Cargando…
Clinical Outcome of Double Kissing Crush Versus Provisional Stenting of Coronary Artery Bifurcation Lesions: The 5-Year Follow-Up Results From a Randomized and Multicenter DKCRUSH-II Study (Randomized Study on Double Kissing Crush Technique Versus Provisional Stenting Technique for Coronary Artery Bifurcation Lesions)
BACKGROUND—: Provisional stenting is effective for anatomic simple bifurcation lesions. Double kissing crush stenting reduces the 1-year rate of target lesion revascularization. This study aimed to investigate the 5-year clinical results of the DKCRUSH-II study (Randomized Study on Double Kissing Cr...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5319391/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28122805 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.116.004497 |
_version_ | 1782509378074574848 |
---|---|
author | Chen, Shao-Liang Santoso, Teguh Zhang, Jun-Jie Ye, Fei Xu, Ya-Wei Fu, Qiang Kan, Jing Zhang, Feng-Fu Zhou, Yong Xie, Du-Jiang Kwan, Tak W. |
author_facet | Chen, Shao-Liang Santoso, Teguh Zhang, Jun-Jie Ye, Fei Xu, Ya-Wei Fu, Qiang Kan, Jing Zhang, Feng-Fu Zhou, Yong Xie, Du-Jiang Kwan, Tak W. |
author_sort | Chen, Shao-Liang |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND—: Provisional stenting is effective for anatomic simple bifurcation lesions. Double kissing crush stenting reduces the 1-year rate of target lesion revascularization. This study aimed to investigate the 5-year clinical results of the DKCRUSH-II study (Randomized Study on Double Kissing Crush Technique Versus Provisional Stenting Technique for Coronary Artery Bifurcation Lesions). METHODS AND RESULTS—: A total of 370 patients with coronary bifurcation lesions who were randomly assigned to either the double kissing crush or provisional stenting group in the DKCRUSH-II study were followed for 5 years. The primary end point was the occurrence of a major adverse cardiac event at 5 years. Patients were classified by simple and complex bifurcation lesions according to the DEFINITION criteria (Definitions and Impact of Complex Bifurcation Lesions on Clinical Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Using Drug-Eluting Stents). At 5 years, the major adverse cardiac event rate (23.8%) in the provisional stenting group was insignificantly different to that of the double kissing group (15.7%; P=0.051). However, the difference in the target lesion revascularization rate between 2 groups was sustained through the 5-year follow-up (16.2% versus 8.6%; P=0.027). The definite and probable stent thrombosis rate was 2.7% in each group (P=1.0). Complex bifurcation was associated with a higher rate of target lesion revascularization (21.6%) at 5 years compared with 11.1% in patients with a simple bifurcation (P=0.037), with an extremely high rate in the provisional stenting group (36.8% versus 12.5%, P=0.005) mainly because of final kissing balloon inflation (19.4% versus 5.2%; P=0.036). CONCLUSIONS—: The double kissing crush stenting technique for coronary bifurcation lesions is associated with a lower rate of target lesion revascularization. The optimal stenting approach based on the lesions’ complexity may improve the revascularization for patients with complex bifurcations. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION—: URL: http://www.chictr.org. Unique identifier: ChiCTR-TRC-0000015. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5319391 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53193912017-03-02 Clinical Outcome of Double Kissing Crush Versus Provisional Stenting of Coronary Artery Bifurcation Lesions: The 5-Year Follow-Up Results From a Randomized and Multicenter DKCRUSH-II Study (Randomized Study on Double Kissing Crush Technique Versus Provisional Stenting Technique for Coronary Artery Bifurcation Lesions) Chen, Shao-Liang Santoso, Teguh Zhang, Jun-Jie Ye, Fei Xu, Ya-Wei Fu, Qiang Kan, Jing Zhang, Feng-Fu Zhou, Yong Xie, Du-Jiang Kwan, Tak W. Circ Cardiovasc Interv Original Articles BACKGROUND—: Provisional stenting is effective for anatomic simple bifurcation lesions. Double