Cargando…

“Twin lesions”: Which one is the bad one? Improvement of clinical diagnosis with reflectance confocal microscopy

BACKGROUND: In vivo reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) is a novel non-invasive diagnostic tool, which is used to differentiate skin lesions. Even in lesions with similar dermatoscopic images, RCM may improve diagnostic accuracy. METHODS: Three sets of false “twin lesions” with similar macroscopic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Saral, Secil, Hartmann, Daniela, Letulè, Valerie, Ruzicka, Thomas, Ruini, Cristel, von Braunmühl, Tanja
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Derm101.com 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5315034/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28243488
http://dx.doi.org/10.5826/dpc.0701a02
_version_ 1782508618579443712
author Saral, Secil
Hartmann, Daniela
Letulè, Valerie
Ruzicka, Thomas
Ruini, Cristel
von Braunmühl, Tanja
author_facet Saral, Secil
Hartmann, Daniela
Letulè, Valerie
Ruzicka, Thomas
Ruini, Cristel
von Braunmühl, Tanja
author_sort Saral, Secil
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In vivo reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) is a novel non-invasive diagnostic tool, which is used to differentiate skin lesions. Even in lesions with similar dermatoscopic images, RCM may improve diagnostic accuracy. METHODS: Three sets of false “twin lesions” with similar macroscopic and dermatoscopic images are matched. All lesions are evaluated with RCM and lesions are excised for further evaluation. Corresponding features in confocal images, dermatoscopy and histopathology are discussed. RESULTS: In all matched pairs, one of the lesions was diagnosed as melanoma with the observation of melanoma findings such as: epidermal disarray, pagetoid cells in epidermis and cellular atypia at the junction. Benign lesions were differentiated easily with RCM imaging. CONCLUSION: Examining dermatoscopically difficult and/or similar lesions with RCM facilitates diagnostic and therapeutic decision making. Using RCM in daily practice may contribute to a decrease in unnecessary excisions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5315034
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Derm101.com
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53150342017-02-27 “Twin lesions”: Which one is the bad one? Improvement of clinical diagnosis with reflectance confocal microscopy Saral, Secil Hartmann, Daniela Letulè, Valerie Ruzicka, Thomas Ruini, Cristel von Braunmühl, Tanja Dermatol Pract Concept Articles BACKGROUND: In vivo reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) is a novel non-invasive diagnostic tool, which is used to differentiate skin lesions. Even in lesions with similar dermatoscopic images, RCM may improve diagnostic accuracy. METHODS: Three sets of false “twin lesions” with similar macroscopic and dermatoscopic images are matched. All lesions are evaluated with RCM and lesions are excised for further evaluation. Corresponding features in confocal images, dermatoscopy and histopathology are discussed. RESULTS: In all matched pairs, one of the lesions was diagnosed as melanoma with the observation of melanoma findings such as: epidermal disarray, pagetoid cells in epidermis and cellular atypia at the junction. Benign lesions were differentiated easily with RCM imaging. CONCLUSION: Examining dermatoscopically difficult and/or similar lesions with RCM facilitates diagnostic and therapeutic decision making. Using RCM in daily practice may contribute to a decrease in unnecessary excisions. Derm101.com 2017-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC5315034/ /pubmed/28243488 http://dx.doi.org/10.5826/dpc.0701a02 Text en ©2017 Saral et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Articles
Saral, Secil
Hartmann, Daniela
Letulè, Valerie
Ruzicka, Thomas
Ruini, Cristel
von Braunmühl, Tanja
“Twin lesions”: Which one is the bad one? Improvement of clinical diagnosis with reflectance confocal microscopy
title “Twin lesions”: Which one is the bad one? Improvement of clinical diagnosis with reflectance confocal microscopy
title_full “Twin lesions”: Which one is the bad one? Improvement of clinical diagnosis with reflectance confocal microscopy
title_fullStr “Twin lesions”: Which one is the bad one? Improvement of clinical diagnosis with reflectance confocal microscopy
title_full_unstemmed “Twin lesions”: Which one is the bad one? Improvement of clinical diagnosis with reflectance confocal microscopy
title_short “Twin lesions”: Which one is the bad one? Improvement of clinical diagnosis with reflectance confocal microscopy
title_sort “twin lesions”: which one is the bad one? improvement of clinical diagnosis with reflectance confocal microscopy
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5315034/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28243488
http://dx.doi.org/10.5826/dpc.0701a02
work_keys_str_mv AT saralsecil twinlesionswhichoneisthebadoneimprovementofclinicaldiagnosiswithreflectanceconfocalmicroscopy
AT hartmanndaniela twinlesionswhichoneisthebadoneimprovementofclinicaldiagnosiswithreflectanceconfocalmicroscopy
AT letulevalerie twinlesionswhichoneisthebadoneimprovementofclinicaldiagnosiswithreflectanceconfocalmicroscopy
AT ruzickathomas twinlesionswhichoneisthebadoneimprovementofclinicaldiagnosiswithreflectanceconfocalmicroscopy
AT ruinicristel twinlesionswhichoneisthebadoneimprovementofclinicaldiagnosiswithreflectanceconfocalmicroscopy
AT vonbraunmuhltanja twinlesionswhichoneisthebadoneimprovementofclinicaldiagnosiswithreflectanceconfocalmicroscopy