Cargando…
Hearing flashes and seeing beeps: Timing audiovisual events
Many events from daily life are audiovisual (AV). Handclaps produce both visual and acoustic signals that are transmitted in air and processed by our sensory systems at different speeds, reaching the brain multisensory integration areas at different moments. Signals must somehow be associated in tim...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5312923/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28207786 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172028 |
_version_ | 1782508277763932160 |
---|---|
author | Vidal, Manuel |
author_facet | Vidal, Manuel |
author_sort | Vidal, Manuel |
collection | PubMed |
description | Many events from daily life are audiovisual (AV). Handclaps produce both visual and acoustic signals that are transmitted in air and processed by our sensory systems at different speeds, reaching the brain multisensory integration areas at different moments. Signals must somehow be associated in time to correctly perceive synchrony. This project aims at quantifying the mutual temporal attraction between senses and characterizing the different interaction modes depending on the offset. In every trial participants saw four beep-flash pairs regularly spaced in time, followed after a variable delay by a fifth event in the test modality (auditory or visual). A large range of AV offsets was tested. The task was to judge whether the last event came before/after what was expected given the perceived rhythm, while attending only to the test modality. Flashes were perceptually shifted in time toward beeps, the attraction being stronger for lagging than leading beeps. Conversely, beeps were not shifted toward flashes, indicating a nearly total auditory capture. The subjective timing of the visual component resulting from the AV interaction could easily be forward but not backward in time, an intuitive constraint stemming from minimum visual processing delays. Finally, matching auditory and visual time-sensitivity with beeps embedded in pink noise produced very similar mutual attractions of beeps and flashes. Breaking the natural auditory preference for timing allowed vision to take over as well, showing that this preference is not hardwired. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5312923 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53129232017-03-03 Hearing flashes and seeing beeps: Timing audiovisual events Vidal, Manuel PLoS One Research Article Many events from daily life are audiovisual (AV). Handclaps produce both visual and acoustic signals that are transmitted in air and processed by our sensory systems at different speeds, reaching the brain multisensory integration areas at different moments. Signals must somehow be associated in time to correctly perceive synchrony. This project aims at quantifying the mutual temporal attraction between senses and characterizing the different interaction modes depending on the offset. In every trial participants saw four beep-flash pairs regularly spaced in time, followed after a variable delay by a fifth event in the test modality (auditory or visual). A large range of AV offsets was tested. The task was to judge whether the last event came before/after what was expected given the perceived rhythm, while attending only to the test modality. Flashes were perceptually shifted in time toward beeps, the attraction being stronger for lagging than leading beeps. Conversely, beeps were not shifted toward flashes, indicating a nearly total auditory capture. The subjective timing of the visual component resulting from the AV interaction could easily be forward but not backward in time, an intuitive constraint stemming from minimum visual processing delays. Finally, matching auditory and visual time-sensitivity with beeps embedded in pink noise produced very similar mutual attractions of beeps and flashes. Breaking the natural auditory preference for timing allowed vision to take over as well, showing that this preference is not hardwired. Public Library of Science 2017-02-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5312923/ /pubmed/28207786 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172028 Text en © 2017 Manuel Vidal http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Vidal, Manuel Hearing flashes and seeing beeps: Timing audiovisual events |
title | Hearing flashes and seeing beeps: Timing audiovisual events |
title_full | Hearing flashes and seeing beeps: Timing audiovisual events |
title_fullStr | Hearing flashes and seeing beeps: Timing audiovisual events |
title_full_unstemmed | Hearing flashes and seeing beeps: Timing audiovisual events |
title_short | Hearing flashes and seeing beeps: Timing audiovisual events |
title_sort | hearing flashes and seeing beeps: timing audiovisual events |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5312923/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28207786 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172028 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vidalmanuel hearingflashesandseeingbeepstimingaudiovisualevents |