kissing crush stenting reduces the 1-year rate of target lesion revascularization. This study aimed to investigate the 5-year clinical results of the DKCRUSH-II study (Randomized Study on Double Kissing Crush Technique Versus Provisional Stenting Technique for Coronary Artery Bifurcation Lesions). METHODS AND RESULTS—: A total of 370 patients with coronary bifurcation lesions who were randomly assigned to either the double kissing crush or provisional stenting group in the DKCRUSH-II study were followed for 5 years. The primary end point was the occurrence of a major adverse cardiac event at 5 years. Patients were classified by simple and complex bifurcation lesions according to the DEFINITION criteria (Definitions and Impact of Complex Bifurcation Lesions on Clinical Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Using Drug-Eluting Stents). At 5 years, the major adverse cardiac event rate (23.8%) in the provisional stenting group was insignificantly different to that of the double kissing group (15.7%; P=0.051). However, the difference in the target lesion revascularization rate between 2 groups was sustained through the 5-year follow-up (16.2% versus 8.6%; P=0.027). The definite and probable stent thrombosis rate was 2.7% in each group (P=1.0). Complex bifurcation was associated with a higher rate of target lesion revascularization (21.6%) at 5 years compared with 11.1% in patients with a simple bifurcation (P=0.037), with an extremely high rate in the provisional stenting group (36.8% versus 12.5%, P=0.005) mainly because of final kissing balloon inflation (19.4% versus 5.2%; P=0.036). CONCLUSIONS—: The double kissing crush stenting technique for coronary bifurcation lesions is associated with a lower rate of target lesion revascularization. The optimal stenting approach based on the lesions’ complexity may improve the revascularization for patients with complex bifurcations. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION—: URL: http://www.chictr.org. Unique identifier: ChiCTR-TRC-0000015. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2017-02 2017-01-25 /pmc/articles/PMC5319391/ /pubmed/28122805 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.116.004497 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions is published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial-NoDervis (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited, the use is noncommercial, and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Chen, Shao-Liang Santoso, Teguh Zhang, Jun-Jie Ye, Fei Xu, Ya-Wei Fu, Qiang Kan, Jing Zhang, Feng-Fu Zhou, Yong Xie, Du-Jiang Kwan, Tak W. Clinical Outcome of Double Kissing Crush Versus Provisional Stenting of Coronary Artery Bifurcation Lesions: The 5-Year Follow-Up Results From a Randomized and Multicenter DKCRUSH-II Study (Randomized Study on Double Kissing Crush Technique Versus Provisional Stenting Technique for Coronary Artery Bifurcation Lesions) |
title | Clinical Outcome of Double Kissing Crush Versus Provisional Stenting of Coronary Artery Bifurcation Lesions: The 5-Year Follow-Up Results From a Randomized and Multicenter DKCRUSH-II Study (Randomized Study on Double Kissing Crush Technique Versus Provisional Stenting Technique for Coronary Artery Bifurcation Lesions) |
title_full | Clinical Outcome of Double Kissing Crush Versus Provisional Stenting of Coronary Artery Bifurcation Lesions: The 5-Year Follow-Up Results From a Randomized and Multicenter DKCRUSH-II Study (Randomized Study on Double Kissing Crush Technique Versus Provisional Stenting Technique for Coronary Artery Bifurcation Lesions) |
title_fullStr | Clinical Outcome of Double Kissing Crush Versus Provisional Stenting of Coronary Artery Bifurcation Lesions: The 5-Year Follow-Up Results From a Randomized and Multicenter DKCRUSH-II Study (Randomized Study on Double Kissing Crush Technique Versus Provisional Stenting Technique for Coronary Artery Bifurcation Lesions) |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical Outcome of Double Kissing Crush Versus Provisional Stenting of Coronary Artery Bifurcation Lesions: The 5-Year Follow-Up Results From a Randomized and Multicenter DKCRUSH-II Study (Randomized Study on Double Kissing Crush Technique Versus Provisional Stenting Technique for Coronary Artery Bifurcation Lesions) |
