Cargando…

A phase II study to evaluate LY2603618 in combination with gemcitabine in pancreatic cancer patients

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine whether checkpoint kinase 1 inihibitor (CHK1), LY2603618, and gemcitabine prolong overall survival (OS) compared to gemcitabine alone in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer. METHODS: Patients with Stage II-IV locally advanced or metastatic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Laquente, Berta, Lopez-Martin, Jose, Richards, Donald, Illerhaus, Gerald, Chang, David Z., Kim, George, Stella, Philip, Richel, Dirk, Szcylik, Cezary, Cascinu, Stefano, Frassineti, G. L., Ciuleanu, Tudor, Hurt, Karla, Hynes, Scott, Lin, Ji, Lin, Aimee Bence, Von Hoff, Daniel, Calvo, Emiliano
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5312529/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28202004
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-017-3131-x
_version_ 1782508221949280256
author Laquente, Berta
Lopez-Martin, Jose
Richards, Donald
Illerhaus, Gerald
Chang, David Z.
Kim, George
Stella, Philip
Richel, Dirk
Szcylik, Cezary
Cascinu, Stefano
Frassineti, G. L.
Ciuleanu, Tudor
Hurt, Karla
Hynes, Scott
Lin, Ji
Lin, Aimee Bence
Von Hoff, Daniel
Calvo, Emiliano
author_facet Laquente, Berta
Lopez-Martin, Jose
Richards, Donald
Illerhaus, Gerald
Chang, David Z.
Kim, George
Stella, Philip
Richel, Dirk
Szcylik, Cezary
Cascinu, Stefano
Frassineti, G. L.
Ciuleanu, Tudor
Hurt, Karla
Hynes, Scott
Lin, Ji
Lin, Aimee Bence
Von Hoff, Daniel
Calvo, Emiliano
author_sort Laquente, Berta
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine whether checkpoint kinase 1 inihibitor (CHK1), LY2603618, and gemcitabine prolong overall survival (OS) compared to gemcitabine alone in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer. METHODS: Patients with Stage II-IV locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer were randomized (2:1) to either 230 mg of LY2603618/1000 mg/m(2) gemcitabine combined or 1000 mg/m(2) gemcitabine alone. OS was assessed using both a Bayesian augment control model and traditional frequentist analysis for inference. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), duration of response, pharmacokinetics (PK), and safety (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [AEs] v 3.0) were also evaluated. RESULTS: Ninety-nine patients (n = 65, LY2603618/gemcitabine; n = 34, gemcitabine) were randomized (intent-to-treat population). The median OS (months) was 7.8 (range, 0.3–18.9) with LY2603618/gemcitabine and 8.3 (range, 0.8-19.1+) with gemcitabine. Similarly, in a Bayesian analysis, the study was not positive since the posterior probability that LY2603618/gemcitabine was superior to gemcitabine in improving OS was 0.3, which did not exceed the prespecified threshold of 0.8. No significant improvements in PFS, ORR, or duration of response were observed. Drug-related treatment-emergent AEs in both arms included nausea, thrombocytopenia, fatigue, and neutropenia. The severity of AEs with LY2603618/gemcitabine was comparable to gemcitabine. The LY2603618 exposure targets (AUC((0-∞)) ≥21,000 ng∙hr/mL and C(max) ≥2000 ng/mL) predicted for maximum pharmacodynamic response were achieved after 230 mg of LY2603618. CONCLUSIONS: LY2603618/gemcitabine was not superior to gemcitabine for the treatment of patients with pancreatic cancer. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT00839332. Clinicaltrials.gov. Date of registration: 6 February 2009
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5312529
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53125292017-02-24 A phase II study to evaluate LY2603618 in combination with gemcitabine in pancreatic cancer patients Laquente, Berta Lopez-Martin, Jose Richards, Donald Illerhaus, Gerald Chang, David Z. Kim, George Stella, Philip Richel, Dirk Szcylik, Cezary Cascinu, Stefano Frassineti, G. L. Ciuleanu, Tudor Hurt, Karla Hynes, Scott Lin, Ji Lin, Aimee Bence Von Hoff, Daniel Calvo, Emiliano BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine whether checkpoint kinase 1 inihibitor (CHK1), LY2603618, and gemcitabine prolong overall survival (OS) compared to gemcitabine alone in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer. METHODS: Patients with Stage II-IV locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer were randomized (2:1) to either 230 mg of LY2603618/1000 mg/m(2) gemcitabine combined or 1000 mg/m(2) gemcitabine alone. OS was assessed using both a Bayesian augment control model and traditional frequentist analysis for inference. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), duration of response, pharmacokinetics (PK), and safety (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [AEs] v 3.0) were also evaluated. RESULTS: Ninety-nine patients (n = 65, LY2603618/gemcitabine; n = 34, gemcitabine) were randomized (intent-to-treat population). The median OS (months) was 7.8 (range, 0.3–18.9) with LY2603618/gemcitabine and 8.3 (range, 0.8-19.1+) with gemcitabine. Similarly, in a Bayesian analysis, the study was not positive since the posterior probability that LY2603618/gemcitabine was superior to gemcitabine in improving OS was 0.3, which did not exceed the prespecified threshold of 0.8. No significant improvements in PFS, ORR, or duration of response were observed. Drug-related treatment-emergent AEs in both arms included nausea, thrombocytopenia, fatigue, and neutropenia. The severity of AEs with LY2603618/gemcitabine was comparable to gemcitabine. The LY2603618 exposure targets (AUC((0-∞)) ≥21,000 ng∙hr/mL and C(max) ≥2000 ng/mL) predicted for maximum pharmacodynamic response were achieved after 230 mg of LY2603618. CONCLUSIONS: LY2603618/gemcitabine was not superior to gemcitabine for the treatment of patients with pancreatic cancer. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT00839332. Clinicaltrials.gov. Date of registration: 6 February 2009 BioMed Central 2017-02-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5312529/ /pubmed/28202004 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-017-3131-x Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Laquente, Berta
Lopez-Martin, Jose
Richards, Donald
Illerhaus, Gerald
Chang, David Z.
Kim, George
Stella, Philip
Richel, Dirk
Szcylik, Cezary
Cascinu, Stefano
Frassineti, G. L.
Ciuleanu, Tudor
Hurt, Karla
Hynes, Scott
Lin, Ji
Lin, Aimee Bence
Von Hoff, Daniel
Calvo, Emiliano
A phase II study to evaluate LY2603618 in combination with gemcitabine in pancreatic cancer patients
title A phase II study to evaluate LY2603618 in combination with gemcitabine in pancreatic cancer patients
title_full A phase II study to evaluate LY2603618 in combination with gemcitabine in pancreatic cancer patients
title_fullStr A phase II study to evaluate LY2603618 in combination with gemcitabine in pancreatic cancer patients
title_full_unstemmed A phase II study to evaluate LY2603618 in combination with gemcitabine in pancreatic cancer patients
title_short A phase II study to evaluate LY2603618 in combination with gemcitabine in pancreatic cancer patients
title_sort phase ii study to evaluate ly2603618 in combination with gemcitabine in pancreatic cancer patients
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5312529/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28202004
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-017-3131-x
work_keys_str_mv AT laquenteberta aphaseiistudytoevaluately2603618incombinationwithgemcitabineinpancreaticcancerpatients
AT lopezmartinjose aphaseiistudytoevaluately2603618incombinationwithgemcitabineinpancreaticcancerpatients
AT richardsdonald aphaseiistudytoevaluately2603618incombinationwithgemcitabineinpancreaticcancerpatients
AT illerhausgerald aphaseiistudytoevaluately2603618incombinationwithgemcitabineinpancreaticcancerpatients
AT changdavidz aphaseiistudytoevaluately2603618incombinationwithgemcitabineinpancreaticcancerpatients
AT kimgeorge aphaseiistudytoevaluately2603618incombinationwithgemcitabineinpancreaticcancerpatients
AT stellaphilip aphaseiistudytoevaluately2603618incombinationwithgemcitabineinpancreaticcancerpatients
AT richeldirk aphaseiistudytoevaluately2603618incombinationwithgemcitabineinpancreaticcancerpatients
AT szcylikcezary aphaseiistudytoevaluately2603618incombinationwithgemcitabineinpancreaticcancerpatients
AT cascinustefano aphaseiistudytoevaluately2603618incombinationwithgemcitabineinpancreaticcancerpatients
AT frassinetigl aphaseiistudytoevaluately2603618incombinationwithgemcitabineinpancreaticcancerpatients
AT ciuleanutudor aphaseiistudytoevaluately2603618incombinationwithgemcitabineinpancreaticcancerpatients
AT hurtkarla aphaseiistudytoevaluately2603618incombinationwithgemcitabineinpancreaticcancerpatients
AT hynesscott aphaseiistudytoevaluately2603618incombinationwithgemcitabineinpancreaticcancerpatients
AT linji aphaseiistudytoevaluately2603618incombinationwithgemcitabineinpancreaticcancerpatients
AT linaimeebence aphaseiistudytoevaluately2603618incombinationwithgemcitabineinpancreaticcancerpatients
AT vonhoffdaniel aphaseiistudytoevaluately2603618incombinationwithgemcitabineinpancreaticcancerpatients
AT calvoemiliano aphaseiistudytoevaluately2603618incombinationwithgemcitabineinpancreaticcancerpatients
AT laquenteberta phaseiistudytoevaluately2603618incombinationwithgemcitabineinpancreaticcancerpatients
AT lopezmartinjose phaseiistudytoevaluately2603618incombinationwithgemcitabineinpancreaticcancerpatients
AT richardsdonald phaseiistudytoevaluately2603618incombinationwithgemcitabineinpancreaticcancerpatients
AT illerhausgerald phaseiistudytoevaluately2603618incombinationwithgemcitabineinpancreaticcancerpatients
AT changdavidz phaseiistudytoevaluately2603618incombinationwithgemcitabineinpancreaticcancerpatients
AT kimgeorge phaseiistudytoevaluately2603618incombinationwithgemcitabineinpancreaticcancerpatients
AT stellaphilip phaseiistudytoevaluately2603618incombinationwithgemcitabineinpancreaticcancerpatients
AT richeldirk phaseiistudytoevaluately2603618incombinationwithgemcitabineinpancreaticcancerpatients
AT szcylikcezary phaseiistudytoevaluately2603618incombinationwithgemcitabineinpancreaticcancerpatients
AT cascinustefano phaseiistudytoevaluately2603618incombinationwithgemcitabineinpancreaticcancerpatients
AT frassinetigl phaseiistudytoevaluately2603618incombinationwithgemcitabineinpancreaticcancerpatients
AT ciuleanutudor phaseiistudytoevaluately2603618incombinationwithgemcitabineinpancreaticcancerpatients
AT hurtkarla phaseiistudytoevaluately2603618incombinationwithgemcitabineinpancreaticcancerpatients
AT hynesscott phaseiistudytoevaluately2603618incombinationwithgemcitabineinpancreaticcancerpatients
AT linji phaseiistudytoevaluately2603618incombinationwithgemcitabineinpancreaticcancerpatients
AT linaimeebence phaseiistudytoevaluately2603618incombinationwithgemcitabineinpancreaticcancerpatients
AT vonhoffdaniel phaseiistudytoevaluately2603618incombinationwithgemcitabineinpancreaticcancerpatients
AT calvoemiliano phaseiistudytoevaluately2603618incombinationwithgemcitabineinpancreaticcancerpatients