Cargando…

Clinical Outcome of Double Kissing Crush Versus Provisional Stenting of Coronary Artery Bifurcation Lesions: The 5-Year Follow-Up Results From a Randomized and Multicenter DKCRUSH-II Study (Randomized Study on Double Kissing Crush Technique Versus Provisional Stenting Technique for Coronary Artery Bifurcation Lesions)

BACKGROUND—: Provisional stenting is effective for anatomic simple bifurcation lesions. Double kissing crush stenting reduces the 1-year rate of target lesion revascularization. This study aimed to investigate the 5-year clinical results of the DKCRUSH-II study (Randomized Study on Double Kissing Cr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Shao-Liang, Santoso, Teguh, Zhang, Jun-Jie, Ye, Fei, Xu, Ya-Wei, Fu, Qiang, Kan, Jing, Zhang, Feng-Fu, Zhou, Yong, Xie, Du-Jiang, Kwan, Tak W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5319391/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28122805
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.116.004497
_version_ 1782509378074574848
author Chen, Shao-Liang
Santoso, Teguh
Zhang, Jun-Jie
Ye, Fei
Xu, Ya-Wei
Fu, Qiang
Kan, Jing
Zhang, Feng-Fu
Zhou, Yong
Xie, Du-Jiang
Kwan, Tak W.
author_facet Chen, Shao-Liang
Santoso, Teguh
Zhang, Jun-Jie
Ye, Fei
Xu, Ya-Wei
Fu, Qiang
Kan, Jing
Zhang, Feng-Fu
Zhou, Yong
Xie, Du-Jiang
Kwan, Tak W.
author_sort Chen, Shao-Liang
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND—: Provisional stenting is effective for anatomic simple bifurcation lesions. Double kissing crush stenting reduces the 1-year rate of target lesion revascularization. This study aimed to investigate the 5-year clinical results of the DKCRUSH-II study (Randomized Study on Double Kissing Crush Technique Versus Provisional Stenting Technique for Coronary Artery Bifurcation Lesions). METHODS AND RESULTS—: A total of 370 patients with coronary bifurcation lesions who were randomly assigned to either the double kissing crush or provisional stenting group in the DKCRUSH-II study were followed for 5 years. The primary end point was the occurrence of a major adverse cardiac event at 5 years. Patients were classified by simple and complex bifurcation lesions according to the DEFINITION criteria (Definitions and Impact of Complex Bifurcation Lesions on Clinical Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Using Drug-Eluting Stents). At 5 years, the major adverse cardiac event rate (23.8%) in the provisional stenting group was insignificantly different to that of the double kissing group (15.7%; P=0.051). However, the difference in the target lesion revascularization rate between 2 groups was sustained through the 5-year follow-up (16.2% versus 8.6%; P=0.027). The definite and probable stent thrombosis rate was 2.7% in each group (P=1.0). Complex bifurcation was associated with a higher rate of target lesion revascularization (21.6%) at 5 years compared with 11.1% in patients with a simple bifurcation (P=0.037), with an extremely high rate in the provisional stenting group (36.8% versus 12.5%, P=0.005) mainly because of final kissing balloon inflation (19.4% versus 5.2%; P=0.036). CONCLUSIONS—: The double kissing crush stenting technique for coronary bifurcation lesions is associated with a lower rate of target lesion revascularization. The optimal stenting approach based on the lesions’ complexity may improve the revascularization for patients with complex bifurcations. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION—: URL: http://www.chictr.org. Unique identifier: ChiCTR-TRC-0000015.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5319391
