Cargando…
Recontacting in clinical practice: an investigation of the views of healthcare professionals and clinical scientists in the United Kingdom
This article explores the views and experiences of healthcare professionals and clinical scientists in genetics about the existence of a duty and/or responsibility to recontact former patients when the genetic information relevant to their health, or that of family members, changes in a potentially...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5315519/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28051074 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ejhg.2016.188 |
_version_ | 1782508697307578368 |
---|---|
author | Carrieri, Daniele Dheensa, Sandi Doheny, Shane Clarke, Angus J Turnpenny, Peter D Lucassen, Anneke M Kelly, Susan E |
author_facet | Carrieri, Daniele Dheensa, Sandi Doheny, Shane Clarke, Angus J Turnpenny, Peter D Lucassen, Anneke M Kelly, Susan E |
author_sort | Carrieri, Daniele |
collection | PubMed |
description | This article explores the views and experiences of healthcare professionals and clinical scientists in genetics about the existence of a duty and/or responsibility to recontact former patients when the genetic information relevant to their health, or that of family members, changes in a potentially important manner. It is based on N=30 semi-structured interviews guided by vignettes of recontacting scenarios. The sample included healthcare professionals in the United Kingdom from different medical specialties (clinical genetics, other ‘mainstream' specialties now offering genetic testing), and scientists from regional genetics laboratories. While viewing recontacting as desirable under certain circumstances, most respondents expressed concerns about its feasibility within the current constraints of the National Health Service (NHS). The main barriers identified were insufficient resources (time, staff, and suitable IT infrastructures) and lack of clarity about role boundaries and responsibilities. All of these are further complicated by genetic testing being increasingly offered by mainstream specialties. Reaching a consensus about roles and responsibilities of clinical specialties with regard to recontacting former patients in the light of evolving genetic information, and about what resources and infrastructures would be needed, was generally seen as a pre-requisite to developing guidelines about recontact. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5315519 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53155192017-02-27 Recontacting in clinical practice: an investigation of the views of healthcare professionals and clinical scientists in the United Kingdom Carrieri, Daniele Dheensa, Sandi Doheny, Shane Clarke, Angus J Turnpenny, Peter D Lucassen, Anneke M Kelly, Susan E Eur J Hum Genet Article This article explores the views and experiences of healthcare professionals and clinical scientists in genetics about the existence of a duty and/or responsibility to recontact former patients when the genetic information relevant to their health, or that of family members, changes in a potentially important manner. It is based on N=30 semi-structured interviews guided by vignettes of recontacting scenarios. The sample included healthcare professionals in the United Kingdom from different medical specialties (clinical genetics, other ‘mainstream' specialties now offering genetic testing), and scientists from regional genetics laboratories. While viewing recontacting as desirable under certain circumstances, most respondents expressed concerns about its feasibility within the current constraints of the National Health Service (NHS). The main barriers identified were insufficient resources (time, staff, and suitable IT infrastructures) and lack of clarity about role boundaries and responsibilities. All of these are further complicated by genetic testing being increasingly offered by mainstream specialties. Reaching a consensus about roles and responsibilities of clinical specialties with regard to recontacting former patients in the light of evolving genetic information, and about what resources and infrastructures would be needed, was generally seen as a pre-requisite to developing guidelines about recontact. Nature Publishing Group 2017-03 2017-01-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5315519/ /pubmed/28051074 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ejhg.2016.188 Text en Copyright © 2017 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Article Carrieri, Daniele Dheensa, Sandi Doheny, Shane Clarke, Angus J Turnpenny, Peter D Lucassen, Anneke M Kelly, Susan E Recontacting in clinical practice: an investigation of the views of healthcare professionals and clinical scientists in the United Kingdom |
title | Recontacting in clinical practice: an investigation of the views of healthcare professionals and clinical scientists in the United Kingdom |
title_full | Recontacting in clinical practice: an investigation of the views of healthcare professionals and clinical scientists in the United Kingdom |
title_fullStr | Recontacting in clinical practice: an investigation of the views of healthcare professionals and clinical scientists in the United Kingdom |
title_full_unstemmed | Recontacting in clinical practice: an investigation of the views of healthcare professionals and clinical scientists in the United Kingdom |
title_short | Recontacting in clinical practice: an investigation of the views of healthcare professionals and clinical scientists in the United Kingdom |
title_sort | recontacting in clinical practice: an investigation of the views of healthcare professionals and clinical scientists in the united kingdom |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5315519/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28051074 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ejhg.2016.188 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT carrieridaniele recontactinginclinicalpracticeaninvestigationoftheviewsofhealthcareprofessionalsandclinicalscientistsintheunitedkingdom AT dheensasandi recontactinginclinicalpracticeaninvestigationoftheviewsofhealthcareprofessionalsandclinicalscientistsintheunitedkingdom AT dohenyshane recontactinginclinicalpracticeaninvestigationoftheviewsofhealthcareprofessionalsandclinicalscientistsintheunitedkingdom AT clarkeangusj recontactinginclinicalpracticeaninvestigationoftheviewsofhealthcareprofessionalsandclinicalscientistsintheunitedkingdom AT turnpennypeterd recontactinginclinicalpracticeaninvestigationoftheviewsofhealthcareprofessionalsandclinicalscientistsintheunitedkingdom AT lucassenannekem recontactinginclinicalpracticeaninvestigationoftheviewsofhealthcareprofessionalsandclinicalscientistsintheunitedkingdom AT kellysusane recontactinginclinicalpracticeaninvestigationoftheviewsofhealthcareprofessionalsandclinicalscientistsintheunitedkingdom |