Cargando…

Randomised phase II trial of irinotecan plus S-1 in patients with gemcitabine-refractory pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND: We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of irinotecan/S-1 (IRIS) therapy with S-1 monotherapy in patients with gemcitabine-refractory pancreatic cancer. METHODS: Patients were treated with oral S-1 (80–120 mg for 14 days every 4 weeks) plus intravenous irinotecan (100 mg m(−2) on day...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ioka, T, Komatsu, Y, Mizuno, N, Tsuji, A, Ohkawa, S, Tanaka, M, Iguchi, H, Ishiguro, A, Kitano, M, Satoh, T, Yamaguchi, T, Takeda, K, Kida, M, Eguchi, K, Ito, T, Munakata, M, Itoi, T, Furuse, J, Hamada, C, Sakata, Y
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5318973/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28081543
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2016.436
_version_ 1782509289165815808
author Ioka, T
Komatsu, Y
Mizuno, N
Tsuji, A
Ohkawa, S
Tanaka, M
Iguchi, H
Ishiguro, A
Kitano, M
Satoh, T
Yamaguchi, T
Takeda, K
Kida, M
Eguchi, K
Ito, T
Munakata, M
Itoi, T
Furuse, J
Hamada, C
Sakata, Y
author_facet Ioka, T
Komatsu, Y
Mizuno, N
Tsuji, A
Ohkawa, S
Tanaka, M
Iguchi, H
Ishiguro, A
Kitano, M
Satoh, T
Yamaguchi, T
Takeda, K
Kida, M
Eguchi, K
Ito, T
Munakata, M
Itoi, T
Furuse, J
Hamada, C
Sakata, Y
author_sort Ioka, T
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of irinotecan/S-1 (IRIS) therapy with S-1 monotherapy in patients with gemcitabine-refractory pancreatic cancer. METHODS: Patients were treated with oral S-1 (80–120 mg for 14 days every 4 weeks) plus intravenous irinotecan (100 mg m(−2) on days 1 and 15 every 4 weeks; IRIS group) or oral S-1 group (80–120 mg daily for 28 days every 6 weeks). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: Of 137 patients enrolled, 127 were eligible for efficacy. The median PFS in the IRIS group and S-1 monotherapy group were 3.5 and 1.9 months, respectively (hazard ratio (HR)=0.77; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.53–1.11; P=0.18), while the median overall survival (OS) were 6.8 and 5.8 months, respectively (HR=0.75; 95% CI, 0.51–1.09; P=0.13). Response rate was significantly higher in the IRIS group than in the S-1 monotherapy group (18.3% vs 6.0%, P=0.03). Grade 3 or higher neutropenia and anorexia occurred more frequently in the IRIS group. CONCLUSIONS: There was a trend for better PFS and OS in the IRIS group that could be a treatment arm in the clinical trials for gemcitabine-refractory pancreatic cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5318973
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53189732018-02-14 Randomised phase II trial of irinotecan plus S-1 in patients with gemcitabine-refractory pancreatic cancer Ioka, T Komatsu, Y Mizuno, N Tsuji, A Ohkawa, S Tanaka, M Iguchi, H Ishiguro, A Kitano, M Satoh, T Yamaguchi, T Takeda, K Kida, M Eguchi, K Ito, T Munakata, M Itoi, T Furuse, J Hamada, C Sakata, Y Br J Cancer Clinical Study BACKGROUND: We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of irinotecan/S-1 (IRIS) therapy with S-1 monotherapy in patients with gemcitabine-refractory pancreatic cancer. METHODS: Patients were treated with oral S-1 (80–120 mg for 14 days every 4 weeks) plus intravenous irinotecan (100 mg m(−2) on days 1 and 15 every 4 weeks; IRIS group) or oral S-1 group (80–120 mg daily for 28 days every 6 weeks). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: Of 137 patients enrolled, 127 were eligible for efficacy. The median PFS in the IRIS group and S-1 monotherapy group were 3.5 and 1.9 months, respectively (hazard ratio (HR)=0.77; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.53–1.11; P=0.18), while the median overall survival (OS) were 6.8 and 5.8 months, respectively (HR=0.75; 95% CI, 0.51–1.09; P=0.13). Response rate was significantly higher in the IRIS group than in the S-1 monotherapy group (18.3% vs 6.0%, P=0.03). Grade 3 or higher neutropenia and anorexia occurred more frequently in the IRIS group. CONCLUSIONS: There was a trend for better PFS and OS in the IRIS group that could be a treatment arm in the clinical trials for gemcitabine-refractory pancreatic cancer. Nature Publishing Group 2017-02-14 2017-01-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5318973/ /pubmed/28081543 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2016.436 Text en Copyright © 2017 Cancer Research UK http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ From twelve months after its original publication, this work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 4.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Ioka, T
Komatsu, Y
Mizuno, N
Tsuji, A
Ohkawa, S
Tanaka, M
Iguchi, H
Ishiguro, A
Kitano, M
Satoh, T
Yamaguchi, T
Takeda, K
Kida, M
Eguchi, K
Ito, T
Munakata, M
Itoi, T
Furuse, J
Hamada, C
Sakata, Y
Randomised phase II trial of irinotecan plus S-1 in patients with gemcitabine-refractory pancreatic cancer
title Randomised phase II trial of irinotecan plus S-1 in patients with gemcitabine-refractory pancreatic cancer
title_full Randomised phase II trial of irinotecan plus S-1 in patients with gemcitabine-refractory pancreatic cancer
title_fullStr Randomised phase II trial of irinotecan plus S-1 in patients with gemcitabine-refractory pancreatic cancer
title_full_unstemmed Randomised phase II trial of irinotecan plus S-1 in patients with gemcitabine-refractory pancreatic cancer
title_short Randomised phase II trial of irinotecan plus S-1 in patients with gemcitabine-refractory pancreatic cancer
title_sort randomised phase ii trial of irinotecan plus s-1 in patients with gemcitabine-refractory pancreatic cancer
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5318973/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28081543
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2016.436
work_keys_str_mv AT iokat randomisedphaseiitrialofirinotecanpluss1inpatientswithgemcitabinerefractorypancreaticcancer
AT komatsuy randomisedphaseiitrialofirinotecanpluss1inpatientswithgemcitabinerefractorypancreaticcancer
AT mizunon randomisedphaseiitrialofirinotecanpluss1inpatientswithgemcitabinerefractorypancreaticcancer
AT tsujia randomisedphaseiitrialofirinotecanpluss1inpatientswithgemcitabinerefractorypancreaticcancer
AT ohkawas randomisedphaseiitrialofirinotecanpluss1inpatientswithgemcitabinerefractorypancreaticcancer
AT tanakam randomisedphaseiitrialofirinotecanpluss1inpatientswithgemcitabinerefractorypancreaticcancer
AT iguchih randomisedphaseiitrialofirinotecanpluss1inpatientswithgemcitabinerefractorypancreaticcancer
AT ishiguroa randomisedphaseiitrialofirinotecanpluss1inpatientswithgemcitabinerefractorypancreaticcancer
AT kitanom randomisedphaseiitrialofirinotecanpluss1inpatientswithgemcitabinerefractorypancreaticcancer
AT satoht randomisedphaseiitrialofirinotecanpluss1inpatientswithgemcitabinerefractorypancreaticcancer
AT yamaguchit randomisedphaseiitrialofirinotecanpluss1inpatientswithgemcitabinerefractorypancreaticcancer
AT takedak randomisedphaseiitrialofirinotecanpluss1inpatientswithgemcitabinerefractorypancreaticcancer
AT kidam randomisedphaseiitrialofirinotecanpluss1inpatientswithgemcitabinerefractorypancreaticcancer
AT eguchik randomisedphaseiitrialofirinotecanpluss1inpatientswithgemcitabinerefractorypancreaticcancer
AT itot randomisedphaseiitrialofirinotecanpluss1inpatientswithgemcitabinerefractorypancreaticcancer
AT munakatam randomisedphaseiitrialofirinotecanpluss1inpatientswithgemcitabinerefractorypancreaticcancer
AT itoit randomisedphaseiitrialofirinotecanpluss1inpatientswithgemcitabinerefractorypancreaticcancer
AT furusej randomisedphaseiitrialofirinotecanpluss1inpatientswithgemcitabinerefractorypancreaticcancer
AT hamadac randomisedphaseiitrialofirinotecanpluss1inpatientswithgemcitabinerefractorypancreaticcancer
AT sakatay randomisedphaseiitrialofirinotecanpluss1inpatientswithgemcitabinerefractorypancreaticcancer