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53193912017-03-02 Clinical Outcome of Double Kissing Crush Versus Provisional Stenting of Coronary Artery Bifurcation Lesions: The 5-Year Follow-Up Results From a Randomized and Multicenter DKCRUSH-II Study (Randomized Study on Double Kissing Crush Technique Versus Provisional Stenting Technique for Coronary Artery Bifurcation Lesions) Chen, Shao-Liang Santoso, Teguh Zhang, Jun-Jie Ye, Fei Xu, Ya-Wei Fu, Qiang Kan, Jing Zhang, Feng-Fu Zhou, Yong Xie, Du-Jiang Kwan, Tak W. Circ Cardiovasc Interv Original Articles BACKGROUND—: Provisional stenting is effective for anatomic simple bifurcation lesions. Double kissing crush stenting reduces the 1-year rate of target lesion revascularization. This study aimed to investigate the 5-year clinical results of the DKCRUSH-II study (Randomized Study on Double Kissing Crush Technique Versus Provisional Stenting Technique for Coronary Artery Bifurcation Lesions). METHODS AND RESULTS—: A total of 370 patients with coronary bifurcation lesions who were randomly assigned to either the double kissing crush or provisional stenting group in the DKCRUSH-II study were followed for 5 years. The primary end point was the occurrence of a major adverse cardiac event at 5 years. Patients were classified by simple and complex bifurcation lesions according to the DEFINITION criteria (Definitions and Impact of Complex Bifurcation Lesions on Clinical Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Using Drug-Eluting Stents). At 5 years, the major adverse cardiac event rate (23.8%) in the provisional stenting group was insignificantly different to that of the double kissing group (15.7%; P=0.051). However, the difference in the target lesion revascularization rate between 2 groups was sustained through the 5-year follow-up (16.2% versus 8.6%; P=0.027). The definite and probable stent thrombosis rate was 2.7% in each group (P=1.0). Complex bifurcation was associated with a higher rate of target lesion revascularization (21.6%) at 5 years compared with 11.1% in patients with a simple bifurcation (P=0.037), with an extremely high rate in the provisional stenting group (36.8% versus 12.5%, P=0.005) mainly because of final kissing balloon inflation (19.4% versus 5.2%; P=0.036). CONCLUSIONS—: The double kissing crush stenting technique for coronary bifurcation lesions is associated with a lower rate of target lesion revascularization. The optimal stenting approach based on the lesions’ complexity may improve the revascularization for patients with complex bifurcations. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION—: URL: http://www.chictr.org. Unique identifier: ChiCTR-TRC-0000015. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2017-02 2017-01-25 /pmc/articles/PMC5319391/ /pubmed/28122805 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.116.004497 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions is published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial-NoDervis (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited, the use is noncommercial, and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Chen, Shao-Liang
Santoso, Teguh
Zhang, Jun-Jie
Ye, Fei
Xu, Ya-Wei
Fu, Qiang
Kan, Jing
Zhang, Feng-Fu
Zhou, Yong
Xie, Du-Jiang
Kwan, Tak W.
Clinical Outcome of Double Kissing Crush Versus Provisional Stenting of Coronary Artery Bifurcation Lesions: The 5-Year Follow-Up Results From a Randomized and Multicenter DKCRUSH-II Study (Randomized Study on Double Kissing Crush Technique Versus Provisional Stenting Technique for Coronary Artery Bifurcation Lesions)
title Clinical Outcome of Double Kissing Crush Versus Provisional Stenting of Coronary Artery Bifurcation Lesions: The 5-Year Follow-Up Results From a Randomized and Multicenter DKCRUSH-II Study (Randomized Study on Double Kissing Crush Technique Versus Provisional Stenting Technique for Coronary Artery Bifurcation Lesions)
title_full Clinical Outcome of Double Kissing Crush Versus Provisional Stenting of Coronary Artery Bifurcation Lesions: The 5-Year Follow-Up Results From a Randomized and Multicenter DKCRUSH-II Study (Randomized Study on Double Kissing Crush Technique Versus Provisional Stenting Technique for Coronary Artery Bifurcation Lesions)
title_fullStr Clinical Outcome of Double Kissing Crush Versus Provisional Stenting of Coronary Artery Bifurcation Lesions: The 5-Year Follow-Up Results From a Randomized and Multicenter DKCRUSH-II Study (Randomized Study on Double Kissing Crush Technique Versus Provisional Stenting Technique for Coronary Artery Bifurcation Lesions)
