Cargando…

Hearing flashes and seeing beeps: Timing audiovisual events

Many events from daily life are audiovisual (AV). Handclaps produce both visual and acoustic signals that are transmitted in air and processed by our sensory systems at different speeds, reaching the brain multisensory integration areas at different moments. Signals must somehow be associated in tim...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Vidal, Manuel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5312923/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28207786
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172028
_version_ 1782508277763932160
author Vidal, Manuel
author_facet Vidal, Manuel
author_sort Vidal, Manuel
collection PubMed
description Many events from daily life are audiovisual (AV). Handclaps produce both visual and acoustic signals that are transmitted in air and processed by our sensory systems at different speeds, reaching the brain multisensory integration areas at different moments. Signals must somehow be associated in time to correctly perceive synchrony. This project aims at quantifying the mutual temporal attraction between senses and characterizing the different interaction modes depending on the offset. In every trial participants saw four beep-flash pairs regularly spaced in time, followed after a variable delay by a fifth event in the test modality (auditory or visual). A large range of AV offsets was tested. The task was to judge whether the last event came before/after what was expected given the perceived rhythm, while attending only to the test modality. Flashes were perceptually shifted in time toward beeps, the attraction being stronger for lagging than leading beeps. Conversely, beeps were not shifted toward flashes, indicating a nearly total auditory capture. The subjective timing of the visual component resulting from the AV interaction could easily be forward but not backward in time, an intuitive constraint stemming from minimum visual processing delays. Finally, matching auditory and visual time-sensitivity with beeps embedded in pink noise produced very similar mutual attractions of beeps and flashes. Breaking the natural auditory preference for timing allowed vision to take over as well, showing that this preference is not hardwired.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5312923
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53129232017-03-03 Hearing flashes and seeing beeps: Timing audiovisual events Vidal, Manuel PLoS One Research Article Many events from daily life are audiovisual (AV). Handclaps produce both visual and acoustic signals that are transmitted in air and processed by our sensory systems at different speeds, reaching the brain multisensory integration areas at different moments. Signals must somehow be associated in time to correctly perceive synchrony. This project aims at quantifying the mutual temporal attraction between senses and characterizing the different interaction modes depending on the offset. In every trial participants saw four beep-flash pairs regularly spaced in time, followed after a variable delay by a fifth event in the test modality (auditory or visual). A large range of AV offsets was tested. The task was to judge whether the last event came before/after what was expected given the perceived rhythm, while attending only to the test modality. Flashes were perceptually shifted in time toward beeps, the attraction being stronger for lagging than leading beeps. Conversely, beeps were not shifted toward flashes, indicating a nearly total auditory capture. The subjective timing of the visual component resulting from the AV interaction could easily be forward but not backward in time, an intuitive constraint stemming from minimum visual processing delays. Finally, matching auditory and visual time-sensitivity with beeps embedded in pink noise produced very similar mutual attractions of beeps and flashes. Breaking the natural auditory preference for timing allowed vision to take over as well, showing that this preference is not hardwired. Public Library of Science 2017-02-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5312923/ /pubmed/28207786 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172028 Text en © 2017 Manuel Vidal http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Vidal, Manuel
Hearing flashes and seeing beeps: Timing audiovisual events
title Hearing flashes and seeing beeps: Timing audiovisual events
title_full Hearing flashes and seeing beeps: Timing audiovisual events
title_fullStr Hearing flashes and seeing beeps: Timing audiovisual events
title_full_unstemmed Hearing flashes and seeing beeps: Timing audiovisual events
title_short Hearing flashes and seeing beeps: Timing audiovisual events
title_sort hearing flashes and seeing beeps: timing audiovisual events
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5312923/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28207786
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172028
work_keys_str_mv AT vidalmanuel hearingflashesandseeingbeepstimingaudiovisualevents