Cargando…

No-Touch Radiofrequency Ablation: A Comparison of Switching Bipolar and Switching Monopolar Ablation in Ex Vivo Bovine Liver

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility, efficiency, and safety of no-touch switching bipolar (SB) and switching monopolar (SM) radiofrequency ablation (RFA) using ex vivo bovine livers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A pork loin cube was inserted as a tumor mimicker in the bovine liver block; RFA was perfor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chang, Won, Lee, Jeong Min, Lee, Sang Min, Han, Joon Koo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Society of Radiology 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5313516/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28246508
http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2017.18.2.279
_version_ 1782508357035229184
author Chang, Won
Lee, Jeong Min
Lee, Sang Min
Han, Joon Koo
author_facet Chang, Won
Lee, Jeong Min
Lee, Sang Min
Han, Joon Koo
author_sort Chang, Won
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility, efficiency, and safety of no-touch switching bipolar (SB) and switching monopolar (SM) radiofrequency ablation (RFA) using ex vivo bovine livers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A pork loin cube was inserted as a tumor mimicker in the bovine liver block; RFA was performed using the no-touch technique in the SM (group A1; 10 minutes, n = 10, group A2; 15 minutes, n = 10) and SB (group B; 10 minutes, n = 10) modes. The groups were compared based on the creation of confluent necrosis with sufficient safety margins, the dimensions, and distance between the electrode and ablation zone margin (DEM). To evaluate safety, small bowel loops were placed above the liver surface and 30 additional ablations were performed in the same groups. RESULTS: Confluent necroses with sufficient safety margins were created in all specimens. SM RFA created significantly larger volumes of ablation compared to SB RFA (all p < 0.001). The DEM of group B was significantly lower than those of groups A1 and A2 (all p < 0.001). Although thermal injury to the small bowel was noted in 90%, 100%, and 30% of the cases in groups A1, A2, and B, respectively, full depth injury was noted only in 60% of group A2 cases. CONCLUSION: The no-touch RFA technique is feasible in both the SB and SM modes; however, SB RFA appears to be more advantageous compared to SM RFA in the creation of an ablation zone while avoiding the unnecessary creation of an adjacent parenchymal ablation zone or adjacent small bowel injuries.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5313516
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher The Korean Society of Radiology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53135162017-03-01 No-Touch Radiofrequency Ablation: A Comparison of Switching Bipolar and Switching Monopolar Ablation in Ex Vivo Bovine Liver Chang, Won Lee, Jeong Min Lee, Sang Min Han, Joon Koo Korean J Radiol Gastrointestinal Imaging OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility, efficiency, and safety of no-touch switching bipolar (SB) and switching monopolar (SM) radiofrequency ablation (RFA) using ex vivo bovine livers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A pork loin cube was inserted as a tumor mimicker in the bovine liver block; RFA was performed using the no-touch technique in the SM (group A1; 10 minutes, n = 10, group A2; 15 minutes, n = 10) and SB (group B; 10 minutes, n = 10) modes. The groups were compared based on the creation of confluent necrosis with sufficient safety margins, the dimensions, and distance between the electrode and ablation zone margin (DEM). To evaluate safety, small bowel loops were placed above the liver surface and 30 additional ablations were performed in the same groups. RESULTS: Confluent necroses with sufficient safety margins were created in all specimens. SM RFA created significantly larger volumes of ablation compared to SB RFA (all p < 0.001). The DEM of group B was significantly lower than those of groups A1 and A2 (all p < 0.001). Although thermal injury to the small bowel was noted in 90%, 100%, and 30% of the cases in groups A1, A2, and B, respectively, full depth injury was noted only in 60% of group A2 cases. CONCLUSION: The no-touch RFA technique is feasible in both the SB and SM modes; however, SB RFA appears to be more advantageous compared to SM RFA in the creation of an ablation zone while avoiding the unnecessary creation of an adjacent parenchymal ablation zone or adjacent small bowel injuries. The Korean Society of Radiology 2017 2017-02-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5313516/ /pubmed/28246508 http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2017.18.2.279 Text en Copyright © 2017 The Korean Society of Radiology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Gastrointestinal Imaging
Chang, Won
Lee, Jeong Min
Lee, Sang Min
Han, Joon Koo
No-Touch Radiofrequency Ablation: A Comparison of Switching Bipolar and Switching Monopolar Ablation in Ex Vivo Bovine Liver
title No-Touch Radiofrequency Ablation: A Comparison of Switching Bipolar and Switching Monopolar Ablation in Ex Vivo Bovine Liver
title_full No-Touch Radiofrequency Ablation: A Comparison of Switching Bipolar and Switching Monopolar Ablation in Ex Vivo Bovine Liver
title_fullStr No-Touch Radiofrequency Ablation: A Comparison of Switching Bipolar and Switching Monopolar Ablation in Ex Vivo Bovine Liver
title_full_unstemmed No-Touch Radiofrequency Ablation: A Comparison of Switching Bipolar and Switching Monopolar Ablation in Ex Vivo Bovine Liver
title_short No-Touch Radiofrequency Ablation: A Comparison of Switching Bipolar and Switching Monopolar Ablation in Ex Vivo Bovine Liver
title_sort no-touch radiofrequency ablation: a comparison of switching bipolar and switching monopolar ablation in ex vivo bovine liver
topic Gastrointestinal Imaging
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5313516/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28246508
http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2017.18.2.279
work_keys_str_mv AT changwon notouchradiofrequencyablationacomparisonofswitchingbipolarandswitchingmonopolarablationinexvivobovineliver
AT leejeongmin notouchradiofrequencyablationacomparisonofswitchingbipolarandswitchingmonopolarablationinexvivobovineliver
AT leesangmin notouchradiofrequencyablationacomparisonofswitchingbipolarandswitchingmonopolarablationinexvivobovineliver
AT hanjoonkoo notouchradiofrequencyablationacomparisonofswitchingbipolarandswitchingmonopolarablationinexvivobovineliver