Cargando…
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients with cervical nodal necrosis
The effectiveness of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) compared with CCRT alone in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients who presented with cervical nodal necrosis (CNN) is unknown. A total of 792 patients with stage T1-4N1-3M0 NPC and presented with C...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5314371/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28211482 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep42624 |
_version_ | 1782508508944531456 |
---|---|
author | Lan, Mei Chen, Chunyan Huang, Ying Tian, Li Duan, Zhijun Han, Fei Liao, Junfang Deng, Meiling Sio, Terence T. Prayongrat, Anussara Zheng, Lie Wu, Shaoxiong Lu, Taixiang |
author_facet | Lan, Mei Chen, Chunyan Huang, Ying Tian, Li Duan, Zhijun Han, Fei Liao, Junfang Deng, Meiling Sio, Terence T. Prayongrat, Anussara Zheng, Lie Wu, Shaoxiong Lu, Taixiang |
author_sort | Lan, Mei |
collection | PubMed |
description | The effectiveness of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) compared with CCRT alone in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients who presented with cervical nodal necrosis (CNN) is unknown. A total of 792 patients with stage T1-4N1-3M0 NPC and presented with CNN based on magnetic resonance imaging were retrospectively reviewed. Propensity score matching method was used to balance treatment arms for baseline characteristics. Eventually, 508 patients were propensity-matched on a 1:1 basis to create two groups (NACT + CCRT and CCRT groups). Survival rates were calculated by Kaplan–Meier method and differences were compared by using the log-rank test. The 5-year disease specific survival, disease-free survival and distant metastasis-free survival were significantly higher in NACT + CCRT group relative to the matched CCRT group (82.1% vs. 72.5%, P = 0.021; 70.3% vs. 54.1%, P < 0.001; 81.9% vs. 67.3%, P < 0.001, respectively). Although the rates of grade 3–4 leucopenia and mucositis were higher in NACT + CCRT group than CCRT group, compliance with the combined treatment was good and no significant difference was observed between two groups. NACT followed by CCRT was relatively safe and could achieve better survival than CCRT alone in NPC patients with CNN by reducing the risk of death, tumor progression and distant metastasis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5314371 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53143712017-02-24 Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients with cervical nodal necrosis Lan, Mei Chen, Chunyan Huang, Ying Tian, Li Duan, Zhijun Han, Fei Liao, Junfang Deng, Meiling Sio, Terence T. Prayongrat, Anussara Zheng, Lie Wu, Shaoxiong Lu, Taixiang Sci Rep Article The effectiveness of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) compared with CCRT alone in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients who presented with cervical nodal necrosis (CNN) is unknown. A total of 792 patients with stage T1-4N1-3M0 NPC and presented with CNN based on magnetic resonance imaging were retrospectively reviewed. Propensity score matching method was used to balance treatment arms for baseline characteristics. Eventually, 508 patients were propensity-matched on a 1:1 basis to create two groups (NACT + CCRT and CCRT groups). Survival rates were calculated by Kaplan–Meier method and differences were compared by using the log-rank test. The 5-year disease specific survival, disease-free survival and distant metastasis-free survival were significantly higher in NACT + CCRT group relative to the matched CCRT group (82.1% vs. 72.5%, P = 0.021; 70.3% vs. 54.1%, P < 0.001; 81.9% vs. 67.3%, P < 0.001, respectively). Although the rates of grade 3–4 leucopenia and mucositis were higher in NACT + CCRT group than CCRT group, compliance with the combined treatment was good and no significant difference was observed between two groups. NACT followed by CCRT was relatively safe and could achieve better survival than CCRT alone in NPC patients with CNN by reducing the risk of death, tumor progression and distant metastasis. Nature Publishing Group 2017-02-17 /pmc/articles/PMC5314371/ /pubmed/28211482 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep42624 Text en Copyright © 2017, The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Article Lan, Mei Chen, Chunyan Huang, Ying Tian, Li Duan, Zhijun Han, Fei Liao, Junfang Deng, Meiling Sio, Terence T. Prayongrat, Anussara Zheng, Lie Wu, Shaoxiong Lu, Taixiang Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients with cervical nodal necrosis |
title | Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients with cervical nodal necrosis |
title_full | Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients with cervical nodal necrosis |
title_fullStr | Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients with cervical nodal necrosis |
title_full_unstemmed | Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients with cervical nodal necrosis |
title_short | Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients with cervical nodal necrosis |
title_sort | neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients with cervical nodal necrosis |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5314371/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28211482 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep42624 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lanmei neoadjuvantchemotherapyfollowedbyconcurrentchemoradiotherapyversusconcurrentchemoradiotherapyaloneinnasopharyngealcarcinomapatientswithcervicalnodalnecrosis AT chenchunyan neoadjuvantchemotherapyfollowedbyconcurrentchemoradiotherapyversusconcurrentchemoradiotherapyaloneinnasopharyngealcarcinomapatientswithcervicalnodalnecrosis AT huangying neoadjuvantchemotherapyfollowedbyconcurrentchemoradiotherapyversusconcurrentchemoradiotherapyaloneinnasopharyngealcarcinomapatientswithcervicalnodalnecrosis AT tianli neoadjuvantchemotherapyfollowedbyconcurrentchemoradiotherapyversusconcurrentchemoradiotherapyaloneinnasopharyngealcarcinomapatientswithcervicalnodalnecrosis AT duanzhijun neoadjuvantchemotherapyfollowedbyconcurrentchemoradiotherapyversusconcurrentchemoradiotherapyaloneinnasopharyngealcarcinomapatientswithcervicalnodalnecrosis AT hanfei neoadjuvantchemotherapyfollowedbyconcurrentchemoradiotherapyversusconcurrentchemoradiotherapyaloneinnasopharyngealcarcinomapatientswithcervicalnodalnecrosis AT liaojunfang neoadjuvantchemotherapyfollowedbyconcurrentchemoradiotherapyversusconcurrentchemoradiotherapyaloneinnasopharyngealcarcinomapatientswithcervicalnodalnecrosis AT dengmeiling neoadjuvantchemotherapyfollowedbyconcurrentchemoradiotherapyversusconcurrentchemoradiotherapyaloneinnasopharyngealcarcinomapatientswithcervicalnodalnecrosis AT sioterencet neoadjuvantchemotherapyfollowedbyconcurrentchemoradiotherapyversusconcurrentchemoradiotherapyaloneinnasopharyngealcarcinomapatientswithcervicalnodalnecrosis AT prayongratanussara neoadjuvantchemotherapyfollowedbyconcurrentchemoradiotherapyversusconcurrentchemoradiotherapyaloneinnasopharyngealcarcinomapatientswithcervicalnodalnecrosis AT zhenglie neoadjuvantchemotherapyfollowedbyconcurrentchemoradiotherapyversusconcurrentchemoradiotherapyaloneinnasopharyngealcarcinomapatientswithcervicalnodalnecrosis AT wushaoxiong neoadjuvantchemotherapyfollowedbyconcurrentchemoradiotherapyversusconcurrentchemoradiotherapyaloneinnasopharyngealcarcinomapatientswithcervicalnodalnecrosis AT lutaixiang neoadjuvantchemotherapyfollowedbyconcurrentchemoradiotherapyversusconcurrentchemoradiotherapyaloneinnasopharyngealcarcinomapatientswithcervicalnodalnecrosis |