Cargando…
Neuromuscular trunk activation patterns in back pain patients during one-handed lifting
AIM: To analyze neuromuscular activity patterns of the trunk in healthy controls (H) and back pain patients (BPP) during one-handed lifting of light to heavy loads. METHODS: After assessment of back pain (graded chronic pain scale according to von Korff) all subjects (n = 43) performed a warm-up (tr...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5314143/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28251064 http://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v8.i2.142 |
_version_ | 1782508474711670784 |
---|---|
author | Mueller, Juliane Engel, Tilman Kopinski, Stephan Mayer, Frank Mueller, Steffen |
author_facet | Mueller, Juliane Engel, Tilman Kopinski, Stephan Mayer, Frank Mueller, Steffen |
author_sort | Mueller, Juliane |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM: To analyze neuromuscular activity patterns of the trunk in healthy controls (H) and back pain patients (BPP) during one-handed lifting of light to heavy loads. METHODS: After assessment of back pain (graded chronic pain scale according to von Korff) all subjects (n = 43) performed a warm-up (treadmill walking). Next, subjects were instructed to lift 3 × a 20 kg weight placed in front of them (with both hand) onto a table (height: 0.75 m). Subsequently, all subjects lifted with one hand (left-side, 3 repetitions) a weight of 1 kg (light), 10 kg (middle) and 20 kg (heavy) in random order from the ground up onto the table left of them. Trunk muscle activity was assessed with a 12-lead EMG (6 ventral/6 dorsal muscles; 4000 Hz). EMG-RMS (%) was averaged over the 3 repetitions and analyzed for the whole one-handed lifting cycle, then normalized to RMS of the two-handed lifting. Additionally, the mean (normalized) EMG-RMS of four trunk areas [right/left ventral area (VR/VL); right/left dorsal area (DR/DL)] was calculated. Data were analyzed descriptively (mean ± SD) followed by student’s t-test comparing H and BPP (α = 0.05). With respect to the unequal distribution of subjects in H and BPP, a matched-group analysis was conducted. Seven healthy controls were gender- and age-matched (group H(matched)) to the 7 BPP. In addition, task failure was calculated and compared between H/H(matched) vs BPP using χ(2). RESULTS: Seven subjects (3m/4f; 32 ± 7 years; 171 ± 7 cm; 65 ± 11 kg) were assigned to BPP (pain grade ≥ 2) and 36 (13m/23f; 28 ± 8 years; 174 ± 10 cm; 71 ± 12 kg) to H (pain grade ≤ 1). H and BPP did not differ significantly in anthropometrics (P > 0.05). All subjects were able to lift the light and middle loads, but 57% of BPP and 22% of H were not able to lift the heavy load (all women). χ(2) analysis revealed statistically significant differences in task failure between H vs BPP (P = 0.03). EMG-RMS ranged from 33% ± 10%/30% ± 9% (DL, 1 kg) to 356% ± 148%/283% ± 80% (VR, 20 kg) in H/BPP with no statistical difference between groups regardless of load (P > 0.05). However, the EMG-RMS of the VR was greatest in all lifting tasks for both groups and increased with heavier loads. CONCLUSION: Heavier loading leads to an increase (2- to 3-fold) in trunk muscle activity with comparable patterns. Heavy loading (20 kg) leads to task failure, especially in women with back pain. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5314143 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Baishideng Publishing Group Inc |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53141432017-03-02 Neuromuscular trunk activation patterns in back pain patients during one-handed lifting Mueller, Juliane Engel, Tilman Kopinski, Stephan Mayer, Frank Mueller, Steffen World J Orthop Basic Study AIM: To analyze neuromuscular activity patterns of the trunk in healthy controls (H) and back pain patients (BPP) during one-handed lifting of light to heavy loads. METHODS: After assessment of back pain (graded chronic pain scale according to von Korff) all subjects (n = 43) performed a warm-up (treadmill walking). Next, subjects were instructed to lift 3 × a 20 kg weight placed in front of them (with both hand) onto a table (height: 0.75 m). Subsequently, all subjects lifted with one hand (left-side, 3 repetitions) a weight of 1 kg (light), 10 kg (middle) and 20 kg (heavy) in random order from the ground up onto the table left of them. Trunk muscle activity was assessed with a 12-lead EMG (6 ventral/6 dorsal muscles; 4000 Hz). EMG-RMS (%) was averaged over the 3 repetitions and analyzed for the whole one-handed lifting cycle, then normalized to RMS of the two-handed lifting. Additionally, the mean (normalized) EMG-RMS of four trunk areas [right/left ventral area (VR/VL); right/left dorsal area (DR/DL)] was calculated. Data were analyzed descriptively (mean ± SD) followed by student’s t-test comparing H and BPP (α = 0.05). With respect to the unequal distribution of subjects in H and BPP, a matched-group analysis was conducted. Seven healthy controls were gender- and age-matched (group H(matched)) to the 7 BPP. In addition, task failure was calculated and compared between H/H(matched) vs BPP using χ(2). RESULTS: Seven subjects (3m/4f; 32 ± 7 years; 171 ± 7 cm; 65 ± 11 kg) were assigned to BPP (pain grade ≥ 2) and 36 (13m/23f; 28 ± 8 years; 174 ± 10 cm; 71 ± 12 kg) to H (pain grade ≤ 1). H and BPP did not differ significantly in anthropometrics (P > 0.05). All subjects were able to lift the light and middle loads, but 57% of BPP and 22% of H were not able to lift the heavy load (all women). χ(2) analysis revealed statistically significant differences in task failure between H vs BPP (P = 0.03). EMG-RMS ranged from 33% ± 10%/30% ± 9% (DL, 1 kg) to 356% ± 148%/283% ± 80% (VR, 20 kg) in H/BPP with no statistical difference between groups regardless of load (P > 0.05). However, the EMG-RMS of the VR was greatest in all lifting tasks for both groups and increased with heavier loads. CONCLUSION: Heavier loading leads to an increase (2- to 3-fold) in trunk muscle activity with comparable patterns. Heavy loading (20 kg) leads to task failure, especially in women with back pain. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2017-02-18 /pmc/articles/PMC5314143/ /pubmed/28251064 http://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v8.i2.142 Text en ©The Author(s) 2017. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. |
spellingShingle | Basic Study Mueller, Juliane Engel, Tilman Kopinski, Stephan Mayer, Frank Mueller, Steffen Neuromuscular trunk activation patterns in back pain patients during one-handed lifting |
title | Neuromuscular trunk activation patterns in back pain patients during one-handed lifting |
title_full | Neuromuscular trunk activation patterns in back pain patients during one-handed lifting |
title_fullStr | Neuromuscular trunk activation patterns in back pain patients during one-handed lifting |
title_full_unstemmed | Neuromuscular trunk activation patterns in back pain patients during one-handed lifting |
title_short | Neuromuscular trunk activation patterns in back pain patients during one-handed lifting |
title_sort | neuromuscular trunk activation patterns in back pain patients during one-handed lifting |
topic | Basic Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5314143/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28251064 http://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v8.i2.142 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT muellerjuliane neuromusculartrunkactivationpatternsinbackpainpatientsduringonehandedlifting AT engeltilman neuromusculartrunkactivationpatternsinbackpainpatientsduringonehandedlifting AT kopinskistephan neuromusculartrunkactivationpatternsinbackpainpatientsduringonehandedlifting AT mayerfrank neuromusculartrunkactivationpatternsinbackpainpatientsduringonehandedlifting AT muellersteffen neuromusculartrunkactivationpatternsinbackpainpatientsduringonehandedlifting |