Cargando…

Considerations for estimating microbial environmental data concentrations collected from a field setting

In the event of an indoor release of an environmentally persistent microbial pathogen such as Bacillus anthracis, the potential for human exposure will be considered when remedial decisions are made. Microbial site characterization and clearance sampling data collected in the field might be used to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Silvestri, Erin E, Yund, Cynthia, Taft, Sarah, Bowling, Charlena Yoder, Chappie, Daniel, Garrahan, Kevin, Brady-Roberts, Eletha, Stone, Harry, Nichols, Tonya L
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5318663/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26883476
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/jes.2016.3
_version_ 1782509231466872832
author Silvestri, Erin E
Yund, Cynthia
Taft, Sarah
Bowling, Charlena Yoder
Chappie, Daniel
Garrahan, Kevin
Brady-Roberts, Eletha
Stone, Harry
Nichols, Tonya L
author_facet Silvestri, Erin E
Yund, Cynthia
Taft, Sarah
Bowling, Charlena Yoder
Chappie, Daniel
Garrahan, Kevin
Brady-Roberts, Eletha
Stone, Harry
Nichols, Tonya L
author_sort Silvestri, Erin E
collection PubMed
description In the event of an indoor release of an environmentally persistent microbial pathogen such as Bacillus anthracis, the potential for human exposure will be considered when remedial decisions are made. Microbial site characterization and clearance sampling data collected in the field might be used to estimate exposure. However, there are many challenges associated with estimating environmental concentrations of B. anthracis or other spore-forming organisms after such an event before being able to estimate exposure. These challenges include: (1) collecting environmental field samples that are adequate for the intended purpose, (2) conducting laboratory analyses and selecting the reporting format needed for the laboratory data, and (3) analyzing and interpreting the data using appropriate statistical techniques. This paper summarizes some key challenges faced in collecting, analyzing, and interpreting microbial field data from a contaminated site. Although the paper was written with considerations for B. anthracis contamination, it may also be applicable to other bacterial agents. It explores the implications and limitations of using field data for determining environmental concentrations both before and after decontamination. Several findings were of interest. First, to date, the only validated surface/sampling device combinations are swabs and sponge-sticks on stainless steel surfaces, thus limiting availability of quantitative analytical results which could be used for statistical analysis. Second, agreement needs to be reached with the analytical laboratory on the definition of the countable range and on reporting of data below the limit of quantitation. Finally, the distribution of the microbial field data and statistical methods needed for a particular data set could vary depending on these data that were collected, and guidance is needed on appropriate statistical software for handling microbial data. Further, research is needed to develop better methods to estimate human exposure from pathogens using environmental data collected from a field setting.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5318663
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53186632017-02-27 Considerations for estimating microbial environmental data concentrations collected from a field setting Silvestri, Erin E Yund, Cynthia Taft, Sarah Bowling, Charlena Yoder Chappie, Daniel Garrahan, Kevin Brady-Roberts, Eletha Stone, Harry Nichols, Tonya L J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol Review In the event of an indoor release of an environmentally persistent microbial pathogen such as Bacillus anthracis, the potential for human exposure will be considered when remedial decisions are made. Microbial site characterization and clearance sampling data collected in the field might be used to estimate exposure. However, there are many challenges associated with estimating environmental concentrations of B. anthracis or other spore-forming organisms after such an event before being able to estimate exposure. These challenges include: (1) collecting environmental field samples that are adequate for the intended purpose, (2) conducting laboratory analyses and selecting the reporting format needed for the laboratory data, and (3) analyzing and interpreting the data using appropriate statistical techniques. This paper summarizes some key challenges faced in collecting, analyzing, and interpreting microbial field data from a contaminated site. Although the paper was written with considerations for B. anthracis contamination, it may also be applicable to other bacterial agents. It explores the implications and limitations of using field data for determining environmental concentrations both before and after decontamination. Several findings were of interest. First, to date, the only validated surface/sampling device combinations are swabs and sponge-sticks on stainless steel surfaces, thus limiting availability of quantitative analytical results which could be used for statistical analysis. Second, agreement needs to be reached with the analytical laboratory on the definition of the countable range and on reporting of data below the limit of quantitation. Finally, the distribution of the microbial field data and statistical methods needed for a particular data set could vary depending on these data that were collected, and guidance is needed on appropriate statistical software for handling microbial data. Further, research is needed to develop better methods to estimate human exposure from pathogens using environmental data collected from a field setting. Nature Publishing Group 2017-03 2016-02-17 /pmc/articles/PMC5318663/ /pubmed/26883476 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/jes.2016.3 Text en Copyright © 2017 Nature America, Inc., part of Springer Nature. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
spellingShingle Review
Silvestri, Erin E
Yund, Cynthia
Taft, Sarah
Bowling, Charlena Yoder
Chappie, Daniel
Garrahan, Kevin
Brady-Roberts, Eletha
Stone, Harry
Nichols, Tonya L
Considerations for estimating microbial environmental data concentrations collected from a field setting
title Considerations for estimating microbial environmental data concentrations collected from a field setting
title_full Considerations for estimating microbial environmental data concentrations collected from a field setting
title_fullStr Considerations for estimating microbial environmental data concentrations collected from a field setting
title_full_unstemmed Considerations for estimating microbial environmental data concentrations collected from a field setting
title_short Considerations for estimating microbial environmental data concentrations collected from a field setting
title_sort considerations for estimating microbial environmental data concentrations collected from a field setting
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5318663/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26883476
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/jes.2016.3
work_keys_str_mv AT silvestrierine considerationsforestimatingmicrobialenvironmentaldataconcentrationscollectedfromafieldsetting
AT yundcynthia considerationsforestimatingmicrobialenvironmentaldataconcentrationscollectedfromafieldsetting
AT taftsarah considerationsforestimatingmicrobialenvironmentaldataconcentrationscollectedfromafieldsetting
AT bowlingcharlenayoder considerationsforestimatingmicrobialenvironmentaldataconcentrationscollectedfromafieldsetting
AT chappiedaniel considerationsforestimatingmicrobialenvironmentaldataconcentrationscollectedfromafieldsetting
AT garrahankevin considerationsforestimatingmicrobialenvironmentaldataconcentrationscollectedfromafieldsetting
AT bradyrobertseletha considerationsforestimatingmicrobialenvironmentaldataconcentrationscollectedfromafieldsetting
AT stoneharry considerationsforestimatingmicrobialenvironmentaldataconcentrationscollectedfromafieldsetting
AT nicholstonyal considerationsforestimatingmicrobialenvironmentaldataconcentrationscollectedfromafieldsetting