Cargando…

Modified enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols for patients with obstructive colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols are now well-known to be useful for elective colorectal surgery, as they result in shorter hospital stays without adversely affecting morbidity. However, the efficacy and safety of ERAS protocols for patients with obstructive colorectal ca...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shida, Dai, Tagawa, Kyoko, Inada, Kentaro, Nasu, Keiichi, Seyama, Yasuji, Maeshiro, Tsuyoshi, Miyamoto, Sachio, Inoue, Satoru, Umekita, Nobutaka
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5314620/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28209144
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-017-0213-2
_version_ 1782508552901885952
author Shida, Dai
Tagawa, Kyoko
Inada, Kentaro
Nasu, Keiichi
Seyama, Yasuji
Maeshiro, Tsuyoshi
Miyamoto, Sachio
Inoue, Satoru
Umekita, Nobutaka
author_facet Shida, Dai
Tagawa, Kyoko
Inada, Kentaro
Nasu, Keiichi
Seyama, Yasuji
Maeshiro, Tsuyoshi
Miyamoto, Sachio
Inoue, Satoru
Umekita, Nobutaka
author_sort Shida, Dai
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols are now well-known to be useful for elective colorectal surgery, as they result in shorter hospital stays without adversely affecting morbidity. However, the efficacy and safety of ERAS protocols for patients with obstructive colorectal cancer have yet to be clarified. METHODS: We evaluated 122 consecutive resections for obstructive colorectal cancer performed between July 2008 and November 2012 at Tokyo Metropolitan Bokutoh Hospital. Patients with rupture or impending rupture and those who received simple colostomy were excluded. The first set of 42 patients was treated based on traditional protocols, and the latter 80 according to modified ERAS protocols. The main endpoints were length of postoperative hospital stay, postoperative short-term morbidity, rate of readmission within 30 days, and mortality. Differences in modified ERAS protocols relative to traditional care include intensive preoperative counseling (by both surgeons and anesthesiologists), perioperative fluid management (avoidance of sodium/fluid overload), shortening of postoperative fasting period and early provision of oral nutrition, intraoperative warm air body heating, enforced postoperative mobilization, stimulation of gut motility, early removal of urinary catheter, and a multidisciplinary team approach to care. RESULTS: Median (interquartile range) postoperative hospital stay was 10 (10–14.25) days in the traditional group, and seven (7–8.75) days in the ERAS group, showing a 3-day reduction in hospital stay (p < 0.01). According to the Clavien-Dindo classification, overall incidences of grade 2 or higher postoperative complications for the traditional and ERAS groups were 15 and 10% (p = 0.48), and 30-day readmission rates were 0 and 1.3% (p = 1.00), respectively. As for mortality, one patient in the traditional group died and none in the ERAS group (p = 0.34). CONCLUSION: Modified ERAS protocols for obstructive colorectal cancer reduced hospital stay without adversely affecting morbidity, indicating that ERAS protocols are feasible for patients with obstructive colorectal cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5314620
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53146202017-02-24 Modified enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols for patients with obstructive colorectal cancer Shida, Dai Tagawa, Kyoko Inada, Kentaro Nasu, Keiichi Seyama, Yasuji Maeshiro, Tsuyoshi Miyamoto, Sachio Inoue, Satoru Umekita, Nobutaka BMC Surg Research Article BACKGROUND: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols are now well-known to be useful for elective colorectal surgery, as they result in shorter hospital stays without adversely affecting morbidity. However, the efficacy and safety of ERAS protocols for patients with obstructive colorectal cancer have yet to be clarified. METHODS: We evaluated 122 consecutive resections for obstructive colorectal cancer performed between July 2008 and November 2012 at Tokyo Metropolitan Bokutoh Hospital. Patients with rupture or impending rupture and those who received simple colostomy were excluded. The first set of 42 patients was treated based on traditional protocols, and the latter 80 according to modified ERAS protocols. The main endpoints were length of postoperative hospital stay, postoperative short-term morbidity, rate of readmission within 30 days, and mortality. Differences in modified ERAS protocols relative to traditional care include intensive preoperative counseling (by both surgeons and anesthesiologists), perioperative fluid management (avoidance of sodium/fluid overload), shortening of postoperative fasting period and early provision of oral nutrition, intraoperative warm air body heating, enforced postoperative mobilization, stimulation of gut motility, early removal of urinary catheter, and a multidisciplinary team approach to care. RESULTS: Median (interquartile range) postoperative hospital stay was 10 (10–14.25) days in the traditional group, and seven (7–8.75) days in the ERAS group, showing a 3-day reduction in hospital stay (p < 0.01). According to the Clavien-Dindo classification, overall incidences of grade 2 or higher postoperative complications for the traditional and ERAS groups were 15 and 10% (p = 0.48), and 30-day readmission rates were 0 and 1.3% (p = 1.00), respectively. As for mortality, one patient in the traditional group died and none in the ERAS group (p = 0.34). CONCLUSION: Modified ERAS protocols for obstructive colorectal cancer reduced hospital stay without adversely affecting morbidity, indicating that ERAS protocols are feasible for patients with obstructive colorectal cancer. BioMed Central 2017-02-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5314620/ /pubmed/28209144 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-017-0213-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Shida, Dai
Tagawa, Kyoko
Inada, Kentaro
Nasu, Keiichi
Seyama, Yasuji
Maeshiro, Tsuyoshi
Miyamoto, Sachio
Inoue, Satoru
Umekita, Nobutaka
Modified enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols for patients with obstructive colorectal cancer
title Modified enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols for patients with obstructive colorectal cancer
title_full Modified enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols for patients with obstructive colorectal cancer
title_fullStr Modified enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols for patients with obstructive colorectal cancer
title_full_unstemmed Modified enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols for patients with obstructive colorectal cancer
title_short Modified enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols for patients with obstructive colorectal cancer
title_sort modified enhanced recovery after surgery (eras) protocols for patients with obstructive colorectal cancer
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5314620/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28209144
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-017-0213-2
work_keys_str_mv AT shidadai modifiedenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryerasprotocolsforpatientswithobstructivecolorectalcancer
AT tagawakyoko modifiedenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryerasprotocolsforpatientswithobstructivecolorectalcancer
AT inadakentaro modifiedenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryerasprotocolsforpatientswithobstructivecolorectalcancer
AT nasukeiichi modifiedenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryerasprotocolsforpatientswithobstructivecolorectalcancer
AT seyamayasuji modifiedenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryerasprotocolsforpatientswithobstructivecolorectalcancer
AT maeshirotsuyoshi modifiedenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryerasprotocolsforpatientswithobstructivecolorectalcancer
AT miyamotosachio modifiedenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryerasprotocolsforpatientswithobstructivecolorectalcancer
AT inouesatoru modifiedenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryerasprotocolsforpatientswithobstructivecolorectalcancer
AT umekitanobutaka modifiedenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryerasprotocolsforpatientswithobstructivecolorectalcancer