Cargando…

Are products with an orphan designation for oncology indications different from products for other rare indications? A retrospective analysis of European orphan designations granted between 2002-2012

BACKGROUND: Orphan designated medicinal products benefit from regulatory and economic incentives for orphan drug development. Approximately 40% of orphan designations target rare neoplastic disorders, referring to rare cancers. In order to provide more insights in drugs for rare neoplastic disorders...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pauwels, Kim, Huys, Isabelle, Casteels, Minne, Larsson, Kristina, Voltz, Caroline, Penttila, Karri, Morel, Thomas, Simoens, Steven
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5314481/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28209180
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13023-017-0578-4
_version_ 1782508528105160704
author Pauwels, Kim
Huys, Isabelle
Casteels, Minne
Larsson, Kristina
Voltz, Caroline
Penttila, Karri
Morel, Thomas
Simoens, Steven
author_facet Pauwels, Kim
Huys, Isabelle
Casteels, Minne
Larsson, Kristina
Voltz, Caroline
Penttila, Karri
Morel, Thomas
Simoens, Steven
author_sort Pauwels, Kim
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Orphan designated medicinal products benefit from regulatory and economic incentives for orphan drug development. Approximately 40% of orphan designations target rare neoplastic disorders, referring to rare cancers. In order to provide more insights in drugs for rare neoplastic disorders that are under development and to better understand the role of orphan designation in the development of oncology drugs, this study investigates the characteristics of the product, the indication and the applicants as well as the stage of development of products with an orphan designation for rare neoplastic disorders and compares them with products with an orphan designation for other rare indications. Therefore, orphan designation application files and annual reports submitted by the applicant were reviewed at the premises of the European Medicines Agency. RESULTS: At the time of application, 41.6% of products with orphan designation for rare neoplastic disorders were in pre-clinical phase; this was 65.1% for other rare conditions (p < 0.05). Thirty percent of orphan designations for rare neoplastic disorders had reached phase 1; compared to 19.3% of orphan designations targeting other rare conditions (p < 0.05). The same trend was observed for the stage of development at the time of the latest annual report. Significant benefit was more often considered for orphan designations for rare neoplastic disorders compared to orphan designations for other rare conditions. CONCLUSION: Orphan designations for rare neoplastic disorders involve products that are in a more advanced stages of development compared to orphan designations for other (non-oncology) rare conditions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5314481
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53144812017-02-24 Are products with an orphan designation for oncology indications different from products for other rare indications? A retrospective analysis of European orphan designations granted between 2002-2012 Pauwels, Kim Huys, Isabelle Casteels, Minne Larsson, Kristina Voltz, Caroline Penttila, Karri Morel, Thomas Simoens, Steven Orphanet J Rare Dis Research BACKGROUND: Orphan designated medicinal products benefit from regulatory and economic incentives for orphan drug development. Approximately 40% of orphan designations target rare neoplastic disorders, referring to rare cancers. In order to provide more insights in drugs for rare neoplastic disorders that are under development and to better understand the role of orphan designation in the development of oncology drugs, this study investigates the characteristics of the product, the indication and the applicants as well as the stage of development of products with an orphan designation for rare neoplastic disorders and compares them with products with an orphan designation for other rare indications. Therefore, orphan designation application files and annual reports submitted by the applicant were reviewed at the premises of the European Medicines Agency. RESULTS: At the time of application, 41.6% of products with orphan designation for rare neoplastic disorders were in pre-clinical phase; this was 65.1% for other rare conditions (p < 0.05). Thirty percent of orphan designations for rare neoplastic disorders had reached phase 1; compared to 19.3% of orphan designations targeting other rare conditions (p < 0.05). The same trend was observed for the stage of development at the time of the latest annual report. Significant benefit was more often considered for orphan designations for rare neoplastic disorders compared to orphan designations for other rare conditions. CONCLUSION: Orphan designations for rare neoplastic disorders involve products that are in a more advanced stages of development compared to orphan designations for other (non-oncology) rare conditions. BioMed Central 2017-02-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5314481/ /pubmed/28209180 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13023-017-0578-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Pauwels, Kim
Huys, Isabelle
Casteels, Minne
Larsson, Kristina
Voltz, Caroline
Penttila, Karri
Morel, Thomas
Simoens, Steven
Are products with an orphan designation for oncology indications different from products for other rare indications? A retrospective analysis of European orphan designations granted between 2002-2012
title Are products with an orphan designation for oncology indications different from products for other rare indications? A retrospective analysis of European orphan designations granted between 2002-2012
title_full Are products with an orphan designation for oncology indications different from products for other rare indications? A retrospective analysis of European orphan designations granted between 2002-2012
title_fullStr Are products with an orphan designation for oncology indications different from products for other rare indications? A retrospective analysis of European orphan designations granted between 2002-2012
title_full_unstemmed Are products with an orphan designation for oncology indications different from products for other rare indications? A retrospective analysis of European orphan designations granted between 2002-2012
title_short Are products with an orphan designation for oncology indications different from products for other rare indications? A retrospective analysis of European orphan designations granted between 2002-2012
title_sort are products with an orphan designation for oncology indications different from products for other rare indications? a retrospective analysis of european orphan designations granted between 2002-2012
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5314481/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28209180
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13023-017-0578-4
work_keys_str_mv AT pauwelskim areproductswithanorphandesignationforoncologyindicationsdifferentfromproductsforotherrareindicationsaretrospectiveanalysisofeuropeanorphandesignationsgrantedbetween20022012
AT huysisabelle areproductswithanorphandesignationforoncologyindicationsdifferentfromproductsforotherrareindicationsaretrospectiveanalysisofeuropeanorphandesignationsgrantedbetween20022012
AT casteelsminne areproductswithanorphandesignationforoncologyindicationsdifferentfromproductsforotherrareindicationsaretrospectiveanalysisofeuropeanorphandesignationsgrantedbetween20022012
AT larssonkristina areproductswithanorphandesignationforoncologyindicationsdifferentfromproductsforotherrareindicationsaretrospectiveanalysisofeuropeanorphandesignationsgrantedbetween20022012
AT voltzcaroline areproductswithanorphandesignationforoncologyindicationsdifferentfromproductsforotherrareindicationsaretrospectiveanalysisofeuropeanorphandesignationsgrantedbetween20022012
AT penttilakarri areproductswithanorphandesignationforoncologyindicationsdifferentfromproductsforotherrareindicationsaretrospectiveanalysisofeuropeanorphandesignationsgrantedbetween20022012
AT morelthomas areproductswithanorphandesignationforoncologyindicationsdifferentfromproductsforotherrareindicationsaretrospectiveanalysisofeuropeanorphandesignationsgrantedbetween20022012
AT simoenssteven areproductswithanorphandesignationforoncologyindicationsdifferentfromproductsforotherrareindicationsaretrospectiveanalysisofeuropeanorphandesignationsgrantedbetween20022012