Cargando…
Are products with an orphan designation for oncology indications different from products for other rare indications? A retrospective analysis of European orphan designations granted between 2002-2012
BACKGROUND: Orphan designated medicinal products benefit from regulatory and economic incentives for orphan drug development. Approximately 40% of orphan designations target rare neoplastic disorders, referring to rare cancers. In order to provide more insights in drugs for rare neoplastic disorders...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5314481/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28209180 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13023-017-0578-4 |
_version_ | 1782508528105160704 |
---|---|
author | Pauwels, Kim Huys, Isabelle Casteels, Minne Larsson, Kristina Voltz, Caroline Penttila, Karri Morel, Thomas Simoens, Steven |
author_facet | Pauwels, Kim Huys, Isabelle Casteels, Minne Larsson, Kristina Voltz, Caroline Penttila, Karri Morel, Thomas Simoens, Steven |
author_sort | Pauwels, Kim |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Orphan designated medicinal products benefit from regulatory and economic incentives for orphan drug development. Approximately 40% of orphan designations target rare neoplastic disorders, referring to rare cancers. In order to provide more insights in drugs for rare neoplastic disorders that are under development and to better understand the role of orphan designation in the development of oncology drugs, this study investigates the characteristics of the product, the indication and the applicants as well as the stage of development of products with an orphan designation for rare neoplastic disorders and compares them with products with an orphan designation for other rare indications. Therefore, orphan designation application files and annual reports submitted by the applicant were reviewed at the premises of the European Medicines Agency. RESULTS: At the time of application, 41.6% of products with orphan designation for rare neoplastic disorders were in pre-clinical phase; this was 65.1% for other rare conditions (p < 0.05). Thirty percent of orphan designations for rare neoplastic disorders had reached phase 1; compared to 19.3% of orphan designations targeting other rare conditions (p < 0.05). The same trend was observed for the stage of development at the time of the latest annual report. Significant benefit was more often considered for orphan designations for rare neoplastic disorders compared to orphan designations for other rare conditions. CONCLUSION: Orphan designations for rare neoplastic disorders involve products that are in a more advanced stages of development compared to orphan designations for other (non-oncology) rare conditions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5314481 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53144812017-02-24 Are products with an orphan designation for oncology indications different from products for other rare indications? A retrospective analysis of European orphan designations granted between 2002-2012 Pauwels, Kim Huys, Isabelle Casteels, Minne Larsson, Kristina Voltz, Caroline Penttila, Karri Morel, Thomas Simoens, Steven Orphanet J Rare Dis Research BACKGROUND: Orphan designated medicinal products benefit from regulatory and economic incentives for orphan drug development. Approximately 40% of orphan designations target rare neoplastic disorders, referring to rare cancers. In order to provide more insights in drugs for rare neoplastic disorders that are under development and to better understand the role of orphan designation in the development of oncology drugs, this study investigates the characteristics of the product, the indication and the applicants as well as the stage of development of products with an orphan designation for rare neoplastic disorders and compares them with products with an orphan designation for other rare indications. Therefore, orphan designation application files and annual reports submitted by the applicant were reviewed at the premises of the European Medicines Agency. RESULTS: At the time of application, 41.6% of products with orphan designation for rare neoplastic disorders were in pre-clinical phase; this was 65.1% for other rare conditions (p < 0.05). Thirty percent of orphan designations for rare neoplastic disorders had reached phase 1; compared to 19.3% of orphan designations targeting other rare conditions (p < 0.05). The same trend was observed for the stage of development at the time of the latest annual report. Significant benefit was more often considered for orphan designations for rare neoplastic disorders compared to orphan designations for other rare conditions. CONCLUSION: Orphan designations for rare neoplastic disorders involve products that are in a more advanced stages of development compared to orphan designations for other (non-oncology) rare conditions. BioMed Central 2017-02-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5314481/ /pubmed/28209180 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13023-017-0578-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Pauwels, Kim Huys, Isabelle Casteels, Minne Larsson, Kristina Voltz, Caroline Penttila, Karri Morel, Thomas Simoens, Steven Are products with an orphan designation for oncology indications different from products for other rare indications? A retrospective analysis of European orphan designations granted between 2002-2012 |
title | Are products with an orphan designation for oncology indications different from products for other rare indications? A retrospective analysis of European orphan designations granted between 2002-2012 |
title_full | Are products with an orphan designation for oncology indications different from products for other rare indications? A retrospective analysis of European orphan designations granted between 2002-2012 |
title_fullStr | Are products with an orphan designation for oncology indications different from products for other rare indications? A retrospective analysis of European orphan designations granted between 2002-2012 |
title_full_unstemmed | Are products with an orphan designation for oncology indications different from products for other rare indications? A retrospective analysis of European orphan designations granted between 2002-2012 |
title_short | Are products with an orphan designation for oncology indications different from products for other rare indications? A retrospective analysis of European orphan designations granted between 2002-2012 |
title_sort | are products with an orphan designation for oncology indications different from products for other rare indications? a retrospective analysis of european orphan designations granted between 2002-2012 |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5314481/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28209180 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13023-017-0578-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pauwelskim areproductswithanorphandesignationforoncologyindicationsdifferentfromproductsforotherrareindicationsaretrospectiveanalysisofeuropeanorphandesignationsgrantedbetween20022012 AT huysisabelle areproductswithanorphandesignationforoncologyindicationsdifferentfromproductsforotherrareindicationsaretrospectiveanalysisofeuropeanorphandesignationsgrantedbetween20022012 AT casteelsminne areproductswithanorphandesignationforoncologyindicationsdifferentfromproductsforotherrareindicationsaretrospectiveanalysisofeuropeanorphandesignationsgrantedbetween20022012 AT larssonkristina areproductswithanorphandesignationforoncologyindicationsdifferentfromproductsforotherrareindicationsaretrospectiveanalysisofeuropeanorphandesignationsgrantedbetween20022012 AT voltzcaroline areproductswithanorphandesignationforoncologyindicationsdifferentfromproductsforotherrareindicationsaretrospectiveanalysisofeuropeanorphandesignationsgrantedbetween20022012 AT penttilakarri areproductswithanorphandesignationforoncologyindicationsdifferentfromproductsforotherrareindicationsaretrospectiveanalysisofeuropeanorphandesignationsgrantedbetween20022012 AT morelthomas areproductswithanorphandesignationforoncologyindicationsdifferentfromproductsforotherrareindicationsaretrospectiveanalysisofeuropeanorphandesignationsgrantedbetween20022012 AT simoenssteven areproductswithanorphandesignationforoncologyindicationsdifferentfromproductsforotherrareindicationsaretrospectiveanalysisofeuropeanorphandesignationsgrantedbetween20022012 |