Cargando…

External Use of Propolis for Oral, Skin, and Genital Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Objective. The aim of this review is to provide the available evidence on the external use of propolis (EUP) for oral, skin, and genital diseases. Method. We searched twelve electronic databases for relevant studies up to June 2016. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) were included and analysed. Resul...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sung, Soo-Hyun, Choi, Gwang-Ho, Lee, Nam-Woo, Shin, Byung-Cheul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5317107/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28265293
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/8025752
_version_ 1782508949590769664
author Sung, Soo-Hyun
Choi, Gwang-Ho
Lee, Nam-Woo
Shin, Byung-Cheul
author_facet Sung, Soo-Hyun
Choi, Gwang-Ho
Lee, Nam-Woo
Shin, Byung-Cheul
author_sort Sung, Soo-Hyun
collection PubMed
description Objective. The aim of this review is to provide the available evidence on the external use of propolis (EUP) for oral, skin, and genital diseases. Method. We searched twelve electronic databases for relevant studies up to June 2016. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) were included and analysed. Results. Of the 286 articles identified, twelve potentially relevant studies met our inclusion criteria. A meta-analysis of two studies on recurrent oral aphthae (ROA) indicated that there were no significant differences in total effective rate (TER) for pain disappearance between EUP and placebo groups (RR = 1.96, 95% CI = 0.97–3.98, and P = 0.06). In two studies on skin diseases, the combined treatment of EUP with other interventions revealed significant effects on the duration of treatment or TER. In one study on genital diseases, EUP showed significant differences in genital herpes outcome measures compared to placebo. Conclusions. Our results on the effectiveness of EUP for treating oral, skin, and genital diseases are not conclusive because of the low methodological qualities and small sample sizes. Further well-designed randomized controlled trials, with high quality and large samples for specific disorders, must be conducted to obtain firm conclusions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5317107
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53171072017-03-06 External Use of Propolis for Oral, Skin, and Genital Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Sung, Soo-Hyun Choi, Gwang-Ho Lee, Nam-Woo Shin, Byung-Cheul Evid Based Complement Alternat Med Review Article Objective. The aim of this review is to provide the available evidence on the external use of propolis (EUP) for oral, skin, and genital diseases. Method. We searched twelve electronic databases for relevant studies up to June 2016. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) were included and analysed. Results. Of the 286 articles identified, twelve potentially relevant studies met our inclusion criteria. A meta-analysis of two studies on recurrent oral aphthae (ROA) indicated that there were no significant differences in total effective rate (TER) for pain disappearance between EUP and placebo groups (RR = 1.96, 95% CI = 0.97–3.98, and P = 0.06). In two studies on skin diseases, the combined treatment of EUP with other interventions revealed significant effects on the duration of treatment or TER. In one study on genital diseases, EUP showed significant differences in genital herpes outcome measures compared to placebo. Conclusions. Our results on the effectiveness of EUP for treating oral, skin, and genital diseases are not conclusive because of the low methodological qualities and small sample sizes. Further well-designed randomized controlled trials, with high quality and large samples for specific disorders, must be conducted to obtain firm conclusions. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2017 2017-02-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5317107/ /pubmed/28265293 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/8025752 Text en Copyright © 2017 Soo-Hyun Sung et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Sung, Soo-Hyun
Choi, Gwang-Ho
Lee, Nam-Woo
Shin, Byung-Cheul
External Use of Propolis for Oral, Skin, and Genital Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title External Use of Propolis for Oral, Skin, and Genital Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full External Use of Propolis for Oral, Skin, and Genital Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr External Use of Propolis for Oral, Skin, and Genital Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed External Use of Propolis for Oral, Skin, and Genital Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short External Use of Propolis for Oral, Skin, and Genital Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort external use of propolis for oral, skin, and genital diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5317107/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28265293
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/8025752
work_keys_str_mv AT sungsoohyun externaluseofpropolisfororalskinandgenitaldiseasesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT choigwangho externaluseofpropolisfororalskinandgenitaldiseasesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT leenamwoo externaluseofpropolisfororalskinandgenitaldiseasesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT shinbyungcheul externaluseofpropolisfororalskinandgenitaldiseasesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis