Cargando…

Participant retention practices in longitudinal clinical research studies with high retention rates

BACKGROUND: There is a need for improving cohort retention in longitudinal studies. Our objective was to identify cohort retention strategies and implementation approaches used in studies with high retention rates. METHODS: Longitudinal studies with ≥200 participants, ≥80% retention rates over ≥1 ye...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Abshire, Martha, Dinglas, Victor D., Cajita, Maan Isabella A., Eakin, Michelle N., Needham, Dale M., Himmelfarb, Cheryl Dennison
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5319074/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28219336
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-017-0310-z
_version_ 1782509311570739200
author Abshire, Martha
Dinglas, Victor D.
Cajita, Maan Isabella A.
Eakin, Michelle N.
Needham, Dale M.
Himmelfarb, Cheryl Dennison
author_facet Abshire, Martha
Dinglas, Victor D.
Cajita, Maan Isabella A.
Eakin, Michelle N.
Needham, Dale M.
Himmelfarb, Cheryl Dennison
author_sort Abshire, Martha
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There is a need for improving cohort retention in longitudinal studies. Our objective was to identify cohort retention strategies and implementation approaches used in studies with high retention rates. METHODS: Longitudinal studies with ≥200 participants, ≥80% retention rates over ≥1 year of follow-up were queried from an Institutional Review Board database at a large research-intensive U.S. university; additional studies were identified through networking. Nineteen (86%) of 22 eligible studies agreed to participate. Through in-depth semi-structured interviews, participants provided retention strategies based on themes identified from previous literature reviews. Synthesis of data was completed by a multidisciplinary team. RESULTS: The most commonly used retention strategies were: study reminders, study visit characteristics, emphasizing study benefits, and contact/scheduling strategies. The research teams were well-functioning, organized, and persistent. Additionally, teams tailored their strategies to their participants, often adapting and innovating their approaches. CONCLUSIONS: These studies included specialized and persistent teams and utilized tailored strategies specific to their cohort and individual participants. Studies’ written protocols and published manuscripts often did not reflect the varied strategies employed and adapted through the duration of study. Appropriate retention strategy use requires cultural sensitivity and more research is needed to identify how strategy use varies globally.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5319074
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53190742017-02-24 Participant retention practices in longitudinal clinical research studies with high retention rates Abshire, Martha Dinglas, Victor D. Cajita, Maan Isabella A. Eakin, Michelle N. Needham, Dale M. Himmelfarb, Cheryl Dennison BMC Med Res Methodol Research Article BACKGROUND: There is a need for improving cohort retention in longitudinal studies. Our objective was to identify cohort retention strategies and implementation approaches used in studies with high retention rates. METHODS: Longitudinal studies with ≥200 participants, ≥80% retention rates over ≥1 year of follow-up were queried from an Institutional Review Board database at a large research-intensive U.S. university; additional studies were identified through networking. Nineteen (86%) of 22 eligible studies agreed to participate. Through in-depth semi-structured interviews, participants provided retention strategies based on themes identified from previous literature reviews. Synthesis of data was completed by a multidisciplinary team. RESULTS: The most commonly used retention strategies were: study reminders, study visit characteristics, emphasizing study benefits, and contact/scheduling strategies. The research teams were well-functioning, organized, and persistent. Additionally, teams tailored their strategies to their participants, often adapting and innovating their approaches. CONCLUSIONS: These studies included specialized and persistent teams and utilized tailored strategies specific to their cohort and individual participants. Studies’ written protocols and published manuscripts often did not reflect the varied strategies employed and adapted through the duration of study. Appropriate retention strategy use requires cultural sensitivity and more research is needed to identify how strategy use varies globally. BioMed Central 2017-02-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5319074/ /pubmed/28219336 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-017-0310-z Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Abshire, Martha
Dinglas, Victor D.
Cajita, Maan Isabella A.
Eakin, Michelle N.
Needham, Dale M.
Himmelfarb, Cheryl Dennison
Participant retention practices in longitudinal clinical research studies with high retention rates
title Participant retention practices in longitudinal clinical research studies with high retention rates
title_full Participant retention practices in longitudinal clinical research studies with high retention rates
title_fullStr Participant retention practices in longitudinal clinical research studies with high retention rates
title_full_unstemmed Participant retention practices in longitudinal clinical research studies with high retention rates
title_short Participant retention practices in longitudinal clinical research studies with high retention rates
title_sort participant retention practices in longitudinal clinical research studies with high retention rates
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5319074/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28219336
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-017-0310-z
work_keys_str_mv AT abshiremartha participantretentionpracticesinlongitudinalclinicalresearchstudieswithhighretentionrates
AT dinglasvictord participantretentionpracticesinlongitudinalclinicalresearchstudieswithhighretentionrates
AT cajitamaanisabellaa participantretentionpracticesinlongitudinalclinicalresearchstudieswithhighretentionrates
AT eakinmichellen participantretentionpracticesinlongitudinalclinicalresearchstudieswithhighretentionrates
AT needhamdalem participantretentionpracticesinlongitudinalclinicalresearchstudieswithhighretentionrates
AT himmelfarbcheryldennison participantretentionpracticesinlongitudinalclinicalresearchstudieswithhighretentionrates