and a meta-analysis was conducted using STATA 12.0 software. Subgroup analyses were conducted by study design (RCT and non-RCT). The odds ratio (OR) or standardized mean difference (SMD) and their 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were used to estimate the outcome measures. Seven articles were included in our meta-analysis. The results indicated that patient who had undergone LESSV had a shorter duration of back to work (overall: SMD = −1.454, 95% CI: −2.502–−0.405, P = 0.007; non-RCT: SMD = −2.906, 95% CI: −3.796–−2.017, P = 0.000; and RCT: SMD = −0.841, 95% CI: −1.393–−0.289, P = 0.003) and less pain experience at 3 h or 6 h (SMD = −0.447, 95% CI: −0.754–−0.139, P = 0.004), day 1 (SMD = −0.477, 95% CI: −0.905–−0.05, P = 0.029), and day 2 (SMD = −0.612, 95% CI: −1.099–−0.125, P = 0.014) postoperatively based on RCT studies. However, the meta-analyses based on operation time, clinical effect (improvement of semen quality and scrotal pain relief), and complications (hydrocele and recurrence) yielded nonsignificant results. In conclusion, LESSV had a rapid recovery and less pain experience over conventional laparoscopic varicocelectomy. However, there was no statistically significant difference between the two varicocelectomy techniques in terms of the clinical effect and the incidence of hydrocele and varicocele recurrence. More high-quality studies are warranted for a comprehensive conclusion. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017 2016-05-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5312228/ /pubmed/27212128 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1008-682X.181194 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Asian Journal of Andrology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Zhang, Zheng Zheng, Shu-Juan Yu, Wen Han, You-Feng Chen, Hai Chen, Yun Dai, Yu-Tian Comparison of surgical effect and postoperative patient experience between laparoendoscopic single-site and conventional laparoscopic varicocelectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Comparison of surgical effect and postoperative patient experience between laparoendoscopic single-site and conventional laparoscopic varicocelectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Comparison of surgical effect and postoperative patient experience between laparoendoscopic single-site and conventional laparoscopic varicocelectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Comparison of surgical effect and postoperative patient experience between laparoendoscopic single-site and conventional laparoscopic varicocelectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of surgical effect and postoperative patient experience between laparoendoscopic single-site and conventional laparoscopic varicocelectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Comparison of surgical effect and postoperative patient experience between laparoendoscopic single-site and conventional laparoscopic varicocelectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | comparison of surgical effect and postoperative patient experience between laparoendoscopic single-site and conventional laparoscopic varicocelectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5312228/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27212128 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1008-682X.181194 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhangzheng comparisonofsurgicaleffectandpostoperativepatientexperiencebetweenlaparoendoscopicsinglesiteandconventionallaparoscopicvaricocelectomyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zhengshujuan comparisonofsurgicaleffectandpostoperativepatientexperiencebetweenlaparoendoscopicsinglesiteandconventionallaparoscopicvaricocelectomyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT yuwen comparisonofsurgicaleffectandpostoperativepatientexperiencebetweenlaparoendoscopicsinglesiteandconventionallaparoscopicvaricocelectomyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT hanyoufeng comparisonofsurgicaleffectandpostoperativepatientexperiencebetweenlaparoendoscopicsinglesiteandconventionallaparoscopicvaricocelectomyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT chenhai comparisonofsurgicaleffectandpostoperativepatientexperiencebetweenlaparoendoscopicsinglesiteandconventionallaparoscopicvaricocelectomyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT chenyun comparisonofsurgicaleffectandpostoperativepatientexperiencebetweenlaparoendoscopicsinglesiteandconventionallaparoscopicvaricocelectomyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT daiyutian comparisonofsurgicaleffectandpostoperativepatientexperiencebetweenlaparoendoscopicsinglesiteandconventionallaparoscopicvaricocelectomyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |