Cargando…
A phase II study to evaluate LY2603618 in combination with gemcitabine in pancreatic cancer patients
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine whether checkpoint kinase 1 inihibitor (CHK1), LY2603618, and gemcitabine prolong overall survival (OS) compared to gemcitabine alone in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer. METHODS: Patients with Stage II-IV locally advanced or metastatic...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5312529/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28202004 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-017-3131-x |
_version_ | 1782508221949280256 |
---|---|
author | Laquente, Berta Lopez-Martin, Jose Richards, Donald Illerhaus, Gerald Chang, David Z. Kim, George Stella, Philip Richel, Dirk Szcylik, Cezary Cascinu, Stefano Frassineti, G. L. Ciuleanu, Tudor Hurt, Karla Hynes, Scott Lin, Ji Lin, Aimee Bence Von Hoff, Daniel Calvo, Emiliano |
author_facet | Laquente, Berta Lopez-Martin, Jose Richards, Donald Illerhaus, Gerald Chang, David Z. Kim, George Stella, Philip Richel, Dirk Szcylik, Cezary Cascinu, Stefano Frassineti, G. L. Ciuleanu, Tudor Hurt, Karla Hynes, Scott Lin, Ji Lin, Aimee Bence Von Hoff, Daniel Calvo, Emiliano |
author_sort | Laquente, Berta |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine whether checkpoint kinase 1 inihibitor (CHK1), LY2603618, and gemcitabine prolong overall survival (OS) compared to gemcitabine alone in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer. METHODS: Patients with Stage II-IV locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer were randomized (2:1) to either 230 mg of LY2603618/1000 mg/m(2) gemcitabine combined or 1000 mg/m(2) gemcitabine alone. OS was assessed using both a Bayesian augment control model and traditional frequentist analysis for inference. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), duration of response, pharmacokinetics (PK), and safety (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [AEs] v 3.0) were also evaluated. RESULTS: Ninety-nine patients (n = 65, LY2603618/gemcitabine; n = 34, gemcitabine) were randomized (intent-to-treat population). The median OS (months) was 7.8 (range, 0.3–18.9) with LY2603618/gemcitabine and 8.3 (range, 0.8-19.1+) with gemcitabine. Similarly, in a Bayesian analysis, the study was not positive since the posterior probability that LY2603618/gemcitabine was superior to gemcitabine in improving OS was 0.3, which did not exceed the prespecified threshold of 0.8. No significant improvements in PFS, ORR, or duration of response were observed. Drug-related treatment-emergent AEs in both arms included nausea, thrombocytopenia, fatigue, and neutropenia. The severity of AEs with LY2603618/gemcitabine was comparable to gemcitabine. The LY2603618 exposure targets (AUC((0-∞)) ≥21,000 ng∙hr/mL and C(max) ≥2000 ng/mL) predicted for maximum pharmacodynamic response were achieved after 230 mg of LY2603618. CONCLUSIONS: LY2603618/gemcitabine was not superior to gemcitabine for the treatment of patients with pancreatic cancer. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT00839332. Clinicaltrials.gov. Date of registration: 6 February 2009 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5312529 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53125292017-02-24 A phase II study to evaluate LY2603618 in combination with gemcitabine in pancreatic cancer patients Laquente, Berta Lopez-Martin, Jose Richards, Donald Illerhaus, Gerald Chang, David Z. Kim, George Stella, Philip Richel, Dirk Szcylik, Cezary Cascinu, Stefano Frassineti, G. L. Ciuleanu, Tudor Hurt, Karla Hynes, Scott Lin, Ji Lin, Aimee Bence Von Hoff, Daniel Calvo, Emiliano BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine whether checkpoint kinase 1 inihibitor (CHK1), LY2603618, and gemcitabine prolong overall survival (OS) compared to gemcitabine alone in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer. METHODS: Patients with Stage II-IV locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer were randomized (2:1) to either 230 mg of LY2603618/1000 mg/m(2) gemcitabine combined or 1000 mg/m(2) gemcitabine alone. OS was assessed using both a Bayesian augment control model and traditional frequentist analysis for inference. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), duration of response, pharmacokinetics (PK), and safety (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [AEs] v 3.0) were also evaluated. RESULTS: Ninety-nine patients (n = 65, LY2603618/gemcitabine; n = 34, gemcitabine) were randomized (intent-to-treat population). The median OS (months) was 7.8 (range, 0.3–18.9) with LY2603618/gemcitabine and 8.3 (range, 0.8-19.1+) with gemcitabine. Similarly, in a Bayesian analysis, the study was not positive since the posterior probability that LY2603618/gemcitabine was superior to gemcitabine in improving OS was 0.3, which did not exceed the prespecified threshold of 0.8. No significant improvements in PFS, ORR, or duration of response were observed. Drug-related treatment-emergent AEs in both arms included nausea, thrombocytopenia, fatigue, and neutropenia. The severity of AEs with LY2603618/gemcitabine was comparable to gemcitabine. The LY2603618 exposure targets (AUC((0-∞)) ≥21,000 ng∙hr/mL and C(max) ≥2000 ng/mL) predicted for maximum pharmacodynamic response were achieved after 230 mg of LY2603618. CONCLUSIONS: LY2603618/gemcitabine was not superior to gemcitabine for the treatment of patients with pancreatic cancer. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT00839332. Clinicaltrials.gov. Date of registration: 6 February 2009 BioMed Central 2017-02-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5312529/ /pubmed/28202004 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-017-3131-x Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Laquente, Berta Lopez-Martin, Jose Richards, Donald Illerhaus, Gerald Chang, David Z. Kim, George Stella, Philip Richel, Dirk Szcylik, Cezary Cascinu, Stefano Frassineti, G. L. Ciuleanu, Tudor Hurt, Karla Hynes, Scott Lin, Ji Lin, Aimee Bence Von Hoff, Daniel Calvo, Emiliano A phase II study to evaluate LY2603618 in combination with gemcitabine in pancreatic cancer patients |
title | A phase II study to evaluate LY2603618 in combination with gemcitabine in pancreatic cancer patients |
title_full | A phase II study to evaluate LY2603618 in combination with gemcitabine in pancreatic cancer patients |
title_fullStr | A phase II study to evaluate LY2603618 in combination with gemcitabine in pancreatic cancer patients |
title_full_unstemmed | A phase II study to evaluate LY2603618 in combination with gemcitabine in pancreatic cancer patients |
title_short | A phase II study to evaluate LY2603618 in combination with gemcitabine in pancreatic cancer patients |
title_sort | phase ii study to evaluate ly2603618 in combination with gemcitabine in pancreatic cancer patients |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5312529/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28202004 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-017-3131-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT laquenteberta aphaseiistudytoevaluately2603618incombinationwithgemcitabineinpancreaticcancerpatients AT lopezmartinjose aphaseiistudytoevaluately2603618incombinationwithgemcitabineinpancreaticcancerpatients AT richardsdonald aphaseiistudytoevaluately2603618incombinationwithgemcitabineinpancreaticcancerpatients AT illerhausgerald aphaseiistudytoevaluately2603618incombinationwithgemcitabineinpancreaticcancerpatients AT changdavidz aphaseiistudytoevaluately2603618incombinationwithgemcitabineinpancreaticcancerpatients AT kimgeorge aphaseiistudytoevaluately2603618incombinationwithgemcitabineinpancreaticcancerpatients AT stellaphilip aphaseiistudytoevaluately2603618incombinationwithgemcitabineinpancreaticcancerpatients AT richeldirk aphaseiistudytoevaluately2603618incombinationwithgemcitabineinpancreaticcancerpatients AT szcylikcezary aphaseiistudytoevaluately2603618incombinationwithgemcitabineinpancreaticcancerpatients AT cascinustefano aphaseiistudytoevaluately2603618incombinationwithgemcitabineinpancreaticcancerpatients AT frassinetigl aphaseiistudytoevaluately2603618incombinationwithgemcitabineinpancreaticcancerpatients AT ciuleanutudor aphaseiistudytoevaluately2603618incombinationwithgemcitabineinpancreaticcancerpatients AT hurtkarla aphaseiistudytoevaluately2603618incombinationwithgemcitabineinpancreaticcancerpatients AT hynesscott aphaseiistudytoevaluately2603618incombinationwithgemcitabineinpancreaticcancerpatients AT linji aphaseiistudytoevaluately2603618incombinationwithgemcitabineinpancreaticcancerpatients AT linaimeebence aphaseiistudytoevaluately2603618incombinationwithgemcitabineinpancreaticcancerpatients AT vonhoffdaniel aphaseiistudytoevaluately2603618incombinationwithgemcitabineinpancreaticcancerpatients AT calvoemiliano aphaseiistudytoevaluately2603618incombinationwithgemcitabineinpancreaticcancerpatients AT laquenteberta phaseiistudytoevaluately2603618incombinationwithgemcitabineinpancreaticcancerpatients AT lopezmartinjose phaseiistudytoevaluately2603618incombinationwithgemcitabineinpancreaticcancerpatients AT richardsdonald phaseiistudytoevaluately2603618incombinationwithgemcitabineinpancreaticcancerpatients AT illerhausgerald phaseiistudytoevaluately2603618incombinationwithgemcitabineinpancreaticcancerpatients AT changdavidz phaseiistudytoevaluately2603618incombinationwithgemcitabineinpancreaticcancerpatients AT kimgeorge phaseiistudytoevaluately2603618incombinationwithgemcitabineinpancreaticcancerpatients AT stellaphilip phaseiistudytoevaluately2603618incombinationwithgemcitabineinpancreaticcancerpatients AT richeldirk phaseiistudytoevaluately2603618incombinationwithgemcitabineinpancreaticcancerpatients AT szcylikcezary phaseiistudytoevaluately2603618incombinationwithgemcitabineinpancreaticcancerpatients AT cascinustefano phaseiistudytoevaluately2603618incombinationwithgemcitabineinpancreaticcancerpatients AT frassinetigl phaseiistudytoevaluately2603618incombinationwithgemcitabineinpancreaticcancerpatients AT ciuleanutudor phaseiistudytoevaluately2603618incombinationwithgemcitabineinpancreaticcancerpatients AT hurtkarla phaseiistudytoevaluately2603618incombinationwithgemcitabineinpancreaticcancerpatients AT hynesscott phaseiistudytoevaluately2603618incombinationwithgemcitabineinpancreaticcancerpatients AT linji phaseiistudytoevaluately2603618incombinationwithgemcitabineinpancreaticcancerpatients AT linaimeebence phaseiistudytoevaluately2603618incombinationwithgemcitabineinpancreaticcancerpatients AT vonhoffdaniel phaseiistudytoevaluately2603618incombinationwithgemcitabineinpancreaticcancerpatients AT calvoemiliano phaseiistudytoevaluately2603618incombinationwithgemcitabineinpancreaticcancerpatients |