Cargando…

Recontacting in clinical practice: an investigation of the views of healthcare professionals and clinical scientists in the United Kingdom

This article explores the views and experiences of healthcare professionals and clinical scientists in genetics about the existence of a duty and/or responsibility to recontact former patients when the genetic information relevant to their health, or that of family members, changes in a potentially...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Carrieri, Daniele, Dheensa, Sandi, Doheny, Shane, Clarke, Angus J, Turnpenny, Peter D, Lucassen, Anneke M, Kelly, Susan E
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5315519/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28051074
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ejhg.2016.188
_version_ 1782508697307578368
author Carrieri, Daniele
Dheensa, Sandi
Doheny, Shane
Clarke, Angus J
Turnpenny, Peter D
Lucassen, Anneke M
Kelly, Susan E
author_facet Carrieri, Daniele
Dheensa, Sandi
Doheny, Shane
Clarke, Angus J
Turnpenny, Peter D
Lucassen, Anneke M
Kelly, Susan E
author_sort Carrieri, Daniele
collection PubMed
description This article explores the views and experiences of healthcare professionals and clinical scientists in genetics about the existence of a duty and/or responsibility to recontact former patients when the genetic information relevant to their health, or that of family members, changes in a potentially important manner. It is based on N=30 semi-structured interviews guided by vignettes of recontacting scenarios. The sample included healthcare professionals in the United Kingdom from different medical specialties (clinical genetics, other ‘mainstream' specialties now offering genetic testing), and scientists from regional genetics laboratories. While viewing recontacting as desirable under certain circumstances, most respondents expressed concerns about its feasibility within the current constraints of the National Health Service (NHS). The main barriers identified were insufficient resources (time, staff, and suitable IT infrastructures) and lack of clarity about role boundaries and responsibilities. All of these are further complicated by genetic testing being increasingly offered by mainstream specialties. Reaching a consensus about roles and responsibilities of clinical specialties with regard to recontacting former patients in the light of evolving genetic information, and about what resources and infrastructures would be needed, was generally seen as a pre-requisite to developing guidelines about recontact.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5315519
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53155192017-02-27 Recontacting in clinical practice: an investigation of the views of healthcare professionals and clinical scientists in the United Kingdom Carrieri, Daniele Dheensa, Sandi Doheny, Shane Clarke, Angus J Turnpenny, Peter D Lucassen, Anneke M Kelly, Susan E Eur J Hum Genet Article This article explores the views and experiences of healthcare professionals and clinical scientists in genetics about the existence of a duty and/or responsibility to recontact former patients when the genetic information relevant to their health, or that of family members, changes in a potentially important manner. It is based on N=30 semi-structured interviews guided by vignettes of recontacting scenarios. The sample included healthcare professionals in the United Kingdom from different medical specialties (clinical genetics, other ‘mainstream' specialties now offering genetic testing), and scientists from regional genetics laboratories. While viewing recontacting as desirable under certain circumstances, most respondents expressed concerns about its feasibility within the current constraints of the National Health Service (NHS). The main barriers identified were insufficient resources (time, staff, and suitable IT infrastructures) and lack of clarity about role boundaries and responsibilities. All of these are further complicated by genetic testing being increasingly offered by mainstream specialties. Reaching a consensus about roles and responsibilities of clinical specialties with regard to recontacting former patients in the light of evolving genetic information, and about what resources and infrastructures would be needed, was generally seen as a pre-requisite to developing guidelines about recontact. Nature Publishing Group 2017-03 2017-01-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5315519/ /pubmed/28051074 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ejhg.2016.188 Text en Copyright © 2017 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Article
Carrieri, Daniele
Dheensa, Sandi
Doheny, Shane
Clarke, Angus J
Turnpenny, Peter D
Lucassen, Anneke M
Kelly, Susan E
Recontacting in clinical practice: an investigation of the views of healthcare professionals and clinical scientists in the United Kingdom
title Recontacting in clinical practice: an investigation of the views of healthcare professionals and clinical scientists in the United Kingdom
title_full Recontacting in clinical practice: an investigation of the views of healthcare professionals and clinical scientists in the United Kingdom
title_fullStr Recontacting in clinical practice: an investigation of the views of healthcare professionals and clinical scientists in the United Kingdom
title_full_unstemmed Recontacting in clinical practice: an investigation of the views of healthcare professionals and clinical scientists in the United Kingdom
title_short Recontacting in clinical practice: an investigation of the views of healthcare professionals and clinical scientists in the United Kingdom
title_sort recontacting in clinical practice: an investigation of the views of healthcare professionals and clinical scientists in the united kingdom
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5315519/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28051074
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ejhg.2016.188
work_keys_str_mv AT carrieridaniele recontactinginclinicalpracticeaninvestigationoftheviewsofhealthcareprofessionalsandclinicalscientistsintheunitedkingdom
AT dheensasandi recontactinginclinicalpracticeaninvestigationoftheviewsofhealthcareprofessionalsandclinicalscientistsintheunitedkingdom
AT dohenyshane recontactinginclinicalpracticeaninvestigationoftheviewsofhealthcareprofessionalsandclinicalscientistsintheunitedkingdom
AT clarkeangusj recontactinginclinicalpracticeaninvestigationoftheviewsofhealthcareprofessionalsandclinicalscientistsintheunitedkingdom
AT turnpennypeterd recontactinginclinicalpracticeaninvestigationoftheviewsofhealthcareprofessionalsandclinicalscientistsintheunitedkingdom
AT lucassenannekem recontactinginclinicalpracticeaninvestigationoftheviewsofhealthcareprofessionalsandclinicalscientistsintheunitedkingdom
AT kellysusane recontactinginclinicalpracticeaninvestigationoftheviewsofhealthcareprofessionalsandclinicalscientistsintheunitedkingdom