Cargando…

Brain network reorganization differs in response to stress in rats genetically predisposed to depression and stress-resilient rats

Treatment-resistant depression (TRD) remains a pressing clinical problem. Optimizing treatment requires better definition of the specificity of the involved brain circuits. The rat strain bred for negative cognitive state (NC) represents a genetic animal model of TRD with high face, construct and pr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gass, N, Becker, R, Schwarz, A J, Weber-Fahr, W, Clemm von Hohenberg, C, Vollmayr, B, Sartorius, A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5315561/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27922640
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/tp.2016.233
_version_ 1782508702787436544
author Gass, N
Becker, R
Schwarz, A J
Weber-Fahr, W
Clemm von Hohenberg, C
Vollmayr, B
Sartorius, A
author_facet Gass, N
Becker, R
Schwarz, A J
Weber-Fahr, W
Clemm von Hohenberg, C
Vollmayr, B
Sartorius, A
author_sort Gass, N
collection PubMed
description Treatment-resistant depression (TRD) remains a pressing clinical problem. Optimizing treatment requires better definition of the specificity of the involved brain circuits. The rat strain bred for negative cognitive state (NC) represents a genetic animal model of TRD with high face, construct and predictive validity. Vice versa, the positive cognitive state (PC) strain represents a stress-resilient phenotype. Although NC rats show depressive-like behavior, some symptoms such as anhedonia require an external trigger, i.e. a stressful event, which is similar to humans when stressful event induces a depressive episode in genetically predisposed individuals (gene–environment interaction). We aimed to distinguish neurobiological predisposition from the depressogenic pathology at the level of brain-network reorganization. For this purpose, resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging time series were acquired at 9.4 Tesla scanner in NC (N=11) and PC (N=7) rats before and after stressful event. We used a graph theory analytical approach to calculate the brain-network global and local properties. There was no difference in the global characteristics between the strains. At the local level, the response in the risk strain was characterized with an increased internodal role and reduced local clustering and efficiency of the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) and prelimbic cortex compared to the stress-resilient strain. We suggest that the increased internodal role of these prefrontal regions could be due to the enhancement of some of their long-range connections, given their connectivity with the amygdala and other default-mode-like network hubs, which could create a bias to attend to negative information characteristic for depression.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5315561
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53155612017-02-27 Brain network reorganization differs in response to stress in rats genetically predisposed to depression and stress-resilient rats Gass, N Becker, R Schwarz, A J Weber-Fahr, W Clemm von Hohenberg, C Vollmayr, B Sartorius, A Transl Psychiatry Original Article Treatment-resistant depression (TRD) remains a pressing clinical problem. Optimizing treatment requires better definition of the specificity of the involved brain circuits. The rat strain bred for negative cognitive state (NC) represents a genetic animal model of TRD with high face, construct and predictive validity. Vice versa, the positive cognitive state (PC) strain represents a stress-resilient phenotype. Although NC rats show depressive-like behavior, some symptoms such as anhedonia require an external trigger, i.e. a stressful event, which is similar to humans when stressful event induces a depressive episode in genetically predisposed individuals (gene–environment interaction). We aimed to distinguish neurobiological predisposition from the depressogenic pathology at the level of brain-network reorganization. For this purpose, resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging time series were acquired at 9.4 Tesla scanner in NC (N=11) and PC (N=7) rats before and after stressful event. We used a graph theory analytical approach to calculate the brain-network global and local properties. There was no difference in the global characteristics between the strains. At the local level, the response in the risk strain was characterized with an increased internodal role and reduced local clustering and efficiency of the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) and prelimbic cortex compared to the stress-resilient strain. We suggest that the increased internodal role of these prefrontal regions could be due to the enhancement of some of their long-range connections, given their connectivity with the amygdala and other default-mode-like network hubs, which could create a bias to attend to negative information characteristic for depression. Nature Publishing Group 2016-12 2016-12-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5315561/ /pubmed/27922640 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/tp.2016.233 Text en Copyright © 2016 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Original Article
Gass, N
Becker, R
Schwarz, A J
Weber-Fahr, W
Clemm von Hohenberg, C
Vollmayr, B
Sartorius, A
Brain network reorganization differs in response to stress in rats genetically predisposed to depression and stress-resilient rats
title Brain network reorganization differs in response to stress in rats genetically predisposed to depression and stress-resilient rats
title_full Brain network reorganization differs in response to stress in rats genetically predisposed to depression and stress-resilient rats
title_fullStr Brain network reorganization differs in response to stress in rats genetically predisposed to depression and stress-resilient rats
title_full_unstemmed Brain network reorganization differs in response to stress in rats genetically predisposed to depression and stress-resilient rats
title_short Brain network reorganization differs in response to stress in rats genetically predisposed to depression and stress-resilient rats
title_sort brain network reorganization differs in response to stress in rats genetically predisposed to depression and stress-resilient rats
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5315561/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27922640
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/tp.2016.233
work_keys_str_mv AT gassn brainnetworkreorganizationdiffersinresponsetostressinratsgeneticallypredisposedtodepressionandstressresilientrats
AT beckerr brainnetworkreorganizationdiffersinresponsetostressinratsgeneticallypredisposedtodepressionandstressresilientrats
AT schwarzaj brainnetworkreorganizationdiffersinresponsetostressinratsgeneticallypredisposedtodepressionandstressresilientrats
AT weberfahrw brainnetworkreorganizationdiffersinresponsetostressinratsgeneticallypredisposedtodepressionandstressresilientrats
AT clemmvonhohenbergc brainnetworkreorganizationdiffersinresponsetostressinratsgeneticallypredisposedtodepressionandstressresilientrats
AT vollmayrb brainnetworkreorganizationdiffersinresponsetostressinratsgeneticallypredisposedtodepressionandstressresilientrats
AT sartoriusa brainnetworkreorganizationdiffersinresponsetostressinratsgeneticallypredisposedtodepressionandstressresilientrats