Cargando…

Poor sensitivity of rapid tests for the detection of antibodies to the hepatitis B virus: implications for field studies

Rapid tests (RTs) can be used as an alternative method for the conventional diagnosis of hepatitis B virus (HBV). This study aims to evaluate antibodies to HBsAg (anti-HBs) and antibodies to HBeAg (anti-HBe) RTs under different Brazilian settings. The following three groups were included: GI: viral...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cruz, Helena Medina, Scalioni, Leticia de Paula, de Paula, Vanessa Salete, Miguel, Juliana Custódio, do Ó, Kycia Maria Rodrigues, Milagres, Flavio Augusto Pádua, Cruz, Marcelo Santos, Bastos, Francisco Inácio, Flores, Priscila Pollo, Leal, Erotildes, Motta-Castro, Ana Rita Coimbra, Lewis-Ximenez, Lia Laura, Lampe, Elisabeth, Villar, Livia Melo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Ministério da Saúde 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5319371/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28146158
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0074-02760160394
_version_ 1782509376111640576
author Cruz, Helena Medina
Scalioni, Leticia de Paula
de Paula, Vanessa Salete
Miguel, Juliana Custódio
do Ó, Kycia Maria Rodrigues
Milagres, Flavio Augusto Pádua
Cruz, Marcelo Santos
Bastos, Francisco Inácio
Flores, Priscila Pollo
Leal, Erotildes
Motta-Castro, Ana Rita Coimbra
Lewis-Ximenez, Lia Laura
Lampe, Elisabeth
Villar, Livia Melo
author_facet Cruz, Helena Medina
Scalioni, Leticia de Paula
de Paula, Vanessa Salete
Miguel, Juliana Custódio
do Ó, Kycia Maria Rodrigues
Milagres, Flavio Augusto Pádua
Cruz, Marcelo Santos
Bastos, Francisco Inácio
Flores, Priscila Pollo
Leal, Erotildes
Motta-Castro, Ana Rita Coimbra
Lewis-Ximenez, Lia Laura
Lampe, Elisabeth
Villar, Livia Melo
author_sort Cruz, Helena Medina
collection PubMed
description Rapid tests (RTs) can be used as an alternative method for the conventional diagnosis of hepatitis B virus (HBV). This study aims to evaluate antibodies to HBsAg (anti-HBs) and antibodies to HBeAg (anti-HBe) RTs under different Brazilian settings. The following three groups were included: GI: viral hepatitis outpatient services; GII: low resource areas; and GIII: crack users and beauticians. Imuno-rápido anti-HBsAg(™) and Imuno-rápido anti-HBeAg(™) RTs were evaluated and showed specificities greater than 95% in all groups. The sensitivity values to anti-HBs were 50.38%, 51.05% and 46.73% and the sensitivity values to anti-HBe were 76.99%, 10.34% and 11.76% in the GI, GII and GIII groups, respectively. The assays had a low sensitivity and high specificity, which indicated their use for screening in regions endemic for HBV.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5319371
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Ministério da Saúde
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53193712017-03-01 Poor sensitivity of rapid tests for the detection of antibodies to the hepatitis B virus: implications for field studies Cruz, Helena Medina Scalioni, Leticia de Paula de Paula, Vanessa Salete Miguel, Juliana Custódio do Ó, Kycia Maria Rodrigues Milagres, Flavio Augusto Pádua Cruz, Marcelo Santos Bastos, Francisco Inácio Flores, Priscila Pollo Leal, Erotildes Motta-Castro, Ana Rita Coimbra Lewis-Ximenez, Lia Laura Lampe, Elisabeth Villar, Livia Melo Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz Short Communication Rapid tests (RTs) can be used as an alternative method for the conventional diagnosis of hepatitis B virus (HBV). This study aims to evaluate antibodies to HBsAg (anti-HBs) and antibodies to HBeAg (anti-HBe) RTs under different Brazilian settings. The following three groups were included: GI: viral hepatitis outpatient services; GII: low resource areas; and GIII: crack users and beauticians. Imuno-rápido anti-HBsAg(™) and Imuno-rápido anti-HBeAg(™) RTs were evaluated and showed specificities greater than 95% in all groups. The sensitivity values to anti-HBs were 50.38%, 51.05% and 46.73% and the sensitivity values to anti-HBe were 76.99%, 10.34% and 11.76% in the GI, GII and GIII groups, respectively. The assays had a low sensitivity and high specificity, which indicated their use for screening in regions endemic for HBV. Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Ministério da Saúde 2017-01-30 2017-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5319371/ /pubmed/28146158 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0074-02760160394 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Short Communication
Cruz, Helena Medina
Scalioni, Leticia de Paula
de Paula, Vanessa Salete
Miguel, Juliana Custódio
do Ó, Kycia Maria Rodrigues
Milagres, Flavio Augusto Pádua
Cruz, Marcelo Santos
Bastos, Francisco Inácio
Flores, Priscila Pollo
Leal, Erotildes
Motta-Castro, Ana Rita Coimbra
Lewis-Ximenez, Lia Laura
Lampe, Elisabeth
Villar, Livia Melo
Poor sensitivity of rapid tests for the detection of antibodies to the hepatitis B virus: implications for field studies
title Poor sensitivity of rapid tests for the detection of antibodies to the hepatitis B virus: implications for field studies
title_full Poor sensitivity of rapid tests for the detection of antibodies to the hepatitis B virus: implications for field studies
title_fullStr Poor sensitivity of rapid tests for the detection of antibodies to the hepatitis B virus: implications for field studies
title_full_unstemmed Poor sensitivity of rapid tests for the detection of antibodies to the hepatitis B virus: implications for field studies
title_short Poor sensitivity of rapid tests for the detection of antibodies to the hepatitis B virus: implications for field studies
title_sort poor sensitivity of rapid tests for the detection of antibodies to the hepatitis b virus: implications for field studies
topic Short Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5319371/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28146158
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0074-02760160394
work_keys_str_mv AT cruzhelenamedina poorsensitivityofrapidtestsforthedetectionofantibodiestothehepatitisbvirusimplicationsforfieldstudies
AT scalionileticiadepaula poorsensitivityofrapidtestsforthedetectionofantibodiestothehepatitisbvirusimplicationsforfieldstudies
AT depaulavanessasalete poorsensitivityofrapidtestsforthedetectionofantibodiestothehepatitisbvirusimplicationsforfieldstudies
AT migueljulianacustodio poorsensitivityofrapidtestsforthedetectionofantibodiestothehepatitisbvirusimplicationsforfieldstudies
AT dookyciamariarodrigues poorsensitivityofrapidtestsforthedetectionofantibodiestothehepatitisbvirusimplicationsforfieldstudies
AT milagresflavioaugustopadua poorsensitivityofrapidtestsforthedetectionofantibodiestothehepatitisbvirusimplicationsforfieldstudies
AT cruzmarcelosantos poorsensitivityofrapidtestsforthedetectionofantibodiestothehepatitisbvirusimplicationsforfieldstudies
AT bastosfranciscoinacio poorsensitivityofrapidtestsforthedetectionofantibodiestothehepatitisbvirusimplicationsforfieldstudies
AT florespriscilapollo poorsensitivityofrapidtestsforthedetectionofantibodiestothehepatitisbvirusimplicationsforfieldstudies
AT lealerotildes poorsensitivityofrapidtestsforthedetectionofantibodiestothehepatitisbvirusimplicationsforfieldstudies
AT mottacastroanaritacoimbra poorsensitivityofrapidtestsforthedetectionofantibodiestothehepatitisbvirusimplicationsforfieldstudies
AT lewisximenezlialaura poorsensitivityofrapidtestsforthedetectionofantibodiestothehepatitisbvirusimplicationsforfieldstudies
AT lampeelisabeth poorsensitivityofrapidtestsforthedetectionofantibodiestothehepatitisbvirusimplicationsforfieldstudies
AT villarliviamelo poorsensitivityofrapidtestsforthedetectionofantibodiestothehepatitisbvirusimplicationsforfieldstudies