Cargando…

Whether regional lymph nodes evaluation should be equally required for both right and left colon cancer

Despite the adequacy of nodal evaluation was gradually improved for colon cancer, the disparity in nodal examination for right colon cancer (RCC) and left colon cancer (LCC) still begs the question of whether 12 nodes is an appropriate threshold for both RCC and LCC. From Surveillance, Epidemiology,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Guan, Xu, Chen, Wei, Liu, Zheng, Jiang, Zheng, Hu, Hanqing, Zhao, Zhixun, Wang, Song, Chen, Yinggang, Wang, Guiyu, Wang, Xishan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Impact Journals LLC 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5312360/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27494866
http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.11007
_version_ 1782508192116244480
author Guan, Xu
Chen, Wei
Liu, Zheng
Jiang, Zheng
Hu, Hanqing
Zhao, Zhixun
Wang, Song
Chen, Yinggang
Wang, Guiyu
Wang, Xishan
author_facet Guan, Xu
Chen, Wei
Liu, Zheng
Jiang, Zheng
Hu, Hanqing
Zhao, Zhixun
Wang, Song
Chen, Yinggang
Wang, Guiyu
Wang, Xishan
author_sort Guan, Xu
collection PubMed
description Despite the adequacy of nodal evaluation was gradually improved for colon cancer, the disparity in nodal examination for right colon cancer (RCC) and left colon cancer (LCC) still begs the question of whether 12 nodes is an appropriate threshold for both RCC and LCC. From Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End-Results (SEER) database, we identified 53897 RCC patients and 11822 LCC patients. Compared with LCC patients, RCC patients examined more lymph nodes (18.7 vs 16.3), and more likely to examine ≥12 nodes (P<0.001), whereas RCC patients showed lower rates of node positivity (P<0.001). To balance the nodal disparity between RCC and LCC, we revised the 12-node measure based on different tumor locations. With the X-tile, we determined 15 as the optimal node number for RCC and 11 for LCC. To validate the availability of this revised nodal evaluation, the 5-year cancer specific survival (CSS) was calculated according to the optimal node number in RCC and LCC patients, Cox's regression model were used to further assess the prognostic value of this revised nodal evaluation. The results showed that 5-year CSSs were significantly improved for RCC patients with ≥15 lymph nodes, and also for LCC patients with ≥11 lymph nodes (P<0.001). This revised nodal evaluation could also improve the rate of nodal positivity and long-term survival in both RCC and LCC patients compared with 12-node measure. Therefore, the lymph node examination should be discriminately evaluated for RCC and LCC, instead of using 12-node measure to colon cancer as a whole.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5312360
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Impact Journals LLC
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53123602017-03-06 Whether regional lymph nodes evaluation should be equally required for both right and left colon cancer Guan, Xu Chen, Wei Liu, Zheng Jiang, Zheng Hu, Hanqing Zhao, Zhixun Wang, Song Chen, Yinggang Wang, Guiyu Wang, Xishan Oncotarget Research Paper Despite the adequacy of nodal evaluation was gradually improved for colon cancer, the disparity in nodal examination for right colon cancer (RCC) and left colon cancer (LCC) still begs the question of whether 12 nodes is an appropriate threshold for both RCC and LCC. From Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End-Results (SEER) database, we identified 53897 RCC patients and 11822 LCC patients. Compared with LCC patients, RCC patients examined more lymph nodes (18.7 vs 16.3), and more likely to examine ≥12 nodes (P<0.001), whereas RCC patients showed lower rates of node positivity (P<0.001). To balance the nodal disparity between RCC and LCC, we revised the 12-node measure based on different tumor locations. With the X-tile, we determined 15 as the optimal node number for RCC and 11 for LCC. To validate the availability of this revised nodal evaluation, the 5-year cancer specific survival (CSS) was calculated according to the optimal node number in RCC and LCC patients, Cox's regression model were used to further assess the prognostic value of this revised nodal evaluation. The results showed that 5-year CSSs were significantly improved for RCC patients with ≥15 lymph nodes, and also for LCC patients with ≥11 lymph nodes (P<0.001). This revised nodal evaluation could also improve the rate of nodal positivity and long-term survival in both RCC and LCC patients compared with 12-node measure. Therefore, the lymph node examination should be discriminately evaluated for RCC and LCC, instead of using 12-node measure to colon cancer as a whole. Impact Journals LLC 2016-08-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5312360/ /pubmed/27494866 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.11007 Text en Copyright: © 2016 Guan et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Paper
Guan, Xu
Chen, Wei
Liu, Zheng
Jiang, Zheng
Hu, Hanqing
Zhao, Zhixun
Wang, Song
Chen, Yinggang
Wang, Guiyu
Wang, Xishan
Whether regional lymph nodes evaluation should be equally required for both right and left colon cancer
title Whether regional lymph nodes evaluation should be equally required for both right and left colon cancer
title_full Whether regional lymph nodes evaluation should be equally required for both right and left colon cancer
title_fullStr Whether regional lymph nodes evaluation should be equally required for both right and left colon cancer
title_full_unstemmed Whether regional lymph nodes evaluation should be equally required for both right and left colon cancer
title_short Whether regional lymph nodes evaluation should be equally required for both right and left colon cancer
title_sort whether regional lymph nodes evaluation should be equally required for both right and left colon cancer
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5312360/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27494866
http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.11007
work_keys_str_mv AT guanxu whetherregionallymphnodesevaluationshouldbeequallyrequiredforbothrightandleftcoloncancer
AT chenwei whetherregionallymphnodesevaluationshouldbeequallyrequiredforbothrightandleftcoloncancer
AT liuzheng whetherregionallymphnodesevaluationshouldbeequallyrequiredforbothrightandleftcoloncancer
AT jiangzheng whetherregionallymphnodesevaluationshouldbeequallyrequiredforbothrightandleftcoloncancer
AT huhanqing whetherregionallymphnodesevaluationshouldbeequallyrequiredforbothrightandleftcoloncancer
AT zhaozhixun whetherregionallymphnodesevaluationshouldbeequallyrequiredforbothrightandleftcoloncancer
AT wangsong whetherregionallymphnodesevaluationshouldbeequallyrequiredforbothrightandleftcoloncancer
AT chenyinggang whetherregionallymphnodesevaluationshouldbeequallyrequiredforbothrightandleftcoloncancer
AT wangguiyu whetherregionallymphnodesevaluationshouldbeequallyrequiredforbothrightandleftcoloncancer
AT wangxishan whetherregionallymphnodesevaluationshouldbeequallyrequiredforbothrightandleftcoloncancer