Cargando…

The impact of the introduction of formalised polypectomy assessment on training in the UK

OBJECTIVE: The aim was to describe the impact on polypectomy experience by the mandatory introduction of the Directly Observed Polypectomy Skills tool (DOPyS) and electronic portfolio as part of the formal colonoscopy certification process. DESIGN: Applications for colonoscopy certification in the U...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Patel, Kinesh, Faiz, Omar, Rutter, Matt, Dunckley, Paul, Thomas-Gibson, Siwan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5318649/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28250907
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/flgastro-2016-100718
_version_ 1782509228338970624
author Patel, Kinesh
Faiz, Omar
Rutter, Matt
Dunckley, Paul
Thomas-Gibson, Siwan
author_facet Patel, Kinesh
Faiz, Omar
Rutter, Matt
Dunckley, Paul
Thomas-Gibson, Siwan
author_sort Patel, Kinesh
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The aim was to describe the impact on polypectomy experience by the mandatory introduction of the Directly Observed Polypectomy Skills tool (DOPyS) and electronic portfolio as part of the formal colonoscopy certification process. DESIGN: Applications for colonoscopy certification in the UK in the year prior to the introduction of DOPyS were analysed retrospectively and compared with data collected prospectively for those in the following year. SETTING: UK National Health Service. PATIENTS: None. INTERVENTIONS: None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The outcomes studied included whether evidence of exposure to polypectomy, endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and colonoscopy changed over the 2-year period. The nature of the polyps removed by trainees was also studied. RESULTS: Thirty two per cent of candidates in the first year had evidence of any observed polypectomy with 7% of candidates referring to training in EMR. The median number of formative colonoscopy assessments was 3 (range 0–16). All of these candidates in the second year had evidence of polypectomy assessment, with a median number of DOPyS of 7 (range 3–27). Eighty nine per cent of applicants had evidence of assessed EMR. The median number of formative colonoscopy assessments in this cohort was 32 (range 9–199). There was a significant increase in the number of logged polypectomy assessments (p<0.001), experience of EMR (p<0.001) and formative colonoscopy assessments (p<0.001). There was no significant difference in the total number of colonoscopy procedures performed. CONCLUSIONS: Structured polypectomy assessment improves trainees’ documented exposure to therapeutic endoscopy as well as providing formal evidence of skills acquisition. As polypectomy plays an increasing role globally in colorectal cancer prevention, the DOPyS provides an effective means of assessing and certifying polypectomy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5318649
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53186492017-02-27 The impact of the introduction of formalised polypectomy assessment on training in the UK Patel, Kinesh Faiz, Omar Rutter, Matt Dunckley, Paul Thomas-Gibson, Siwan Frontline Gastroenterol Endoscopy OBJECTIVE: The aim was to describe the impact on polypectomy experience by the mandatory introduction of the Directly Observed Polypectomy Skills tool (DOPyS) and electronic portfolio as part of the formal colonoscopy certification process. DESIGN: Applications for colonoscopy certification in the UK in the year prior to the introduction of DOPyS were analysed retrospectively and compared with data collected prospectively for those in the following year. SETTING: UK National Health Service. PATIENTS: None. INTERVENTIONS: None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The outcomes studied included whether evidence of exposure to polypectomy, endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and colonoscopy changed over the 2-year period. The nature of the polyps removed by trainees was also studied. RESULTS: Thirty two per cent of candidates in the first year had evidence of any observed polypectomy with 7% of candidates referring to training in EMR. The median number of formative colonoscopy assessments was 3 (range 0–16). All of these candidates in the second year had evidence of polypectomy assessment, with a median number of DOPyS of 7 (range 3–27). Eighty nine per cent of applicants had evidence of assessed EMR. The median number of formative colonoscopy assessments in this cohort was 32 (range 9–199). There was a significant increase in the number of logged polypectomy assessments (p<0.001), experience of EMR (p<0.001) and formative colonoscopy assessments (p<0.001). There was no significant difference in the total number of colonoscopy procedures performed. CONCLUSIONS: Structured polypectomy assessment improves trainees’ documented exposure to therapeutic endoscopy as well as providing formal evidence of skills acquisition. As polypectomy plays an increasing role globally in colorectal cancer prevention, the DOPyS provides an effective means of assessing and certifying polypectomy. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-04 2016-07-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5318649/ /pubmed/28250907 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/flgastro-2016-100718 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Endoscopy
Patel, Kinesh
Faiz, Omar
Rutter, Matt
Dunckley, Paul
Thomas-Gibson, Siwan
The impact of the introduction of formalised polypectomy assessment on training in the UK
title The impact of the introduction of formalised polypectomy assessment on training in the UK
title_full The impact of the introduction of formalised polypectomy assessment on training in the UK
title_fullStr The impact of the introduction of formalised polypectomy assessment on training in the UK
title_full_unstemmed The impact of the introduction of formalised polypectomy assessment on training in the UK
title_short The impact of the introduction of formalised polypectomy assessment on training in the UK
title_sort impact of the introduction of formalised polypectomy assessment on training in the uk
topic Endoscopy
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5318649/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28250907
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/flgastro-2016-100718
work_keys_str_mv AT patelkinesh theimpactoftheintroductionofformalisedpolypectomyassessmentontrainingintheuk
AT faizomar theimpactoftheintroductionofformalisedpolypectomyassessmentontrainingintheuk
AT ruttermatt theimpactoftheintroductionofformalisedpolypectomyassessmentontrainingintheuk
AT dunckleypaul theimpactoftheintroductionofformalisedpolypectomyassessmentontrainingintheuk
AT thomasgibsonsiwan theimpactoftheintroductionofformalisedpolypectomyassessmentontrainingintheuk
AT patelkinesh impactoftheintroductionofformalisedpolypectomyassessmentontrainingintheuk
AT faizomar impactoftheintroductionofformalisedpolypectomyassessmentontrainingintheuk
AT ruttermatt impactoftheintroductionofformalisedpolypectomyassessmentontrainingintheuk
AT dunckleypaul impactoftheintroductionofformalisedpolypectomyassessmentontrainingintheuk
AT thomasgibsonsiwan impactoftheintroductionofformalisedpolypectomyassessmentontrainingintheuk