Cargando…
Modified enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols for patients with obstructive colorectal cancer
BACKGROUND: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols are now well-known to be useful for elective colorectal surgery, as they result in shorter hospital stays without adversely affecting morbidity. However, the efficacy and safety of ERAS protocols for patients with obstructive colorectal ca...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5314620/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28209144 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-017-0213-2 |
_version_ | 1782508552901885952 |
---|---|
author | Shida, Dai Tagawa, Kyoko Inada, Kentaro Nasu, Keiichi Seyama, Yasuji Maeshiro, Tsuyoshi Miyamoto, Sachio Inoue, Satoru Umekita, Nobutaka |
author_facet | Shida, Dai Tagawa, Kyoko Inada, Kentaro Nasu, Keiichi Seyama, Yasuji Maeshiro, Tsuyoshi Miyamoto, Sachio Inoue, Satoru Umekita, Nobutaka |
author_sort | Shida, Dai |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols are now well-known to be useful for elective colorectal surgery, as they result in shorter hospital stays without adversely affecting morbidity. However, the efficacy and safety of ERAS protocols for patients with obstructive colorectal cancer have yet to be clarified. METHODS: We evaluated 122 consecutive resections for obstructive colorectal cancer performed between July 2008 and November 2012 at Tokyo Metropolitan Bokutoh Hospital. Patients with rupture or impending rupture and those who received simple colostomy were excluded. The first set of 42 patients was treated based on traditional protocols, and the latter 80 according to modified ERAS protocols. The main endpoints were length of postoperative hospital stay, postoperative short-term morbidity, rate of readmission within 30 days, and mortality. Differences in modified ERAS protocols relative to traditional care include intensive preoperative counseling (by both surgeons and anesthesiologists), perioperative fluid management (avoidance of sodium/fluid overload), shortening of postoperative fasting period and early provision of oral nutrition, intraoperative warm air body heating, enforced postoperative mobilization, stimulation of gut motility, early removal of urinary catheter, and a multidisciplinary team approach to care. RESULTS: Median (interquartile range) postoperative hospital stay was 10 (10–14.25) days in the traditional group, and seven (7–8.75) days in the ERAS group, showing a 3-day reduction in hospital stay (p < 0.01). According to the Clavien-Dindo classification, overall incidences of grade 2 or higher postoperative complications for the traditional and ERAS groups were 15 and 10% (p = 0.48), and 30-day readmission rates were 0 and 1.3% (p = 1.00), respectively. As for mortality, one patient in the traditional group died and none in the ERAS group (p = 0.34). CONCLUSION: Modified ERAS protocols for obstructive colorectal cancer reduced hospital stay without adversely affecting morbidity, indicating that ERAS protocols are feasible for patients with obstructive colorectal cancer. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5314620 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53146202017-02-24 Modified enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols for patients with obstructive colorectal cancer Shida, Dai Tagawa, Kyoko Inada, Kentaro Nasu, Keiichi Seyama, Yasuji Maeshiro, Tsuyoshi Miyamoto, Sachio Inoue, Satoru Umekita, Nobutaka BMC Surg Research Article BACKGROUND: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols are now well-known to be useful for elective colorectal surgery, as they result in shorter hospital stays without adversely affecting morbidity. However, the efficacy and safety of ERAS protocols for patients with obstructive colorectal cancer have yet to be clarified. METHODS: We evaluated 122 consecutive resections for obstructive colorectal cancer performed between July 2008 and November 2012 at Tokyo Metropolitan Bokutoh Hospital. Patients with rupture or impending rupture and those who received simple colostomy were excluded. The first set of 42 patients was treated based on traditional protocols, and the latter 80 according to modified ERAS protocols. The main endpoints were length of postoperative hospital stay, postoperative short-term morbidity, rate of readmission within 30 days, and mortality. Differences in modified ERAS protocols relative to traditional care include intensive preoperative counseling (by both surgeons and anesthesiologists), perioperative fluid management (avoidance of sodium/fluid overload), shortening of postoperative fasting period and early provision of oral nutrition, intraoperative warm air body heating, enforced postoperative mobilization, stimulation of gut motility, early removal of urinary catheter, and a multidisciplinary team approach to care. RESULTS: Median (interquartile range) postoperative hospital stay was 10 (10–14.25) days in the traditional group, and seven (7–8.75) days in the ERAS group, showing a 3-day reduction in hospital stay (p < 0.01). According to the Clavien-Dindo classification, overall incidences of grade 2 or higher postoperative complications for the traditional and ERAS groups were 15 and 10% (p = 0.48), and 30-day readmission rates were 0 and 1.3% (p = 1.00), respectively. As for mortality, one patient in the traditional group died and none in the ERAS group (p = 0.34). CONCLUSION: Modified ERAS protocols for obstructive colorectal cancer reduced hospital stay without adversely affecting morbidity, indicating that ERAS protocols are feasible for patients with obstructive colorectal cancer. BioMed Central 2017-02-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5314620/ /pubmed/28209144 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-017-0213-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Shida, Dai Tagawa, Kyoko Inada, Kentaro Nasu, Keiichi Seyama, Yasuji Maeshiro, Tsuyoshi Miyamoto, Sachio Inoue, Satoru Umekita, Nobutaka Modified enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols for patients with obstructive colorectal cancer |
title | Modified enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols for patients with obstructive colorectal cancer |
title_full | Modified enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols for patients with obstructive colorectal cancer |
title_fullStr | Modified enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols for patients with obstructive colorectal cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Modified enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols for patients with obstructive colorectal cancer |
title_short | Modified enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols for patients with obstructive colorectal cancer |
title_sort | modified enhanced recovery after surgery (eras) protocols for patients with obstructive colorectal cancer |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5314620/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28209144 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-017-0213-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shidadai modifiedenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryerasprotocolsforpatientswithobstructivecolorectalcancer AT tagawakyoko modifiedenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryerasprotocolsforpatientswithobstructivecolorectalcancer AT inadakentaro modifiedenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryerasprotocolsforpatientswithobstructivecolorectalcancer AT nasukeiichi modifiedenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryerasprotocolsforpatientswithobstructivecolorectalcancer AT seyamayasuji modifiedenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryerasprotocolsforpatientswithobstructivecolorectalcancer AT maeshirotsuyoshi modifiedenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryerasprotocolsforpatientswithobstructivecolorectalcancer AT miyamotosachio modifiedenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryerasprotocolsforpatientswithobstructivecolorectalcancer AT inouesatoru modifiedenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryerasprotocolsforpatientswithobstructivecolorectalcancer AT umekitanobutaka modifiedenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryerasprotocolsforpatientswithobstructivecolorectalcancer |