title_full_unstemmed Clinical Outcome of Double Kissing Crush Versus Provisional Stenting of Coronary Artery Bifurcation Lesions: The 5-Year Follow-Up Results From a Randomized and Multicenter DKCRUSH-II Study (Randomized Study on Double Kissing Crush Technique Versus Provisional Stenting Technique for Coronary Artery Bifurcation Lesions)
title_short Clinical Outcome of Double Kissing Crush Versus Provisional Stenting of Coronary Artery Bifurcation Lesions: The 5-Year Follow-Up Results From a Randomized and Multicenter DKCRUSH-II Study (Randomized Study on Double Kissing Crush Technique Versus Provisional Stenting Technique for Coronary Artery Bifurcation Lesions)
title_sort clinical outcome of double kissing crush versus provisional stenting of coronary artery bifurcation lesions: the 5-year follow-up results from a randomized and multicenter dkcrush-ii study (randomized study on double kissing crush technique versus provisional stenting technique for coronary artery bifurcation lesions)
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5319391/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28122805
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.116.004497
work_keys_str_mv AT chenshaoliang clinicaloutcomeofdoublekissingcrushversusprovisionalstentingofcoronaryarterybifurcationlesionsthe5yearfollowupresultsfromarandomizedandmulticenterdkcrushiistudyrandomizedstudyondoublekissingcrushtechniqueversusprovisionalstentingtechniqueforcoronaryartery
AT santosoteguh clinicaloutcomeofdoublekissingcrushversusprovisionalstentingofcoronaryarterybifurcationlesionsthe5yearfollowupresultsfromarandomizedandmulticenterdkcrushiistudyrandomizedstudyondoublekissingcrushtechniqueversusprovisionalstentingtechniqueforcoronaryartery
AT zhangjunjie clinicaloutcomeofdoublekissingcrushversusprovisionalstentingofcoronaryarterybifurcationlesionsthe5yearfollowupresultsfromarandomizedandmulticenterdkcrushiistudyrandomizedstudyondoublekissingcrushtechniqueversusprovisionalstentingtechniqueforcoronaryartery
AT yefei clinicaloutcomeofdoublekissingcrushversusprovisionalstentingofcoronaryarterybifurcationlesionsthe5yearfollowupresultsfromarandomizedandmulticenterdkcrushiistudyrandomizedstudyondoublekissingcrushtechniqueversusprovisionalstentingtechniqueforcoronaryartery
AT xuyawei clinicaloutcomeofdoublekissingcrushversusprovisionalstentingofcoronaryarterybifurcationlesionsthe5yearfollowupresultsfromarandomizedandmulticenterdkcrushiistudyrandomizedstudyondoublekissingcrushtechniqueversusprovisionalstentingtechniqueforcoronaryartery
AT fuqiang clinicaloutcomeofdoublekissingcrushversusprovisionalstentingofcoronaryarterybifurcationlesionsthe5yearfollowupresultsfromarandomizedandmulticenterdkcrushiistudyrandomizedstudyondoublekissingcrushtechniqueversusprovisionalstentingtechniqueforcoronaryartery
AT kanjing clinicaloutcomeofdoublekissingcrushversusprovisionalstentingofcoronaryarterybifurcationlesionsthe5yearfollowupresultsfromarandomizedandmulticenterdkcrushiistudyrandomizedstudyondoublekissingcrushtechniqueversusprovisionalstentingtechniqueforcoronaryartery
AT zhangfengfu clinicaloutcomeofdoublekissingcrushversusprovisionalstentingofcoronaryarterybifurcationlesionsthe5yearfollowupresultsfromarandomizedandmulticenterdkcrushiistudyrandomizedstudyondoublekissingcrushtechniqueversusprovisionalstentingtechniqueforcoronaryartery
AT zhouyong clinicaloutcomeofdoublekissingcrushversusprovisionalstentingofcoronaryarterybifurcationlesionsthe5yearfollowupresultsfromarandomizedandmulticenterdkcrushiistudyrandomizedstudyondoublekissingcrushtechniqueversusprovisionalstentingtechniqueforcoronaryartery
AT xiedujiang clinicaloutcomeofdoublekissingcrushversusprovisionalstentingofcoronaryarterybifurcationlesionsthe5yearfollowupresultsfromarandomizedandmulticenterdkcrushiistudyrandomizedstudyondoublekissingcrushtechniqueversusprovisionalstentingtechniqueforcoronaryartery
AT kwantakw clinicaloutcomeofdoublekissingcrushversusprovisionalstentingofcoronaryarterybifurcationlesionsthe5yearfollowupresultsfromarandomizedandmulticenterdkcrushiistudyrandomizedstudyondoublekissingcrushtechniqueversusprovisionalstentingtechniqueforcoronaryartery