Cargando…
“Twin lesions”: Which one is the bad one? Improvement of clinical diagnosis with reflectance confocal microscopy
BACKGROUND: In vivo reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) is a novel non-invasive diagnostic tool, which is used to differentiate skin lesions. Even in lesions with similar dermatoscopic images, RCM may improve diagnostic accuracy. METHODS: Three sets of false “twin lesions” with similar macroscopic...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Derm101.com
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5315034/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28243488 http://dx.doi.org/10.5826/dpc.0701a02 |
_version_ | 1782508618579443712 |
---|---|
author | Saral, Secil Hartmann, Daniela Letulè, Valerie Ruzicka, Thomas Ruini, Cristel von Braunmühl, Tanja |
author_facet | Saral, Secil Hartmann, Daniela Letulè, Valerie Ruzicka, Thomas Ruini, Cristel von Braunmühl, Tanja |
author_sort | Saral, Secil |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In vivo reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) is a novel non-invasive diagnostic tool, which is used to differentiate skin lesions. Even in lesions with similar dermatoscopic images, RCM may improve diagnostic accuracy. METHODS: Three sets of false “twin lesions” with similar macroscopic and dermatoscopic images are matched. All lesions are evaluated with RCM and lesions are excised for further evaluation. Corresponding features in confocal images, dermatoscopy and histopathology are discussed. RESULTS: In all matched pairs, one of the lesions was diagnosed as melanoma with the observation of melanoma findings such as: epidermal disarray, pagetoid cells in epidermis and cellular atypia at the junction. Benign lesions were differentiated easily with RCM imaging. CONCLUSION: Examining dermatoscopically difficult and/or similar lesions with RCM facilitates diagnostic and therapeutic decision making. Using RCM in daily practice may contribute to a decrease in unnecessary excisions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5315034 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Derm101.com |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53150342017-02-27 “Twin lesions”: Which one is the bad one? Improvement of clinical diagnosis with reflectance confocal microscopy Saral, Secil Hartmann, Daniela Letulè, Valerie Ruzicka, Thomas Ruini, Cristel von Braunmühl, Tanja Dermatol Pract Concept Articles BACKGROUND: In vivo reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) is a novel non-invasive diagnostic tool, which is used to differentiate skin lesions. Even in lesions with similar dermatoscopic images, RCM may improve diagnostic accuracy. METHODS: Three sets of false “twin lesions” with similar macroscopic and dermatoscopic images are matched. All lesions are evaluated with RCM and lesions are excised for further evaluation. Corresponding features in confocal images, dermatoscopy and histopathology are discussed. RESULTS: In all matched pairs, one of the lesions was diagnosed as melanoma with the observation of melanoma findings such as: epidermal disarray, pagetoid cells in epidermis and cellular atypia at the junction. Benign lesions were differentiated easily with RCM imaging. CONCLUSION: Examining dermatoscopically difficult and/or similar lesions with RCM facilitates diagnostic and therapeutic decision making. Using RCM in daily practice may contribute to a decrease in unnecessary excisions. Derm101.com 2017-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC5315034/ /pubmed/28243488 http://dx.doi.org/10.5826/dpc.0701a02 Text en ©2017 Saral et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Articles Saral, Secil Hartmann, Daniela Letulè, Valerie Ruzicka, Thomas Ruini, Cristel von Braunmühl, Tanja “Twin lesions”: Which one is the bad one? Improvement of clinical diagnosis with reflectance confocal microscopy |
title | “Twin lesions”: Which one is the bad one? Improvement of clinical diagnosis with reflectance confocal microscopy |
title_full | “Twin lesions”: Which one is the bad one? Improvement of clinical diagnosis with reflectance confocal microscopy |
title_fullStr | “Twin lesions”: Which one is the bad one? Improvement of clinical diagnosis with reflectance confocal microscopy |
title_full_unstemmed | “Twin lesions”: Which one is the bad one? Improvement of clinical diagnosis with reflectance confocal microscopy |
title_short | “Twin lesions”: Which one is the bad one? Improvement of clinical diagnosis with reflectance confocal microscopy |
title_sort | “twin lesions”: which one is the bad one? improvement of clinical diagnosis with reflectance confocal microscopy |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5315034/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28243488 http://dx.doi.org/10.5826/dpc.0701a02 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT saralsecil twinlesionswhichoneisthebadoneimprovementofclinicaldiagnosiswithreflectanceconfocalmicroscopy AT hartmanndaniela twinlesionswhichoneisthebadoneimprovementofclinicaldiagnosiswithreflectanceconfocalmicroscopy AT letulevalerie twinlesionswhichoneisthebadoneimprovementofclinicaldiagnosiswithreflectanceconfocalmicroscopy AT ruzickathomas twinlesionswhichoneisthebadoneimprovementofclinicaldiagnosiswithreflectanceconfocalmicroscopy AT ruinicristel twinlesionswhichoneisthebadoneimprovementofclinicaldiagnosiswithreflectanceconfocalmicroscopy AT vonbraunmuhltanja twinlesionswhichoneisthebadoneimprovementofclinicaldiagnosiswithreflectanceconfocalmicroscopy |