Cargando…
Is biomass a reliable estimate of plant fitness?(1)
The measurement of fitness is critical to biological research. Although the determination of fitness for some organisms may be relatively straightforward under controlled conditions, it is often a difficult or nearly impossible task in nature. Plants are no exception. The potential for long-distance...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Botanical Society of America
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5315378/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28224055 http://dx.doi.org/10.3732/apps.1600094 |
_version_ | 1782508681236054016 |
---|---|
author | Younginger, Brett S. Sirová, Dagmara Cruzan, Mitchell B. Ballhorn, Daniel J. |
author_facet | Younginger, Brett S. Sirová, Dagmara Cruzan, Mitchell B. Ballhorn, Daniel J. |
author_sort | Younginger, Brett S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The measurement of fitness is critical to biological research. Although the determination of fitness for some organisms may be relatively straightforward under controlled conditions, it is often a difficult or nearly impossible task in nature. Plants are no exception. The potential for long-distance pollen dispersal, likelihood of multiple reproductive events per inflorescence, varying degrees of reproductive growth in perennials, and asexual reproduction all confound accurate fitness measurements. For these reasons, biomass is frequently used as a proxy for plant fitness. However, the suitability of indirect fitness measurements such as plant size is rarely evaluated. This review outlines the important associations between plant performance, fecundity, and fitness. We make a case for the reliability of biomass as an estimate of fitness when comparing conspecifics of the same age class. We reviewed 170 studies on plant fitness and discuss the metrics commonly employed for fitness estimations. We find that biomass or growth rate are frequently used and often positively associated with fecundity, which in turn suggests greater overall fitness. Our results support the utility of biomass as an appropriate surrogate for fitness under many circumstances, and suggest that additional fitness measures should be reported along with biomass or growth rate whenever possible. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5315378 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Botanical Society of America |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53153782017-02-21 Is biomass a reliable estimate of plant fitness?(1) Younginger, Brett S. Sirová, Dagmara Cruzan, Mitchell B. Ballhorn, Daniel J. Appl Plant Sci Review Article The measurement of fitness is critical to biological research. Although the determination of fitness for some organisms may be relatively straightforward under controlled conditions, it is often a difficult or nearly impossible task in nature. Plants are no exception. The potential for long-distance pollen dispersal, likelihood of multiple reproductive events per inflorescence, varying degrees of reproductive growth in perennials, and asexual reproduction all confound accurate fitness measurements. For these reasons, biomass is frequently used as a proxy for plant fitness. However, the suitability of indirect fitness measurements such as plant size is rarely evaluated. This review outlines the important associations between plant performance, fecundity, and fitness. We make a case for the reliability of biomass as an estimate of fitness when comparing conspecifics of the same age class. We reviewed 170 studies on plant fitness and discuss the metrics commonly employed for fitness estimations. We find that biomass or growth rate are frequently used and often positively associated with fecundity, which in turn suggests greater overall fitness. Our results support the utility of biomass as an appropriate surrogate for fitness under many circumstances, and suggest that additional fitness measures should be reported along with biomass or growth rate whenever possible. Botanical Society of America 2017-02-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5315378/ /pubmed/28224055 http://dx.doi.org/10.3732/apps.1600094 Text en © 2017 Younginger et al. Published by the Botanical Society of America https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted noncommercial use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited and the new work is distributed under the same license as the original. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Younginger, Brett S. Sirová, Dagmara Cruzan, Mitchell B. Ballhorn, Daniel J. Is biomass a reliable estimate of plant fitness?(1) |
title | Is biomass a reliable estimate of plant fitness?(1) |
title_full | Is biomass a reliable estimate of plant fitness?(1) |
title_fullStr | Is biomass a reliable estimate of plant fitness?(1) |
title_full_unstemmed | Is biomass a reliable estimate of plant fitness?(1) |
title_short | Is biomass a reliable estimate of plant fitness?(1) |
title_sort | is biomass a reliable estimate of plant fitness?(1) |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5315378/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28224055 http://dx.doi.org/10.3732/apps.1600094 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT youngingerbretts isbiomassareliableestimateofplantfitness1 AT sirovadagmara isbiomassareliableestimateofplantfitness1 AT cruzanmitchellb isbiomassareliableestimateofplantfitness1 AT ballhorndanielj isbiomassareliableestimateofplantfitness1 |