Cargando…
Feasibility of an implementation strategy for the integration of health promotion in routine primary care: a quantitative process evaluation
BACKGROUND: Process evaluation is recommended to improve the understanding of underlying mechanisms related to clinicians, patients, context and intervention delivery that may impact on trial or program results, feasibility and transferability to practice. The aim of this study was to assess the fea...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5316192/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28212621 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-017-0585-5 |
_version_ | 1782508804771938304 |
---|---|
author | Sanchez, Alvaro Grandes, Gonzalo Cortada, Josep M. Pombo, Haizea Martinez, Catalina Corrales, Mary Helen de la Peña, Enrique Mugica, Justo Gorostiza, Esther |
author_facet | Sanchez, Alvaro Grandes, Gonzalo Cortada, Josep M. Pombo, Haizea Martinez, Catalina Corrales, Mary Helen de la Peña, Enrique Mugica, Justo Gorostiza, Esther |
author_sort | Sanchez, Alvaro |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Process evaluation is recommended to improve the understanding of underlying mechanisms related to clinicians, patients, context and intervention delivery that may impact on trial or program results, feasibility and transferability to practice. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of the Prescribe Healthy Life (PVS from the Spanish “Prescribe Vida Saludable”) implementation strategy for enhancing the adoption and implementation of an evidence-based health promotion intervention in primary health care. METHODS: A descriptive study of 2-year implementation indicators for the PVS clinical intervention was conducted in four primary health care centers. A multifaceted collaborative modeling implementation strategy was developed to enhance the integration of a clinical intervention to promote healthy lifestyles into clinical practice. Process indicators were assessed for intervention reach, adoption, implementation, sustainability and their variability at center, practice, and patient levels. RESULTS: Mean rates of adoption by means of active collaboration among the three main professional categories (family physicians, nurses and administrative personnel) were 75% in all centers. Just over half of the patients that attended (n = 11650; 51.9%) were reached in terms of having their lifestyle habits assessed, while more than a third (33.7%; n = 7433) and almost 10% (n = 2175) received advice or a printed prescription for at least one lifestyle change, respectively. Only 3.7% of the target population received a repeat prescription. These process indicators significantly (p < 0.001) varied by center, lifestyle habit and patient characteristics. Sustainability of intervention components changed thorough the implementation period within centers. CONCLUSIONS: The implementation strategy used showed moderate-to-good performance on process indicators related to adoption, reach, and implementation of the evidence-based healthy lifestyle promotion intervention in the context of routine primary care. Sources of heterogeneity and instability in these indicators may improve our understanding of factors required to attain adequate program adoption and implementation through improved implementation strategies. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12875-017-0585-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5316192 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53161922017-02-24 Feasibility of an implementation strategy for the integration of health promotion in routine primary care: a quantitative process evaluation Sanchez, Alvaro Grandes, Gonzalo Cortada, Josep M. Pombo, Haizea Martinez, Catalina Corrales, Mary Helen de la Peña, Enrique Mugica, Justo Gorostiza, Esther BMC Fam Pract Research Article BACKGROUND: Process evaluation is recommended to improve the understanding of underlying mechanisms related to clinicians, patients, context and intervention delivery that may impact on trial or program results, feasibility and transferability to practice. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of the Prescribe Healthy Life (PVS from the Spanish “Prescribe Vida Saludable”) implementation strategy for enhancing the adoption and implementation of an evidence-based health promotion intervention in primary health care. METHODS: A descriptive study of 2-year implementation indicators for the PVS clinical intervention was conducted in four primary health care centers. A multifaceted collaborative modeling implementation strategy was developed to enhance the integration of a clinical intervention to promote healthy lifestyles into clinical practice. Process indicators were assessed for intervention reach, adoption, implementation, sustainability and their variability at center, practice, and patient levels. RESULTS: Mean rates of adoption by means of active collaboration among the three main professional categories (family physicians, nurses and administrative personnel) were 75% in all centers. Just over half of the patients that attended (n = 11650; 51.9%) were reached in terms of having their lifestyle habits assessed, while more than a third (33.7%; n = 7433) and almost 10% (n = 2175) received advice or a printed prescription for at least one lifestyle change, respectively. Only 3.7% of the target population received a repeat prescription. These process indicators significantly (p < 0.001) varied by center, lifestyle habit and patient characteristics. Sustainability of intervention components changed thorough the implementation period within centers. CONCLUSIONS: The implementation strategy used showed moderate-to-good performance on process indicators related to adoption, reach, and implementation of the evidence-based healthy lifestyle promotion intervention in the context of routine primary care. Sources of heterogeneity and instability in these indicators may improve our understanding of factors required to attain adequate program adoption and implementation through improved implementation strategies. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12875-017-0585-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-02-17 /pmc/articles/PMC5316192/ /pubmed/28212621 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-017-0585-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Sanchez, Alvaro Grandes, Gonzalo Cortada, Josep M. Pombo, Haizea Martinez, Catalina Corrales, Mary Helen de la Peña, Enrique Mugica, Justo Gorostiza, Esther Feasibility of an implementation strategy for the integration of health promotion in routine primary care: a quantitative process evaluation |
title | Feasibility of an implementation strategy for the integration of health promotion in routine primary care: a quantitative process evaluation |
title_full | Feasibility of an implementation strategy for the integration of health promotion in routine primary care: a quantitative process evaluation |
title_fullStr | Feasibility of an implementation strategy for the integration of health promotion in routine primary care: a quantitative process evaluation |
title_full_unstemmed | Feasibility of an implementation strategy for the integration of health promotion in routine primary care: a quantitative process evaluation |
title_short | Feasibility of an implementation strategy for the integration of health promotion in routine primary care: a quantitative process evaluation |
title_sort | feasibility of an implementation strategy for the integration of health promotion in routine primary care: a quantitative process evaluation |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5316192/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28212621 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-017-0585-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sanchezalvaro feasibilityofanimplementationstrategyfortheintegrationofhealthpromotioninroutineprimarycareaquantitativeprocessevaluation AT grandesgonzalo feasibilityofanimplementationstrategyfortheintegrationofhealthpromotioninroutineprimarycareaquantitativeprocessevaluation AT cortadajosepm feasibilityofanimplementationstrategyfortheintegrationofhealthpromotioninroutineprimarycareaquantitativeprocessevaluation AT pombohaizea feasibilityofanimplementationstrategyfortheintegrationofhealthpromotioninroutineprimarycareaquantitativeprocessevaluation AT martinezcatalina feasibilityofanimplementationstrategyfortheintegrationofhealthpromotioninroutineprimarycareaquantitativeprocessevaluation AT corralesmaryhelen feasibilityofanimplementationstrategyfortheintegrationofhealthpromotioninroutineprimarycareaquantitativeprocessevaluation AT delapenaenrique feasibilityofanimplementationstrategyfortheintegrationofhealthpromotioninroutineprimarycareaquantitativeprocessevaluation AT mugicajusto feasibilityofanimplementationstrategyfortheintegrationofhealthpromotioninroutineprimarycareaquantitativeprocessevaluation AT gorostizaesther feasibilityofanimplementationstrategyfortheintegrationofhealthpromotioninroutineprimarycareaquantitativeprocessevaluation AT feasibilityofanimplementationstrategyfortheintegrationofhealthpromotioninroutineprimarycareaquantitativeprocessevaluation |