title_short | Clinical Outcome of Double Kissing Crush Versus Provisional Stenting of Coronary Artery Bifurcation Lesions: The 5-Year Follow-Up Results From a Randomized and Multicenter DKCRUSH-II Study (Randomized Study on Double Kissing Crush Technique Versus Provisional Stenting Technique for Coronary Artery Bifurcation Lesions) |
title_sort | clinical outcome of double kissing crush versus provisional stenting of coronary artery bifurcation lesions: the 5-year follow-up results from a randomized and multicenter dkcrush-ii study (randomized study on double kissing crush technique versus provisional stenting technique for coronary artery bifurcation lesions) |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5319391/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28122805 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.116.004497 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chenshaoliang clinicaloutcomeofdoublekissingcrushversusprovisionalstentingofcoronaryarterybifurcationlesionsthe5yearfollowupresultsfromarandomizedandmulticenterdkcrushiistudyrandomizedstudyondoublekissingcrushtechniqueversusprovisionalstentingtechniqueforcoronaryartery AT santosoteguh clinicaloutcomeofdoublekissingcrushversusprovisionalstentingofcoronaryarterybifurcationlesionsthe5yearfollowupresultsfromarandomizedandmulticenterdkcrushiistudyrandomizedstudyondoublekissingcrushtechniqueversusprovisionalstentingtechniqueforcoronaryartery AT zhangjunjie clinicaloutcomeofdoublekissingcrushversusprovisionalstentingofcoronaryarterybifurcationlesionsthe5yearfollowupresultsfromarandomizedandmulticenterdkcrushiistudyrandomizedstudyondoublekissingcrushtechniqueversusprovisionalstentingtechniqueforcoronaryartery AT yefei clinicaloutcomeofdoublekissingcrushversusprovisionalstentingofcoronaryarterybifurcationlesionsthe5yearfollowupresultsfromarandomizedandmulticenterdkcrushiistudyrandomizedstudyondoublekissingcrushtechniqueversusprovisionalstentingtechniqueforcoronaryartery AT xuyawei clinicaloutcomeofdoublekissingcrushversusprovisionalstentingofcoronaryarterybifurcationlesionsthe5yearfollowupresultsfromarandomizedandmulticenterdkcrushiistudyrandomizedstudyondoublekissingcrushtechniqueversusprovisionalstentingtechniqueforcoronaryartery AT fuqiang clinicaloutcomeofdoublekissingcrushversusprovisionalstentingofcoronaryarterybifurcationlesionsthe5yearfollowupresultsfromarandomizedandmulticenterdkcrushiistudyrandomizedstudyondoublekissingcrushtechniqueversusprovisionalstentingtechniqueforcoronaryartery AT kanjing clinicaloutcomeofdoublekissingcrushversusprovisionalstentingofcoronaryarterybifurcationlesionsthe5yearfollowupresultsfromarandomizedandmulticenterdkcrushiistudyrandomizedstudyondoublekissingcrushtechniqueversusprovisionalstentingtechniqueforcoronaryartery AT zhangfengfu clinicaloutcomeofdoublekissingcrushversusprovisionalstentingofcoronaryarterybifurcationlesionsthe5yearfollowupresultsfromarandomizedandmulticenterdkcrushiistudyrandomizedstudyondoublekissingcrushtechniqueversusprovisionalstentingtechniqueforcoronaryartery AT zhouyong clinicaloutcomeofdoublekissingcrushversusprovisionalstentingofcoronaryarterybifurcationlesionsthe5yearfollowupresultsfromarandomizedandmulticenterdkcrushiistudyrandomizedstudyondoublekissingcrushtechniqueversusprovisionalstentingtechniqueforcoronaryartery AT xiedujiang clinicaloutcomeofdoublekissingcrushversusprovisionalstentingofcoronaryarterybifurcationlesionsthe5yearfollowupresultsfromarandomizedandmulticenterdkcrushiistudyrandomizedstudyondoublekissingcrushtechniqueversusprovisionalstentingtechniqueforcoronaryartery AT kwantakw clinicaloutcomeofdoublekissingcrushversusprovisionalstentingofcoronaryarterybifurcationlesionsthe5yearfollowupresultsfromarandomizedandmulticenterdkcrushiistudyrandomizedstudyondoublekissingcrushtechniqueversusprovisionalstentingtechniqueforcoronaryartery |