Cargando…

Medialization thyroplasty versus injection laryngoplasty: a cost minimization analysis

BACKGROUND: Medialization thyroplasty and injection laryngoplasty are widely accepted treatment options for unilateral vocal fold paralysis. Although both procedures result in similar clinical outcomes, little is known about the corresponding medical care costs. Medialization thyroplasty requires ex...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tam, Samantha, Sun, Hongmei, Sarma, Sisira, Siu, Jennifer, Fung, Kevin, Sowerby, Leigh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5319113/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28219447
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40463-017-0191-5
_version_ 1782509320011776000
author Tam, Samantha
Sun, Hongmei
Sarma, Sisira
Siu, Jennifer
Fung, Kevin
Sowerby, Leigh
author_facet Tam, Samantha
Sun, Hongmei
Sarma, Sisira
Siu, Jennifer
Fung, Kevin
Sowerby, Leigh
author_sort Tam, Samantha
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Medialization thyroplasty and injection laryngoplasty are widely accepted treatment options for unilateral vocal fold paralysis. Although both procedures result in similar clinical outcomes, little is known about the corresponding medical care costs. Medialization thyroplasty requires expensive operating room resources while injection laryngoplasty utilizes outpatient resources but may require repeated procedures. The purpose of this study, therefore, is to quantify the cost differences in adult patients with unilateral vocal fold paralysis undergoing medialization thyroplasty versus injection laryngoplasty. STUDY DESIGN: Cost minimization analysis conducted using a decision tree model. METHODS: A decision tree model was constructed to capture clinical scenarios for medialization thyroplasty and injection laryngoplasty. Probabilities for various events were obtained from a retrospective cohort from the London Health Sciences Centre, Canada. Costs were derived from the published literature and the London Health Science Centre. All costs were reported in 2014 Canadian dollars. Time horizon was 5 years. The study was conducted from an academic hospital perspective in Canada. Various sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess differences in procedure-specific costs and probabilities of key events. RESULTS: Sixty-three patients underwent medialization thyroplasty and 41 underwent injection laryngoplasty. Cost of medialization thyroplasty was C$2499.10 per patient whereas those treated with injection laryngoplasty cost C$943.19. Results showed that cost savings with IL were C$1555.91. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses suggested cost savings ranged from C$596 to C$3626. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with injection laryngoplasty results in cost savings of C$1555.91 per patient. Our extensive sensitivity analyses suggest that switching from medialization thyroplasty to injection laryngoplasty will lead to a minimum cost savings of C$596 per patient. Considering the significant cost savings and similar effectiveness, injection laryngoplasty should be strongly considered as a preferred treatment option for patients diagnosed with unilateral vocal fold paralysis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5319113
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53191132017-02-24 Medialization thyroplasty versus injection laryngoplasty: a cost minimization analysis Tam, Samantha Sun, Hongmei Sarma, Sisira Siu, Jennifer Fung, Kevin Sowerby, Leigh J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Original Research Article BACKGROUND: Medialization thyroplasty and injection laryngoplasty are widely accepted treatment options for unilateral vocal fold paralysis. Although both procedures result in similar clinical outcomes, little is known about the corresponding medical care costs. Medialization thyroplasty requires expensive operating room resources while injection laryngoplasty utilizes outpatient resources but may require repeated procedures. The purpose of this study, therefore, is to quantify the cost differences in adult patients with unilateral vocal fold paralysis undergoing medialization thyroplasty versus injection laryngoplasty. STUDY DESIGN: Cost minimization analysis conducted using a decision tree model. METHODS: A decision tree model was constructed to capture clinical scenarios for medialization thyroplasty and injection laryngoplasty. Probabilities for various events were obtained from a retrospective cohort from the London Health Sciences Centre, Canada. Costs were derived from the published literature and the London Health Science Centre. All costs were reported in 2014 Canadian dollars. Time horizon was 5 years. The study was conducted from an academic hospital perspective in Canada. Various sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess differences in procedure-specific costs and probabilities of key events. RESULTS: Sixty-three patients underwent medialization thyroplasty and 41 underwent injection laryngoplasty. Cost of medialization thyroplasty was C$2499.10 per patient whereas those treated with injection laryngoplasty cost C$943.19. Results showed that cost savings with IL were C$1555.91. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses suggested cost savings ranged from C$596 to C$3626. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with injection laryngoplasty results in cost savings of C$1555.91 per patient. Our extensive sensitivity analyses suggest that switching from medialization thyroplasty to injection laryngoplasty will lead to a minimum cost savings of C$596 per patient. Considering the significant cost savings and similar effectiveness, injection laryngoplasty should be strongly considered as a preferred treatment option for patients diagnosed with unilateral vocal fold paralysis. BioMed Central 2017-02-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5319113/ /pubmed/28219447 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40463-017-0191-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Tam, Samantha
Sun, Hongmei
Sarma, Sisira
Siu, Jennifer
Fung, Kevin
Sowerby, Leigh
Medialization thyroplasty versus injection laryngoplasty: a cost minimization analysis
title Medialization thyroplasty versus injection laryngoplasty: a cost minimization analysis
title_full Medialization thyroplasty versus injection laryngoplasty: a cost minimization analysis
title_fullStr Medialization thyroplasty versus injection laryngoplasty: a cost minimization analysis
title_full_unstemmed Medialization thyroplasty versus injection laryngoplasty: a cost minimization analysis
title_short Medialization thyroplasty versus injection laryngoplasty: a cost minimization analysis
title_sort medialization thyroplasty versus injection laryngoplasty: a cost minimization analysis
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5319113/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28219447
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40463-017-0191-5
work_keys_str_mv AT tamsamantha medializationthyroplastyversusinjectionlaryngoplastyacostminimizationanalysis
AT sunhongmei medializationthyroplastyversusinjectionlaryngoplastyacostminimizationanalysis
AT sarmasisira medializationthyroplastyversusinjectionlaryngoplastyacostminimizationanalysis
AT siujennifer medializationthyroplastyversusinjectionlaryngoplastyacostminimizationanalysis
AT fungkevin medializationthyroplastyversusinjectionlaryngoplastyacostminimizationanalysis
AT sowerbyleigh medializationthyroplastyversusinjectionlaryngoplastyacostminimizationanalysis