Cargando…

Evaluation of PCR Systems for Field Screening of Bacillus anthracis

There is little published data on the performance of hand-portable polymerase chain reaction (PCR) systems that can be used by first responders to determine if a suspicious powder contains a potential biothreat agent. We evaluated 5 commercially available hand-portable PCR instruments for detection...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ozanich, Richard M., Colburn, Heather A., Victry, Kristin D., Bartholomew, Rachel A., Arce, Jennifer S., Heredia-Langner, Alejandro, Jarman, Kristin, Kreuzer, Helen W., Bruckner-Lea, Cynthia J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5314994/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28192050
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/hs.2016.0043
_version_ 1782508613138382848
author Ozanich, Richard M.
Colburn, Heather A.
Victry, Kristin D.
Bartholomew, Rachel A.
Arce, Jennifer S.
Heredia-Langner, Alejandro
Jarman, Kristin
Kreuzer, Helen W.
Bruckner-Lea, Cynthia J.
author_facet Ozanich, Richard M.
Colburn, Heather A.
Victry, Kristin D.
Bartholomew, Rachel A.
Arce, Jennifer S.
Heredia-Langner, Alejandro
Jarman, Kristin
Kreuzer, Helen W.
Bruckner-Lea, Cynthia J.
author_sort Ozanich, Richard M.
collection PubMed
description There is little published data on the performance of hand-portable polymerase chain reaction (PCR) systems that can be used by first responders to determine if a suspicious powder contains a potential biothreat agent. We evaluated 5 commercially available hand-portable PCR instruments for detection of Bacillus anthracis. We used a cost-effective, statistically based test plan to evaluate systems at performance levels ranging from 0.85-0.95 lower confidence bound (LCB) of the probability of detection (POD) at confidence levels of 80% to 95%. We assessed specificity using purified genomic DNA from 13 B. anthracis strains and 18 Bacillus near neighbors, potential interference with 22 suspicious powders that are commonly encountered in the field by first responders during suspected biothreat incidents, and the potential for PCR inhibition when B. anthracis spores were spiked into these powders. Our results indicate that 3 of the 5 systems achieved 0.95 LCB of the probability of detection with 95% confidence levels at test concentrations of 2,000 genome equivalents/mL (GE/mL), which is comparable to 2,000 spores/mL. This is more than sufficient sensitivity for screening visible suspicious powders. These systems exhibited no false-positive results or PCR inhibition with common suspicious powders and reliably detected B. anthracis spores spiked into these powders, though some issues with assay controls were observed. Our testing approach enables efficient performance testing using a statistically rigorous and cost-effective test plan to generate performance data that allow users to make informed decisions regarding the purchase and use of field biodetection equipment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5314994
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53149942017-03-06 Evaluation of PCR Systems for Field Screening of Bacillus anthracis Ozanich, Richard M. Colburn, Heather A. Victry, Kristin D. Bartholomew, Rachel A. Arce, Jennifer S. Heredia-Langner, Alejandro Jarman, Kristin Kreuzer, Helen W. Bruckner-Lea, Cynthia J. Health Secur Original Articles There is little published data on the performance of hand-portable polymerase chain reaction (PCR) systems that can be used by first responders to determine if a suspicious powder contains a potential biothreat agent. We evaluated 5 commercially available hand-portable PCR instruments for detection of Bacillus anthracis. We used a cost-effective, statistically based test plan to evaluate systems at performance levels ranging from 0.85-0.95 lower confidence bound (LCB) of the probability of detection (POD) at confidence levels of 80% to 95%. We assessed specificity using purified genomic DNA from 13 B. anthracis strains and 18 Bacillus near neighbors, potential interference with 22 suspicious powders that are commonly encountered in the field by first responders during suspected biothreat incidents, and the potential for PCR inhibition when B. anthracis spores were spiked into these powders. Our results indicate that 3 of the 5 systems achieved 0.95 LCB of the probability of detection with 95% confidence levels at test concentrations of 2,000 genome equivalents/mL (GE/mL), which is comparable to 2,000 spores/mL. This is more than sufficient sensitivity for screening visible suspicious powders. These systems exhibited no false-positive results or PCR inhibition with common suspicious powders and reliably detected B. anthracis spores spiked into these powders, though some issues with assay controls were observed. Our testing approach enables efficient performance testing using a statistically rigorous and cost-effective test plan to generate performance data that allow users to make informed decisions regarding the purchase and use of field biodetection equipment. Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. 2017-02-01 2017-02-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5314994/ /pubmed/28192050 http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/hs.2016.0043 Text en © Richard M. Ozanich et al., 2017; Published by Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. This Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Ozanich, Richard M.
Colburn, Heather A.
Victry, Kristin D.
Bartholomew, Rachel A.
Arce, Jennifer S.
Heredia-Langner, Alejandro
Jarman, Kristin
Kreuzer, Helen W.
Bruckner-Lea, Cynthia J.
Evaluation of PCR Systems for Field Screening of Bacillus anthracis
title Evaluation of PCR Systems for Field Screening of Bacillus anthracis
title_full Evaluation of PCR Systems for Field Screening of Bacillus anthracis
title_fullStr Evaluation of PCR Systems for Field Screening of Bacillus anthracis
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of PCR Systems for Field Screening of Bacillus anthracis
title_short Evaluation of PCR Systems for Field Screening of Bacillus anthracis
title_sort evaluation of pcr systems for field screening of bacillus anthracis
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5314994/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28192050
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/hs.2016.0043
work_keys_str_mv AT ozanichrichardm evaluationofpcrsystemsforfieldscreeningofbacillusanthracis
AT colburnheathera evaluationofpcrsystemsforfieldscreeningofbacillusanthracis
AT victrykristind evaluationofpcrsystemsforfieldscreeningofbacillusanthracis
AT bartholomewrachela evaluationofpcrsystemsforfieldscreeningofbacillusanthracis
AT arcejennifers evaluationofpcrsystemsforfieldscreeningofbacillusanthracis
AT heredialangneralejandro evaluationofpcrsystemsforfieldscreeningofbacillusanthracis
AT jarmankristin evaluationofpcrsystemsforfieldscreeningofbacillusanthracis
AT kreuzerhelenw evaluationofpcrsystemsforfieldscreeningofbacillusanthracis
AT brucknerleacynthiaj evaluationofpcrsystemsforfieldscreeningofbacillusanthracis