Cargando…

Time to ‘re-think’ physical activity promotion for young people? Results from a repeated cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between knowledge of the current UK physical activity (PA) guidelines and amount of daily PA using a sample population of 11–16 year olds in Northern Ireland. METHODS: Cross-sectional survey data from the 2010 and 2013 Young Perso...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Best, Paul, Tully, Mark A., Corepal, Rekesh, Kee, Frank, Hunter, Ruth F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5316169/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28212634
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4136-8
_version_ 1782508799738773504
author Best, Paul
Tully, Mark A.
Corepal, Rekesh
Kee, Frank
Hunter, Ruth F.
author_facet Best, Paul
Tully, Mark A.
Corepal, Rekesh
Kee, Frank
Hunter, Ruth F.
author_sort Best, Paul
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between knowledge of the current UK physical activity (PA) guidelines and amount of daily PA using a sample population of 11–16 year olds in Northern Ireland. METHODS: Cross-sectional survey data from the 2010 and 2013 Young Persons’ Behaviour and Attitudes Survey of 10,790 young people provided information on PA, knowledge of guidelines and socio-demographic characteristics. Multinomial logistic regression was used to investigate the associations between knowledge and amount of daily PA. RESULTS: Results from 2013 showed 67.0% of respondents were aware of PA guidelines with 15.4% reporting meeting them. Males were more likely to meet PA guidelines than females (OR 3.36, 95% CI 2.47, 4.59). Males who were active for 60 min or more, 7 days per week were less likely to be aware of guidelines (OR = 1.51, 95% CI 1.02, 2.24). For females, knowledge of PA guidelines had no significant association with amount of daily PA (OR = 1.74, 95% CI 0.99, 3.07). Those who did not enjoy being active were less likely to meet the guidelines (OR = 0.05, 95% CI 0.02, 0.12). CONCLUSIONS: Knowledge did not appear to be an important predictor of PA in young people. Consequently, threshold based messaging containing recommended minimum PA guideline information may not be appropriate for this age group. Re-branding PA promotion to include the use of humour may offer a new direction for public health messaging based around fun and enjoyment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5316169
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53161692017-02-24 Time to ‘re-think’ physical activity promotion for young people? Results from a repeated cross-sectional study Best, Paul Tully, Mark A. Corepal, Rekesh Kee, Frank Hunter, Ruth F. BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between knowledge of the current UK physical activity (PA) guidelines and amount of daily PA using a sample population of 11–16 year olds in Northern Ireland. METHODS: Cross-sectional survey data from the 2010 and 2013 Young Persons’ Behaviour and Attitudes Survey of 10,790 young people provided information on PA, knowledge of guidelines and socio-demographic characteristics. Multinomial logistic regression was used to investigate the associations between knowledge and amount of daily PA. RESULTS: Results from 2013 showed 67.0% of respondents were aware of PA guidelines with 15.4% reporting meeting them. Males were more likely to meet PA guidelines than females (OR 3.36, 95% CI 2.47, 4.59). Males who were active for 60 min or more, 7 days per week were less likely to be aware of guidelines (OR = 1.51, 95% CI 1.02, 2.24). For females, knowledge of PA guidelines had no significant association with amount of daily PA (OR = 1.74, 95% CI 0.99, 3.07). Those who did not enjoy being active were less likely to meet the guidelines (OR = 0.05, 95% CI 0.02, 0.12). CONCLUSIONS: Knowledge did not appear to be an important predictor of PA in young people. Consequently, threshold based messaging containing recommended minimum PA guideline information may not be appropriate for this age group. Re-branding PA promotion to include the use of humour may offer a new direction for public health messaging based around fun and enjoyment. BioMed Central 2017-02-17 /pmc/articles/PMC5316169/ /pubmed/28212634 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4136-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Best, Paul
Tully, Mark A.
Corepal, Rekesh
Kee, Frank
Hunter, Ruth F.
Time to ‘re-think’ physical activity promotion for young people? Results from a repeated cross-sectional study
title Time to ‘re-think’ physical activity promotion for young people? Results from a repeated cross-sectional study
title_full Time to ‘re-think’ physical activity promotion for young people? Results from a repeated cross-sectional study
title_fullStr Time to ‘re-think’ physical activity promotion for young people? Results from a repeated cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Time to ‘re-think’ physical activity promotion for young people? Results from a repeated cross-sectional study
title_short Time to ‘re-think’ physical activity promotion for young people? Results from a repeated cross-sectional study
title_sort time to ‘re-think’ physical activity promotion for young people? results from a repeated cross-sectional study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5316169/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28212634
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4136-8
work_keys_str_mv AT bestpaul timetorethinkphysicalactivitypromotionforyoungpeopleresultsfromarepeatedcrosssectionalstudy
AT tullymarka timetorethinkphysicalactivitypromotionforyoungpeopleresultsfromarepeatedcrosssectionalstudy
AT corepalrekesh timetorethinkphysicalactivitypromotionforyoungpeopleresultsfromarepeatedcrosssectionalstudy
AT keefrank timetorethinkphysicalactivitypromotionforyoungpeopleresultsfromarepeatedcrosssectionalstudy
AT hunterruthf timetorethinkphysicalactivitypromotionforyoungpeopleresultsfromarepeatedcrosssectionalstudy