Cargando…

Vascular Impulse Technology versus elevation in the treatment of posttraumatic swelling of extremity fractures: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Fractures of the extremities are often complicated by a variable degree of swelling secondary to hemorrhage and soft tissue injury. Patients typically require up to 7 days of inpatient bed rest and elevation to reduce swelling to an acceptable level for operative treatment with internal...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schnetzke, Marc, Swartman, Benedict, Bonnen, Isabel, Keil, Holger, Schüler, Svenja, Grützner, Paul A., Franke, Jochen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5314677/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28209169
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-1824-8
_version_ 1782508562090557440
author Schnetzke, Marc
Swartman, Benedict
Bonnen, Isabel
Keil, Holger
Schüler, Svenja
Grützner, Paul A.
Franke, Jochen
author_facet Schnetzke, Marc
Swartman, Benedict
Bonnen, Isabel
Keil, Holger
Schüler, Svenja
Grützner, Paul A.
Franke, Jochen
author_sort Schnetzke, Marc
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Fractures of the extremities are often complicated by a variable degree of swelling secondary to hemorrhage and soft tissue injury. Patients typically require up to 7 days of inpatient bed rest and elevation to reduce swelling to an acceptable level for operative treatment with internal fixation. Alternatively, an intermittent pneumatic compression device, such as the Vascular Impulse Technology (VIT) system, can be used at the injured extremity to reduce the posttraumatic swelling. The VIT system consists of a pneumatic compressor that intermittently rapidly inflates a bladder positioned under the arch of the hand or the foot, which results in compression of the venous hand or foot plexus. That intermittent compression induces an increased venous velocity and aims to reduce the soft tissue swelling of the affected extremity. METHODS/DESIGN: The VIT study is a prospective, monocenter, randomized controlled trial to compare the VIT system with elevation in the treatment of posttraumatic swelling in the case of a fracture of the upper and lower extremity. This study will include 280 patients with fractures of the upper and the lower extremity with nine different injury types. For each of the nine injury types a separate randomization to the two intervention groups (VIT group or control group) will be performed. The primary outcome parameter is the time taken for the swelling to resolve sufficiently to permit surgery. A separate analysis for each of the nine injury types will be performed. DISCUSSION: In the proposed study, the effectiveness of the VIT system in the treatment of posttraumatic swelling of upper and lower extremity fractures will be evaluated. TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Clinical Trial Register, No. DRKS00010510. Registered on 17 July 2016. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-017-1824-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5314677
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53146772017-02-24 Vascular Impulse Technology versus elevation in the treatment of posttraumatic swelling of extremity fractures: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial Schnetzke, Marc Swartman, Benedict Bonnen, Isabel Keil, Holger Schüler, Svenja Grützner, Paul A. Franke, Jochen Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Fractures of the extremities are often complicated by a variable degree of swelling secondary to hemorrhage and soft tissue injury. Patients typically require up to 7 days of inpatient bed rest and elevation to reduce swelling to an acceptable level for operative treatment with internal fixation. Alternatively, an intermittent pneumatic compression device, such as the Vascular Impulse Technology (VIT) system, can be used at the injured extremity to reduce the posttraumatic swelling. The VIT system consists of a pneumatic compressor that intermittently rapidly inflates a bladder positioned under the arch of the hand or the foot, which results in compression of the venous hand or foot plexus. That intermittent compression induces an increased venous velocity and aims to reduce the soft tissue swelling of the affected extremity. METHODS/DESIGN: The VIT study is a prospective, monocenter, randomized controlled trial to compare the VIT system with elevation in the treatment of posttraumatic swelling in the case of a fracture of the upper and lower extremity. This study will include 280 patients with fractures of the upper and the lower extremity with nine different injury types. For each of the nine injury types a separate randomization to the two intervention groups (VIT group or control group) will be performed. The primary outcome parameter is the time taken for the swelling to resolve sufficiently to permit surgery. A separate analysis for each of the nine injury types will be performed. DISCUSSION: In the proposed study, the effectiveness of the VIT system in the treatment of posttraumatic swelling of upper and lower extremity fractures will be evaluated. TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Clinical Trial Register, No. DRKS00010510. Registered on 17 July 2016. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-017-1824-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-02-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5314677/ /pubmed/28209169 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-1824-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Schnetzke, Marc
Swartman, Benedict
Bonnen, Isabel
Keil, Holger
Schüler, Svenja
Grützner, Paul A.
Franke, Jochen
Vascular Impulse Technology versus elevation in the treatment of posttraumatic swelling of extremity fractures: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title Vascular Impulse Technology versus elevation in the treatment of posttraumatic swelling of extremity fractures: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_full Vascular Impulse Technology versus elevation in the treatment of posttraumatic swelling of extremity fractures: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Vascular Impulse Technology versus elevation in the treatment of posttraumatic swelling of extremity fractures: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Vascular Impulse Technology versus elevation in the treatment of posttraumatic swelling of extremity fractures: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_short Vascular Impulse Technology versus elevation in the treatment of posttraumatic swelling of extremity fractures: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_sort vascular impulse technology versus elevation in the treatment of posttraumatic swelling of extremity fractures: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5314677/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28209169
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-1824-8
work_keys_str_mv AT schnetzkemarc vascularimpulsetechnologyversuselevationinthetreatmentofposttraumaticswellingofextremityfracturesstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT swartmanbenedict vascularimpulsetechnologyversuselevationinthetreatmentofposttraumaticswellingofextremityfracturesstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT bonnenisabel vascularimpulsetechnologyversuselevationinthetreatmentofposttraumaticswellingofextremityfracturesstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT keilholger vascularimpulsetechnologyversuselevationinthetreatmentofposttraumaticswellingofextremityfracturesstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT schulersvenja vascularimpulsetechnologyversuselevationinthetreatmentofposttraumaticswellingofextremityfracturesstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT grutznerpaula vascularimpulsetechnologyversuselevationinthetreatmentofposttraumaticswellingofextremityfracturesstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT frankejochen vascularimpulsetechnologyversuselevationinthetreatmentofposttraumaticswellingofextremityfracturesstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial