Cargando…

The controversy surrounding penile rehabilitation after radical prostatectomy

Radical prostatectomy (RP) techniques have been refined in the last few decades. Despite nerve-sparing surgery, erectile dysfunction (ED) still seems to be affecting more than half of patients undergoing RP. Penile rehabilitation consists of understanding the mechanisms that affect erectile function...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Clavell-Hernández, Jonathan, Wang, Run
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5313301/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28217445
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau.2016.08.14
_version_ 1782508329673687040
author Clavell-Hernández, Jonathan
Wang, Run
author_facet Clavell-Hernández, Jonathan
Wang, Run
author_sort Clavell-Hernández, Jonathan
collection PubMed
description Radical prostatectomy (RP) techniques have been refined in the last few decades. Despite nerve-sparing surgery, erectile dysfunction (ED) still seems to be affecting more than half of patients undergoing RP. Penile rehabilitation consists of understanding the mechanisms that affect erectile function (EF) and utilizing pharmacologic agents, devices or interventions to promote male sexual function before and after any insult to the penile erectile physiologic axis. There currently is a limited amount of clinical trials that assess treatments with the goal of recovering post-prostatectomy EF. The goal of this article is to assess a contemporary series of trials that study penile rehabilitation. Although the current evidence lacks to prove its irrefutable effectiveness, advancements in research and technology forecast a promising future in penile rehabilitation management.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5313301
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53133012017-02-17 The controversy surrounding penile rehabilitation after radical prostatectomy Clavell-Hernández, Jonathan Wang, Run Transl Androl Urol Review Article Radical prostatectomy (RP) techniques have been refined in the last few decades. Despite nerve-sparing surgery, erectile dysfunction (ED) still seems to be affecting more than half of patients undergoing RP. Penile rehabilitation consists of understanding the mechanisms that affect erectile function (EF) and utilizing pharmacologic agents, devices or interventions to promote male sexual function before and after any insult to the penile erectile physiologic axis. There currently is a limited amount of clinical trials that assess treatments with the goal of recovering post-prostatectomy EF. The goal of this article is to assess a contemporary series of trials that study penile rehabilitation. Although the current evidence lacks to prove its irrefutable effectiveness, advancements in research and technology forecast a promising future in penile rehabilitation management. AME Publishing Company 2017-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5313301/ /pubmed/28217445 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau.2016.08.14 Text en 2017 Translational Andrology and Urology. All rights reserved.
spellingShingle Review Article
Clavell-Hernández, Jonathan
Wang, Run
The controversy surrounding penile rehabilitation after radical prostatectomy
title The controversy surrounding penile rehabilitation after radical prostatectomy
title_full The controversy surrounding penile rehabilitation after radical prostatectomy
title_fullStr The controversy surrounding penile rehabilitation after radical prostatectomy
title_full_unstemmed The controversy surrounding penile rehabilitation after radical prostatectomy
title_short The controversy surrounding penile rehabilitation after radical prostatectomy
title_sort controversy surrounding penile rehabilitation after radical prostatectomy
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5313301/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28217445
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau.2016.08.14
work_keys_str_mv AT clavellhernandezjonathan thecontroversysurroundingpenilerehabilitationafterradicalprostatectomy
AT wangrun thecontroversysurroundingpenilerehabilitationafterradicalprostatectomy
AT clavellhernandezjonathan controversysurroundingpenilerehabilitationafterradicalprostatectomy
AT wangrun controversysurroundingpenilerehabilitationafterradicalprostatectomy