Cargando…
The controversy surrounding penile rehabilitation after radical prostatectomy
Radical prostatectomy (RP) techniques have been refined in the last few decades. Despite nerve-sparing surgery, erectile dysfunction (ED) still seems to be affecting more than half of patients undergoing RP. Penile rehabilitation consists of understanding the mechanisms that affect erectile function...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
AME Publishing Company
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5313301/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28217445 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau.2016.08.14 |
_version_ | 1782508329673687040 |
---|---|
author | Clavell-Hernández, Jonathan Wang, Run |
author_facet | Clavell-Hernández, Jonathan Wang, Run |
author_sort | Clavell-Hernández, Jonathan |
collection | PubMed |
description | Radical prostatectomy (RP) techniques have been refined in the last few decades. Despite nerve-sparing surgery, erectile dysfunction (ED) still seems to be affecting more than half of patients undergoing RP. Penile rehabilitation consists of understanding the mechanisms that affect erectile function (EF) and utilizing pharmacologic agents, devices or interventions to promote male sexual function before and after any insult to the penile erectile physiologic axis. There currently is a limited amount of clinical trials that assess treatments with the goal of recovering post-prostatectomy EF. The goal of this article is to assess a contemporary series of trials that study penile rehabilitation. Although the current evidence lacks to prove its irrefutable effectiveness, advancements in research and technology forecast a promising future in penile rehabilitation management. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5313301 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | AME Publishing Company |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53133012017-02-17 The controversy surrounding penile rehabilitation after radical prostatectomy Clavell-Hernández, Jonathan Wang, Run Transl Androl Urol Review Article Radical prostatectomy (RP) techniques have been refined in the last few decades. Despite nerve-sparing surgery, erectile dysfunction (ED) still seems to be affecting more than half of patients undergoing RP. Penile rehabilitation consists of understanding the mechanisms that affect erectile function (EF) and utilizing pharmacologic agents, devices or interventions to promote male sexual function before and after any insult to the penile erectile physiologic axis. There currently is a limited amount of clinical trials that assess treatments with the goal of recovering post-prostatectomy EF. The goal of this article is to assess a contemporary series of trials that study penile rehabilitation. Although the current evidence lacks to prove its irrefutable effectiveness, advancements in research and technology forecast a promising future in penile rehabilitation management. AME Publishing Company 2017-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5313301/ /pubmed/28217445 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau.2016.08.14 Text en 2017 Translational Andrology and Urology. All rights reserved. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Clavell-Hernández, Jonathan Wang, Run The controversy surrounding penile rehabilitation after radical prostatectomy |
title | The controversy surrounding penile rehabilitation after radical prostatectomy |
title_full | The controversy surrounding penile rehabilitation after radical prostatectomy |
title_fullStr | The controversy surrounding penile rehabilitation after radical prostatectomy |
title_full_unstemmed | The controversy surrounding penile rehabilitation after radical prostatectomy |
title_short | The controversy surrounding penile rehabilitation after radical prostatectomy |
title_sort | controversy surrounding penile rehabilitation after radical prostatectomy |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5313301/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28217445 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau.2016.08.14 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT clavellhernandezjonathan thecontroversysurroundingpenilerehabilitationafterradicalprostatectomy AT wangrun thecontroversysurroundingpenilerehabilitationafterradicalprostatectomy AT clavellhernandezjonathan controversysurroundingpenilerehabilitationafterradicalprostatectomy AT wangrun controversysurroundingpenilerehabilitationafterradicalprostatectomy |