Cargando…
Considerations for estimating microbial environmental data concentrations collected from a field setting
In the event of an indoor release of an environmentally persistent microbial pathogen such as Bacillus anthracis, the potential for human exposure will be considered when remedial decisions are made. Microbial site characterization and clearance sampling data collected in the field might be used to...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5318663/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26883476 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/jes.2016.3 |
_version_ | 1782509231466872832 |
---|---|
author | Silvestri, Erin E Yund, Cynthia Taft, Sarah Bowling, Charlena Yoder Chappie, Daniel Garrahan, Kevin Brady-Roberts, Eletha Stone, Harry Nichols, Tonya L |
author_facet | Silvestri, Erin E Yund, Cynthia Taft, Sarah Bowling, Charlena Yoder Chappie, Daniel Garrahan, Kevin Brady-Roberts, Eletha Stone, Harry Nichols, Tonya L |
author_sort | Silvestri, Erin E |
collection | PubMed |
description | In the event of an indoor release of an environmentally persistent microbial pathogen such as Bacillus anthracis, the potential for human exposure will be considered when remedial decisions are made. Microbial site characterization and clearance sampling data collected in the field might be used to estimate exposure. However, there are many challenges associated with estimating environmental concentrations of B. anthracis or other spore-forming organisms after such an event before being able to estimate exposure. These challenges include: (1) collecting environmental field samples that are adequate for the intended purpose, (2) conducting laboratory analyses and selecting the reporting format needed for the laboratory data, and (3) analyzing and interpreting the data using appropriate statistical techniques. This paper summarizes some key challenges faced in collecting, analyzing, and interpreting microbial field data from a contaminated site. Although the paper was written with considerations for B. anthracis contamination, it may also be applicable to other bacterial agents. It explores the implications and limitations of using field data for determining environmental concentrations both before and after decontamination. Several findings were of interest. First, to date, the only validated surface/sampling device combinations are swabs and sponge-sticks on stainless steel surfaces, thus limiting availability of quantitative analytical results which could be used for statistical analysis. Second, agreement needs to be reached with the analytical laboratory on the definition of the countable range and on reporting of data below the limit of quantitation. Finally, the distribution of the microbial field data and statistical methods needed for a particular data set could vary depending on these data that were collected, and guidance is needed on appropriate statistical software for handling microbial data. Further, research is needed to develop better methods to estimate human exposure from pathogens using environmental data collected from a field setting. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5318663 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53186632017-02-27 Considerations for estimating microbial environmental data concentrations collected from a field setting Silvestri, Erin E Yund, Cynthia Taft, Sarah Bowling, Charlena Yoder Chappie, Daniel Garrahan, Kevin Brady-Roberts, Eletha Stone, Harry Nichols, Tonya L J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol Review In the event of an indoor release of an environmentally persistent microbial pathogen such as Bacillus anthracis, the potential for human exposure will be considered when remedial decisions are made. Microbial site characterization and clearance sampling data collected in the field might be used to estimate exposure. However, there are many challenges associated with estimating environmental concentrations of B. anthracis or other spore-forming organisms after such an event before being able to estimate exposure. These challenges include: (1) collecting environmental field samples that are adequate for the intended purpose, (2) conducting laboratory analyses and selecting the reporting format needed for the laboratory data, and (3) analyzing and interpreting the data using appropriate statistical techniques. This paper summarizes some key challenges faced in collecting, analyzing, and interpreting microbial field data from a contaminated site. Although the paper was written with considerations for B. anthracis contamination, it may also be applicable to other bacterial agents. It explores the implications and limitations of using field data for determining environmental concentrations both before and after decontamination. Several findings were of interest. First, to date, the only validated surface/sampling device combinations are swabs and sponge-sticks on stainless steel surfaces, thus limiting availability of quantitative analytical results which could be used for statistical analysis. Second, agreement needs to be reached with the analytical laboratory on the definition of the countable range and on reporting of data below the limit of quantitation. Finally, the distribution of the microbial field data and statistical methods needed for a particular data set could vary depending on these data that were collected, and guidance is needed on appropriate statistical software for handling microbial data. Further, research is needed to develop better methods to estimate human exposure from pathogens using environmental data collected from a field setting. Nature Publishing Group 2017-03 2016-02-17 /pmc/articles/PMC5318663/ /pubmed/26883476 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/jes.2016.3 Text en Copyright © 2017 Nature America, Inc., part of Springer Nature. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Review Silvestri, Erin E Yund, Cynthia Taft, Sarah Bowling, Charlena Yoder Chappie, Daniel Garrahan, Kevin Brady-Roberts, Eletha Stone, Harry Nichols, Tonya L Considerations for estimating microbial environmental data concentrations collected from a field setting |
title | Considerations for estimating microbial environmental data concentrations collected from a field setting |
title_full | Considerations for estimating microbial environmental data concentrations collected from a field setting |
title_fullStr | Considerations for estimating microbial environmental data concentrations collected from a field setting |
title_full_unstemmed | Considerations for estimating microbial environmental data concentrations collected from a field setting |
title_short | Considerations for estimating microbial environmental data concentrations collected from a field setting |
title_sort | considerations for estimating microbial environmental data concentrations collected from a field setting |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5318663/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26883476 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/jes.2016.3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT silvestrierine considerationsforestimatingmicrobialenvironmentaldataconcentrationscollectedfromafieldsetting AT yundcynthia considerationsforestimatingmicrobialenvironmentaldataconcentrationscollectedfromafieldsetting AT taftsarah considerationsforestimatingmicrobialenvironmentaldataconcentrationscollectedfromafieldsetting AT bowlingcharlenayoder considerationsforestimatingmicrobialenvironmentaldataconcentrationscollectedfromafieldsetting AT chappiedaniel considerationsforestimatingmicrobialenvironmentaldataconcentrationscollectedfromafieldsetting AT garrahankevin considerationsforestimatingmicrobialenvironmentaldataconcentrationscollectedfromafieldsetting AT bradyrobertseletha considerationsforestimatingmicrobialenvironmentaldataconcentrationscollectedfromafieldsetting AT stoneharry considerationsforestimatingmicrobialenvironmentaldataconcentrationscollectedfromafieldsetting AT nicholstonyal considerationsforestimatingmicrobialenvironmentaldataconcentrationscollectedfromafieldsetting |