Cargando…

Biomarkers of acute appendicitis: systematic review and cost–benefit trade-off analysis

BACKGROUND: Acute appendicitis is the most common surgical emergency and can represent a challenging diagnosis, with a negative appendectomy rate as high as 20 %. This review aimed to evaluate the clinical utility of individual biomarkers in the diagnosis of appendicitis and appraise the quality of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Acharya, Amish, Markar, Sheraz R., Ni, Melody, Hanna, George B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5315733/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27495334
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-5109-1
_version_ 1782508715586355200
author Acharya, Amish
Markar, Sheraz R.
Ni, Melody
Hanna, George B.
author_facet Acharya, Amish
Markar, Sheraz R.
Ni, Melody
Hanna, George B.
author_sort Acharya, Amish
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Acute appendicitis is the most common surgical emergency and can represent a challenging diagnosis, with a negative appendectomy rate as high as 20 %. This review aimed to evaluate the clinical utility of individual biomarkers in the diagnosis of appendicitis and appraise the quality of these studies. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature between January 2000 and September 2015 using of PubMed, OvidMedline, EMBASE and Google Scholar was conducted. Studies in which the diagnostic accuracy, statistical heterogeneity and predictive ability for severity of several biomarkers could be elicited were included. Information regarding costs and process times was retrieved from the regional laboratory. European surgeons blinded to these reviews were independently asked to rank which characteristics of biomarkers were most important in acute appendicitis to inform a cost–benefit trade-off. Sensitivity testing and the QUADAS-2 tool were used to assess the robustness of the analysis and study quality, respectively. RESULTS: Sixty-two studies met the inclusion criteria and were assessed. Traditional biomarkers (such as white cell count) were found to have a moderate diagnostic accuracy (0.75) but lower costs in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Conversely, novel markers (pro-calcitonin, IL 6 and urinary 5-HIAA) were found to have high process-related costs including analytical times, but improved diagnostic accuracy. QUADAS-2 analysis revealed significant potential biases in the literature. CONCLUSION: When assessing biomarkers, an appreciation of the trade-offs between the costs and benefits of individual biomarkers is needed. Further studies should seek to investigate new biomarkers and address concerns over bias, in order to improve the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00464-016-5109-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5315733
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53157332017-03-02 Biomarkers of acute appendicitis: systematic review and cost–benefit trade-off analysis Acharya, Amish Markar, Sheraz R. Ni, Melody Hanna, George B. Surg Endosc Review BACKGROUND: Acute appendicitis is the most common surgical emergency and can represent a challenging diagnosis, with a negative appendectomy rate as high as 20 %. This review aimed to evaluate the clinical utility of individual biomarkers in the diagnosis of appendicitis and appraise the quality of these studies. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature between January 2000 and September 2015 using of PubMed, OvidMedline, EMBASE and Google Scholar was conducted. Studies in which the diagnostic accuracy, statistical heterogeneity and predictive ability for severity of several biomarkers could be elicited were included. Information regarding costs and process times was retrieved from the regional laboratory. European surgeons blinded to these reviews were independently asked to rank which characteristics of biomarkers were most important in acute appendicitis to inform a cost–benefit trade-off. Sensitivity testing and the QUADAS-2 tool were used to assess the robustness of the analysis and study quality, respectively. RESULTS: Sixty-two studies met the inclusion criteria and were assessed. Traditional biomarkers (such as white cell count) were found to have a moderate diagnostic accuracy (0.75) but lower costs in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Conversely, novel markers (pro-calcitonin, IL 6 and urinary 5-HIAA) were found to have high process-related costs including analytical times, but improved diagnostic accuracy. QUADAS-2 analysis revealed significant potential biases in the literature. CONCLUSION: When assessing biomarkers, an appreciation of the trade-offs between the costs and benefits of individual biomarkers is needed. Further studies should seek to investigate new biomarkers and address concerns over bias, in order to improve the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00464-016-5109-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2016-08-05 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5315733/ /pubmed/27495334 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-5109-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Review
Acharya, Amish
Markar, Sheraz R.
Ni, Melody
Hanna, George B.
Biomarkers of acute appendicitis: systematic review and cost–benefit trade-off analysis
title Biomarkers of acute appendicitis: systematic review and cost–benefit trade-off analysis
title_full Biomarkers of acute appendicitis: systematic review and cost–benefit trade-off analysis
title_fullStr Biomarkers of acute appendicitis: systematic review and cost–benefit trade-off analysis
title_full_unstemmed Biomarkers of acute appendicitis: systematic review and cost–benefit trade-off analysis
title_short Biomarkers of acute appendicitis: systematic review and cost–benefit trade-off analysis
title_sort biomarkers of acute appendicitis: systematic review and cost–benefit trade-off analysis
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5315733/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27495334
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-5109-1
work_keys_str_mv AT acharyaamish biomarkersofacuteappendicitissystematicreviewandcostbenefittradeoffanalysis
AT markarsherazr biomarkersofacuteappendicitissystematicreviewandcostbenefittradeoffanalysis
AT nimelody biomarkersofacuteappendicitissystematicreviewandcostbenefittradeoffanalysis
AT hannageorgeb biomarkersofacuteappendicitissystematicreviewandcostbenefittradeoffanalysis