Cargando…
Explaining Sad People’s Memory Advantage for Faces
Sad people recognize faces more accurately than happy people (Hills et al., 2011). We devised four hypotheses for this finding that are tested between in the current study. The four hypotheses are: (1) sad people engage in more expert processing associated with face processing; (2) sad people are mo...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5313490/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28261138 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00207 |
_version_ | 1782508351516573696 |
---|---|
author | Hills, Peter J. Marquardt, Zoe Young, Isabel Goodenough, Imogen |
author_facet | Hills, Peter J. Marquardt, Zoe Young, Isabel Goodenough, Imogen |
author_sort | Hills, Peter J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Sad people recognize faces more accurately than happy people (Hills et al., 2011). We devised four hypotheses for this finding that are tested between in the current study. The four hypotheses are: (1) sad people engage in more expert processing associated with face processing; (2) sad people are motivated to be more accurate than happy people in an attempt to repair their mood; (3) sad people have a defocused attentional strategy that allows more information about a face to be encoded; and (4) sad people scan more of the face than happy people leading to more facial features to be encoded. In Experiment 1, we found that dysphoria (sad mood often associated with depression) was not correlated with the face-inversion effect (a measure of expert processing) nor with response times but was correlated with defocused attention and recognition accuracy. Experiment 2 established that dysphoric participants detected changes made to more facial features than happy participants. In Experiment 3, using eye-tracking we found that sad-induced participants sampled more of the face whilst avoiding the eyes. Experiment 4 showed that sad-induced people demonstrated a smaller own-ethnicity bias. These results indicate that sad people show different attentional allocation to faces than happy and neutral people. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5313490 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53134902017-03-03 Explaining Sad People’s Memory Advantage for Faces Hills, Peter J. Marquardt, Zoe Young, Isabel Goodenough, Imogen Front Psychol Psychology Sad people recognize faces more accurately than happy people (Hills et al., 2011). We devised four hypotheses for this finding that are tested between in the current study. The four hypotheses are: (1) sad people engage in more expert processing associated with face processing; (2) sad people are motivated to be more accurate than happy people in an attempt to repair their mood; (3) sad people have a defocused attentional strategy that allows more information about a face to be encoded; and (4) sad people scan more of the face than happy people leading to more facial features to be encoded. In Experiment 1, we found that dysphoria (sad mood often associated with depression) was not correlated with the face-inversion effect (a measure of expert processing) nor with response times but was correlated with defocused attention and recognition accuracy. Experiment 2 established that dysphoric participants detected changes made to more facial features than happy participants. In Experiment 3, using eye-tracking we found that sad-induced participants sampled more of the face whilst avoiding the eyes. Experiment 4 showed that sad-induced people demonstrated a smaller own-ethnicity bias. These results indicate that sad people show different attentional allocation to faces than happy and neutral people. Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-02-17 /pmc/articles/PMC5313490/ /pubmed/28261138 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00207 Text en Copyright © 2017 Hills, Marquardt, Young and Goodenough. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Hills, Peter J. Marquardt, Zoe Young, Isabel Goodenough, Imogen Explaining Sad People’s Memory Advantage for Faces |
title | Explaining Sad People’s Memory Advantage for Faces |
title_full | Explaining Sad People’s Memory Advantage for Faces |
title_fullStr | Explaining Sad People’s Memory Advantage for Faces |
title_full_unstemmed | Explaining Sad People’s Memory Advantage for Faces |
title_short | Explaining Sad People’s Memory Advantage for Faces |
title_sort | explaining sad people’s memory advantage for faces |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5313490/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28261138 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00207 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hillspeterj explainingsadpeoplesmemoryadvantageforfaces AT marquardtzoe explainingsadpeoplesmemoryadvantageforfaces AT youngisabel explainingsadpeoplesmemoryadvantageforfaces AT goodenoughimogen explainingsadpeoplesmemoryadvantageforfaces |